A cross-country comparison of malaria policy as a premise for contextualized appropriation of foreign aid in global health
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
34127020
PubMed Central
PMC8201720
DOI
10.1186/s12961-021-00700-6
PII: 10.1186/s12961-021-00700-6
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Environmental health, Global health, Health policy, Healthcare economics and organizations, International agencies, Malaria, Public health,
- MeSH
- Global Health * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Malaria * MeSH
- International Cooperation MeSH
- Policy MeSH
- Developing Countries MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: Foreign aid continues to play an essential role in health sector development in low-resource countries, particularly in terms of providing a vital portion of their health expenditures. However, the relationship between foreign aid allocation and malaria policy formulation and/or implementation among state aid recipients remains unknown. METHODS: Publicly available data were collected with the country as observational unit to set up the conceptual framework. The quality and strength of relationships between socioeconomic, environmental and institutional parameters were estimated by Pearson and polychoric correlations. A correlation matrix was explored by factor analysis. RESULTS: The first policy index captured policy variation related to malaria burden and development assistance. Funding per capita from all international agencies was correlated with malaria burden, whereas governmental funding for national malaria programmes per capita was not. The second policy index captured variation beyond malaria endemicity and country size. Variation was found to be related to international country risk instruments and funding from the United States Agency for International Development President's Malaria Initiative. CONCLUSIONS: Not all agencies involved in malaria policy allocate assistance in alignment with the gross domestic product and malaria burden. While the country size does not negatively impact malaria burden, it does account for greater development assistance per capita from selected international agencies. Novel policy indexes describe complex relationships between malaria policy, international foreign aid and socioeconomic parameters. Small countries have distinct environmental and sociopolitical properties.
Department of Preventive Medicine Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Urology Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital New Taipei City 235 Taiwan
See more in PubMed
Gallup JL, Sachs JD, Mellinger AD. Geography and economic development. Int Reg Sci Rev. 1999;22(2):179–232. doi: 10.1177/016001799761012334. DOI
Easterly W, Levine R. Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development. J Monet Econ. 2003;50(1):3–39. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00200-3. DOI
Braveman PA. Epidemiology and (neo-) colonialism. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55(3):160–161. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.3.160. PubMed DOI PMC
Dudley L, Montmarquette C. A model of the supply of bilateral foreign aid. Am Econ Rev. 1976;66(1):132–142.
Crowards T. Defining the category of ‘small’ states. J Int Dev. 2002;14(2):143–179.
Jalan B. Problems and policies in small countries. London: Croom Helm; 1982.
Downes AS. On the statistical measurement of smallness: a principal component measure of country size. Soc Econ Stud. 1988;37:75–96.
Schiavo-Campo S. Some considerations on development aid to small countries. In: Selwyn P, editor. Development Policy in Small States. London: Croom Helm; 1975. p. 164–84.
Prussing E. Critical epidemiology in action: research for and by indigenous peoples. SSM-Popul Health. 2018;6:98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.09.003. PubMed DOI PMC
Sachs J, Malaney P. The economic and social burden of malaria. Nature. 2002;415(6872):680. doi: 10.1038/415680a. PubMed DOI
World Health Organization. Action and investment to defeat malaria 2016–2030—for a malaria-free world. Technical report. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
Okorosobo T, Okorosobo F, Mwabu G, Orem JN, Kirigia JM. Economic burden of malaria in six countries of Africa. Eur J Bus Manag. 2011;3(6):42–63.
Tarnoff C. US Agency for International Development (USAID): background, operations, and issues. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service; 2015.
Williams HA, Durrheim D, Shretta R. The process of changing national malaria treatment policy: lessons from country-level studies. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(6):356–370. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh051. PubMed DOI
International Organization for Standardization. ISO. https://www.iso.org/home.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2020.
Hagenlocher M, Castro MC. Mapping malaria risk and vulnerability in the United Republic of Tanzania: a spatial explicit model. Popul Health Metr. 2015;13(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12963-015-0036-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Sachs JD, Warner A, Åslund A, Fischer S. Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brook Pap Econ Act. 1995;1995(1):1–118. doi: 10.2307/2534573. DOI
Knack S, Keefer P. Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Econ Polit. 1995;7(3):207–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x. DOI
Sagar AD, Najam A. The human development index: a critical review 1. Ecol Econ. 1998;25(3):249–264. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00168-7. DOI
Global Malaria Programme WHO. Policy brief for the implementation of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy using sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP). Geneva: WHO; 2013. https://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/policy_brief_iptp_sp_policy_recommendation/en/. Accessed 15 Nov 2020.
Ekström J. The phi-coefficient, the tetrachoric correlation coefficient, and the Pearson–Yule debate. 2011. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7qp4604r. Accessed 12 Nov 2020.
Yeomans KA, Golder PA. The Guttman–Kaiser criterion as a predictor of the number of common factors. The Statistician. 1982;31:221–229. doi: 10.2307/2987988. DOI
Liang L-L, Mirelman AJ. Why do some countries spend more for health? An assessment of sociopolitical determinants and international aid for government health expenditures. Soc Sci Med. 2014;114:161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.044. PubMed DOI
Hay SI, Guerra CA, Tatem AJ, Noor AM, Snow RW. The global distribution and population at risk of malaria: past, present, and future. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4(6):327–336. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01043-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Gupta S, Davoodi H, Tiongson E. Corruption and the provision of health care and education services. In: Jain AK, editor. The Political Economy of Corruption. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge; 2001. p. 123–53.
Dave S, Dave P, Pal M. The impact of climate change on the emergence and re-emergence of vector borne human diseases. Int J Livest Res. 2015;5:1–10. doi: 10.5455/ijlr.20150729112108. DOI