Red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio) show a substantial variability in their nest defence behaviour, which usually follows the rules of optimal parental behaviour, vigorously attacking egg and chick predators and only passively guarding against harmless animals. Nevertheless, shrikes hesitate to attack the Eurasian magpie (Pica pica), which specializes in plundering passerine nests. Our previous studies have suggested that this behaviour may be the result of an alternative defence strategy, relying on nest crypsis. To test this hypothesis, at the shrike nests, we presented a magpie dummy associated with playbacks drawing the predators' attention to the presence of the nest. We predicted that the presentation of a magpie dummy associated with shrike alarm calls moves the parents to action, causing them to chase the magpie away from the nest. We showed that the presence of a magpie dummy associated with shrike alarm calls elicits a significantly more active response in shrike parents compared to a magpie dummy associated with neutral song. Parents actively moved around the dummy and produced alarm calls; nevertheless, most of the tested pairs hesitated to attack the dummy. We may conclude that the low nest defence activity of shrike parents towards magpie dummy was partly the result of an alternative strategy, which may be cancelled out by alerting the predator to the location of the nest; nevertheless, shrikes seem to be afraid of the magpie and hesitate to attack it physically.

Faculty of Agriculture University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic

Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Branišovská 1760 37005 Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Andersson M, Wiklund CG, Rundgren H (1980) Parental defence of offspring: a model and an example. Anim Behav 28:536–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80062-5 DOI

Antczak M, Goławski A, Kuźniak S, Tryjanowski P (2009) Costly replacement: how do different stages of nest failure affect clutch replacement in the redbacked shrikes Lanius collurio? Ethol Ecol Evol 21:127–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2009.9522501 DOI

AOPK ČR (2020) Nature conservation finding database. Online: https://portal.nature.cz/nd

Armstrong EA (1952) The distraction displays of the Little Ringed Plover and territorial competition with the Ringed Plover. Brit Birds 45:55–59

Armstrong EA (1956) Distraction display and the human predator. Ibis 98:641–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1956.tb01454.x DOI

Baker MC, Becker AM (2002) Mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees: effects of urgency on call production. Wilson Bull 114:510–516. https://doi.org/10.1676/0043-5643(2002)114[0510:MCOBCC]2.0.CO;2 DOI

Bartmess-LeVasseur J, Branch CL, Browning SA, Owens JL, Freeberg TM (2010) Predator stimuli and calling behavior of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis), tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor), and white-breasted nuthatches (Sitta carolinensis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1187–1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0935-y DOI

Brunton DH (1986) Fatal antipredator behavior of a Killdeer. Wilson Bull 98:605–607

Bureš S, Pavel V (2003) Do birds behave in order to avoid disclosing their nest site? Bird Study 50:73–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650309461293 DOI

Burhans DE (2000) Avoiding the nest: responses of field sparrows to the threat of nest predation. Auk 117:803–806. https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0803:ATNROF]2.0.CO;2 DOI

Byrkjedal I (1987) Antipredator behavior and breeding success in Greater Golden-Plover and Eurasian Dotterel. Condor 89:40–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368758 DOI

Caro TM (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Clayton NS, Krebs JR (1995) Memory in food-storing birds: from behaviour to brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5:149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4388(95)80020-4 PubMed DOI

Crowder LB, Squires DD, Rice JA (1997) Non-additive effects of terrestrial and aquatic predators on juvenile estuarine fish. Ecology 78:1796–1804. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1796:NEOTAA]2.0.CO;2 DOI

Curio E, Klump G, Regelmann K (1983) An antipredator response in the great tit (Parus major): is it tuned to predation risk? Oecologia 60:83–88 DOI

Dale S, Gustavsen R, Slagsvold T (1996) Risk taking during parental care: a test of three hypotheses applied to the pied flycatcher. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050264 DOI

del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Christie DA (2009) Handbook of the Birds of the World, Volume 14: Bush-shrikes to Old World Sparrows. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona

Drachmann J, Broberg MM, Søgaard P (2002) Nest predation and semicolonial breeding in Linnets Carduelis cannabina. Bird Study 49:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650209461242 DOI

Ferguson KI, Stiling P (1996) Non-additive effects of multiple natural enemies on aphid populations. Oecologia 108:375–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334664 PubMed DOI

Firth JA, Cole EF, Ioannou CC, Quinn JL, Aplin LM, Culina A, Sheldon BC (2018) Personality shapes pair bonding in a wild bird social system. Nat Ecol Evol 2:1696–1699. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0670-8 PubMed DOI PMC

Freeberg TM, Krama T, Vrublevska J, Krams I, Kullberg C (2014) Tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor) calling and risk-sensitive foraging in the face of threat. Anim Cogn 17:1341–1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0770-z PubMed DOI

Fuchs R, Veselý P, Nácarová J (2019) Predator recognition in birds: the use of key features. In: Springer Briefs in Animal Sciences, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12404-5 (ISBN:978-3-030-12402-1)

Goławski A (2007) Does the Red-backed Shrike (Lanius collurio L.) benefits from nesting in the association with the Barred Warbler (Sylvia nisoria Bechst.)? Pol J Ecol 55:601–604

Goławski A, Mitrus C (2008) What is more important: Nest-site concealment or aggressive behaviour? A case study of the red-backed shrike, Lanius collurio. Folia Zool 57:403–410

Gómez-Serrano MA, López-López P (2017) Deceiving predators: linking distraction behavior with nest survival in a ground-nesting bird. Behav Ecol 28:260–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw157 DOI

Greig-Smith PW (1980) Parental investment in nest defence by stonechats (Saxicola torquata). Anim Behav 28:604–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(80)80069-8 DOI

Groenewoud F, Kingma SA, Bebbington K, Richardson DS, Komdeur J (2019) Experimentally induced antipredator responses are mediated by social and environmental factors. Behav Ecol 30:986–992. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arz039 PubMed DOI PMC

Harvey PH, Greenwood PJ (1978) Anti-predator defence strategies: some evolutionary problems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 4th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 129–151

Holyoak D (1968) A comparative study of the food of some British Corvidae. Bird Study 15:147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063656809476194 DOI

Hora J, Čihák K, Kučera Z (2015) Monitoring druhů přílohy I směrnice o ptácích a ptačích oblastí v letech 2008–2010. Příroda 33:5–489

Hudec K (1983) Fauna ČSSR Ptáci 3. Academia Praha, 1234 pp.

Hurd LE, Eisenberg RM (1990) Arthropod community responses to manipulation of a bitrophic predator guild. Ecology 71:2107–2114. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938624 DOI

Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Magrath RD, Oteyza JC, Chalfoun AD, Haff TM, Schmidt KA, Thomson RL, Martin TE (2015) Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives. J Ornithol 156:S247–S262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1207-4 DOI

Kelley JL, Magurran AE (2003) Learned predator recognition and antipredator responses in fishes. Fish Fish 4:216–226. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00126.x DOI

Kleindorfer S, Hoi H, Fessl B (1996) Alarm calls and chick reactions in the moustached warbler, Acrocephalus melanopogon. Anim Behav 51:1199–1206. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0125 DOI

Kleindorfer S, Fessl B, Hoi H (2005) Avian nest defence behaviour: assessment in relation to predator distance and type, and nest height. Anim Behav 69:307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.003 DOI

Klvaňová A, Horáková D, Exnerová A (2011) Nest defence intensity in House Sparrows Passer domesticus in relation to parental quality and brood value. Acta Ornithol 46:47–54. https://doi.org/10.3161/000164511X589910 DOI

Kontiainen P, Pietiäinen H, Huttunen K, Karell P, Kolunen H, Brommer JE (2009) Aggressive ural owl mothers recruit more offspring. Behav Ecol 20:789–796. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp062 DOI

Krama T, Krams I (2004) Cost of mobbing call to breeding pied flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav Ecol 16:37–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh116 DOI

Krams I (2001) Communication in crested tits and the risk of predation. Anim Behav 61:1065–1068. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1702 DOI

Krams I, Krama T, Igaune K, Mänd R (2007) Long-lasting mobbing of the pied flycatcher increases the risk of nest predation. Behav Ecol 18:1082–1084. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm079 DOI

Krebs CJ, Boutin S, Boonstra R, Sinclair ARE, Smith JNM, Dale MRT, Martin K, Turkington R (1995) Impact of food and predation on the snowshoe hare cycle. Science 269:1112–1115. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.269.5227.1112 PubMed DOI

Krištín A (1988) Nahrungsansprüche der Nestlinge Pica pica L. und Passer montanus L. in der Windbrechern der Schuttinsel. Folia Zool 37:343–356

Kryštofková M, Haas M, Exnerová A (2011) Nest defense in blackbirds Turdus merula: effect of predator distance and parental sex. Acta Ornithologica 46:55–63. https://doi.org/10.3161/000164511x589938 DOI

Kuźniak S, Bednorz J, Tryjanowski P (2001) Spatial and temporal relations between the Barred Warbler Sylvia nisoria and the Red–backed Shrike Lanius collurio in the Wielkopolska region (W Poland). Acta Ornithol 36:129–133. https://doi.org/10.3161/068.036.0205 DOI

Leavesley AJ, Magrath RD (2005) Communicating about danger: urgency alarm calling in a bird. Anim Behav 70:365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.10.017 DOI

Lefranc N, Worfolk T (1997) Shrikes: a guide to the shrikes of the world. Pica Press

Leniowski K, Wegrzyn E (2018) Synchronisation of parental behaviours reduces the risk ofnest predation in a socially monogamous passerine bird. Sci Rep 8:7385. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25746-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Listøen C, Karlsen RF, Slagsvold T (2000) Risk taking during parental care: a test of the harm-to-offspring hypothesis. Behav Ecol 11:40–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/11.1.40 DOI

Martin TE (1992) Interaction of nest predation and food limitation in reproductive strategies. Curr Ornithol 9:163–197 DOI

Martin TH, Wright RA, Crowder LB (1989) Non-additive impact of blue crabs and spot on their prey assemblages. Ecology 70:1935–1942. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938123 DOI

Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q Rev Biol 63:167–187 DOI

Němec M, Fuchs R (2014) Nest defense of the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio against five corvid species. Acta Ethol 17:149–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-013-0175-z DOI

Olendorf R, Robinson SK (2000) Effectiveness of nest defence in the Acadian flycatcher Empidonax virescens. Ibis 142:365–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2000.tb04432.x DOI

Patterson TL, Petrinovich L, James DK (1980) Reproductive value and appropriateness of response to predators by white-crowned sparrows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:227–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299368 DOI

Polak M (2013) Comparison of nest defence behaviour between two associate passerines. J Ethol 31:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-012-0340-2 DOI

Polak M (2014) Protective nesting association between the Barred Warbler Sylvia nisoria and the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio: an experiment using artificial and natural nests. Ecol Res 29:949–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-014-1183-9 DOI

Polak M (2016) Comparative breeding ecology, nest survival, and agonistic behaviour between the Barred Warbler and the Red-backed Shrike. J Ornithol 157:747–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-016-1336-4 DOI

Pollok B, Prior H, Güntürkün O (2000) Development of object permanence in food-storing magpies (Pica pica). J Comp Psychol 114:148–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.114.2.148 PubMed DOI

R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/ . Accessed 1st April 2020

Redondo T (1989) Avian nest defence: theoretical models and evidence. Behaviour 111:161–195. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853989X00646 DOI

Redondo T, Carranza J (1989) Offspring reproductive value and the nest defense in the magpie (Pica pica). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302995 DOI

Roos S, Pärt T (2004) Nest predators affect spatial dynamics of breeding red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio). J Anim Ecol 73:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00786.x DOI

Rosenheim JA, Wilhoit LR, Armer CA (1993) Influence of intraguild predation among generalist insect predators on the suppression of an herbivore population. Oecologia 96:439–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317517 PubMed DOI

Shettleworth SJ (2010) Cognition, evolution, and behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Sih A, Englund G, Wooster D (1998) Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol Evol 13:350–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01437-2 PubMed DOI

Simmons KEL (1951) Distraction-display in the Kentish Plover. Brit Birds 44:181–187

Sordahl TA (1990) The risks of avian mobbing and distraction behavior: an anecdotal review. Wilson Bull 102:349–352

Spiller DA, Schoener TW (1994) Effects of top and intermediate predators in a terrestrial food web. Ecology 75:182–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939393 DOI

Strnad M, Němec M, Veselý P, Fuchs R (2012) Red-backed Shrikes (Lanius collurio) adjust the mobbing intensity, but not mobbing frequency, by assessing the potential threat to themselves from different predators. Ornis Fenn 89:206–215

Strnadová I, Němec M, Strnad M, Veselý P, Fuchs R (2018) The nest defence by the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio)—support for the vulnerability hypothesis. J Avian Biol 49:e01726. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01726 DOI

Syrová M, Němec M, Veselý P, Landová E, Fuchs R (2016) Facing a clever predator demands clever responses—red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio) vs. Eurasian Magpies (Pica pica). PLoS ONE 11:e0159432. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159432 PubMed DOI PMC

Tryjanowski P, Goławski A (2004) Sex differences in nest defence by the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio: effects of offspring age, brood size and stage of breeding season. J Ethol 22:13–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-003-0096-9 DOI

Tryjanowski P, Goławski A, Kuźniak S, Mokwa T, Antczak M (2007) Disperse or stay? Exceptionally high breeding-site infidelity in the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio. Ardea 95:316–320. https://doi.org/10.5253/078.095.0214 DOI

Tryjanowski P, Morelli F, Kwieciński Z, Indykiewicz P, Møller AP (2018) Birds respond similarly to taxidermic models and live cuckoos Cuculus canorus. J Ethol 36:243–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-018-0554-z DOI

Wheelwright NT, Dorsey FB (1991) Short-term and long-term consequences of predator avoidance by Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Auk 108:719–723. https://doi.org/10.2307/4088118 DOI

Zinkivskay A, Nazir F, Smulders TV (2009) What–Where–When memory in magpies (Pica pica). Anim Cogn 12:119–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0176-x (PMID: 18670793) PubMed DOI

Zucca P, Milos N, Vallortigara G (2007) Piagetian object permanence and its development in Eurasian jays (Garrulus glandarius). Anim Cogn 10:243–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0063-2 PubMed DOI

Red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An example of ineffective cuckoo-hawk mimicry