• This record comes from PubMed

Identifying the Optimal Number of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Cycles in Patients with Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

. 2022 Jan ; 207 (1) : 70-76. [epub] 20210827

Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study

PURPOSE: We investigated the pathological response rates and survival associated with 3 vs 4 cycles of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with cT2-4N0M0 muscle invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cohort study we analyzed clinical data of 828 patients treated with NAC and radical cystectomy between 2000 and 2020. A total of 384 and 444 patients were treated with 3 and 4 cycles of NAC, respectively. Pathological objective response (pOR; ypT0-Ta-Tis-T1 N0), pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0 N0), cancer-specific survival and overall survival were investigated. RESULTS: pOR and pCR were achieved in 378 (45%; 95% CI 42, 49) and 207 (25%; 95% CI 22, 28) patients, respectively. Patients treated with 4 cycles of NAC had higher pOR (49% vs 42%, p=0.03) and pCR (28% vs 21%, p=0.02) rates compared to those treated with 3 cycles. This effect was confirmed on multivariable logistic regression analysis (pOR OR 1.46 p=0.008, pCR OR 1.57, p=0.007). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, 4 cycles of NAC were significantly associated with overall survival (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.49, 0.94; p=0.02) but not with cancer-specific survival (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.50, 1.04; p=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Four cycles of NAC achieved better pathological response and survival compared to 3 cycles. These findings may aid clinicians in counseling patients and serve as a benchmark for prospective trials. Prospective validation of these findings and assessment of cumulative toxicity derived from an increased number of cycles are needed.

Cross Cancer Institute Edmonton Alberta Canada

Department of Genitourinary Oncology H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa Florida

Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio

Department of Medicine Division of Medical Oncology University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington

Department of Oncology University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

Department of Surgery Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust Exeter UK

Department of Surgery McGill University Health Center Montreal Canada

Department of Urologic Sciences University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada

Department of Urologic Surgery Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prag Czech Republic

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy

Department of Urology Freeman Hospital Newcastle Upon Tyne UK

Department of Urology Louisiana Paz University Hospital Madrid Spain

Department of Urology MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas

Department of Urology Molinette Hospital University of Turin Turin Italy

Department of Urology The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland

Department of Urology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Urology University of California at Davis Davis Medical Center Sacramento California

Department of Urology University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City Kansas

Department of Urology University of Michigan Health System Ann Arbor Michigan

Department of Urology University of Oklahoma College of Medicine Oklahoma City Oklahoma

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas

Department of Urology University of Washington Seattle Washington

Department of Urology Western Health Melbourne Australia

Departments of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York

Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health 1 M Sechenov 1st Moscow State Medical University Moscow Russia

Princess Margaret Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada

USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center Institute of Urology University of Southern California Los Angeles California

Erratum In

PubMed

References provided by Crossref.org

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...