Mammalian sperm cells are not capable of fertilizing an egg immediately after ejaculation; instead, they must gradually acquire the capacity to fertilize while they travel inside the female reproductive tract. Sperm cells are transported by the muscular activity of the myometrium to the utero-tubal junction (UTJ) before entering the oviduct where they undergo this physiological process, termed capacitation. Since the successful emulation of mammalian sperm capacitation in vitro, which led to the development of in vitro fertilization techniques, sperm capacitation and gamete interaction studies have been mostly carried out under in vitro conditions. Sperm cells are typically incubated in vitro for up to several hours at a concentration of more than 1 million cells per milliliter in the capacitation media inside a 37°C incubator with 5% CO2, mimicking the tubal fluid composed of serum albumin, bicarbonate, and Ca2+. The resultant sperm are functionally and molecularly heterogeneous with respect to acrosome reaction, motility, and phosphorylation. By contrast, in vivo sperm capacitation occurs in a time- and space-dependent manner, with limits on the number of capacitating sperm in the oviduct. The small number of sperm at the fertilization site in vivo are highly homogeneous and uniformly capable of fertilization. This discrepancy makes the degree of correlation between the changes observed from in vitro capacitation as a population average and the fertilizing capacity of sperm less clear. To overcome this issue, we used CLARITY tissue clearing to visualize sperm directly inside the female tract in situ and isolated sperm capacitated in vivo from the oviducts of the female mice after timed mating ( Ded et al., 2020 ). Here, we present a step-by-step protocol to collect in vivo capacitated sperm by detailing a microdissection technique and subsequent preparation steps for fluorescent imaging. The advantage of the microdissection technique over in vitro capacitation is the ability to collect physiologically segregated, homogeneous sperm populations at different stages of capacitation. Compared to CLARITY, this technique is more straightforward and compatible with a broader spectrum of antibodies for downstream imaging studies, as it allows the researcher to avoid a potentially high background from non-sperm cells in the tissue. The disadvantage of this technique is the potential contamination of the isolated sperm from different regions of the oviduct and disruption of the fine molecular structures (e.g., CatSper nanodomains) during sperm isolation, especially when the preparation is not performed swiftly. Hence, we suggest that the combination of both in situ and ex vivo isolated sperm imaging is the best way how to address the molecular features of in vivo capacitated sperm.

Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology Yale School of Medicine New Haven USA

Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences Yale School of Medicine New Haven USA

Laboratory of Reproductive Biology Institute of Biotechnology Czech Academy of Sciences BIOCEV Vestec Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Austin C. R.(1951). Observations on the penetration of the sperm in the mammalian egg. Aust J Sci Res B 4(4): 581-596. PubMed

Caligioni C. S.(2009). Assessing reproductive status/stages in mice. Curr Protoc Neurosci 48: A.4I.1-A.4I.8. PubMed PMC

Chang M. C.(1951). Fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa deposited into the fallopian tubes. Nature 168(4277): 697-698. PubMed

Chung J. J., Miki K., Kim D., Shim S. H., Shi H. F., Hwang J. Y., Cai X., Iseri Y., Zhuang X. and Clapham D. E.(2017). CatSperzeta regulates the structural continuity of sperm Ca(2+) signaling domains and is required for normal fertility. Elife 6: e23082. PubMed PMC

Champlin A. K., Dorr D. L. and Gates A. H.(1973). Determining the stage of the estrous cycle in the mouse by the appearance of the vagina. Biol Reprod 8(4): 491-494. PubMed

Ded L., Hwang J. Y., Miki K., Shi H. F. and Chung J. J.(2020). 3D in situ imaging of the female reproductive tract reveals molecular signatures of fertilizing spermatozoa in mice . Elife 9: e62043. PubMed PMC

Li H., Hung P. H. and Suarez S. S.(2015). Ejaculated mouse sperm enter cumulus-oocyte complexes more efficiently in vitro than epididymal sperm . PLoS One 10(5): e0127753. PubMed PMC

Nagy A., Gertsenstein M., Vintersten K. and Behringer R.(2003). Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual.(3rd edition). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; (2003 re-edition; 1986 org. ed.) 764 pp.

Steptoe P. C. and Edwards R. G.(1976). Reimplantation of a human embryo with subsequent tubal pregnancy. Lancet 1(7965): 880-882. PubMed