Risks of breast and ovarian cancer for women harboring pathogenic missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 compared with those harboring protein truncating variants
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
R01 CA225662
NCI NIH HHS - United States
UM1 CA164920
NCI NIH HHS - United States
20861
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
R01 CA116167
NCI NIH HHS - United States
P50 CA116201
NCI NIH HHS - United States
C12292/A20861
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
R35 CA253187
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
34906479
PubMed Central
PMC10170303
DOI
10.1016/j.gim.2021.08.016
PII: S1098-3600(21)01130-8
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- BRCA1, BRCA2, Cancer risks, Missense variants,
- MeSH
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease MeSH
- Genetic Testing methods MeSH
- Genes, BRCA1 MeSH
- Genes, BRCA2 MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Breast Neoplasms * genetics pathology MeSH
- Ovarian Neoplasms * genetics MeSH
- BRCA1 Protein genetics MeSH
- BRCA2 Protein genetics MeSH
- Germ-Line Mutation genetics MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Names of Substances
- BRCA1 protein, human MeSH Browser
- BRCA2 protein, human MeSH Browser
- BRCA1 Protein MeSH
- BRCA2 Protein MeSH
PURPOSE: Germline genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants has been a part of clinical practice for >2 decades. However, no studies have compared the cancer risks associated with missense pathogenic variants (PVs) with those associated with protein truncating (PTC) variants. METHODS: We collected 582 informative pedigrees segregating 1 of 28 missense PVs in BRCA1 and 153 pedigrees segregating 1 of 12 missense PVs in BRCA2. We analyzed 324 pedigrees with PTC variants in BRCA1 and 214 pedigrees with PTC variants in BRCA2. Cancer risks were estimated using modified segregation analysis. RESULTS: Estimated breast cancer risks were markedly lower for women aged >50 years carrying BRCA1 missense PVs than for the women carrying BRCA1 PTC variants (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.9 [2.4-6.2] for PVs vs 12.8 [5.7-28.7] for PTC variants; P = .01), particularly for missense PVs in the BRCA1 C-terminal domain (HR = 2.8 [1.4-5.6]; P = .005). In case of BRCA2, for women aged >50 years, the HR was 3.9 (2.0-7.2) for those heterozygous for missense PVs compared with 7.0 (3.3-14.7) for those harboring PTC variants. BRCA1 p.[Cys64Arg] and BRCA2 p.[Trp2626Cys] were associated with particularly low risks of breast cancer compared with other PVs. CONCLUSION: These results have important implications for the counseling of at-risk women who harbor missense PVs in the BRCA1/2 genes.
Cancer Control and Population Science Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City UT
Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA
Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics The University of Chicago Chicago IL
Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics College of Medicine The Ohio State University Columbus OH
Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Brno Czech Republic
Department of Clinical Genetics Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
Department of Clinical Genetics Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
Department of Clinical Genetics Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Clinical Genetics Sygehus Lillebaelt Vejle Hospital Vejle Denmark
Department of Health Sciences Research Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
Divisions of Oncology and Pathology Department of Clinical Sciences Lund Lund University Lund Sweden
Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton Southampton United Kingdom
Genome Diagnostics Program IFOM the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Milan Italy
Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit IOV Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS Padova Italy
Institute for Medical Informatics Statistics and Epidemiology University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany
Medical Genetics Unit Department of Medical Sciences University of Torino Torino Italy
Medical Oncology Unit AZIENDA SOCIO SANITARIA TERRITORIALE PAPA GIOVANNI XXIII Bergamo Italy
Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Germany
NorthShore University HealthSystem University of Chicago Evanston IL
SOD Genetica Molecolare University Hospital Pisa Italy
Unit of Hereditary Cancer IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Genoa Italy
See more in PubMed
Easton DF, Ford D, Bishop DT. Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;56(1):265–271. PubMed PMC
Antoniou AC, Pharoah PD, Narod S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(5):1117–1130. Published correction appears in Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73(3):709. 10.1086/375033. PubMed DOI PMC
Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA. 2017;317(23):2402–2416. 10.1001/jama.2017.7112. PubMed DOI
Thompson D, Easton D, Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Variation in BRCA1 cancer risks by mutation position. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11(4):329–336. PubMed
Gayther SA, Warren W, Mazoyer S, et al. Germline mutations of the BRCA1 gene in breast and ovarian cancer families provide evidence for a genotype-phenotype correlation. Nat Genet. 1995;11(4):428–433. 10.1038/ng1295-428. PubMed DOI
Rebbeck TR, Mitra N, Wan F, et al. Association of type and location of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with risk of breast and ovarian cancer. JAMA. 2015;313(13):1347–1361. Published correction appears in JAMA. 2015;314(6):628. 10.1001/jama.2014.5985. PubMed DOI PMC
Spurdle AB, Healey S, Devereau A, et al. ENIGMA—evidence-based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: an international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(1):2–7. 10.1002/humu.21628. PubMed DOI PMC
Goldgar DE, Easton DF, Deffenbaugh AM, et al. Integrated evaluation of DNA sequence variants of unknown clinical significance: application to BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75(4):535–544. 10.1086/424388. PubMed DOI PMC
Thompson D, Easton DF, Goldgar DE. A full-likelihood method for the evaluation of causality of sequence variants from family data. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73(3):652–655. 10.1086/378100. PubMed DOI PMC
Easton DF, Deffenbaugh AM, Pruss D, et al. A systematic genetic assessment of 1,433 sequence variants of unknown clinical significance in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer-predisposition genes. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(5):873–883. 10.1086/521032. PubMed DOI PMC
Li H, LaDuca H, Pesaran T, et al. Classification of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using personal and family history of cancer from individuals in a large hereditary cancer multigene panel testing cohort. Genet Med. 2020;22(4):701–708. 10.1038/s41436-019-0729-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Spurdle AB, Couch FJ, Parsons MT, et al. Refined histopathological predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status: a large-scale analysis of breast cancer characteristics from the BCAC, CIMBA, and ENIGMA consortia. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(6):3419. 10.1186/s13058-014-0474-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Parsons MT, Tudini E, Li H, et al. Large scale multifactorial likelihood quantitative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: an ENIGMA resource to support clinical variant classification. Hum Mutat. 2019;40(9):1557–1578. 10.1002/humu.23818. PubMed DOI PMC
Spurdle AB, Whiley PJ, Thompson B, et al. BRCA1 R1699Q variant displaying ambiguous functional abrogation confers intermediate breast and ovarian cancer risk. J Med Genet. 2012;49(8):525–532. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101037. PubMed DOI PMC
Moghadasi S, Meeks HD, Vreeswijk MP, et al. The BRCA1 c. 5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) intermediate risk variant: breast and ovarian cancer risk estimation and recommendations for clinical management from the ENIGMA consortium. J Med Genet. 2018;55(1):15–20. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104560. PubMed DOI
Shimelis H, Mesman RLS, Von Nicolai C, et al. BRCA2 hypomorphic missense variants confer moderate risks of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2017;77(11):2789–2799. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2568. PubMed DOI PMC
ClinVar. National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar. Accessed July 15, 2018.
Cline MS, Liao RG, Parsons MT, et al. BRCA Challenge: BRCA Exchange as a global resource for variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2. PLoS Genet. 2018;14(12): e1007752. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007752. PubMed DOI PMC
Chenevix-Trench G, Milne RL, Antoniou AC, et al. An international initiative to identify genetic modifiers of cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the Consortium of Investigators of modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (CIMBA). Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(2):104. 10.1186/bcr1670. PubMed DOI PMC
Tavtigian SV, Byrnes GB, Goldgar DE, Thomas A. Classification of rare missense substitutions, using risk surfaces, with genetic- and molecular-epidemiology applications. Hum Mutat. 2008;29(11): 1342–1354. 10.1002/humu.20896. PubMed DOI PMC
Valleé MP, Di Sera TL, Nix DA, et al. Adding in silico assessment of potential splice aberration to the integrated evaluation of BRCA gene unclassified variants. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(7):627–639. 10.1002/humu.22973. PubMed DOI PMC
Richardson ME, Hu C, Lee KY, et al. Strong functional data for pathogenicity or neutrality classify BRCA2 DNA-binding-domain variants of uncertain significance. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108(3):458–468. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.02.005. PubMed DOI PMC
Woods NT, Baskin R, Golubeva V, et al. Functional assays provide a robust tool for the clinical annotation of genetic variants of uncertain significance. NPJ Genom Med. 2016;1:16001. 10.1038/npjgenmed.2016.1. PubMed DOI PMC
Findlay GM, Daza RM, Martin B, et al. Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing. Nature. 2018;562(7726):217–222. 10.1038/s41586-018-0461-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Walker LC, Whiley PJ, Couch FJ, et al. Detection of splicing aberrations caused by BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variants encoding missense substitutions: implications for prediction of pathogenicity. Hum Mutat. 2010;31(6):E1484–E1505. 10.1002/humu.21267. PubMed DOI PMC
Fraile-Bethencourt E, Valenzuela-Palomo A, Díez-Gó mez B, Caloca MJ, Gó mez-Barrero S, Velasco EA. Minigene splicing assays identify 12 Spliceogenic Variants of BRCA2 Exons 14 and 15. Front Genet. 2019;10:503. 10.3389/fgene.2019.00503. PubMed DOI PMC
Caleca L, Putignano AL, Colombo M, et al. Characterization of an Italian founder mutation in the RING-finger domain of BRCA1. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e86924. 10.1371/journal.pone.0086924. PubMed DOI PMC
Anagnostopoulos T, Pertesi M, Konstantopoulou I, et al. G1738R is a BRCA1 founder mutation in Greek breast/ovarian cancer patients: evaluation of its pathogenicity and inferences on its genealogical history. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;110(2):377–385. 10.1007/s10549-007-9729-y. PubMed DOI
PedPro. Fishing for Gene & Proteins http://www.bjfenglab.org. Accessed September 21, 2018.
Lange K, Weeks D, Boehnke M. Programs for pedigree analysis: MENDEL, FISHER, and dGENE. Genet Epidemiol. 1988;5(6):471–472. 10.1002/gepi.1370050611. PubMed DOI
Yang X, Leslie G, Doroszuk A, et al. Cancer risks associated with germline PALB2 pathogenic variants: an international study of 524 families. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(7):674–685. 10.1200/JCO.19.01907. PubMed DOI PMC
Forman D, Bray F, Brewster DH, et al., eds. Cancer incidence in five continents. IARC Sci Publ No. 164. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2014. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home. Accessed July 22, 2019.
Barnes DR, Rookus MA, McGuffog L, et al. Polygenic risk scores and breast and epithelial ovarian cancer risks for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. Genet Med. 2020;22(10):1653–1666. 10.1038/s41436-020-0862-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Terry MB, Liao Y, Kast K, et al. The influence of number and timing of pregnancies on breast cancer risk for women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018;2(4):pky078. 10.1093/jncics/pky078. PubMed DOI PMC
Antoniou AC, Cunningham AP, Peto J, et al. The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers: updates and extensions. Br J Cancer. 2008;98(8):1457–1466. Published correction appears in Br J Cancer. 2008;98(12):2015. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604305. PubMed DOI PMC
Guidugli L, Carreira A, Caputo SM, et al. Functional assays for analysis of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA2. Hum Mutat. 2014;35(2):151–164. 10.1002/humu.22478. PubMed DOI PMC
Amos CI, Dennis J, Wang Z, et al. The OncoArray consortium: a network for understanding the genetic architecture of common cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(1):126–135. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0106. PubMed DOI PMC