• This record comes from PubMed

Measuring fear evoked by the scariest animal: Czech versions of the Spider Questionnaire and Spider Phobia Beliefs Questionnaire

. 2022 Jan 06 ; 22 (1) : 18. [epub] 20220106

Language English Country Great Britain, England Media electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Links

PubMed 34991495
PubMed Central PMC8740501
DOI 10.1186/s12888-021-03672-7
PII: 10.1186/s12888-021-03672-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources

BACKGROUND: Although tiny in size and mostly harmless, spiders evoke exceptional fear in a significant part of the population and arachnophobia is one of the most common anxiety disorders with prevalence 2.7-6.1%. Two standard measures have been widely used to reliably assess the emotional and cognitive component of spider fear, the Spider Questionnaire (SPQ) and Spider Phobia Beliefs Questionnaire (SBQ). We aimed to develop and validate their Czech translations, describe distribution of spider fear in the Czech population, and analyse its association with disgust propensity and other sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: In Phase 1, we developed Czech translations of both questionnaires using a back-translation procedure and then tested their psychometric properties against their English versions in a counterbalanced experimental design using the Mann-Whitney U test and two-sided t-test. In Phase 2, we analysed scores on the Czech SPQ and SBQ on a larger sample. We evaluated the effects of age, gender, level of education, biology background, and association with the assessments of snake fear (i.e. the Snake Questionnaire, SNAQ) and disgust propensity (i.e. the Disgust Scale-Revised, DS-R) using a Spearman correlation, redundancy analysis, and general linear models. RESULTS: We have demonstrated that the Czech SPQ and SBQ are equivalent to their originals and show excellent test-retest reliability (SPQ: 0.93; SBQ: 0.87-0.90). In total, 398 (10.3%) out of 3863 subjects reached the cut-off point for potential spider phobia. In addition, SPQ and SBQ scores were highly correlated (0.73-0.79), significantly more than with the SNAQ (0.21-0.32) or the DS-R (0.36-0.40). Two multivariate statistical methods revealed a significant association between the gender, age, level of education, biology background, or disgust propensity and the SPQ scores. CONCLUSION: The Czech SPQ and SBQ may produce reliable and valid assessments of spider fear, but they must be further psychometrically tested considering the limitation of this study before wider use. We corroborate previous findings that fear of spiders is significantly associated with sociodemographic variables, such as gender, age, or education, as well as with the individual level of disgust propensity.

See more in PubMed

Oosterink FM, de Jongh A, Hoogstraten J. Prevalence of dental fear and phobia relative to other fear and phobia subtypes. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117:135–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00602.x. PubMed DOI

Fredrikson M, Annas P, Fischer H, Wik G. Gender and age differences in the prevalence of specific fears and phobias. Behav Res Ther. 1996;34:33–39. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00048-3. PubMed DOI

Zsido AN, Arato N, Inhof O, Janszky J, Darnai G. Short versions of two specific phobia measures: the snake and the spider questionnaires. J Anxiety Disord. 2018;54:11–16. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.12.002. PubMed DOI

Zsido AN. The spider and the snake–a psychometric study of two phobias and insights from the Hungarian validation. Psychiatry Res. 2017;257:61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.07.024. PubMed DOI

Seim RW, Spates CR. The prevalence and comorbidity of specific phobias in college students and their interest in receiving treatment. J Coll Student Psychoter. 2009;24:49–58. doi: 10.1080/87568220903400302. DOI

Asma ST. On monsters: an unnatural history of our worst fears. Oxford:Oxford University Press. 2011.

American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5. Arlington, VA: Author; 2013.

Andrews G. Epidemiology of phobias: a review. In: Maj M, Akiskal HS, López-Ibor, JJ, Okasha, A, editors. Phobias, Volume 7. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2004. p61–80.

Thorpe SJ, Salkovskis PM. Animal phobias. In: Davey GCL, editor. Phobias: a handbook of theory, research and treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999. pp. 81–105.

Arntz A, Lavy E, Van den Berg G, Van Rijsoort S. Negative beliefs of spider phobics: a psychometric evaluation of the spider phobia beliefs questionnaire. Adv Behav Res Ther. 1993;15:257–277. doi: 10.1016/0146-6402(93)90012-Q. DOI

Doctor RM, Kahn AP, Adamec CA. The encyclopedia of phobias, fears, and anxieties. New York: Infobase Publishing; 2008.

Rachman S. The conditioning theory of fear acquisition: a critical examination. Behav Res Ther. 1977;15:375–387. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(77)90041-9. PubMed DOI

Seligman ME. Phobias and preparedness. Behav Ther. 1971;2:307–320. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(71)80064-3. PubMed DOI

Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychol Rev. 2001;108:483–522. doi:10.1037%2F0033-295X.108.3.483. PubMed

Öhman A, Flykt A, Esteves F. Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001;130:466–478. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.466. PubMed DOI

Hoehl S, Hellmer K, Johansson M, Gredebäck G. Itsy bitsy spider…: infants react with increased arousal to spiders and snakes. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00393. PubMed DOI PMC

Hoehl S, Pauen S. Do infants associate spiders and snakes with fearful facial expressions? Evol Hum Behav. 2017;38:404–413. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.12.001. DOI

Öhman A, Soares SC, Juth P, Lindström B, Esteves F. Evolutionary derived modulations of attention to two common fear stimuli: serpents and hostile humans. J Cogn Psychol. 2012;24:17–32. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2011.629603. DOI

Kawai N, Koda H. Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) quickly detect snakes but not spiders: evolutionary origins of fear-relevant animals. J Comp Psychol. 2016;30:299–303. doi: 10.1037/com0000032. PubMed DOI

He H, Kubo K, Kawai N. Spiders do not evoke greater early posterior negativity in the event-related potential as snakes. Neuroreport. 2014;25:1049–1053. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000227. PubMed DOI

Van Strien JW, Eijlers R, Franken IHA, Huijding J. Snake pictures draw more early attention than spider pictures in non-phobic women: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Biol Psychol. 2014;96:150–157. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.12.014. PubMed DOI

Van Strien JW, Franken IH, Huijding J. Testing the snake-detection hypothesis: larger early posterior negativity in humans to pictures of snakes than to pictures of other reptiles, spiders and slugs. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:691. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00691. PubMed DOI PMC

Platnick NI. Spiders of the world: a natural history. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2020.

Davey GC. The" disgusting" spider: the role of disease and illness in the perpetuation of fear of spiders. Soc Anim. 1994;2:17–25. doi: 10.1163/156853094X00045. DOI

Gerdes AB, Uhl G, Alpers GW. Spiders are special: fear and disgust evoked by pictures of arthropods. Evol Hum Behav. 2009;30:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.08.005. DOI

Mulkens SA, de Jong PJ, Merckelbach H. Disgust and spider phobia. J Abnorm Psychol. 1996;105:464–468. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.105.3.464. PubMed DOI

de Jong PJ, Muris P. Spider phobia: interaction of disgust and perceived likelihood of involuntary physical contact. J Anxiety Disord. 2002;16:51–65. doi: 10.1016/s0887-6185(01)00089-5. PubMed DOI

Polák J, Rádlová S, Janovcová M, Flegr J, Landová E, Frynta D. Scary and nasty beasts: self-reported fear and disgust of common phobic animals. Brit J Psychol. 2020;111:297–321. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12409. PubMed DOI

de Jong PJ, Merckelbach H. Blood-injection-injury phobia and fear of spiders: domain specific individual differences in disgust sensitivity. Pers Indiv Differ. 1998;24:153–158. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00178-5. DOI

Matchett G, Davey GC. A test of a disease-avoidance model of animal phobias. Behav Res Ther. 1991;29:91–94. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(09)80011-9. PubMed DOI

Klorman R, Weerts TC, Hastings JE, Melamed BG, Lang PJ. Psychometric description of some specific-fear questionnaires. Behav Ther. 1974;5:401–409. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(74)80008-0. DOI

Fredrikson M. Reliability and validity of some specific fear questionnaires. Scand J Psychol. 1983;24:331–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00507.x. PubMed DOI

Muris P, Merckelbach H. A comparison of two spider fear questionnaires. J Behav Ther Exp Psy. 1996;27:241–244. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7916(96)00022-5. PubMed DOI

Polák J, Sedláčková K, Landová E, Frynta D. Faster detection of snake and spider phobia: revisited. Heliyon. 2020;6:e03968. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03968. PubMed DOI PMC

International Test Commission. The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Test, 2nd ed. 2017. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf. Accessed 18 Aug 2021.

Hambleton RK, Lee MK. Methods for translating and adapting tests to increase cross-language. In: Saklofske DH, Reynolds CR, Schwean VL, editors. The Oxford handbook of child psychological assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. pp. 172–181.

McCrae RR, Kurtz JE, Yamagata S, Terracciano A. Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15:28–50. doi: 10.1177/1088868310366253. PubMed DOI PMC

McConnell KE, Strand IE, Valdés S. Testing temporal reliability and carry-over effect: the role of correlated responses in test-retest reliability studies. Environ Resour Econ. 1998;12:357–374. doi: 10.1023/A:1008264922331. DOI

Mimura C, Griffiths P. A Japanese version of the perceived stress scale: translation and preliminary test. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004;41:379–385. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.10.009 PubMed DOI

Polák J, Sedláčková K, Nácar D, Landová E, Frynta D. Fear the serpent: a psychometric study of snake phobia. Psychiatry Res. 2016;242:163–168. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.05.024. PubMed DOI

Schuirmann D. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 1987;15:657–680. doi: 10.1007/BF01068419. PubMed DOI

Corp IBM. Released. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 22.0. IBM Corp: Armonk; 2013.

Addinsoft XLSTAT. Data analysis and statistical solution for Microsoft excel. Paris: Addinsoft; 2017. p. 2017.

Haidt J, McCauley C, Rozin P. Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: a scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Pers Indiv Differ. 1994;16:701–713. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7. DOI

Olatunji BO, Williams NL, Tolin DF, Abramowitz JS, Sawchuk CN, Lohr JM, et al. The disgust scale: item analysis, factor structure, and suggestions for refinement. Psychol Assessment. 2007;19:281–297. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.281. PubMed DOI

Polák J, Landová E, Frynta D. Undisguised disgust: a psychometric evaluation of a disgust propensity measure. Curr Psychol. 2019;38:608–617. doi: 10.1007/s12144-018-9925-4. DOI

Wright LM, Holborn SW, Resutek PE. An experimental test of stimulus estimation theory: danger and safety with snake phobic stimuli. Behav Res Ther. 2002;40:911–922. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00078-x. PubMed DOI

Wikström J, Lundh LG, Westerlund J, Högman L. Preattentive bias for snake words in snake phobia? Behav Res Ther. 2004;42:949–970. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.002. PubMed DOI

van Overveld M, de Jong PJ, Peters ML, Schouten E. The disgust scale-R: a valid and reliable index to investigate separate disgust domains? Pers Indiv Differ. 2011;51:325–330. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.023. DOI

McCall WA. How to measure in education. London: Macmillan; 1922.

Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.4–5. 2017.

ter Braak CJ, Šmilauer P. Canoco reference manual and user's guide: Software for ordination (version 5.10). Biometris, Wageningen University & Research; 2018.

Schisterman EF, Perkins NJ, Liu A, Bondell H. Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples. Epidemiology. 2005;16:73–81. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000147512.81966.ba. PubMed DOI

R Development Core team R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for statistical Computing; 2010.

Groth-Marnat G. Handbook of psychological assessment. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

Thorpe SJ, Salkovskis PM. Studies on the role of disgust in the acquisition and maintenance of specific phobias. Behav Res Ther. 1998;36:877–893. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00066-7. PubMed DOI

McLean CP, Anderson ER. Brave men and timid women? A review of the gender differences in fear and anxiety. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29:496–505. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.05.003. PubMed DOI

Makashvili M, Kaishauri N, Azmaiparashvili T. The role of knowledge in overcoming snake fear. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;152:184–187. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.178. DOI

Herman BE, Skokan EG. Bites that poison: a tale of spiders, snakes, and scorpions. Contemp Pediatr. 1999;16:41.

Hauke TJ, Herzig V. Dangerous arachnids - fake news or reality? Toxicon. 2017;138:173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.08.024. PubMed DOI

Davey GC, McDonald AS, Hirisave U, Prabhu GG, Iwawaki S, Im Jim C, et al. A cross-cultural study of animal fears. Behav Res Ther. 1998;36:735–750. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00059-x. PubMed DOI

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...