Membrane fouling is one of the most significant issues to overcome in membrane-based technologies as it causes a decrease in the membrane flux and increases operational costs. This study investigates the effect of common chemical cleaning agents on polymeric nanofibrous membranes (PNM) prepared by polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyacrylonitrile (PAN), and polyamide 6 (PA6) nanofibers. Common alkaline and acid membrane cleaners were selected as the chemical cleaning agents. Membrane surface morphology was investigated. The PAN PNM were selected and fouled by engine oil and then cleaned by the different chemical cleaning agents at various ratios. The SEM results indicated that the use of chemical agents had some effects on the surface of the nanofibrous membranes. Moreover, alkaline cleaning of the fouled membrane using the Triton X 100 surfactant showed a two to five times higher flux recovery than without using a surfactant. Among the tested chemical agents, the highest flux recovery rate was obtained by a binary solution of 5% sodium hydroxide + Triton for alkaline cleaning, and an individual solution of 1% citric acid for acidic cleaning. The results presented here provide one of the first investigations into the chemical cleaning of nanofiber membranes.

Institute for Nanomaterials Advanced Technology and Innovation Technical University of Liberec Studentska 1402 2 46117 Liberec Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Wang X., Hsiao B.S. Electrospun nanofiber membranes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2016;12:62–81. doi: 10.1016/j.coche.2016.03.001. DOI

Wang R., Liu Y., Li B., Hsiao B.S., Chu B. Electrospun nanofibrous membranes for high flux microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2012;392-393:167–174. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.019. DOI

Nasreen S.A.A.N., Sundarrajan S., Nizar S.A.S., Balamurugan R., Ramakrishna S. Advancement in Electrospun Nanofibrous Membranes Modification and Their Application in Water Treatment. Membranes. 2013;3:266–284. doi: 10.3390/membranes3040266. PubMed DOI PMC

Yalcinkaya F., Yalcinkaya B., Jirsak O. Influence of Salts on Electrospinning of Aqueous and Nonaqueous Polymer Solutions. J. Nanomater. 2015;2015:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2015/134251. DOI

Tiyek I., Gunduz A., Yalcinkaya F., Chaloupek J. Influence of Electrospinning Parameters on the Hydrophilicity of Electrospun Polycaprolactone Nanofibres. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019;19:7251–7260. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2019.16605. PubMed DOI

Yalcinkaya F. Mechanically enhanced electrospun nanofibers for wastewater treatment. E3S Web Conf. 2017;22:00193. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/20172200193. DOI

Makaremi M., De Silva R.T., Pasbakhsh P. Electrospun Nanofibrous Membranes of Polyacrylonitrile/Halloysite with Superior Water Filtration Ability. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015;119:7949–7958. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00662. DOI

Wirth E., Sabantina L., Weber M.O., Finsterbusch K., Ehrmann A. Preliminary Study of Ultrasonic Welding as a Joining Process for Electrospun Nanofiber Mats. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:746. doi: 10.3390/nano8100746. PubMed DOI PMC

Fatma Y., Siekierka A., Bryjak M., Maryska J. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Volume 254. Institute of Physics Publishing; Bristol, UK: 2017. Preparation of Various Nanofibrous Composite Membranes Using Wire Electrospinning for Oil-Water Separation; p. 102011.

Ma H., Hsiao B.S., Chu B. Functionalized electrospun nanofibrous microfiltration membranes for removal of bacteria and viruses. J. Membr. Sci. 2014;452:446–452. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.047. DOI

Lee J.-W., Jung J., Cho Y.H., Yadav S.K., Baek K.Y., Park H.B., Hong S.M., Koo C.M. Fouling-Tolerant Nanofibrous Polymer Membranes for Water Treatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014;6:14600–14607. doi: 10.1021/am503874b. PubMed DOI

Doan H., Lohi A. Mass Transfer—Advances in Sustainable Energy and Environment Oriented Numerical Modeling. IntechOpen; London, UK: 2013. Fouling in Membrane Filtration and Remediation Methods; pp. 195–219. DOI

Najafpour G.D. Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. Membrane Reactor; pp. 453–493.

Zhang B., Ma S. Study on Fouling and Cleaning of PVDF Membrane. Mod. Appl. Sci. 2009;3:52. doi: 10.5539/mas.v3n11p52. DOI

Garmsiri E., Rasouli Y., Abbasi M., Izadpanah A.A. Chemical cleaning of mullite ceramic microfiltration membranes which are fouled during oily wastewater treatment. J. Water Process Eng. 2017;19:81–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.07.012. DOI

Mohammadi T., Madaeni S., Moghadam M. Investigation of membrane fouling. Desalination. 2003;153:155–160. doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)01118-9. DOI

Lin J.C.-T., Lee D.-J., Huang C. Membrane Fouling Mitigation: Membrane Cleaning. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2010;45:858–872. doi: 10.1080/01496391003666940. DOI

Gul A., Hruza J., Yalcinkaya F. Fouling and Chemical Cleaning of Microfiltration Membranes: A Mini-Review. Polymers. 2021;13:846. doi: 10.3390/polym13060846. PubMed DOI PMC

Scharnagl N., Buschatz H. Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) membranes for ultra- and microfiltration. Desalination. 2001;139:191–198. doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00310-1. DOI

Bryjak M., Hodge H., Dach B. Modification of Porous Polyacrylonitrile Membrane. Angew. Makromol. Chem. 1998;260:25–29. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-9505(19981101)260:1<25::AID-APMC25>3.0.CO;2-K. DOI

Oh N.-W., Jegal J., Lee K.-H. Preparation and characterization of nanofiltration composite membranes using polyacrylonitrile (PAN). I. preparation and modification of PAN supports. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001;80:1854–1862. doi: 10.1002/app.1282. DOI

Rabuni M.F., Sulaiman N.N., Aroua M.K., Chee C.Y., Hashim N.A. Impact of in situ physical and chemical cleaning on PVDF membrane properties and performances. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015;122:426–435. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2014.09.053. DOI

Boyraz E., Yalcinkaya F., Hruza J., Maryska J. Surface-Modified Nanofibrous PVDF Membranes for Liquid Separation Technology. Materials. 2019;12:2702. doi: 10.3390/ma12172702. PubMed DOI PMC

Torres-Mendieta R., Yalcinkaya F., Boyraz E., Havelka O., Wacławek S., Maryška J., Černík M., Bryjak M. PVDF nanofibrous membranes modified via laser-synthesized Ag nanoparticles for a cleaner oily water separation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020;526:146575. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146575. DOI

Rabuni M.F., Sulaiman N.M.N., Aroua M.K., Hashim N.A. Effects of Alkaline Environments at Mild Conditions on the Stability of PVDF Membrane: An Experimental Study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013;52:15874–15882. doi: 10.1021/ie402684b. DOI

Jun B.-M., Yoon Y., Park C.M. Post-Treatment of Nanofiltration Polyamide Membrane through Alkali-Catalyzed Hydrolysis to Treat Dyes in Model Wastewater. Water. 2019;11:1645. doi: 10.3390/w11081645. DOI

Hashim N.A., Liu Y., Li K. Stability of PVDF hollow fibre membranes in sodium hydroxide aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011;66:1565–1575. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2010.12.019. DOI

Simon A., McDonald J.A., Khan S., Price W.E., Nghiem L.D. Effects of caustic cleaning on pore size of nanofiltration membranes and their rejection of trace organic chemicals. J. Membr. Sci. 2013;447:153–162. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.013. DOI

Wang Z.-G., Wan L.-S., Xu Z.-K. Surface engineerings of polyacrylonitrile-based asymmetric membranes towards biomedical applications: An overview. J. Membr. Sci. 2007;304:8–23. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.05.012. DOI

Lohokare H.R., Kumbharkar S.C., Bhole Y.S., Kharul U.K. Surface modification of polyacrylonitrile based ultrafiltration membrane. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006;101:4378–4385. doi: 10.1002/app.23917. DOI

Boyraz E., Yalcinkaya F. Hydrophilic Surface-Modified PAN Nanofibrous Membranes for Efficient Oil—Water Emulsion Separation. Polymers. 2021;13:197. doi: 10.3390/polym13020197. PubMed DOI PMC

Krentsel L.B., Kudryavtsev Y.V., Rebrov A.I., Litmanovich A.D., Platé N.A. Acidic Hydrolysis of Polyacrylonitrile: Effect of Neighboring Groups. Macromolecules. 2001;34:5607–5610. doi: 10.1021/ma010213o. DOI

Rosa M., de Pinho M. Membrane surface characterisation by contact angle measurements using the immersed method. J. Membr. Sci. 1997;131:167–180. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00043-4. DOI

Azari S., Karimi M., Kish M.H. Structural Properties of the Poly(acrylonitrile) Membrane Prepared with Different Cast Thicknesses. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010;49:2442–2448. doi: 10.1021/ie900952v. DOI

Abdallah H., Jamil T.S., Shaban A., Mansor E.S., Souaya E.R. Influence of the polyacrylonitrile proportion on the fabricated UF blend membranes’ performance for humic acid removal. J. Polym. Eng. 2018;38:129–136. doi: 10.1515/polyeng-2017-0003. DOI

Cornelissen E., Boomgaard T.V.D., Strathmann H. Physicochemical aspects of polymer selection for ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1998;138:283–289. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(96)03862-9. DOI

Banipal T.S., Kaur H., Kaur A., Banipal P.K. Effect of tartarate and citrate based food additives on the micellar properties of sodium dodecylsulfate for prospective use as food emulsifier. Food Chem. 2016;190:599–606. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.05.130. PubMed DOI

Jafari M., Mehrnejad F., Rahimi F., Asghari S.M. The Molecular Basis of the Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Effect on Human Ubiquitin Structure: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:2150. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20669-7. PubMed DOI PMC

Madaeni S., Mansourpanah Y. Chemical cleaning of reverse osmosis membranes fouled by whey. Desalination. 2004;161:13–24. doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(04)90036-7. DOI

Yalcinkaya F., Siekierka A., Bryjak M. Surface modification of electrospun nanofibrous membranes for oily wastewater separation. RSC Adv. 2017;7:56704–56712. doi: 10.1039/C7RA11904F. DOI

Kim I.-C., Yun H.-G., Lee K.-H. Preparation of asymmetric polyacrylonitrile membrane with small pore size by phase inversion and post-treatment process. J. Membr. Sci. 2002;199:75–84. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00680-9. DOI

Hills B. Possible role of adsorbed surfactant in controlling membrane permeability and function. Med. Hypotheses. 1989;28:85–92. doi: 10.1016/0306-9877(89)90019-4. PubMed DOI

Musale D., Kumar A., Pleizier G. Formation and characterization of poly(acrylonitrile)/Chitosan composite ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1999;154:163–173. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00265-8. DOI

Bansod G. Chemically cleaning of UF membranes fouled by oily waste water. Int. J. Mod. Trends Eng. Res. 2016;3:75–82. doi: 10.21884/IJMTER.2016.3085.KCVHU. DOI

Ali N.S.M., Hassan A.R. The effect of ctab and sds surfactant on the morphology and performance of low pressure active reverse osmosis membrane. Malays. J. Anal. Sci. 2016;20:510–516. doi: 10.17576/mjas-2016-2003-07. DOI

Wang C., Wang M., Li Y. Effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate on forward osmosis membrane fouling and its cleaning. Chemosphere. 2020;257:127180. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127180. PubMed DOI

Saedi S., Madaeni S., Shamsabadi A.A., Mottaghi F. The effect of surfactants on the structure and performance of PES membrane for separation of carbon dioxide from methane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012;99:104–119. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.08.028. DOI

Hou D., Yuan Z., Tang M., Wang K., Wang J. Effect and mechanism of an anionic surfactant on membrane performance during direct contact membrane distillation. J. Membr. Sci. 2020;595:117495. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117495. DOI

Muthumareeswaran M.R., Alhoshan M., Agarwal G.P. Ultrafiltration membrane for effective removal of chromium ions from potable water. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:41423. doi: 10.1038/srep41423. PubMed DOI PMC

Car A. Polyether Block Amide (PEBAX) In: Drioli E., Giorno L., editors. Encyclopedia of Membranes. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2016. pp. 1–2.

Gan J.A.Q., Howellb R.W., Fieldb R., Englandb M.R., Birdb M.T.M. Synergetic Cleaning Procedure for a Ceramic Membrane Fouled by Beer Micro®ltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999;155:277–289. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00320-2. DOI

Madaeni S.S., Tavakolian H.R., Rahimpour F. Cleaning Optimization of Microfiltration Membrane Employed for Milk Sterilization. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2011;46:571–580. doi: 10.1080/01496395.2010.534118. DOI

Zhang G., Liu Z., Song L., Hu J., Ong S., Ng W. One-step cleaning method for flux recovery of an ultrafiltration membrane fouled by banknote printing works wastewater. Desalination. 2004;170:271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.desa1.2004.02.101. DOI

Bartlett M., Bird M., Howell J. An experimental study for the development of a qualitative membrane cleaning model. J. Membr. Sci. 1995;105:147–157. doi: 10.1016/0376-7388(95)00052-E. DOI