Radiofrequency ablation using the second-generation temperature-controlled diamond tip system in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: results from FASTR-AF
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu multicentrická studie, časopisecké články
PubMed
35581464
DOI
10.1007/s10840-022-01234-9
PII: 10.1007/s10840-022-01234-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation, DiamondTemp, Radiofrequency,
- MeSH
- fibrilace síní * chirurgie MeSH
- katetrizační ablace * metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- teplota MeSH
- venae pulmonales * chirurgie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) technology development reflects the need to improve the effectiveness of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. Recently, the DiamondTemp Ablation (DTA) RF generator software was updated with a more responsive power ramp. METHODS: DIAMOND FASTR-AF was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial. This study sought to characterize the performance of the updated DTA system for the treatment of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal and persistent AF (PAF and PsAF). The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence following a 90-day blanking period through 12 months, and the primary safety endpoint was a composite of serious adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 60 subjects (34 PAF and 26 PsAF) underwent CA at three centers. Patients were 71.7% male, (age 63.9 ± 10.2 years, with an AF diagnosis duration 3.1 ± 3.9 years and left atrial size 4.4 ± 0.8 cm). Pulmonary vein isolation-only ablation strategy was performed in 34 (56.7%) subjects. The procedural characteristics show a procedure time 90.8 ± 31.6 min, total RF time 14.7 ± 7.7 min, ablation duration 10.7 ± 3.6 s, and fluid infusion 284.7 ± 111.5 ml. The serious adverse event rate was 8.3% (5/60), 3 pulmonary edema and 2 extended hospitalizations. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was achieved in 67.6% of subjects by 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The updated DTA system demonstrated long-term safety and effectiveness through 12 months of post-ablation follow-up for patients with atrial fibrillation. Additionally, procedures were demonstrated to be highly efficient with short procedure times and low levels of fluid infusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Sponsored by Medtronic, Inc.; FASTR-AF ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03626649.
Clinique du Tonkin Valleurbanne France
Clinique Pasteur Toulouse France
Medtronic Inc Minneapolis MN USA
Na Homolce Hospital Roentgenova 37 2 150 00 Prague 5 Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(10):e275–444. PubMed DOI PMC
Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(10):659–66. PubMed DOI
Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(19):1812–22. PubMed DOI
Neuzil P, Reddy VY, Kautzner J, et al. Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(2):327–33. PubMed DOI
Kautzner J, Neuzil P, Lambert H, et al. EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17(8):1229–35. PubMed DOI PMC
Das M, Wynn GJ, Saeed Y, et al. Pulmonary vein re-isolation as a routine strategy regardless of symptoms: the PRESSURE randomized controlled trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(6):602–11. PubMed DOI
Iwasawa J, Koruth JS, Petru J, et al. Temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(5):542–53. PubMed DOI
Hussein A, Das M, Riva S, et al. Use of ablation index-guided ablation results in high rates of durable pulmonary vein isolation and freedom from arrhythmia in persistent atrial fibrillation patients: the PRAISE study results. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11(9):e006576. PubMed DOI
Pranata R, Vania R, Huang I. Ablation-index guided versus conventional contact-force guided ablation in pulmonary vein isolation - systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2019;19(4):155–60. PubMed DOI PMC
Ioannou A, Papageorgiou N, Lim WY, et al. Efficacy and safety of ablation index-guided catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis. Europace. 2020;22(11):1659–71. PubMed DOI
Naniwadekar A, Dukkipati SR. High-power short-duration ablation of atrial fibrillation: a contemporary review. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;44(3):528–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14167 (Epub 2021 Jan 31). PubMed DOI
Nilsson B, Chen X, Pehrson S, Svendsen JH. The effectiveness of a high output/short duration radiofrequency current application technique in segmental pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2006;8(11):962–5. PubMed DOI
Bunch TJ, Day JD. Novel ablative approach for atrial fibrillation to decrease risk of esophageal injury. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(4):624–7. PubMed DOI
Qiu J, Wang Y, Wang DW, Hu M, Chen G. Update on high-power short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(9):2499–508. PubMed DOI
Winkle RA. HPSD ablation for AF high-power short-duration RF ablation for atrial fibrillation: a review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14863 (Epub ahead of print). PubMed DOI
Stoffregen W, Maddox W, Couco F. B-PO02-094 – temperature sensing accuracy and lesion characteristics of a novel, diamond tip, temperature-controlled open irrigated radiofrequency catheter. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(5):S218.
Verma A, Schmidt MM, Lalonde JP, Ramirez DA, Getman MK. Assessing the relationship of applied force and ablation duration on lesion size using a diamond tip catheter ablation system. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021;14(7):e009541. PubMed DOI PMC
Kautzner J, Albenque JP, Natale A, et al. A novel temperature-controlled radiofrequency catheter ablation system used to treat patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7(3):352–63. PubMed DOI
Starek Z, Lehar F, Jez J, et al. Efficacy and safety of novel temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation system during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: TRAC-AF study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-00986-0 (Epub ahead of print). PubMed DOI
Mansour M, Calkins H, Osorio J, et al. Persistent atrial fibrillation ablation with contact force-sensing catheter: the prospective multicenter PRECEPT trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(8):958–69. PubMed DOI
Chinitz LA, Melby DP, Marchlinski FE, et al. Safety and efficiency of porous-tip contact-force catheter for drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: results from the SMART SF trial. Europace. 2018;20(FI_3):f392–400. PubMed DOI
Neuzil P, Poty H, de Chillou C, et al. AFS2022–34 - procedural efficiencies using a novel diamond tip radiofrequency ablation catheter when treating atrial fibirllation.Abstracts from the 27th Annual International Atrial Fibrillation Symposium January 13–15, 2022. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03626649