Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
Sanofi
PubMed
35653225
PubMed Central
PMC10084276
DOI
10.1002/hon.3038
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- CD38, elderly, isatuximab, monoclonal antibody, multiple myeloma,
- MeSH
- dexamethason škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- dexamethason MeSH
In this subgroup analysis of the randomized, Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285), we evaluated efficacy and safety of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody isatuximab (Isa) in combination with carfilzomib-dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) versus Kd in older (≥70 years of age, n = 86) and younger (<70 years, n = 216) patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients received Isa 10 mg/kg intravenously weekly for 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks in the Isa-Kd arm, and approved schedule of carfilzomib (twice weekly) and dexamethasone in both study arms. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); key secondary efficacy endpoints included rates of overall response (ORR), very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), minimal residual disease negativity (MRD-), and complete response (CR). Addition of Isa to Kd resulted in improved PFS in elderly patients (hazard ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.18-0.75]) consistent with the significant PFS improvement observed in the overall IKEMA population. Treatment with Isa-Kd improved depth of response versus Kd, with higher rates of ≥VGPR (73.1% vs. 55.9%), MRD- (23.1% vs. 11.8%), and CR (38.5% vs. 23.5%). Although the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was higher in Isa-Kd, the incidence of serious TEAEs was similar between arms. Fewer elderly patients definitively discontinued treatment due to TEAEs in Isa-Kd than Kd: 11.8% versus 23.5%. In conclusion, Isa-Kd provides a consistent benefit versus Kd in elderly patients, with a manageable safety profile, and represents a new treatment option for patients with relapsed MM, independent of age.
Austin and Repatriation Medical Center Heidelberg Victoria Australia
Department of Haematology Lille University Hospital Lille France
Department of Haematology University College Hospital London UK
Hospital Clinic IDIBAPS Barcelona Spain
Hospital das Clínicas de São Paulo São Paolo Brazil
Sanofi R and D Chilly Mazarin France
Sanofi R and D Vitry Sur Seine France
Seoul National University Hospital Seoul South Korea
University of California San Francisco San Francisco California USA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Mina R, Bringhen S, Wildes TM, Zweegman S, Rosko AE. Approach to the older adult with multiple myeloma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019;39:500‐518. 10.1200/edbk_239067 PubMed DOI PMC
SEER Cancer Statistics Review. 2017. Accessed February 4, 2022. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2017/browse_csr.php
Cowan AJ, Allen C, Barac A, et al. Global burden of multiple myeloma: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(9):1221‐1227. 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e20023 PubMed DOI PMC
Bringhen S, Mateos MV, Zweegman S, et al. Age and organ damage correlate with poor survival in myeloma patients: meta‐analysis of 1, 435 individual patient data from 4 randomized trials. Haematologica. 2013;98(6):980‐987. 10.3324/haematol.2012.075051 PubMed DOI PMC
Madan S, Kumar S. Current treatment options for elderly patients with multiple myeloma: clinical impact of novel agents. Therapy. 2011;8(4):415‐429. 10.2217/thy.11.39 DOI
Bonello F, Boccadoro M, Larocca A. Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the management of intermediate and frail elderly multiple myeloma patients. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(11):3106. 10.3390/cancers12113106 PubMed DOI PMC
Deckert J, Wetzel MC, Bartle LM, et al. SAR650984, a novel humanized CD38‐targeting antibody, demonstrates potent antitumor activity in models of multiple myeloma and other CD38+ hematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(17):4574‐4578. 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0695 PubMed DOI
Martin TG, Corzo K, Chiron M, et al. Therapeutic opportunities with pharmacological inhibition of CD38 with isatuximab. Cells. 2019;8(12):1522. 10.3390/cells8121522 PubMed DOI PMC
Attal M, Richardson PG, Rajkumar SV, et al. ICARIA‐MM study group. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low‐dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low‐dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA‐MM): a randomised, multicentre, open‐label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;394(10214):2096‐2107. PubMed
Schjesvold FH, Richardson PG, Facon T, et al. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in elderly patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: ICARIA‐MM subgroup analysis. Haematologica. 2021;106(4):1182‐1187. PubMed PMC
Moreau P, Dimopoulos M‐A, Mikhael J, et al. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma (IKEMA): a multicentre, open‐label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10292):2361‐2371. PubMed
SARCLISA® (Isatuximab‐irfc) Injection, for Intravenous Use. Prescribing Information. 2021. Accessed February 4, 2022. https://products.sanofi.us/Sarclisa/sarclisa.pdf
European Medicines Agency. Sarclisa, INN‐Isatuximab. Summary of Product Characteristics; 2021. Accessed February 4, 2022. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product‐information/sarclisa‐epar‐product‐information_en.pdf
SARCLISA® (isatuximab) . Prescribing Information Nishi Shinjuku, Tokyo; 2021. Accessed February 4, 2022. https://www.pmda.go.jp/PmdaSearch/iyakuDetail/ResultDataSetPDF/780069_4291454A1021_1_02
Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2016;17(8):e328‐e346. 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30206-6 PubMed DOI
Dimopoulos M, Quach H, Mateos MV, et al. Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): results from a randomised, multicentre, open‐label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2020;396(10245):186‐197. 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30734-0 PubMed DOI
Silvennoinen R, Heckman CA. A candid view of CANDOR. Lancet. 2020;396(10245):147‐148. 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30901-6 PubMed DOI
Mateos MV, Spencer A, Nooka AK, et al. Daratumumab‐based regimens are highly effective and well tolerated in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma regardless of patient age: subgroup analysis of the phase 3 CASTOR and POLLUX studies. Haematologica. 2020;105(2):468‐477. 10.3324/haematol.2019.217448 PubMed DOI PMC
Ludwig H, Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, et al. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone vs bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: results of the phase 3 study ENDEAVOR (NCT01568866) according to age subgroup. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017;58(10):2501‐2504. 10.1080/10428194.2017.1298755 PubMed DOI
Bishnoi R, Xie Z, Shah C, et al. Real‐world experience of carfilzomib‐associated cardiovascular adverse events: SEER‐Medicare data set analysis. Cancer Med. 2021;10(1):70‐78. 10.1002/cam4.3568 PubMed DOI PMC
Zhai Y, Ye X, Hu F, et al. Cardiovascular toxicity of carfilzomib: the real‐world evidence based on the adverse event reporting system database of the FDA, the United States. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:735466. 10.3389/fcvm.2021.735466 PubMed DOI PMC