The impact of aerobic and resistance training intensity on markers of neuroplasticity in health and disease
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review, Systematic Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
35853549
DOI
10.1016/j.arr.2022.101698
PII: S1568-1637(22)00140-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Aging, Cognition motor function, Exercise, Intensity Dose-response relationship,
- MeSH
- Biomarkers MeSH
- Exercise physiology MeSH
- Cognition physiology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neuronal Plasticity MeSH
- Resistance Training * MeSH
- Multiple Sclerosis * MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Biomarkers MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of low- vs. high-intensity aerobic and resistance training on motor and cognitive function, brain activation, brain structure, and neurochemical markers of neuroplasticity and the association thereof in healthy young and older adults and in patients with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and stroke. DESIGN: Systematic review and robust variance estimation meta-analysis with meta-regression. DATA SOURCES: Systematic search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases. RESULTS: Fifty studies with 60 intervention arms and 2283 in-analyses participants were included. Due to the low number of studies, the three patient groups were combined and analyzed as a single group. Overall, low- (g=0.19, p = 0.024) and high-intensity exercise (g=0.40, p = 0.001) improved neuroplasticity. Exercise intensity scaled with neuroplasticity only in healthy young adults but not in healthy older adults or patient groups. Exercise-induced improvements in neuroplasticity were associated with changes in motor but not cognitive outcomes. CONCLUSION: Exercise intensity is an important variable to dose and individualize the exercise stimulus for healthy young individuals but not necessarily for healthy older adults and neurological patients. This conclusion warrants caution because studies are needed that directly compare the effects of low- vs. high-intensity exercise on neuroplasticity to determine if such changes are mechanistically and incrementally linked to improved cognition and motor function.
Department of Biomedical Sciences University of Sassari Sassari Italy
Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot Israel
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Research Center of Molecular Exercise Science Hungarian University of Sport Science Budapest Hungary
References provided by Crossref.org
Managing multiple sclerosis in individuals aged 55 and above: a comprehensive review