Etiopathogenetic Factors of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Overall Survival, and Their Evolution over Time-Czech Tertiary Center Overview
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
NV19-08-00525
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
PubMed
36013566
PubMed Central
PMC9414813
DOI
10.3390/medicina58081099
PII: medicina58081099
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- BCLC classification, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cirrhosis, transarterial chemoembolization,
- MeSH
- antivirové látky terapeutické užití MeSH
- chemoembolizace * škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- chronická hepatitida C * komplikace farmakoterapie MeSH
- hepatocelulární karcinom * etiologie terapie MeSH
- jaterní cirhóza komplikace diagnóza MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory jater * etiologie terapie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antivirové látky MeSH
Background and Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer with a highly unfavorable prognosis. Aims: Retrospective statistical analysis of patients with HCC in the field of liver cirrhosis treated at our center from the perspective of demography, and the effects of key changes in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the last 10 years on overall survival (OS) and earlier diagnosis. Materials and Methods: This study included 170 cirrhotic patients with HCC (136 men, 80%). Demographic and etiological factors and OS were analyzed based on distribution into three groups according to the period and key changes in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches (BCLC classification staging; standardization of protocol for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis C (HCV); expansion of systemic oncological therapy). Results: The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 69.3 years (SD = 8.1), and etiology was as follows: non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) 39%, alcoholic liver disease (ALD) 36%, HCV 18%, cryptogenic liver cirrhosis 3%, chronic hepatitis B infection (HBV) 2%, and other etiology 2%. Distribution of stages according to the BCLC: 0 + A 36%, B 31%, C 22%, and D 11%. However, the distribution in the first studied period was as follows: 0 + A 15%, B 34%, C 36%, and D 15%; and in the last period: 0 + A 45%, B 27%, C 17%, and D 11%, and difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The median OS for stages 0 + A, B, C, and D was 58, 19, 6, and 2 months, respectively. During the monitored period, there was a visible increase in the etiology of ALD from 30% to 47% and a decrease in HCV from 22% to 11%. In patients treated with TACE (stage B), the median OS grew from 10 to 24 months (p < 0.0001) between the marginal monitored periods. Conclusions: We described a decreasing number of patients with HCV-related HCC during follow-up possibly linked with the introduction of DAA. In our cohort, an improvement in early-stage diagnosis was found, which we mainly concluded as a result of proper ultrasound surveillance, the institution of a HCV treatment center, and increased experience of our sonographers with an examination of cirrhotic patients. Lastly, we described significantly improved overall survival in patients with intermediate HCC treated by TACE, due to the increased experience of interventional radiologists with the method at our facility and an earlier switch to systemic therapy in case of non-response to TACE.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Khalaf N., Ying J., Mittal S., Temple S., Kanwal F., Davila J., El-Serag H.B. Natural History of Untreated Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a US Cohort and the Role of Cancer Surveillance. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017;15:273–281.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.033. PubMed DOI
Mazzaferro V., Bhoori S., Sposito C., Bongini M., Langer M., Miceli R., Mariani L. Milan criteria in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: An evidence-based analysis of 15 years of experience. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:S44–S57. doi: 10.1002/lt.22365. PubMed DOI
Llovet J.M., Bru C., Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: The BCLC staging classification. Semin. Liver Dis. 1999;19:329–338. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1007122. PubMed DOI
European Association for the Study of The Liver EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2018;69:182–236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019. PubMed DOI
Heimbach J.K., Kulik L.M., Finn R.S., Sirlin C.B., Abecassis M.M., Roberts L.R., Marrero J.A. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67:358–380. doi: 10.1002/hep.29086. PubMed DOI
Marrero J.A., Kulik L.M., Sirlin C.B., Zhu A.X., Finn R.S., Abecassis M.M., Heimbach J.K. Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;68:723–750. doi: 10.1002/hep.29913. PubMed DOI
Bruha R. Doporučený postup pro léčbu a diagnostiku hepatocelulárního karcinomu. Gastroent. Hepatol. 2012;66:83–92.
Dong Y., Wang W.P., Lee W.J., Meloni M.F., Clevert D.A., Chammas M.C., Tannapfel A., Forgione A., Piscaglia F., Dietrich C.F. Hepatocellular carcinoma in the non-cirrhotic liver. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2022;80:423–443. doi: 10.3233/CH-211309. PubMed DOI
Łapiński T., Tarasik A., Januszkiewicz M., Flisiak R. Clinical aspects and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in north- eastern Poland. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2021;7:79–84. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2021.104631. PubMed DOI PMC
White D.L., Thrift A.P., Kanwal F., Davila J., El-Serag H.B. Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in All 50 United States, From 2000 Through 2012. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:812–820.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.020. PubMed DOI PMC
Dušek L. Epidemiologie Zhoubných Nádorů v České Republice. 2018. [(accessed on 2 May 2022)]. Available online: http://www.svod.cz.
Hung A.K., Guy J. Hepatocellular carcinoma in the elderly: Meta-analysis and systematic literature review. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015;21:12197–12210. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12197. PubMed DOI PMC
Ascha M.S., Hanouneh I.A., Lopez R., Tamimi T.A.R., Feldstein A.F., Zein N.N. The incidence and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2010;51:1972–1978. doi: 10.1002/hep.23527. PubMed DOI
Li J., Zou B., Yeo Y.H., Feng Y., Xie X., Lee D.H., Nguyen M.H. Prevalence, incidence, and outcome of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Asia, 1999–2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;4:389–398. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30039-1. PubMed DOI
Kanwal F., Kramer J.R., Mapakshi S., Natarajan Y., Chayanupatkul M., Richardson P.A., El-Serag H.B. Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer in Patients With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:1828–1837.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.024. PubMed DOI PMC
Rabekova Z., Frankova S., Jirsa M., Neroldova M., Lunova M., Fabian O., Sperl J. Alpha-1 Antitrypsin and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Cirrhosis: SERPINA1 MZ or MS Genotype Carriage Decreases the Risk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:10560. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910560. PubMed DOI PMC
Liu Y.L., Patman G.L., Leathart J.B.S., Piguet A.C., Burt A.D., Dufour J.F., Anstee Q.M. Carriage of the PNPLA3 rs738409 C >G polymorphism confers an increased risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease associated hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2014;61:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.02.030. PubMed DOI
Dash S., Aydin Y., Widmer K.E., Nayak L. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Mechanisms Associated with Chronic HCV Infection and the Impact of Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment. J. Hepatocell. Carcinoma. 2020;7:45–76. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S221187. PubMed DOI PMC
Llovet J.M., Di Bisceglie A.M., Bruix J., Kramer B.S., Lencioni R., Zhu A.X., Panel of Experts in HCC-Design Clinical Trials Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2008;100:698–711. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn134. PubMed DOI
Okusaka T., Kasugai H., Shioyama Y., Tanaka K., Kudo M., Saisho H., Sato T. Transarterial chemotherapy alone versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized phase III trial. J. Hepatol. 2009;51:1030–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.09.004. PubMed DOI
Meyer T., Fox R., Ma Y.T., Ross P.J., James M.W., Sturgess R., Palmer D.H. Sorafenib in combination with transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (TACE 2): A randomised placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017;2:565–575. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30156-5. PubMed DOI
Chau I., Park J.O., Ryoo B.Y., Yen C.J., Poon R., Pastorelli D., Zhu A.X. Alpha-fetoprotein kinetics in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving ramucirumab or placebo: An analysis of the phase 3 REACH study. Br. J. Cancer. 2018;119:19–26. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0103-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Llovet J.M., De Baere T., Kulik L., Haber P.K., Greten T.F., Meyer T., Lencioni R. Locoregional therapies in the era of molecular and immune treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021;18:293–313. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-00395-0. PubMed DOI
Lencioni R., de Baere T., Soulen M.C., Rilling W.S., Geschwind J.F.H. Lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review of efficacy and safety data. Hepatology. 2016;64:106–116. doi: 10.1002/hep.28453. PubMed DOI
Lencioni R., Llovet J.M. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin. Liver Dis. 2010;30:52–60. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247132. PubMed DOI