SARS-CoV-2 removal by mix matrix membrane: A novel application of artificial neural network based simulation in MATLAB for evaluating wastewater reuse risks
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36252897
PubMed Central
PMC9560862
DOI
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136837
PII: S0045-6535(22)03330-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Artificial neural network, Mix matrix membrane, SARS-CoV-2, Wastewater treatment,
- MeSH
- COVID-19 * epidemiologie MeSH
- kovové nanočástice * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- neuronové sítě MeSH
- odpadní voda MeSH
- odpadní vody MeSH
- SARS-CoV-2 MeSH
- stříbro MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- odpadní voda MeSH
- odpadní vody MeSH
- stříbro MeSH
The COVID-19 outbreak led to the discovery of SARS-CoV-2 in sewage; thus, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) could have the virus in their effluent. However, whether SARS-CoV-2 is eradicated by sewage treatment is virtually unknown. Specifically, the objectives of this study include (i) determining whether a mixed matrixed membrane (MMM) is able to remove SARS-CoV-2 (polycarbonate (PC)-hydrous manganese oxide (HMO) and PC-silver nanoparticles (Ag-NP)), (ii) comparing filtration performance among different secondary treatment processes, and (iii) evaluating whether artificial neural networks (ANNs) can be employed as performance indicators to reduce SARS-CoV-2 in the treatment of sewage. At Shariati Hospital in Mashhad, Iran, secondary treatment effluent during the outbreak of COVID-19 was collected from a WWTP. There were two PC-Ag-NP and PC-HMO processes at the WWTP targeted. RT-qPCR was employed to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in sewage fractions. For the purposes of determining SARS-CoV-2 prevalence rates in the treated effluent, 10 L of effluent specimens were collected in middle-risk and low-risk treatment MMMs. For PC-HMO, the log reduction value (LRV) for SARS-CoV-2 was 1.3-1 log10 for moderate risk and 0.96-1 log10 for low risk, whereas for PC-Ag-NP, the LRV was 0.99-1.3 log10 for moderate risk and 0.94-0.98 log10 for low risk. MMMs demonstrated the most robust absorption performance during the sampling period, with the least significant LRV recorded in PC-Ag-NP and PC-HMO at 0.94 log10 and 0.96 log10, respectively.
Department of Civil Engineering Pardis Branch Islamic Azad University Pardis Iran
Department of Computer Engineering Bojnourd Branch Islamic Azad University Bojnourd Iran
Faculty of Civil Engineering Architecture and Urban Planning University of Eyvanekey Iran
Mechanical Engineering Department Government Engineering College Patan Gujarat India
School of Chemical Engineering Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou 450001 China
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Alamin M., Tsuji S., Hata A., Hara-Yamamura H., Honda R. Selection of surrogate viruses for process control in detection of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;823 PubMed PMC
Bivins A., Kaya D., Bibby K., Simpson S.L., Bustin S.A., Shanks O.C., Ahmed W. Variability in RT-qPCR assay parameters indicates unreliable SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification for wastewater surveillance. Water Res. 2021;203 PubMed PMC
Blackburn B.G., Craun G.F., Yoder J.S., Hill V., Calderon R.L., Chen N., Lee S.H., Levy D.A., Beach M.J. Surveillance for waterborne-disease outbreaks associated with drinking water--United States, 2001-2002. MMWR surveillance summaries. 2004;53(8):23. PubMed
Blackburne R., Yuan Z., Keller J. Partial nitrification to nitrite using low dissolved oxygen concentration as the main selection factor. Biodegradation. 2008;19(2):303–312. PubMed
Chaudhry R.M., Nelson K.L., Drewes J.r.E. Mechanisms of pathogenic virus removal in a full-scale membrane bioreactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;49(5):2815–2822. PubMed
Chuah L.F., Chew K.W., Bokhari A., Mubashir M., Show P.L. Biodegradation of crude oil in seawater by using a consortium of symbiotic bacteria. Environ. Res. 2022;213 PubMed
Chuah L.F., Mokhtar K., Bakar A.A., Othman M.R., Osman N.H., Bokhari A., Mubashir M., Abdullah M.A., Hasan M. Marine environment and maritime safety assessment using Port State Control database. Chemosphere. 2022;304 PubMed
Dai F., Lee C.F., Ngai Y.Y. Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng. Geol. 2002;64(1):65–87.
Haramoto E., Malla B., Thakali O., Kitajima M. First environmental surveillance for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater and river water in Japan. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;737 PubMed PMC
Jones D.L., Baluja M.Q., Graham D.W., Corbishley A., McDonald J.E., Malham S.K., Hillary L.S., Connor T.R., Gaze W.H., Moura I.B. Shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in feces and urine and its potential role in person-to-person transmission and the environment-based spread of COVID-19. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;749 PubMed PMC
Kim J., Kim J., Wang Y. Uncertainty risks and strategic reaction of restaurant firms amid COVID-19: evidence from China. Int. J. Hospit. Manag. 2021;92 PubMed PMC
Kitamura K., Sadamasu K., Muramatsu M., Yoshida H. Efficient detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the solid fraction of wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;763 PubMed PMC
Kumar M., Joshi M., Shah A.V., Srivastava V., Dave S. Wastewater surveillance-based city zonation for effective COVID-19 pandemic preparedness powered by early warning: a perspectives of temporal variations in SARS-CoV-2-RNA in Ahmedabad, India. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;792 PubMed PMC
Kumar M., Kuroda K., Patel A.K., Patel N., Bhattacharya P., Joshi M., Joshi C.G. Decay of SARS-CoV-2 RNA along the wastewater treatment outfitted with Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) system evaluated through two sample concentration techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;754 PubMed PMC
Li L., Mazurowski L., Dewan A., Carine M., Haak L., Guarin T.C., Dastjerdi N.G., Gerrity D., Mentzer C., Pagilla K.R. Longitudinal monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater using viral genetic markers and the estimation of unconfirmed COVID-19 cases. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;817 PubMed PMC
Lim Y.J., Lee S.M., Wang R., Lee J. Emerging materials to prepare mixed matrix membranes for pollutant removal in water. Membranes. 2021;11(7):508. PubMed PMC
Mohapatra S., Menon N.G., Mohapatra G., Pisharody L., Pattnaik A., Menon N.G., Bhukya P.L., Srivastava M., Singh M., Barman M.K. The novel SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: possible environmental transmission, detection, persistence and fate during wastewater and water treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;765 PubMed PMC
Naidoo S., Olaniran A.O. Treated wastewater effluent as a source of microbial pollution of surface water resources. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. 2014;11(1):249–270. PubMed PMC
Patriarca R., Di Gravio G., Costantino F., Tronci M. The Functional Resonance Analysis Method for a systemic risk based environmental auditing in a sinter plant: a semi-quantitative approach. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2017;63:72–86.
Serra-Compte A., González S., Arnaldos M., Berlendis S., Courtois S., Loret J.F., Schlosser O., Yanez A.M., Soria-Soria E., Fittipaldi M. Elimination of SARS-CoV-2 along wastewater and sludge treatment processes. Water Res. 2021;202 PubMed PMC
Shinta F.R., Karnaningroem N., Mardyanto M.A. Risk management of wastewater treatment in the wastewater treatment plant of PT. X. IPTEK J. Proc. Ser. 2019;(5):140–149.
Sun Y., Wang D., Tsang D.C., Wang L., Ok Y.S., Feng Y. A critical review of risks, characteristics, and treatment strategies for potentially toxic elements in wastewater from shale gas extraction. Environ. Int. 2019;125:452–469. PubMed
Sonawane C., Alrubaie A.J., Panchal H., Chamkha A.J., Jaber M.M., Oza A.D., Zahmatkesh S., Burduhos-Nergis D.D., Burduhos-Nergis D.P. Investigation on the Impact of Different Absorber Materials in Solar Still Using CFD Simulation—Economic and Environmental Analysis. Water. 2022;14(19):3031.
Tietenberg T., Lewis L. Routledge; 2018. Environmental and Natural Resource Economics.
Wang R., Matsuura N., Hara-Yamamura H., Watanabe T., Honda R. Initial behaviors and removal of extracellular plasmid gene in membrane bioreactor. J. Environ. Manag. 2021;298 PubMed
Ye Y., Ellenberg R.M., Graham K.E., Wigginton K.R. Survivability, partitioning, and recovery of enveloped viruses in untreated municipal wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016;50(10):5077–5085. PubMed
Zahmatkesh S., Amesho K.T., Sillanpää M. A critical review on diverse technologies for Advanced wastewater treatment during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: what Do we know? J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022 PubMed PMC
Zahmatkesh S., Far S.S., Sillanpää M. RSM-D-optimal modeling approach for COD removal from low strength wastewater by microalgae, sludge, and activated carbon-case study mashhad. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022;7
Zahmatkesh S., Klemeš J.J., Bokhari A., Wang C., Sillanpaa M., Hasan M., Amesho K.T. Critical role of Hyssop plant in the possible transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in contaminated human Feces and its implications for the prevention of the virus spread in sewage. Chemosphere. 2022 PubMed PMC
Zahmatkesh S., Rezakhani Y., Arabi A., Hasan M., Ahmad Z., Wang C., Sillanpää M., Al-Bahrani M., Ghodrati I. An approach to removing COD and BOD based on polycarbonate mixed matrix membranes that contain hydrous manganese oxide and silver nanoparticles: a novel application of artificial neural network based simulation in MATLAB. Chemosphere. 2022;308(2) PubMed
Zahmatkesh S., Klemeš J.J., Bokhari A., Wang C., Sillanpaa M., Amesho K. Reducing chemical oxygen Demand from low strength wastewater: a novel application of fuzzy logic based simulation in MATLAB. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2022;166
Zahmatkesh S., Sillanpaa M., Rezakhani Y., Wang C. Review of concerned SARS-CoV-2 variants like Alpha (B. 1.1. 7), Beta (B. 1.351), Gamma (P. 1), Delta (B. 1.617. 2), and Omicron (B. 1.1. 529), as well as novel methods for reducing and inactivating SARS-CoV-2 mutants in wastewater treatment facilities. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022;7 PubMed PMC
Zahmatkesh S., Amesho K.T., Sillanpaa M., Wang C. Integration of renewable energy in wastewater treatment during COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges, opportunities, and progressive research trends. Clean. Chem. Eng. 2022;3:100036.
Zahmatkesh S., Pirouzi A. Effects of the microalgae, sludge and activated carbon on the wastewater treatment with low organics (weak wastewater) Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;17(5):2681–2688.
Zahmatkesh S., Sillanpää M. Review of method and a new tool for decline and inactive SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater treatment. Clean. Chem. Eng. 2022;3
Zheng Z., Huang S., Bian W., Liang D., Wang X., Zhang K., Ma X., Li J. Enhanced nitrogen removal of the simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox and denitrification (SNAD) biofilm reactor for treating mainstream wastewater under low dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration. Bioresour. Technol. 2019;283:213–220. PubMed