Comparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbers

. 2023 Feb 25 ; 13 (1) : 3287. [epub] 20230225

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid36841900
Odkazy

PubMed 36841900
PubMed Central PMC9968301
DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-30499-x
PII: 10.1038/s41598-023-30499-x
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

This study compared perceptional and physiological responses of finger flexor exercise performed with free flow and blood flow restriction (BFR). Thirteen male advanced climbers completed three sessions of finger flexor resistance exercise at (1) 40% of MVC (Low) and (2) 75% of MVC (High) and (3) BFR at 40% of MVC (Low + BFR) in a randomized and counterbalanced order. Rate of perceived exertion for effort (RPE) and discomfort (RPD), session pleasure/displeasure (sPDF), exercise enjoyment (EES), lactate concentration and oxygen saturation were recorded after the last set. Both low-intensity sessions induced higher RPD than High (p = 0.018-0.022, ES = 1.01-1.09) and High was perceived as more enjoyable than Low-BFR (p = 0.031, ES = 1.08). No differences were found for RPE or sPDF (p = 0.132-0.804). Lactate was elevated more after High than the Low-sessions (p < 0.001, ES = 1.88-2.08). Capillary oxygen saturation was lower after Low + BFR compared to the other sessions (p = 0.031, ES = 1.04-1.27). Finally, the exercise volume was greater in Low compared to High (p = 0.022, ES = 1.14) and Low + BFR (p = 0.020, ES = 0.77). In conclusion, among advanced male climbers, performing Low + BFR led to a similar exercise volume but was perceived as more discomforting and less enjoyable compared to High. The Low session yielded similar responses as the Low + BFR but required a much greater exercise volume.

Erratum v

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Saul D, Steinmetz G, Lehmann W, Schilling AF. Determinants for success in climbing: A systematic review. J. Exerc. Sci. Fit. 2019;17:91–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2019.04.002. PubMed DOI PMC

Watts PB, Martin DT, Durtschi S. Anthropometric profiles of elite male and female competitive sport rock climbers. J. Sports Sci. 1993;11:113–117. doi: 10.1080/02640419308729974. PubMed DOI

Baláš J, Pecha O, Martin AJ, Cochrane D. Hand–arm strength and endurance as predictors of climbing performance. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2012;12:16–25. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2010.546431. DOI

Stien N, Riiser A, Shaw MP, Saeterbakken AH, Andersen V. Effects of climbing-and resistance-training on climbing-specific performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol. Sport. 2023;40:179–191. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.113295. PubMed DOI PMC

Barrile AM, Feng SY, Nesiama JA, Huang C. Injury rates, patterns, mechanisms, and risk factors among competitive youth climbers in the United States. Wilderness Environ. Med. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2021.09.005. PubMed DOI

Grønhaug G. Self-reported chronic injuries in climbing: Who gets injured when? BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2018;4:e000406. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000406. PubMed DOI PMC

Ellefsen S, et al. Blood flow-restricted strength training displays high functional and biological efficacy in women: A within-subject comparison with high-load strength training. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2015;309:R767–779. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00497.2014. PubMed DOI PMC

Laurentino GC, et al. Strength training with blood flow restriction diminishes myostatin gene expression. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2012;44:406–412. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318233b4bc. PubMed DOI

Ganesan G, et al. Effect of blood flow restriction on tissue oxygenation during knee extension. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2015;47:185–193. doi: 10.1249/mss.0000000000000393. PubMed DOI PMC

Kent-Braun JA, Fitts RH, Christie A. Skeletal muscle fatigue. Compr. Physiol. 2012;2:997–1044. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c110029. PubMed DOI

Wernbom M, Aagaard P. Muscle fibre activation and fatigue with low-load blood flow restricted resistance exercise-An integrative physiology review. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 2020;228:e13302. doi: 10.1111/apha.13302. PubMed DOI

Fisher JP, Stuart C, Steele J, Gentil P, Giessing J. Heavier- and lighter-load isolated lumbar extension resistance training produce similar strength increases, but different perceptual responses, in healthy males and females. PeerJ. 2018;6:e6001. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6001. PubMed DOI PMC

Yasuda T, et al. Combined effects of low-intensity blood flow restriction training and high-intensity resistance training on muscle strength and size. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011;111:2525–2533. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-1873-8. PubMed DOI

Schoenfeld BJ, Grgic J, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Strength and hypertrophy adaptations between low- vs. high-load resistance training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2017;31:3508–3523. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002200. PubMed DOI

Campos GE, et al. Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: Specificity of repetition maximum training zones. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002;88:50–60. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0681-6. PubMed DOI

Lorenz DS, et al. Blood flow restriction training. J. Athl. Train. 2021;56:937–944. doi: 10.4085/418-20. PubMed DOI PMC

Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ. Variation and homogeneity in affective responses to physical activity of varying intensities: An alternative perspective on dose-response based on evolutionary considerations. J. Sports Sci. 2005;23:477–500. doi: 10.1080/02640410400021492. PubMed DOI

Williams DM, et al. Acute affective response to a moderate-intensity exercise stimulus predicts physical activity participation 6 and 12 months later. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2008;9:231–245. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.04.002. PubMed DOI PMC

Patterson SD, et al. Blood flow restriction exercise: Considerations of methodology, application, and safety. Front. Physiol. 2019;10:533. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00533. PubMed DOI PMC

Halperin I, Emanuel A. Rating of perceived effort: Methodological concerns and future directions. Sports Med. 2020;50:679–687. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01229-z. PubMed DOI

de Queiros VS, et al. Acute effect of resistance training with blood flow restriction on perceptual responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Health. 2022 doi: 10.1177/19417381221131533. PubMed DOI PMC

Bell ZW, et al. Moderately heavy exercise produces lower cardiovascular, RPE, and discomfort compared to lower load exercise with and without blood flow restriction. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018;118:1473–1480. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3877-0. PubMed DOI

Miller RM, et al. Perceptual responses: Clinical versus practical blood flow restriction resistance exercise. Physiol. Behav. 2020;227:113137. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113137. PubMed DOI

Rogatzki MJ, Ferguson BS, Goodwin ML, Gladden LB. Lactate is always the end product of glycolysis. Front. Neurosci. 2015;9:22. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00022. PubMed DOI PMC

Loenneke JP, et al. The influence of exercise load with and without different levels of blood flow restriction on acute changes in muscle thickness and lactate. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging. 2017;37:734–740. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12367. PubMed DOI

Freitas EDS, et al. The acute physiological responses to traditional vs. practical blood flow restriction resistance exercise in untrained men and women. Front Physiol. 2020;11:577224. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.577224. PubMed DOI PMC

Wernbom M, Augustsson J, Thomeé R. Effects of vascular occlusion on muscular endurance in dynamic knee extension exercise at different submaximal loads. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2006;20:372–377. doi: 10.1519/r-16884.1. PubMed DOI

Dankel SJ, et al. Perceptual and arterial occlusion responses to very low load blood flow restricted exercise performed to volitional failure. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging. 2019;39:29–34. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12535. PubMed DOI

Spitz RW, et al. Blood flow restricted exercise and discomfort: A review. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2022;36:871–879. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000003525. PubMed DOI

Smirmaul Bde P. Sense of effort and other unpleasant sensations during exercise: Clarifying concepts and mechanisms. Br. J. Sports Med. 2012;46:308–311. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.071407. PubMed DOI

MacLeod D, et al. Physiological determinants of climbing-specific finger endurance and sport rock climbing performance. J. Sports Sci. 2007;25:1433–1443. doi: 10.1080/02640410600944550. PubMed DOI

Suga T, et al. Exercise adherence-related perceptual responses to low-load blood flow restriction resistance exercise in young adults: A pilot study. Physiol. Rep. 2021;9:e15122. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15122. PubMed DOI PMC

Fisher JP, Steele J. Heavier and lighter load resistance training to momentary failure produce similar increases in strength with differing degrees of discomfort. Muscle Nerve. 2017;56:797–803. doi: 10.1002/mus.25537. PubMed DOI

Andersen V, et al. A comparison of affective responses between time efficient and traditional resistance training. Front. Psychol. 2022 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912368. PubMed DOI PMC

Lixandrão ME, et al. Magnitude of muscle strength and mass adaptations between high-load resistance training versus low-load resistance training associated with blood-flow restriction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2018;48:361–378. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0795-y. PubMed DOI

Stien N, et al. Upper body rate of force development and maximal strength discriminates performance levels in sport climbing. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0249353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249353. PubMed DOI PMC

Saeterbakken AH, et al. The effects of acute blood flow restriction on climbing-specific tests. Mov. Sport Sci. 2020;109:7–14. doi: 10.1051/sm/2020004. DOI

Karanasios S, et al. The effect of body position and the reliability of upper limb arterial occlusion pressure using a handheld doppler ultrasound for blood flow restriction training. Sports Health. 2022;14:717–724. doi: 10.1177/19417381211043877. PubMed DOI PMC

Loenneke JP, Thiebaud RS, Abe T, Bemben MG. Blood flow restriction pressure recommendations: the hormesis hypothesis. Med. Hypotheses. 2014;82:623–626. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.02.023. PubMed DOI

Steele J, Fisher J, McKinnon S, McKinnon P. Differentiation between perceived effort and discomfort during resistance training in older adults: Reliability of trainee ratings of effort and discomfort, and reliability and validity of trainer ratings of trainee effort. J. Trainol. 2016;6:1–8. doi: 10.17338/trainology.6.1_1. DOI

Ribeiro AS, Dos Santos ED, Nunes JP, Schoenfeld BJ. Acute effects of different training loads on affective responses in resistance-trained men. Int. J. Sports Med. 2019;40:850–855. doi: 10.1055/a-0997-6680. PubMed DOI

Schwartz H, Emanuel A, Rozen S, II, Halperin I. Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0256231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256231. PubMed DOI PMC

Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2. L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...