Anatomical variants complicating the posterior approaches towards the elbow joint
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Review, Journal Article
Grant support
IGA-KZ-2022-1-6
Masaryk Hospital (Ústí nad Labem) grant agency
PubMed
36920516
PubMed Central
PMC10130116
DOI
10.1007/s00276-023-03124-9
PII: 10.1007/s00276-023-03124-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Accessory bones, Chondroepitrochlearis, Dorsoepitrochlearis, Epitrochleoanconeus, Posterior approach, Subanconeus, Ulnar nerve, Variability around elbow joint,
- MeSH
- Muscle, Skeletal surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Elbow innervation MeSH
- Elbow Joint * anatomy & histology MeSH
- Elbow Injuries * MeSH
- Forearm surgery MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Anatomical variants observed during the posterior approach to the elbow joint require special attention due to their clinical relevance. We aim to present a compendious review of described variants potentially encountered during the posterior approach towards the elbow joint to the experts in the elbow surgery. METHODS: A narrative review of surgical and anatomical textbooks, as well as search of scientific databases was carried out. RESULTS: Variability of the subcutaneous nerves is important during incision planning. Accessory muscles such as dorsoepitrochlearis, chondroepitrochlearis, epitrochleoanconeus, subanconeus or supernumerary flexor carpi ulnaris may confuse even the senior surgeon during the dissection and possibly complicate the fracture reduction. Some bony variants such as supratrochlear foramen may lead to fracture or possibly interfere with the osteosynthesis placement. Accessory bones are also present in the region of the elbow joint. Those situated intra-articular may present with symptoms. CONCLUSION: Many variants can be encountered in the area of the elbow joint and their knowledge is essential to truly understand its anatomy. The presented review enables easier orientation in the current literature with the aim on the posterior approach towards the elbow joint.
Clinic of Trauma Surgery Masaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem Czech Republic
Department of Health Care Studies College of Polytechnics Jihlava Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Afshar A. Os supratrochleare dorsale. J Hand Surg Eur. 2011;36(9):821–822. doi: 10.1177/1753193411419948. PubMed DOI
Bando K. Musculus epitrochleo-anconeus. Hirosaki-Igaku. 1956;7:192.
Bhardwaj P, Bhandari L, Sabapathy SR. Supernumerary flexor carpi ulnaris—case report and review. Hand Surg. 2013;18(3):393–397. doi: 10.1142/S0218810413720222. PubMed DOI
Caetano EB, Neto JJS, Vieira LA, Caetano MF. The arcade of Struthers: an anatomical study and clinical implication. Rev Bras Ortop. 2017;52(3):331–336. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.07.006. PubMed DOI PMC
Cassebaum WH. Operative treatment of T and Y fractures of the lower end of the humerus. Am J Surg. 1952;83(3):265–270. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(52)90254-7. PubMed DOI
Cheema P, Singla R. Four headed triceps brachii muscle. Int J Anat Var. 2011;4:43–44.
Cheung EV, Sarkissian EJ (2017) Surgical approaches to the elbow. In: Tashjina RZ (ed) The unstable elbow. Springer Cham, Switzerland, pp 27–38
Chow JCY, Papachristos AA, Ojeda A. An aberrant anatomic variation along the course of the ulnar nerve above the elbow with coexistent cubital tunnel syndrome. Clin Anat. 2006;19(7):661–664. doi: 10.1002/ca.20351. PubMed DOI
Clemens HJ. Zur Morphologie des Ligamentum epitrochle-anconeum. Anat Anz. 1957;104:343. PubMed
Dellon AL. Musculotendinous variations about the medial humeral epicondyle. J Hand Surg Br. 1986;11(2):175–181. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681_86_90254-8. PubMed DOI
Dowdy PA, Bain GI, King GJ, Patterson SD. The midline posterior elbow incision: an anatomical appraisal. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77(5):696–699. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.77B5.7559692. PubMed DOI
Eisler P (1912) Die Muskeln des Stammes. Fischer, Jena
Erdogmus S, Guler M, Erogli S, Duran N. The importance of the supratrochlear foramen of the humerus in humans: an anatomical study. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:2643–2650. doi: 10.12659/MSM.892074. PubMed DOI PMC
Fabrizio PA, Clemente FR. Variation in the triceps brachii muscle: a fourth muscular head. Clin Anat. 1997;10(4):259–263. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:4<259::AID-CA8>3.0.CO;2-N. PubMed DOI
Gonzalez MH, Lofti P, Bendre A, Mandelbroyt Y, Lieska N. The ulnar nerve at the elbow and its local branching: an anatomic study. J Hand Surg Br. 2001;26(2):142–144. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0532. PubMed DOI
Haninec P, Tomas R, Kaiser R, Cihak R. Development and clinical significance of the musculus dorsoepitrochlearis in men. Clin Anat. 2009;22(4):481–488. doi: 10.1002/ca.20799. PubMed DOI
Hirasawa Y, Sawamura H, Sakakida K. Entrapment neuropathy due to bilateral epitrochleoanconeus muscles: A case report. J Hand Surg. 1979;4(2):181–184. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(79)80139-2. PubMed DOI
Iliev AL, Dandov A, Jelev L, Hinova-Palova D. An abberant fourth head of the triceps brachii muscle. Praem. 2015;30(1):9–12.
Kalaci A, Dogramaci Y, Sevinc TT, Yanat AN. Unusual origin of the motor branch of the ulnar nerve to the flexor carpi ulnaris. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(3):e38–e39. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.07.015. PubMed DOI
Kunc V, Kunc V, Cerny V, Polovincak M, Kachlik D. Accessory bones of the elbow: prevalence, localization and modified classification. J Anat. 2020;237(4):618–622. doi: 10.1111/joa13233. PubMed DOI PMC
Kunc V, Stulpa M, Feigl G, Kachlík D. Accessory flexor carpi ulnaris muscle with associated anterior interosseous artery variation: case report with the definition of a new type and review of concomitant variants. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019;41(11):1315–1318. doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02261-4. PubMed DOI
Linnel EA. The distribution of nerves in the upper limb with reference to variabilities and their clinical significance. J Anat. 1921;55:79–112. PubMed PMC
Lowe JB, Maggi SP, Mackinnon SE. The position of crossing branches of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve during cubital tunnel surgery in humans. Plas Reconst Surg. 2004;114(3):692–696. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000130966.16460.3c. PubMed DOI
Marur T, Akkin SM, Alp M, Demirci S, Yalcin L, Ogüt T, Akgün I. The muscular branching patterns of the ulnar nerve to the flexor carpi ulnaris and flexor digitorum profundus muscles. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005;27(4):322–326. doi: 10.1007/S00276-005-0325-8. PubMed DOI
Mermenthaler M. Die luxation des Nervus ulnaris am Ellenbogen. Dtsch Z Nervenheilkunde. 1958;178:163–198. PubMed
Mittal R, Kumar VS, Gupta T. Patella cubiti: a case report and literature review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134:467–471. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-1926-7. PubMed DOI
Mori M. Statistics on the musculature of the Japanese. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1964;40:195–300. doi: 10.2535/ofaj1936.40.3_195. PubMed DOI
Natsis K, Totlis T, Vlasis K, Sofidis G, Lazaridis N, Tsitouridis I. Dorsoepitrochlearis muscle: an uknown cause of shoulder motion limitation and axilla deformity. J Orthop Sci. 2011;17(2):186–188. doi: 10.1007/s00776-011-0079-6. PubMed DOI
Ng ZY, Mitchell JH, Fogg QA, Hart AM. The anatomy of ulnar nerve branches in anterior transposition. Hand Surg. 2013;18(3):301–306. doi: 10.1142/S0218810413500305. PubMed DOI
Obermann WR, Loose HW. The os supratrochleare dorsale: a normal variant that may cause symptoms. Am J Roentegenol. 1983;141(1):123–127. doi: 10.2214/ajr.141.1.123. PubMed DOI
Paulos R, Leclercq C. Motor branches of the ulnar nerve to the forearm: an anatomical study and guidelines for selective neurectomy. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:1043–1048. doi: 10.1007/s00276-015-1448-1. PubMed DOI
Sahajpal DT, Pichora D. Septal aperture: an anatomic variant predisposing to bilateral low-energy fractures of the distal humerus. Can J Surg. 2006;49(5):363–364. PubMed PMC
Singhal S, Rao V. Supratrochlear foramen of the humerus. Anat Sci Int. 2007;82(2):105–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-073x.2007.00172.x. PubMed DOI
Siqueira MG, Martins RS. The controversial arcade of Struthers. Surg Neurol. 2005;64(1):S17–20. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2005.04.017. PubMed DOI
Soubhagya RN, Aswin K, Madhan SJK, Latha VP, Vasudha S, Merin MT. Four-headed biceps and triceps brachii muscles, with neurovascular variation. Anat Sci Int. 2008;83:107–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-073x.2007.00171.x. PubMed DOI
Spinner RJ, Carmichael SW, Spinner M. Infraclavicular ulnar nerve entrapment due to a chondroepitrochlearis muscle. J Hand Surg. 1991;16(3):315–317. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(91)90060-2. PubMed DOI
Sunderland S, Hughes ESR. Metrical and non-metrical features of the muscular branches of the ulnar nerve. J Comp Neurol. 1946;85:113–125. doi: 10.1002/cne.900850109. PubMed DOI
Sunderland S. Nerves and nerve injuries. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1968.
Suwannakhan A, Chaiyamoon A, Yammine K, Yurasakpong L, Janta S, Limpanuparb T, Meemon K. The prevalence of anconeus epitrochlearis muscle and Osborne’s ligament in cubital tunnel syndrome patients and healthy individuals: an anatomical study with meta-analysis. Surgeon. 2021;19(6):e402–e411. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.12.006. PubMed DOI
Tountas CP, Bergman RA. Anatomic variations of the upper extremity. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1993.
Tubbs RS, Oakes WJ, Salter EG. The subanconeus muscle. Folia Morphol. 2006;65(1):22–25. PubMed
Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Oakes WJ. Triceps brachii muscle demonstrating a fourth head. Clin Anat. 2006;19(7):657–660. doi: 10.1002/ca.20326. PubMed DOI
Wachsmuth W, Wilhelm A. Der Musculus epitrochleo-anconaeus und seine klinische Bedeutung. Monatsschr Unfallheilkd. 1968;71:1–22. PubMed
Wilkinson JM, Stanley D. Posterior surgical approaches to the elbow: A comparative anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10(4):380–382. doi: 10.1067/mse.2001.1165517. PubMed DOI
Wood VE, Campbell GS. The supratrochleare dorsale accessory ossicle in the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3(6):395–398. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(09)80026-8. PubMed DOI