Statement of the AGO Kommission Ovar, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO Austria, Swiss AGO, BGOG, CEEGOG, GEICO, and SFOG regarding the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in epithelial ovarian cancer
Jazyk angličtina Země Francie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
PubMed
36967330
DOI
10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.02.011
PII: S0007-4551(23)00098-X
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Chemotherapy, HIPEC, Hyperthermia, Intraperitoneal, Ovarian cancer,
- MeSH
- epiteliální ovariální karcinom patologie MeSH
- hypertermická intraperitoneální peroperační chemoterapie MeSH
- indukovaná hypertermie * metody MeSH
- kombinovaná terapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory vaječníků * farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Rakousko MeSH
- Švýcarsko MeSH
An international joint statement about the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in ovarian cancer was published in 2016, warning about the uncritical use of HIPEC outside controlled studies. This statement has now been updated after the most recent literature was reviewed by the participating study groups and societies. HIPEC became a treatment option in patients with advanced colon cancer after positive results of a randomized trial comparing surgery and HIPEC versus palliative treatment alone. Although this trial did not compare the added value of HIPEC to surgery alone, HIPEC for the treatment of peritoneal metastases was in the subsequent years generalized to many other cancer types associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis including epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In the meantime, new evidence from prospective randomized trials specifically for EOC-patients emerged, with however contradicting results and several quality aspects that made the interpretation of their findings critical. Moreover, three additional trials in colorectal cancer failed to confirm the previously presumed survival benefit through the implementation of HIPEC in peritoneally disseminated colorectal cancers. Based on a still unclear and inconsistent landscape, the authors conclude that HIPEC should remain within the remit of clinical trials for EOC-patients. Available evidence is not yet sufficient to justify its broad endorsement into the routine clinical practice.
Centre Léon Bérard Lyon France
Department of Gynaecology National Insitute of Oncology Budapest Hungary
Department of Gynecologic Oncology Medical Faculty Mannheim Heidelberg University Mannheim Germany
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CHU de Liège Liège Belgium
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinica Universidad de Navarra Madrid Spain
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg Salzburg Austria
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany
Departments of Surgery and Cancer Faculty of Medicine Imperial College London London UK
Division of Gynaecological Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
Institut Bergonié Bordeaux France
Institut Gustave Roussy Villejuif France
Medical Oncology Department Hospital Universitario La Paz IdiPAZ Madrid Spain
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org