Isolation and characterization of vB_SenS_Ib_psk2 bacteriophage against drug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
37074624
DOI
10.1007/s12223-023-01052-0
PII: 10.1007/s12223-023-01052-0
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Antimicrobial, Bacteriophage, Biocontrol, Chicken, Resistance, Salmonella,
- MeSH
- Anti-Bacterial Agents MeSH
- Bacteriophages * genetics MeSH
- Salmonella enterica * MeSH
- Serogroup MeSH
- Siphoviridae * genetics MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Kentucky MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Anti-Bacterial Agents MeSH
Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky is one of the food-borne zoonotic pathogens which is isolated in high frequency from poultry meat in the recent decades and is known for its multidrug resistance. The current study was aimed to isolate and characterize a bacteriophage against S. enterica serovar Kentucky isolate, 5925, which showed resistance to at least seven antibiotics and to study its efficiency to decontaminate S. Kentucky from chicken skin. The bacteriophage against S. enterica serovar Kentucky was isolated and was named vB_SenS_Ib_psk2 representing the place, source, and host. Electron microscopy revealed that the phage possesses isometric head and contractile tail, indicative of Siphoviridae family. Molecular detection of major capsid protein E gene yielded 511 bp, and NCBI blast analysis revealed that the phage belonged to the genus chivirus. The optimum temperature and pH for phage survival and multiplication were found to be - 20 to 42 °C and 6-10, respectively. One-step growth curve experiment of vB_SenS_Ib_psk2 revealed a latent period of 20 min and burst size of 253 phages/bacterial cell. The host susceptibility studies revealed that 83% of MDR isolates of S. enterica were susceptible to vB_SenS_Ib_psk2. Artificial spiking studies on chicken skin revealed that high multiplicity of infection (MOI) of phages of 106 pfu/mL is required for significant reduction (p ≤ 0.01) of bacterial concentration (0.14 ± 0.04) after 24-h incubation at 8 °C compared to group 1 (2.55 ± 0.89 cfu/mL).
See more in PubMed
Adams MH (1959) Bacteriophages. Interscience Publishers Inc, New York DOI
Antunes P, Mourão J, Campos J, Peixe L (2016) Salmonellosis: the role of poultry meat. ClinMicrobiol Infect 22(2):110–121 DOI
Augustine J, Bhat SG (2015) Biocontrol of Salmonella enteritidis in spiked chicken cuts by lytic bacteriophages ΦSP-1 and ΦSP-3. J Basic Microbiol 55(4):500–503 PubMed DOI
Bao H, Zhang H, Wang R (2011) Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages of Salmonella enterica serovar Pullorum. Poult Sci 90(10):2370–2377
Barua H, Biswas PK, Olsen KE, Christensen JP (2012) Prevalence and characterization of motile Salmonella in commercial layer poultry farms in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 7:e35914 PubMed DOI PMC
Endersen L, Coffey A (2020) The use of bacteriophages for food safety. Curr Opin FoodSci 36:1–8
Fagbamila IO, Barco L, Mancin M, Kwaga J, Ngulukun SS, Zavagnin P et al (2017) Salmonella serovars and their distribution in Nigerian commercial chicken layer farms. PLoS ONE 12:e0173097 PubMed DOI PMC
Fernández J, Guerra B, Rodicio MR (2018) Resistance to carbapenems in non typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars from humans, animals and food. Vet Sci 5(2):40 PubMed PMC
Foley SL, Nayak R, Hanning IB, Johnson TJ, Han J, Ricke SC (2011) Population dynamics of Salmonella enterica serotypes in commercial egg and poultry production. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(13):4273–4279
Haselbeck AH, Panzner U, Im J, Baker S, Meyer CG, Marks F (2017) Current perspectives on invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella disease. Curr Opin Infect Dis 30(5):498–503 DOI
Hawkey J, Le Hello S, Doublet B, Granier SA, Hendriksen RS, Fricke WF, Ceyssens PJ, Gomart, C, Billman-Jacobe H, Holt KE, Weill FX (2019) Global phylogenomics of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky ST198. Microb Genom 5(7):e000269
Hong SS, Jeong J, Lee J, Kim S, Min W, Myung H (2013) Therapeutic effects of bacteriophages against Salmonella gallinarum infection in chickens. J MicrobiolBiotechnol 23:1478–1483
Inbaraj S, Agrawal RK, Thomas P, Mohan C, Agarwal RK, Verma MR, Chaudhuri P (2022) Antimicrobial resistance in Indian isolates of non typhoidal Salmonella of livestock, poultry and environmental origin from 1990 to 2017. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 80:101719 PubMed DOI
Jakočiūnė D, Moodley A (2018) A rapid bacteriophage DNA extraction method. Methods Protoc 1(3):27 PubMed DOI PMC
Jurczak-Kurek A, Gąsior T, Nejman-Faleńczyk B, Bloch S, Dydecka A, Topka G, Necel A, Jakubowska-Deredas M, Narajczyk M, Richert M, Mieszkowska A (2016) Biodiversity of bacteriophages: morphological and biological properties of a large group of phages isolated from urban sewage. Sci Rep 6(1):1–17 DOI
Kang HW, Kim JW, JungTS, Woo GJ (2013) wksl3, a new biocontrol agent for Salmonella enterica serovars enteritidis and typhimurium in foods: characterization, application, sequence analysis, and oral acute toxicity study. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(6):1956–1968
Kim JH, Kim HJ, Jung SJ, Mizan MFR, Park SH, Ha SD (2020) Characterization of Salmonella spp.-specific bacteriophages and their biocontrol application in chicken breast meat. J Food Sci 85:526–534 PubMed DOI
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549 PubMed DOI PMC
Le Hello S, Bekhit A, Granier SA, Barua H, Beutlich J, Zając M, Münch S, Sintchenko V, Bouchrif B et al (2013) The global establishment of a highly-fluoroquinolone resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky ST198 strain. Front Microbiol 4:395 PubMed DOI PMC
Litt PK, Saha J, Jaroni D (2018) Characterization of bacteriophages targeting non-O157 Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli. J Food Prot 81(5):785–794 PubMed DOI
Manyi-Loh C, Mamphweli S, Meyer E, Okoh A (2018) Antibiotic use in agriculture and its consequential resistance in environmental sources: potential public health implications. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 23(4):795
Moye ZD, WoolstonJ SA (2018) Bacteriophage applications for food production and processing. Viruses 10(4):205 PubMed DOI PMC
Nilsson AS (2014) Phage therapy—constraints and possibilities. Ups J Med Sci 119(2):192–198 PubMed DOI PMC
Phothaworn P, Dunne M, Supokaivanich R, Ong C, Lim J, Taharnklaew R, Vesaratchavest M, Khumthong R, Pringsulaka O, Ajawatanawong P, Klumpp J, Brown N, Imam M, Clokie MRJ, Galyov EE, Korbsrisate S (2019) Characterization of flagellotropic, chi-like Salmonella phages isolated from Thai poultry farms. Viruses 11(6):520 PubMed DOI PMC
Salehi S, Howe K, Brooks J, Lawrence ML, Bailey RH, Karsi A (2016) Identification of Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky genes involved in attachment to chicken skin. BMC Microbiol 16(1):168 PubMed DOI PMC
Sharma J, Kumar D, Hussain S, PathakA SM, Prasanna Kumar V, Anisha PN, Rautela R, Upadhyay AK, Singh SP (2019) Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes characterization of nontyphoidal Salmonella isolated from retail chicken meat shops in northern India. Food Control 102:104–111 DOI
Sun WJ, Liu CF, Yu L, Cui FJ, Zhou Q, Yu SL, Sun L (2012) A novel bacteriophage KSL-1 of 2-Keto-gluconic acid producer Pseudomonas fluorescens K1005: isolation, characterization and its remedial action. BMC Microbiol 12:127 PubMed DOI PMC
WHO: Food safety factsheet (2020) Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/food-safety
Yang M, Liang Y, Huang S, Zhang J, Wang J, Chen H, Ye Y, Gao X, Wu Q, Tan Z (2020) Isolation and characterization of the novel phages vB_VpS_BA3 and vB_VpS_CA8 for lysing Vibrio parahaemolyticus. FrontMicrobiol 11:259
ŻbikowskaK MM, Dolka B (2020) The use of bacteriophages in the poultry industry. Animals (basel) 10(5):872 DOI