BACKGROUND: In the last three decades, both medical and sports science professionals have recognized the considerable potential of digital-based interventions (DBI) to enhance the health-related outcomes of their practitioners. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and potential moderators of DBI on measures of muscular strength. METHODS: Six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, SportDiscus, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar) were searched for eligible studies up to June 2022. The GRADE, PEDRO, and TIDieR checklists were used to assess the quality of evidence, methodology, and completeness of intervention descriptions, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 56 studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 2346), and participants were classified as healthy (n = 918), stroke survivors (n = 572), diagnosed with other neurological disorders (n = 683), and frail (n = 173). The DBI showed a small effect (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.28, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.31; p < 0.001) on strength, regardless of the type of intervention, control group, or tested body part. More specifically, while splitting the studies into different subgroups, a meta-analysis of 19 studies (n = 918) showed a small effect (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.63; p = 0.003) on strength in the asymptomatic population. Similarly, small but positive effects of DBI were observed for stroke survivors (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.56; p = 0.002), patients diagnosed with other neurological disorders (SMD = 0.17, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.32; p = 0.021), and the frail population (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.5; p = 0.051). Sub-group analysis and meta-regression revealed that neither variable modified the effects of the DBI on measures of strength. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, DBI may serve as an effective method to improve measures of strength in adults, regardless of their health status as well as the type of digital device, the presence of human-computer interaction, and the age of participants. In addition, the DBI was found to be more effective than traditional training or rehabilitation methods.KEY MESSAGESDigital-based intervention (DBI) is effective in improving measures of muscular strength in adults regardless of participants' health statusDBIs were equally effective for strength improvements in lower and upper limbsAlthough, DBIs were found to be effective in improving muscular strength, most studies did not follow strength training guidelines when prescribing the interventions.

Department of Health Sciences Alma Mater Europaea ECM Maribor Slovenia

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education University of Sarajevo Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina

Faculty of Sport University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia

Faculty of Sports Studies Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Science and Research Centre Koper Institute for Kinesiology Research Koper Slovenia

See more in PubMed

Maestroni L, Read P, Bishop C, et al. . The benefits of strength training on musculoskeletal system health: practical applications for interdisciplinary care. Sports Med. [Internet]. 2020;50(8):1–11. Available from doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01309-5. PubMed DOI

Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Stone MH.. The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports Med. 2016;46(10):1419–1449. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0486-0. PubMed DOI

Momma H, Kawakami R, Honda T, et al. . Muscle-strengthening activities are associated with lower risk and mortality in major non-communicable diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(13):755–763. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105061. PubMed DOI PMC

Pedersen BK, Saltin B.. Exercise as medicine - Evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25:1–72. doi: 10.1111/sms.12581. PubMed DOI

Katzmarzyk PT, Craig CL.. Musculoskeletal fitness and risk of mortality. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(5):740–744. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200205000-00002. PubMed DOI

Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, et al. . Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the prospective urban rural epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. [Internet]. 2015;386(9990):266–273. Available from doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6. PubMed DOI

Zeni JA, Snyder-Mackler L.. Early postoperative measures predict 1- and 2-year outcomes after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: importance of contralateral limb strength. Phys Ther. 2010;90(1):43–54. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090089. PubMed DOI PMC

Nyman SR, Victor CR.. Older people’s participation in and engagement with falls prevention interventions in community settings: an augment to the cochrane systematic review. Age Ageing. 2012;41(1):16–23. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr103. PubMed DOI

Meulenberg CJW, de Bruin ED, Marusic U.. A perspective on implementation of technology-driven exergames for adults as telerehabilitation services. Front Psychol. 2022;13:840863. [Internet]. Available from doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840863. PubMed DOI PMC

Paravlic AH. Motor imagery and action observation as appropriate strategies for home-based rehabilitation: a mini-review focusing on improving physical function in orthopedic patients. Front Psychol. 2022;13(March):1–9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.826476. PubMed DOI PMC

Singh DKA, Mohd Nordin NA, Aziz NAA, et al. . Effects of substituting a portion of standard physiotherapy time with virtual reality games among community-dwelling stroke survivors. BMC Neurol. 2013;13(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-199. PubMed DOI PMC

Valenzuela T, Okubo Y, Woodbury A, et al. . Adherence to technology-based exercise programs in older adults: a systematic review. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2018;41(1):49–61. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000095. PubMed DOI

Aminov A, Rogers JM, Middleton S, et al. . What do randomized controlled trials say about virtual rehabilitation in stroke? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of upper-limb and cognitive outcomes. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2018;15(1):1–24. PubMed PMC

Corregidor-Sánchez AI, Segura-Fragoso A, Rodríguez-Hernández M, et al. . Effectiveness of virtual reality technology on functional mobility of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2021;50(2):370–379. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa197. PubMed DOI

Elena P, Demetris S, Christina M, et al. . Differences between exergaming rehabilitation and conventional physiotherapy on quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2021;12:683385. [Internet]. Available from doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.683385. PubMed DOI PMC

Qian J, McDonough DJ, Gao Z.. The effectiveness of virtual reality exercise on individual’s physiological, psychological and rehabilitative outcomes: a systematic review. IJERPH. [Internet]. 2020; 17(11):4133. Available from https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/4133 doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114133. PubMed DOI PMC

Zavala-González J, Martínez D, Gutiérrez-Espinoza H.. Effectiveness of adding virtual reality to physiotherapeutic treatment in patients with total hip arthroplasty. A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2022;36(5):660–668. doi: 10.1177/02692155221080546. PubMed DOI

Lim DY, Hwang DM, Cho KH, et al. . A fully immersive virtual reality method for upper limb rehabilitation in spinal cord injury. Ann Rehabil Med. [Internet]. 2020;44(4):311–319. Aug 31Available from doi: 10.5535/arm.19181. PubMed DOI PMC

Viana RB, Dankel SJ, Loenneke JP, et al. . The effects of exergames on anxiety levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020;30(7):1100–1116. doi: 10.1111/sms.13654. PubMed DOI

Givon N, Zeilig G, Weingarden H, et al. . Video-games used in a group setting is feasible and effective to improve indicators of physical activity in individuals with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. [Internet]. 2016;30(4):383–392. Available from doi: 10.1177/0269215515584382. PubMed DOI

Kwok BC, Pua YH.. Effects of WiiActive exercises on fear of falling and functional outcomes in community-dwelling older adults: a randomised control trial. Age Ageing. [Internet]. 2016; 45(5):621–627. Available from doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw108. PubMed DOI

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 2021;88:1–11. PubMed

Paravlic AH, Slimani M, Tod D, et al. . Effects and dose–response relationships of motor imagery practice on strength development in healthy adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sport Med. 2018;48:1165–1187. PubMed

Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. . Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. [Internet]. 2003;83(8):713–721. Available from https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/83/8/713/2805287/Reliability-of-the-PEDro-Scale-for-Rating-Quality doi: 10.1093/ptj/83.8.713. PubMed DOI

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. . GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. [Internet]. 2008;336(7650):924–926. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/content/336/7650/924.full.pdf%5Cnpapers2://publication/uuid/37799DA6-4C83-468D-B0FC-13C2E1F7248A doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. PubMed DOI PMC

Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. . Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. [Internet]. 2014;348(March):1–12. Available from doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687. PubMed DOI

Scammacca N. Meta-Analysis with complex research designs: dealing with dependence from multiple measures and multiple group comparisons. Rev Educ Res. 2014;84(3):328–364. doi: 10.3102/0034654313500826. PubMed DOI PMC

Hopkins Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J, et al. . Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2009;41(1):3–13. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278. PubMed DOI

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. PubMed DOI PMC

Šlosar L, Voelcker-Rehage C, Paravlić AH, et al. . Combining physical and virtual worlds for motor-cognitive training interventions: position paper with guidelines on technology classification in movement-related research. Front Psychol. [Internet]. 2022;13(December):1009052. Available from doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009052. PubMed DOI PMC

Martín‐Martínez JP, Villafaina S, Collado‐Mateo D, et al. . Effects of 24‐week exergame intervention on physical function under single‐ and dual‐task conditions in fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports. [Internet]. 2019;29(10):1610–1617. Available from doi: 10.1111/sms.13502. PubMed DOI

Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. . 2011 Compendium of physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. [Internet]. 2011;43(8):1575–1581. Available from https://journals.lww.com/00005768-201108000-00025 PubMed

Kim K, Choi B, Lim W.. The efficacy of virtual reality assisted versus traditional rehabilitation intervention on individuals with functional ankle instability: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. [Internet]. 2019; 14(3):276–280. Available from doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1429501. PubMed DOI

Liao Y-Y, Yang Y-R, Wu Y-R, et al. . Virtual reality-based Wii fit training in improving muscle strength, sensory integration ability, and walking abilities in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized control trial. Int J Gerontol. [Internet]. 2015;9(4):190–195. Available fromhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S187395981500099X doi: 10.1016/j.ijge.2014.06.007. DOI

Martinho NM, Silva VR, Marques J, et al. . The effects of training by virtual reality or gym ball on pelvic floor muscle strength in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther. [Internet]. 2016;20(3):248–257. JAvailable fromhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552016000300248&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0148. PubMed DOI PMC

Kasper K. Sports training principles. Curr Sports Med Rep. [Internet]. 2019; 18(4):95–96. Available from http://journals.lww.com/00149619-201904000-00002 PubMed

Calabrò RS, Naro A, Russo M, et al. . The role of virtual reality in improving motor performance as revealed by EEG: a randomized clinical trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. [Internet]. 2017;14(1):53. Available from doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0268-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Lin R, Chiang S, Heitkemper MM, et al. . Effectiveness of early rehabilitation combined with virtual reality training on muscle strength, mood state, and functional status in patients with acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. [Internet]. 2020;17(2):158–167. Available from doi: 10.1111/wvn.12429. PubMed DOI

Bell IH, Nicholas J, Alvarez-Jimenez M, et al. . Virtual reality as a clinical tool in mental health research and practice. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. [Internet]. 2020;22(2):169–177. Available from doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/lvalmaggia. PubMed DOI PMC

Stanney KM, Nye H, Haddad S, et al. . Extended reality (XR) environments. In handbook of human factors and ergonomics. [Internet]. 5th ed., eds W. Karwowski, A. Szopa, and M. M. Soares (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press). Wiley; 2021. p. 782–815. Available from doi: 10.1002/9781119636113.ch30. DOI

Delaux A, Saint AJ, Ramanoël S, et al. . Mobile brain/body imaging of landmark‐based navigation with high‐density EEG. Solis‐escalante T, editor. Eur J Neurosci. [Internet]. 2021;54(12):8256–8282. Dec 4 Available from doi: 10.1111/ejn.15190. PubMed DOI PMC