Using social media records to inform conservation planning
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
DFG-FZT118,202548816
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
PubMed
37551776
DOI
10.1111/cobi.14161
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Bangladesh, Wallacean shortfall, ciencia ciudadana, citizen science, conservation planning, crowdsourcing, déficit wallaceano, iEcology, megadiverse countries, países megadiversos, planeación de la conservación, protected area, redes sociales, social media, tropics, trópicos, área protegida, 众包, 保护地, 保护规划, 公民科学, 华莱士知识空缺, 孟加拉国, 热带, 社交媒体, 高生物多样性国家,
- MeSH
- biodiverzita MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- motýli * MeSH
- ptáci MeSH
- sociální média * MeSH
- zachování přírodních zdrojů MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Citizen science plays a crucial role in helping monitor biodiversity and inform conservation. With the widespread use of smartphones, many people share biodiversity information on social media, but this information is still not widely used in conservation. Focusing on Bangladesh, a tropical megadiverse and mega-populated country, we examined the importance of social media records in conservation decision-making. We collated species distribution records for birds and butterflies from Facebook and Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), grouped them into GBIF-only and combined GBIF and Facebook data, and investigated the differences in identifying critical conservation areas. Adding Facebook data to GBIF data improved the accuracy of systematic conservation planning assessments by identifying additional important conservation areas in the northwest, southeast, and central parts of Bangladesh, extending priority conservation areas by 4,000-10,000 km2 . Community efforts are needed to drive the implementation of the ambitious Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework targets, especially in megadiverse tropical countries with a lack of reliable and up-to-date species distribution data. We highlight that conservation planning can be enhanced by including available data gathered from social media platforms.
Registros de las redes sociales para guiar la planeación de la conservación Resumen La ciencia ciudadana es importante para monitorear la biodiversidad e informar la conservación. Con el creciente uso de los teléfonos inteligentes, muchas personas comparten información de la biodiversidad en redes sociales, pero todavía no se usa ampliamente en la conservación. Analizamos la importancia de los registros de las redes sociales para las decisiones de conservación enfocados en Bangladesh, un país tropical megadiverso y mega poblado. Cotejamos los registros de distribución de especies de aves y mariposas en Facebook y Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), las agrupamos en datos sólo de GBIF o datos combinados de Facebook y GBIF e investigamos las diferencias en la identificación de las áreas de conservación críticas. La combinación de los datos de Facebook con los de GBIF mejoró la precisión de las evaluaciones de la planeación de la conservación sistemática al identificar otras áreas importantes de conservación en el noroeste, sureste y centro de Bangladesh, extendiendo así las áreas prioritarias de conservación en unos 4,000-10,000 km2 . Se requieren esfuerzos comunitarios para impulsar la implementación de los objetivos ambiciosos del Marco Global de Biodiversidad Kunming-Montreal, especialmente en países tropicales que carecen de datos confiables y actuales sobre la distribución de las especies. Destacamos que la planeación de la conservación puede mejorarse si se incluye información tomada de las redes sociales.
Biodiversity Unit University of Turku Turku Finland
Department of Biology and Biotechnologies Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
Department of Ecosystem Services Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ Leipzig Germany
Department of Geosciences and Geography University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
Department of Marine Renewable Resources Institute of Marine Sciences Barcelona Spain
Department of Zoology University of Dhaka Dhaka Bangladesh
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle Jena Leipzig Leipzig Germany
Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
Institute of Biodiversity Friedrich Schiller University Jena Jena Germany
Institute of Biological and Health Sciences Federal University of Alagoas Maceió Brazil
School of Biological Sciences The University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland Australia
School of Life Sciences University of KwaZulu Natal Durban South Africa
Université Paris Saclay CNRS AgroParisTech Ecologie Systématique Evolution Orsay France
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Aiello-Lammens, M. E., Boria, R. A., Radosavljevic, A., Vilela, B., & Anderson, R. P. (2015). spThin: An R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography, 38, 541-545.
Andrachuk, M., Marschke, M., Hings, C., & Armitage, D. (2019). Smartphone technologies supporting community-based environmental monitoring and implementation: A systematic scoping review. Biological Conservation, 237, 430-442.
Bradshaw, C. J., Sodhi, N. S., & Brook, B. W. (2009). Tropical turmoil: A biodiversity tragedy in progress. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 79-87.
Buchhorn, M., Smets, B., Bertels, L., De Roo, B., Lesiv, M., Tsendbazar, N.-E., Herold, M., & Fritz, S. (2020). Copernicus Global Land Service: Land Cover 100m: collection 3: epoch 2019: Globe 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3939050
Butchart, S. H. M., Clarke, M., Smith, R. J., Sykes, R. E., Scharlemann, J. P. W., Harfoot, M., Buchanan, G. M., Angulo, A., Balmford, A., Bertzky, B., Brooks, T. M., Carpenter, K. E., Comeros-Raynal, M. T., Cornell, J., Ficetola, G. F., Fishpool, L. D. C., Fuller, R. A., Geldmann, J., Harwell, H., … Burgess, N. D. (2015). Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters, 8, 329-337.
Callaghan, C. T., Mesaglio, T., Ascher, J. S., Brooks, T. M., Cabras, A. A., Chandler, M., Cornwell, W. K., Cristóbal Ríos-Málaver, I., Dankowicz, E., Urfi Dhiya'ulhaq, N., Fuller, R. A., Galindo-Leal, C., Grattarola, F., Hewitt, S., Higgins, L., Hitchcock, C., James Hung, K.-L., Iwane, T., Kahumbu, P., … Young, A. N. (2022). The benefits of contributing to the citizen science platform iNaturalist as an identifier. PLoS Biology, 20, Article e3001843.
Callaghan, C. T., Poore, A. G., Mesaglio, T., Moles, A. T., Nakagawa, S., Roberts, C., Rowley, J. J. L., VergÉs, A., Wilshire, J. H., & Cornwell, W. K. (2021). Three frontiers for the future of biodiversity research using citizen science data. Bioscience, 71, 55-63.
Chamberlain, S., Barve, V., Mcglinn, D., Oldoni, D., Desmet, P., Geffert, L., & Ram, K. (2022). rgbif: Interface to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility API. R package version 3.7.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgbif
Chandler, M., See, L., Copas, K., Bonde, A. M. Z., López, B. C., Danielsen, F., Legind, J. K., Masinde, S., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Newman, G., Rosemartin, A., & Turak, E. (2017). Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation, 213, 280-294.
Chowdhury, S. (2023). Threatened species could be more vulnerable to climate change in tropical countries. Science of The Total Environment, 858, Article 159989.
Chowdhury, S., Ahmed, S., Alam, S., Callaghan, C., Das, P., Marco, M. D., Minin, E. D., Jarić, I., Labi, M., Rokonuzzaman, M., Roll, U., Sbragaglia, V., Siddika, A., & Bonn, A. (2023). A standard protocol for harvesting biodiversity data from Facebook. EcoEvoRxiv. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2XS4F
Chowdhury, S., Aich, U., Rokonuzzaman, M., Alam, S., Das, P., Siddika, A., & Fuller, R. A. (2022). Spatial occurrence data for the animals of Bangladesh derived from Facebook. PANGAEA. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.948104
Chowdhury, S., Aich, U., Rokonuzzaman, M., Alam, S., Das, P., Siddika, A., Ahmed, S., Labi, M. M., Marco, M. D., Fuller, R. A., & Callaghan, C. T. (2023). Increasing biodiversity knowledge through social media: A case study from tropical Bangladesh. Bioscience, 73, 453-459.
Chowdhury, S., Alam, S., Chowdhury, S. U., Rokonuzzaman, M. d., Shahriar, S. A., Shome, A. R., & Fuller, R. A. (2021). Butterflies are weakly protected in a mega-populated country, Bangladesh. Global Ecology and Conservation, 26, Article e01484.
Chowdhury, S., Alam, S., Labi, M. M., Khan, N., Rokonuzzaman, M., Biswas, D., Tahea, T., Mukul, S. A., & Fuller, R. A. (2021). Protected areas in South Asia: Status and prospects. Science of the Total Environment, 811, Article 152316.
Chowdhury, S., Fuller, R. A., Rokonuzzaman, M., Alam, S., Das, P., Siddika, A., Ahmed, S., Labi, M. M., Chowdhury, S. U., Mukul, S. A., Böhm, M., & Hanson, J. O. (2023). Insights from citizen science reveal priority areas for conserving biodiversity in Bangladesh. One Earth. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.08.025
Chowdhury, S., Jennions, M. D., Zalucki, M. P., Maron, M., Watson, J. E., & Fuller, R. A. (2022). Protected areas and the future of insect conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 38, 85-95.
Collen, B., Ram, M., Zamin, T., & Mcrae, L. (2008). The tropical biodiversity data gap: Addressing disparity in global monitoring. Tropical Conservation Science, 1(2), 75-88.
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (2022). Kunming-Montreal Global biodiversity framework. Draft decision submitted by the President CBD/COP/15/L.25, 18 December 2022. https://www.cbd.int/conferences/2021-2022/cop-15/documents
Di Marco, M., Chapman, S., Althor, G., Kearney, S., Besancon, C., Butt, N., Maina, J. M., Possingham, H. P., von Bieberstein, K. R., Venter, O., & Watson, J. E. M. (2017). Changing trends and persisting biases in three decades of conservation science. Global Ecology and Conservation, 10, 32-42.
Di Minin, E., Tenkanen, H., & Toivonen, T. (2015). Prospects and challenges for social media data in conservation science. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 3, Article 63.
Ferrier, S., Pressey, R. L., & Barrett, T. W. (2000). A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement. Biological Conservation, 93, 303-325.
Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). (2022). Filtered export of GBIF occurrence data. https://doi.org/10.15468/dd.rghepr
Gurobi Optimization, LLC. (2021). gurobi: Gurobi Optimizer 8.1 interface. R package version 8.1-0. http://www.gurobi.com
Hanson, J. O. (2022). wdpar: Interface to the World Database on Protected Areas. R package version 1.3.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wdpar
Hanson, J. O., Schuster, R., Morrell, N., Strimas-Mackey, M., Edwards, B. P. M., Watts, M. E., Arcese, P., Bennett, J., & Possingham, H. P. (2022). prioritizr: Systematic Conservation Prioritization in R. R package version 7.2.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=prioritizr
Heberling, J. M., Miller, J. T., Noesgaard, D., Weingart, S. B., & Schigel, D. (2021). Data integration enables global biodiversity synthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118, Article e2018093118.
Hortal, J., de Bello, F., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Lewinsohn, T. M., Lobo, J. M., & Ladle, R. J. (2015). Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 46, 523-549.
Hughes, A. C., Orr, M. C., Ma, K., Costello, M. J., Waller, J., Provoost, P., Yang, Q., Zhu, C., & Qiao, H. (2021). Sampling biases shape our view of the natural world. Ecography, 44, 1259-1269.
IUCN Bangladesh. (2015). Red list of Bangladesh: A brief on assessment result 2015. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office.
Jarić, I., Correia, R. A., Brook, B. W., Buettel, J. C., Courchamp, F., Di Minin, E., Firth, J. A., Gaston, K. J., Jepson, P., Kalinkat, G., Ladle, R., Soriano-Redondo, A., Souza, A. T., & Roll, U. (2020). iEcology: Harnessing large online resources to generate ecological insights. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35, 630-639.
Kelling, S., Johnston, A., Bonn, A., Fink, D., Ruiz-Gutierrez, V., Bonney, R., Fernandez, M., Hochachka, W. M., Julliard, R., Kraemer, R., & Guralnick, R. (2019). Using semistructured surveys to improve citizen science data for monitoring biodiversity. Bioscience, 69, 170-179.
Kelly, R., Fleming, A., Pecl, G., Richter, A., & Bonn, A. (2019). Social licence through citizen science: A tool for marine conservation. Ecology & Society, 24, Article 16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10704-240116
Kühl, H. S., Bowler, D. E., Bösch, L., Bruelheide, H., Dauber, J., Eichenberg, D., Eisenhauer, N., Fernández, N., Guerra, C. A., Henle, K., Herbinger, I., Isaac, N. J. B., Jansen, F., König-Ries, B., Kühn, I., Nilsen, E. B., Pe'er, G., Richter, A., Schulte, R., … Bonn, A. (2020). Effective biodiversity monitoring needs a culture of integration. One Earth, 3, 462-474.
Lewis, S. L., Edwards, D. P., & Galbraith, D. (2015). Increasing human dominance of tropical forests. Science, 349, 827-832.
Liu, C., Newell, G., & White, M. (2016). On the selection of thresholds for predicting species occurrence with presence-only data. Ecology and Evolution, 6, 337-348.
Malhi, Y., Gardner, T. A., Goldsmith, G. R., Silman, M. R., & Zelazowski, P. (2014). Tropical forests in the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 125-159.
Marcenò, C., Padullés Cubino, J., Chytrý, M., Genduso, E., Salemi, D., La Rosa, A., Gristina, A. S., Agrillo, E., Bonari, G., Giusso Del Galdo, G., Ilardi, V., Landucci, F., & Guarino, R. (2021). Facebook groups as citizen science tools for plant species monitoring. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58, 2018-2028.
Maxwell, S. L., Cazalis, V., Dudley, N., Hoffmann, M., Rodrigues, A. S. L., Stolton, S., Visconti, P., Woodley, S., Kingston, N., Lewis, E., Maron, M., Strassburg, B. B. N., Wenger, A., Jonas, H. D., Venter, O., & Watson, J. E. M. (2020). Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century. Nature, 586, 217-227.
Mukul, S. A., & Rashid, A. Z. M. M. (Eds.). (2017). Protected areas: Policies, management and future directions. Nova Science Publishers.
Muscarella, R., Galante, P. J., Soley-Guardia, M., Boria, R. A., Kass, J. M., Uriarte, M., & Anderson, R. P. (2014). ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 1198-1205.
Newton, P., Kinzer, A. T., Miller, D. C., Oldekop, J. A., & Agrawal, A. (2020). The number and spatial distribution of forest-proximate people globally. One Earth, 3, 363-370.
O'neill, D., Häkkinen, H., Neumann, J., Shaffrey, L., Cheffings, C., Norris, K., & Pettorelli, N. (2023). Investigating the potential of social media and citizen science data to track changes in species' distributions. Ecology and Evolution, 13, Article e10063.
Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., Abell, R., Brooks, T. M., Gittleman, J. L., Joppa, L. N., Raven, P. H., Roberts, C. M., & Sexton, J. O. (2014). The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science, 344, Article 1246752.
Pocock, M. J. O., Roy, H. E., August, T., Kuria, A., Barasa, F., Bett, J., Githiru, M., Kairo, J., Kimani, J., Kinuthia, W., Kissui, B., Madindou, I., Mbogo, K., Mirembe, J., Mugo, P., Muniale, F. M., Njoroge, P., Njuguna, E. G., Olendo, M. I., … Trevelyan, R. (2019). Developing the global potential of citizen science: Assessing opportunities that benefit people, society and the environment in East Africa. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56, 274-281.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Ross, N. (2020). fasterize: Fast polygon to raster conversion. R package version 1.0.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fasterize
Sbragaglia, V., Coco, S., Correia, R. A., Coll, M., & Arlinghaus, R. (2021). Analyzing publicly available videos about recreational fishing reveals key ecological and social insights: A case study about groupers in the Mediterranean Sea. Science of the Total Environment, 765, Article 142672.
Sbragaglia, V., Espasandín, L., Jarić, I., Vardi, R., Ramírez, F., & Coll, M. (2023). Tracking ongoing transboundary marine distributional range shifts in the digital era. Marine Ecology Progress Series, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14309
Schmeller, D. S., Henry, P.-Y., Julliard, R., Gruber, B., Clobert, J., Dziock, F., Lengyel, S., Nowicki, P., Déri, E., Budrys, E., Kull, T., Tali, K., Bauch, B., Settele, J., Van Swaay, C., Kobler, A., Babij, V., Papastergiadou, E., & Henle, K. (2009). Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conservation Biology, 23, 307-316.
Schuster, R., Hanson, J. O., Strimas-Mackey, M., & Bennett, J. R. (2020). Exact integer linear programming solvers outperform simulated annealing for solving conservation planning problems. PeerJ, 8, Article e9258.
Slade, E. M., & Ong, X. R. (2023). The future of tropical insect diversity: Strategies to fill data and knowledge gaps. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 58, Article 101063.
Symes, W. S., Edwards, D. P., Miettinen, J., Rheindt, F. E., & Carrasco, L. R (2018). Combined impacts of deforestation and wildlife trade on tropical biodiversity are severely underestimated. Nature Communications, 9, Article 4052.
Toivonen, T., Heikinheimo, V., Fink, C., Hausmann, A., Hiippala, T., Järv, O., Tenkanen, H., & Di Minin, E. (2019). Social media data for conservation science: A methodological overview. Biological Conservation, 233, 298-315.
Troudet, J., Grandcolas, P., Blin, A., Vignes-Lebbe, R., & Legendre, F. (2017). Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 9132.
UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC). (2021). Protected area profile for Bangladesh from the World Database of Protected Areas. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. www.protectedplanet.net
van Klink, R., August, T., Bas, Y., Bodesheim, P., Bonn, A., Fossøy, F., Høye, T. T., Jongejans, E., Menz, M. H. M., Miraldo, A., Roslin, T., Roy, H. E., Ruczyński, I., Schigel, D., Schäffler, L., Sheard, J. K., Svenningsen, C., Tschan, G. F., Wäldchen, J., … Bowler, D. E. (2022). Emerging technologies revolutionise insect ecology and monitoring. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 37, 872-885.
Venter, O., Sanderson, E. W., Magrach, A., Allan, J. R., Beher, J., Jones, K. R., Possingham, H. P., Laurance, W. F., Wood, P., Fekete, B. M., Levy, M. A., & Watson, J. E. (2018). Last of the wild project, version 3 (LWP-3): 2009 human footprint, 2018 release. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC).
Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., & Hockings, M. (2014). The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature, 515, 67-73.
Zizka, A., Silvestro, D., Andermann, T., Azevedo, J., Duarte Ritter, C., Edler, D., Farooq, H., Herdean, A., Ariza, M., Scharn, R., Svantesson, S., Wengström, N., Zizka, V., & Antonelli, A. (2019). CoordinateCleaner: Standardised cleaning of occurrence records from biological collection databases. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 744-751.
Leveraging social media and other online data to study animal behavior
Emerging technologies in citizen science and potential for insect monitoring