Adjuvant nivolumab in resected stage IIB/C melanoma: primary results from the randomized, phase 3 CheckMate 76K trial
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
Grant support
P50 CA225450
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
37845511
PubMed Central
PMC10667090
DOI
10.1038/s41591-023-02583-2
PII: 10.1038/s41591-023-02583-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Adjuvants, Immunologic MeSH
- Double-Blind Method MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant MeSH
- Melanoma * drug therapy surgery MeSH
- Skin Neoplasms * drug therapy surgery MeSH
- Nivolumab MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Adjuvants, Immunologic MeSH
- Nivolumab MeSH
Patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma have high recurrence risk, similar to those with resected stage IIIA/B disease. The phase 3, double-blind CheckMate 76K trial assessed 790 patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma randomized 2:1 (stratified by tumor category) to nivolumab 480 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 12 months. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints included distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and safety. At 7.8 months of minimum follow-up, nivolumab significantly improved RFS versus placebo (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-0.59; P < 0.0001), with 12-month RFS of 89.0% versus 79.4% and benefit observed across subgroups; DMFS was also improved (HR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.30-0.72). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 10.3% (nivolumab) and 2.3% (placebo) of patients. One treatment-related death (0.2%) occurred with nivolumab. Nivolumab is an effective and generally well-tolerated adjuvant treatment in patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04099251 .
Bristol Myers Squibb Princeton NJ USA
Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
Elbe Klinikum Buxtehude Buxtehude Germany
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy
Hôpital de la Timone Marseille France
Hôpital Saint André Bordeaux France
Institute of Oncology Poznan University of Medical Sciences Poznan Poland
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS 'Fondazione G Pascale' Naples Italy
Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS Padova Italy
Maria Skłodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Warsaw Poland
Medizinische Universität Wien Vienna Austria
Nantes University Hospital Nantes France
NYU Langone Medical Center New York NY USA
University Medical Center Mainz Mainz Germany
University of Western Australia and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Perth WA Australia
See more in PubMed
National Cancer Institute. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer stat facts: melanoma of the skin. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html (2023).
Poklepovic AS, Luke JJ. Considering adjuvant therapy for stage II melanoma. Cancer. 2020;126:1166–1174. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32585. PubMed DOI PMC
Garbe C, et al. Prognosis of patients with primary melanoma stage I and II according to American Joint Committee on Cancer Version 8 validated in two independent cohorts: implications for adjuvant treatment. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022;40:3741–3749. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00202. PubMed DOI PMC
Gershenwald JE, et al. Melanoma staging: evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Cancer Staging Manual. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017;67:472–492. doi: 10.3322/caac.21409. PubMed DOI PMC
National Cancer Institute. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)*Explorer: an interactive website for SEER cancer statistics. https://seer.cancer.gov/explorer (2023).
Garbe C, et al. Prognosis of patients with stage III melanoma according to American Joint Committee on Cancer Version 8: a reassessment on the basis of 3 independent stage III melanoma cohorts. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020;38:2543–2551. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03034. PubMed DOI PMC
Eggermont AMM, et al. Adjuvant ipilimumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma (EORTC 18071): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:522–530. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70122-1. PubMed DOI
Weber J, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:1824–1835. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709030. PubMed DOI
Larkin J, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III/IV melanoma: 5-year efficacy and biomarker results from CheckMate 238. Clin. Cancer Res. 2023;29:3352–3361. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3145. PubMed DOI PMC
Eggermont AMM, et al. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:1789–1801. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802357. PubMed DOI
Eggermont AMM, et al. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): distant metastasis-free survival results from a double-blind, randomized, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:643–654. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00065-6. PubMed DOI
Luke JJ, et al. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in completely resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (KEYNOTE-716): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022;399:1718–1729. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00562-1. PubMed DOI
Long GV, et al. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (KEYNOTE-716): distant metastasis-free survival results of a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23:1378–1388. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00559-9. PubMed DOI
Cust AE, et al. A risk prediction model for the development of subsequent primary melanoma in a population‐based cohort. Br. J. Dermatol. 2020;182:1148–1157. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18524. PubMed DOI PMC
van der Leest RJT, Flohil SC, Arends LR, de Vries E, Nijsten T. Risk of subsequent cutaneous malignancy in patients with prior melanoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2015;29:1053–1062. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12887. PubMed DOI
Luke JJ, et al. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in stage IIB or IIC melanoma: final analysis of distant metastasis-free survival in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.17_suppl.LBA9505. PubMed DOI PMC
Ascierto PA, Kirkwood JM. Adjuvant therapy of melanoma with interferon: lessons of the past decade. J. Transl. Med. 2008;6:62. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-6-62. PubMed DOI PMC
Espinosa E, et al. Treatment patterns of adjuvant interferon-α2b for high-risk melanoma: a retrospective study of the Grupo Español Multidisciplinar de Melanoma—Prima study. Melanoma Res. 2016;26:278–283. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000254. PubMed DOI PMC
Kwak M, et al. Updates in adjuvant systemic therapy for melanoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2019;119:222–231. doi: 10.1002/jso.25298. PubMed DOI PMC
Patel SP, et al. Neoadjuvant-adjuvant or adjuvant-only pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023;388:813–823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2211437. PubMed DOI PMC
Robert C, et al. Seven-year follow-up of the phase III KEYNOTE-006 study: pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023;41:3998–4003. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01599. PubMed DOI
Wolchok JD, et al. Long-term outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022;40:127–137. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02229. PubMed DOI PMC
Eggermont, A. M. M. et al. Five-year analysis of adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo in stage III melanoma. NEJM Evid.1, 10.1056/EVIDoa2200214 (2022). PubMed
Weber JS, et al. Indirect treatment comparison of nivolumab versus placebo as adjuvant treatment for resected melanoma. Eur. J. Cancer. 2021;158:225–233. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.028. PubMed DOI
Schadendorf D, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with fully resected BRAFV600 mutation-positive melanoma receiving adjuvant vemurafenib. Eur. J. Cancer. 2019;123:155–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.019. PubMed DOI
Coart E, et al. Evaluating the potential of relapse-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in the adjuvant therapy of melanoma with checkpoint inhibitors. Eur. J. Cancer. 2020;137:171–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.07.011. PubMed DOI
Suciu, S. et al. Relapse-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in the evaluation of stage II-III melanoma adjuvant therapy. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 110, 87–96 (2018). PubMed
Gupta S, Jain S, Yeh J, Guddati AK. Unequal allotment of patients in phase III oncology clinical trials. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2021;11:3735–3741. PubMed PMC
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT04099251