Decoration of semiconductor photocatalysts with cocatalysts is generally done by a step-by-step assembly process. Here, we describe the self-assembling and self-activating nature of a photocatalytic system that forms under illumination of reduced anatase TiO2 nanoparticles in an aqueous Ni2+ solution. UV illumination creates in situ a Ni+/TiO2/Ti3+ photocatalyst that self-activates and, over time, produces H2 at a higher rate. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy show that key to self-assembly and self-activation is the light-induced formation of defects in the semiconductor, which enables the formation of monovalent nickel (Ni+) surface states. Metallic nickel states, i.e., Ni0, do not form under the dark (resting state) or under illumination (active state). Once the catalyst is assembled, the Ni+ surface states act as electron relay for electron transfer to form H2 from water, in the absence of sacrificial species or noble metal cocatalysts.

Department Materials Science WW 4 LKO Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen Nuremberg Erlangen 91058 Germany

Dipartimento di Chimica Università degli Studi di Milano Via Golgi 19 Milan 20133 Italy

Dipartimento di Chimica Università degli Studi di Pavia Viale Taramelli 13 Pavia 27100 Italy

ESRF The European Synchrotron 71 Avenue des Martyrs CS40220 Grenoble Cedex 9 38043 France

Nanotechnology Centre VŠB Technical University of Ostrava 17 listopadu 2172 15 Ostrava Poruba 708 00 Czech Republic

PhotoCatalytic Synthesis PCS Group MESA Institute for Nanotechnology University of Twente P O Box 217 Enschede 7500 AE The Netherlands

Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials Czech Advanced Technology and Research Institute Palacký University Olomouc Křížkovského 511 8 Olomouc 779 00 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Whitesides G. M.; Grzybowski B. Self-Assembly at All Scales. Science 2002, 295, 2418–2421. 10.1126/science.1070821. PubMed DOI

Eigen M. Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften 1971, 58, 465–523. 10.1007/BF00623322. PubMed DOI

Zhang J.; Nosaka Y. Mechanism of the OH Radical Generation in Photocatalysis with TiO2 of Different Crystalline Types. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 10824–10832. 10.1021/jp501214m. DOI

Liu N.; Mohajernia S.; Nguyen N. T.; Hejazi S.; Plass F.; Kahnt A.; Yokosawa T.; Osvet A.; Spiecker E.; Guldi D. M.; et al. Long-Living Holes in Grey Anatase TiO2 Enable Noble-Metal-Free and Sacrificial-Agent-Free Water Splitting. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 4937–4944. 10.1002/cssc.202001045. DOI

Nosaka Y.; Nosaka A. Understanding Hydroxyl Radical (•OH) Generation Processes in Photocatalysis. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 356–359. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00174. DOI

Diesen V.; Jonsson M. Formation of H2O2 in TiO2 Photocatalysis of Oxygenated and Deoxygenated Aqueous Systems: A Probe for Photocatalytically Produced Hydroxyl Radicals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 10083–10087. 10.1021/jp500315u. DOI

Ge M.; Cai J.; Iocozzia J.; Cao C.; Huang J.; Zhang X.; Shen J.; Wang S.; Zhang S.; Zhang K.-Q.; et al. A review of TiO2 nanostructured catalysts for sustainable H2 generation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 8418–8449. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.052. DOI

Ni M.; Leung M. K. H.; Leung D. Y. C.; Sumathy K. A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 401–425. 10.1016/j.rser.2005.01.009. DOI

Nakata K.; Fujishima A. TiO2 photocatalysis: Design and applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol., C 2012, 13, 169–189. 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2012.06.001. DOI

Osterloh F. E. Inorganic Materials as Catalysts for Photochemical Splitting of Water. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20 (1), 35–54. 10.1021/cm7024203. DOI

Kudo A.; Miseki Y. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 253–278. 10.1039/B800489G. PubMed DOI

Fujishima A.; Zhang X.; Tryk D. A. TiO2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2008, 63, 515–582. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2008.10.001. DOI

Schneider J.; Matsuoka M.; Takeuchi M.; Zhang J.; Horiuchi Y.; Anpo M.; Bahnemann D. W. Understanding TiO2 Photocatalysis: Mechanisms and Materials. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9919–9986. 10.1021/cr5001892. PubMed DOI

Chen S.; Takata T.; Domen K. Particulate photocatalysts for overall water splitting. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17050.10.1038/natrevmats.2017.50. DOI

Yoshida M.; Yamakata A.; Takanabe K.; Kubota J.; Osawa M.; Domen K. ATR-SEIRAS Investigation of the Fermi Level of Pt Cocatalyst on a GaN Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution under Irradiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13218–13219. 10.1021/ja904991p. PubMed DOI

Maeda K.; Teramura K.; Lu D.; Saito N.; Inoue Y.; Domen K. Noble-Metal/Cr2O3 Core/Shell Nanoparticles as a Cocatalyst for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7806–7809. 10.1002/anie.200602473. PubMed DOI

Gomes Silva C.; Juárez R.; Marino T.; Molinari R.; García H. Influence of Excitation Wavelength (UV or Visible Light) on the Photocatalytic Activity of Titania Containing Gold Nanoparticles for the Generation of Hydrogen or Oxygen from Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 595–602. 10.1021/ja1086358. PubMed DOI

Chen X.; Shen S.; Guo L.; Mao S. S. Semiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6503–6570. 10.1021/cr1001645. PubMed DOI

Wang Q.; Domen K. Particulate Photocatalysts for Light-Driven Water Splitting: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Design Strategies. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 919–985. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00201. PubMed DOI

Kamat P. V.; Jin S. Semiconductor Photocatalysis: “Tell Us the Complete Story!”. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 622–623. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00196. DOI

Schneider J.; Bahnemann D. W. Undesired Role of Sacrificial Reagents in Photocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 3479–3483. 10.1021/jz4018199. DOI

Yuan J.; Wen J.; Zhong Y.; Li X.; Fang Y.; Zhang S.; Liu W. Enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution over noble-metal-free NiS cocatalyst modified CdS nanorods/g-C3N4 heterojunctions. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 18244–18255. 10.1039/C5TA04573H. DOI

Zong X.; Han J.; Ma G.; Yan H.; Wu G.; Li C. Photocatalytic H2 Evolution on CdS Loaded with WS2 as Cocatalyst under Visible Light Irradiation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 12202–12208. 10.1021/jp2006777. DOI

Sun Z.; Zheng H.; Li J.; Du P. Extraordinarily efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution in water using semiconductor nanorods integrated with crystalline Ni2P cocatalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2668–2676. 10.1039/C5EE01310K. DOI

Zong X.; Yan H.; Wu G.; Ma G.; Wen F.; Wang L.; Li C. Enhancement of Photocatalytic H2 Evolution on CdS by Loading MoS2 as Cocatalyst under Visible Light Irradiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7176–7177. 10.1021/ja8007825. PubMed DOI

Zhang X.; Fu A.; Chen X.; Liu L.; Ren L.; Tong L.; Ye J. Highly efficient Cu induced photocatalysis for visible-light hydrogen evolution. Catal. Today 2019, 335, 166–172. 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.11.002. DOI

Peng Y.; Jiang K.; Hill W.; Lu Z.; Yao H.; Wang H. Large-Scale, Low-Cost, and High-Efficiency Water-Splitting System for Clean H2 Generation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 3971–3977. 10.1021/acsami.8b19251. PubMed DOI

Spanu D.; Recchia S.; Mohajernia S.; Tomanec O.; Kment Š.; Zboril R.; Schmuki P.; Altomare M. Templated Dewetting–Alloying of NiCu Bilayers on TiO2 Nanotubes Enables Efficient Noble-Metal-Free Photocatalytic H2 Evolution. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 5298–5305. 10.1021/acscatal.8b01190. DOI

Shahvaranfard F.; Ghigna P.; Minguzzi A.; Wierzbicka E.; Schmuki P.; Altomare M. Dewetting of PtCu Nanoalloys on TiO2 Nanocavities Provides a Synergistic Photocatalytic Enhancement for Efficient H2 Evolution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 38211–38221. 10.1021/acsami.0c10968. PubMed DOI

Pinna M.; Wei A. W. W.; Spanu D.; Will J.; Yokosawa T.; Spiecker E.; Recchia S.; Schmuki P.; Altomare M. Amorphous NiCu Thin Films Sputtered on TiO2 Nanotube Arrays: A Noble-Metal Free Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution. ChemCatChem 2022, 14, e20220105210.1002/cctc.202201052. DOI

Chen W.-T.; Chan A.; Sun-Waterhouse D.; Llorca J.; Idriss H.; Waterhouse G. I. N. Performance comparison of Ni/TiO2 and Au/TiO2 photocatalysts for H2 production in different alcohol-water mixtures. J. Catal. 2018, 367, 27–42. 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.08.015. DOI

Melián E. P.; Suárez M. N.; Jardiel T.; Rodríguez J. M. D.; Caballero A. C.; Araña J.; Calatayud D. G.; Díaz O. G. Influence of nickel in the hydrogen production activity of TiO2. Appl. Catal., B 2014, 152–153, 192–201. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.01.039. DOI

Xu Y.; Xu R. Nickel-based cocatalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 351, 779–793. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.171. DOI

Chen W.-T.; Chan A.; Sun-Waterhouse D.; Moriga T.; Idriss H.; Waterhouse G. I. N. Ni/TiO2: A promising low-cost photocatalytic system for solar H2 production from ethanol–water mixtures. J. Catal. 2015, 326, 43–53. 10.1016/j.jcat.2015.03.008. DOI

Wang J.; Mao S.; Liu Z.; Wei Z.; Wang H.; Chen Y.; Wang Y. Dominating Role of Ni0 on the Interface of Ni/NiO for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 7139–7147. 10.1021/acsami.6b15377. PubMed DOI

Townsend T. K.; Browning N. D.; Osterloh F. E. Overall photocatalytic water splitting with NiOx–SrTiO3 – a revised mechanism. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 9543–9550. 10.1039/c2ee22665k. DOI

Wang W.; Liu S.; Nie L.; Cheng B.; Yu J. Enhanced photocatalytic H2-production activity of TiO2 using Ni(NO3)2 as an additive. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 12033–12039. 10.1039/C2CP43628K. PubMed DOI

Forouzan F.; Richards T. C.; Bard A. J. Photoinduced Reaction at TiO2 Particles. Photodeposition from NiII Solutions with Oxalate. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 100, 18123–18127. 10.1021/jp953241f. DOI

Spanu D.; Minguzzi A.; Recchia S.; Shahvardanfard F.; Tomanec O.; Zboril R.; Schmuki P.; Ghigna P.; Altomare M. An Operando X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy Study of a NiCu–TiO2 Photocatalyst for H2 Evolution. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 8293–8302. 10.1021/acscatal.0c01373. DOI

Han K.; Kreuger T.; Mei B.; Mul G. Transient Behavior of Ni@NiOx Functionalized SrTiO3 in Overall Water Splitting. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 1610–1614. 10.1021/acscatal.6b03662. PubMed DOI PMC

Nosaka Y.; Nosaka A. Y. Generation and Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species in Photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 11302–11336. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00161. PubMed DOI

Kiwi J.; Graetzel M. Optimization of conditions for photochemical water cleavage. Aqueous platinum/TiO2 (anatase) dispersions under ultraviolet light. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 88, 1302–1307. 10.1021/j150651a012. DOI

Kiwi J.; Graetzel M. Specific analysis of surface-bound peroxides formed during photoinduced water cleavage in titanium dioxide-based microheterogeneous systems. J. Mol. Catal. 1987, 39, 63–70. 10.1016/0304-5102(87)80047-0. DOI

Munuera G.; Espinós J. P.; Fernández A.; Malet P.; González-Elipe A. R. TiO2 corrosion during water photocleavage using Rh/TiO2 suspensions. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1990, 86, 3441–3445. 10.1039/FT9908603441. DOI

Siahrostami S.; Li G.-L.; Viswanathan V.; Nørskov J. K. One- or Two-Electron Water Oxidation, Hydroxyl Radical, or H2O2 Evolution. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 1157–1160. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02924. PubMed DOI

Liu N.; Zhou X.; Nguyen N. T.; Peters K.; Zoller F.; Hwang I.; Schneider C.; Miehlich M. E.; Freitag D.; Meyer K.; et al. Black Magic in Gray Titania: Noble-Metal-Free Photocatalytic H2 Evolution from Hydrogenated Anatase. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 62–67. 10.1002/cssc.201601264. PubMed DOI

Qin S.; Badura Z.; Denisov N.; Tomanec O.; Mohajernia S.; Liu N.; Kment S.; Zoppellaro G.; Schmuki P. Self-assembly of a Ni(I)-photocatalyst for plain water splitting without sacrificial agents. Electrochem. Commun. 2021, 122, 106909.10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106909. DOI

Chen X.; Liu L.; Yu P. Y.; Mao S. S. Increasing Solar Absorption for Photocatalysis with Black Hydrogenated Titanium Dioxide Nanocrystals. Science 2011, 331, 746–750. 10.1126/science.1200448. PubMed DOI

Chen X.; Liu L.; Huang F. Black titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 1861–1885. 10.1039/C4CS00330F. PubMed DOI

Liu N.; Schneider C.; Freitag D.; Hartmann M.; Venkatesan U.; Müller J.; Spiecker E.; Schmuki P. Black TiO2 Nanotubes: Cocatalyst-Free Open-Circuit Hydrogen Generation. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 3309–3313. 10.1021/nl500710j. PubMed DOI

Naldoni A.; Altomare M.; Zoppellaro G.; Liu N.; Kment Š; Zbořil R.; Schmuki P. Photocatalysis with Reduced TiO2: From Black TiO2 to Cocatalyst-Free Hydrogen Production. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 345–364. 10.1021/acscatal.8b04068. PubMed DOI PMC

Wierzbicka E.; Altomare M.; Wu M.; Liu N.; Yokosawa T.; Fehn D.; Qin S.; Meyer K.; Unruh T.; Spiecker E.; et al. Reduced grey brookite for noble metal free photocatalytic H2 evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 1168–1179. 10.1039/D0TA09066B. DOI

Will J.; Wierzbicka E.; Wu M.; Götz K.; Yokosawa T.; Liu N.; Tesler A. B.; Stiller M.; Unruh T.; Altomare M.; et al. Hydrogenated anatase TiO2 single crystals: Defects formation and structural changes as microscopic origin of co-catalyst free photocatalytic H2 evolution activity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 24932–24942. 10.1039/D1TA04809K. DOI

Qin S.; Kim H.; Denisov N.; Fehn D.; Schmidt J.; Meyer K.; Schmuki P. Grey facet-controlled anatase nanosheets for photocatalytic H2 evolution without co-catalyst. J. Phys.: Energy 2021, 3, 034003.10.1088/2515-7655/abd5a8. DOI

Liu N.; Schneider C.; Freitag D.; Venkatesan U.; Marthala V. R. R.; Hartmann M.; Winter B.; Spiecker E.; Osvet A.; Zolnhofer E. M.; et al. Hydrogenated Anatase: Strong Photocatalytic Dihydrogen Evolution without the Use of a Co-Catalyst. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 14201–14205. 10.1002/anie.201408493. PubMed DOI

Mohajernia S.; Andryskova P.; Zoppellaro G.; Hejazi S.; Kment S.; Zboril R.; Schmidt J.; Schmuki P. Influence of Ti3+ defect-type on heterogeneous photocatalytic H2 evolution activity of TiO2. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 1432–1442. 10.1039/C9TA10855F. DOI

Qin S.; Denisov N.; Zhou X.; Zdražil L.; Fehn D.; Hwang I.; Bruns M.; Kim H.; Meyer K.; Schmuki P. Critical factors for photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic H2 evolution from gray anatase (001) nanosheets. J. Phys.: Energy 2022, 4, 044004.10.1088/2515-7655/ac8ed3. DOI

Wierzbicka E.; Zhou X.; Denisov N.; Yoo J.; Fehn D.; Liu N.; Meyer K.; Schmuki P. Self-Enhancing H2 Evolution from TiO2 Nanostructures under Illumination. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 1900–1905. 10.1002/cssc.201900192. PubMed DOI

Lo W. J.; Chung Y. W.; Somorjai G. A. Electron spectroscopy studies of the chemisorption of O2, H2 and H2O on the TiO2(100) surfaces with varied stoichiometry: Evidence for the photogeneration of Ti+3 and for its importance in chemisorption. Surf. Sci. 1978, 71, 199–219. 10.1016/0039-6028(78)90328-X. DOI

Millet M.-M.; Algara-Siller G.; Wrabetz S.; Mazheika A.; Girgsdies F.; Teschner D.; Seitz F.; Tarasov A.; Levchenko S. V.; Schlögl R.; et al. Ni Single Atom Catalysts for CO2 Activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 2451–2461. 10.1021/jacs.8b11729. PubMed DOI PMC

Wang A.; Li J.; Zhang T. Heterogeneous single-atom catalysis. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2018, 2, 65–81. 10.1038/s41570-018-0010-1. DOI

Gao C.; Low J.; Long R.; Kong T.; Zhu J.; Xiong Y. Heterogeneous Single-Atom Photocatalysts: Fundamentals and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 12175–12216. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00840. PubMed DOI

Moulder J. F.; Stickle W. F.; Sobol P. E.; Bomben K. D.. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; Perkin Elmer Corp.,: Eden Prairie/USA, 1992.

Grosvenor A. P.; Biesinger M. C.; Smart R. S. C.; McIntyre N. S. New interpretations of XPS spectra of nickel metal and oxides. Surf. Sci. 2006, 600, 1771–1779. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.01.041. DOI

Biesinger M. C.; Payne B. P.; Lau L. W. M.; Gerson A.; Smart R. S. C. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic chemical state quantification of mixed nickel metal, oxide and hydroxide systems. Surf. Interface Anal. 2009, 41, 324–332. 10.1002/sia.3026. DOI

Dubey P.; Kaurav N.; Devan R. S.; Okram G. S.; Kuo Y. K. The effect of stoichiometry on the structural, thermal and electronic properties of thermally decomposed nickel oxide. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 5882–5890. 10.1039/C8RA00157J. PubMed DOI PMC

Nesbitt H. W.; Legrand D.; Bancroft G. M. Interpretation of Ni2p XPS spectra of Ni conductors and Ni insulators. Phys. Chem. Miner. 2000, 27, 357–366. 10.1007/s002690050265. DOI

Abba F.; De Santis G.; Fabbrizzi L.; Licchelli M.; Manotti Lanfredi A. M.; Pallavicini P.; Poggi A.; Ugozzoli F. Nickel(II) Complexes of Azacyclams: Oxidation and Reduction Behavior and Catalytic Effects in the Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 1366–1375. 10.1021/ic00085a026. DOI

Di Casa M.; Fabbrizzi L.; Licchelli M.; Poggi A.; Sacchi D.; Zema M. A novel fluorescence redox switch based on the formal NiII/NiI couple. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2001, 1671–1675. 10.1039/b101310f. DOI

Lovecchio F. V.; Gore E. S.; Busch D. H. Oxidation and reduction behavior of macrocyclic complexes of nickel. Electrochemical and electron spin resonance studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 3109–3118. 10.1021/ja00817a016. DOI

Bad’ura Z.; Naldoni A.; Qin S.; Bakandritsos A.; Kment Š.; Schmuki P.; Zoppellaro G. Light-Induced Migration of Spin Defects in TiO2 Nanosystems and their Contribution to the H2 Evolution Catalysis from Water. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 4408–4414. 10.1002/cssc.202101218. PubMed DOI

Single Atom Cocatalysts in Photocatalysis

Enhanced Photocatalytic Paracetamol Degradation by NiCu-Modified TiO2 Nanotubes: Mechanistic Insights and Performance Evaluation