The comparison of magnetic resonance and fluoroscopic imaging options in the preoperative assessment of boys with anorectal malformations and a colostomy
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
38038736
DOI
10.1007/s00247-023-05816-1
PII: 10.1007/s00247-023-05816-1
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Anorectal malformation, Distal colostogram, Fluoroscopy, Infant, Magnetic resonance imaging, Male, Rectovesical fistula,
- MeSH
- Anorectal Malformations * diagnostic imaging surgery MeSH
- Colostomy MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods MeSH
- Rectal Fistula * surgery MeSH
- Rectum diagnostic imaging surgery abnormalities MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: In recent decades, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained prominence as a standard diagnostic method for preoperative assessment in patients with anorectal malformations and a colostomy, with the potential to replace the classic fluoroscopic distal pressure colostogram (FDPC). Three MRI techniques are available: MRI-distal pressure colostogram with gadolinium (MRI-DPCG) or saline (MRI-DPCS) instillation into the colostomy and native MRI without colostomy instillation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI (native MRI, MRI-DPCG and MRI-DPCS) in the preoperative workup of boys with an anorectal malformation and a colostomy and to compare it to FDPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two boys with preoperative MRI using one of the three approaches and 43 with FDPC met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective study. The presence and localization of rectal fistulas according to the Krickenbeck classification were evaluated and compared with intraoperative findings. RESULTS: The accuracy of fistula detection for MRI in general (regardless of the technique), MRI-DPCS, MRI-DPCG, native MRI and FDPC was 95% (59/62, P<0.001), 100% (12/12, P=0.03), 100% (30/30, P<0.001), 85% (17/20, P=0.41) and 72% (31/43, P=0.82), respectively. The accuracy of describing fistula type in patients with a correctly detected fistula using these methods was 96% (45/47, P<0.001), 100% (9/9, P<0.001), 100% (23/23, P<0.001), 87% (13/15, P<0.001) and 67% (13/21, P=0.002), respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI is a reliable method for detecting and classifying fistulas in boys with an anorectal malformation and a colostomy and can be considered the modality of first choice for preoperative workup.
See more in PubMed
Levitt MA, Pena A (2007) Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2:33 PubMed DOI PMC
Bischoff A, Frischer J, Dickie BH, Pena A (2014) Anorectal malformation without fistula: a defect with unique characteristics. Pediatr Surg Int 30:763–766 PubMed DOI
Kraus SJ, Levitt MA, Pena A (2018) Augmented-pressure distal colostogram: the most important diagnostic tool for planning definitive surgical repair of anorectal malformations in boys. Pediatr Radiol 48:258–269 PubMed DOI
Holschneider A, Hutson J, Pena A et al (2005) Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations. J Pediatr Surg 40:1521–1526 PubMed DOI
Alamo L, Meyrat BJ, Meuwly JY et al (2013) Anorectal malformations: finding the pathway out of the labyrinth. Radiographics 33:491–512 PubMed DOI
Nievelstein RA, Vos A, Valk J (1998) MR imaging of anorectal malformations and associated anomalies. Eur Radiol 8:573–581 PubMed DOI
Westgarth-Taylor C, Westgarth-Taylor TL, Wood R, Levitt M (2015) Imaging in anorectal malformations: what does the surgeon need to know? S Afr J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v19i2.903
Bischoff A, Pena A, Levitt MA (2013) Laparoscopic-assisted PSARP - the advantages of combining both techniques for the treatment of anorectal malformations with recto-bladderneck or high prostatic fistulas. J Pediatr Surg 48:367–371 PubMed DOI
Bischoff A, Levitt MA, Pena A (2013) Update on the management of anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 29:899–904 PubMed DOI
Eltomey MA, Donnelly LF, Emery KH et al (2008) Postoperative pelvic MRI of anorectal malformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1469–1476 PubMed DOI
Podberesky DJ, Towbin AJ, Eltomey MA, Levitt MA (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging of anorectal malformations. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 21:791–812 PubMed DOI
Kavalcova L, Skaba R, Kyncl M et al (2013) The diagnostic value of MRI fistulogram and MRI distal colostogram in patients with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 48:1806–1809 PubMed DOI
Stafrace S, Lobo L, Augdal TA et al (2022) Imaging of anorectal malformations: where are we now? Abdominal imaging task force of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology. Pediatr Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05395-7 DOI
Thomeer MG, Devos A, Lequin M et al (2015) High resolution MRI for preoperative work-up of neonates with an anorectal malformation: a direct comparison with distal pressure colostography/fistulography. Eur Radiol 25:3472–3479 PubMed DOI PMC
Riccabona M, Lobo ML, Ording-Muller LS et al (2017) European Society of Paediatric Radiology abdominal imaging task force recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part IX: imaging in anorectal and cloacal malformation, imaging in childhood ovarian torsion, and efforts in standardising paediatric uroradiology terminology. Pediatr Radiol 47:1369–1380 PubMed DOI PMC
Alves JC, Sidler D, Lotz JW, Pitcher RD (2013) Comparison of MR and fluoroscopic mucous fistulography in the pre-operative evaluation of infants with anorectal malformation: a pilot study. Pediatr Radiol 43:958–963 PubMed DOI
Madhusmita, Ghasi RG, Mittal MK, Bagga D (2018) Anorectal malformations: role of MRI in preoperative evaluation. Indian J Radiol Imaging 28:187–194 PubMed DOI PMC
Elsayed RF, Kamal HA, El-Liethy NE (2016) Recent advances in MRI in the preoperative assessment of anorectal malformations. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 47:711–721 DOI
Zhan Y, Wang J, Guo WL (2019) Comparative effectiveness of imaging modalities for preoperative assessment of anorectal malformation in the pediatric population. J Pediatr Surg 54:2550–2553 PubMed DOI
Bischoff A, de La Torre L, Peña A (2020) Comparative effectiveness of imaging modalities for preoperative assessment of anorectal malformation in the pediatric population. J Pediatr Surg 55:354 PubMed DOI
deVries PA, Peña A (1982) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 17:638–643 PubMed DOI
R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ . Accessed 23 March 2023
Kuhn M (2021) caret: classification and regression training. R package version 6.0-90. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret . Accessed 23 March 2023
Gamer MLJ, Fellows I, Puspendra Singh (2019) irr: various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. https://www.r-project.org . Accessed 23 March 2023
Bischoff A, Bealer J, Wilcox DT, Peña A (2019) Error traps and culture of safety in anorectal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg 28:131–134 PubMed DOI
Kim SM, Chang HK, Lee MJ et al (2010) Spinal dysraphism with anorectal malformation: lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of 120 patients. J Pediatr Surg 45:769–776 PubMed DOI
Scottoni F, Iacobelli BD, Zaccara AM et al (2014) Spinal ultrasound in patients with anorectal malformations: is this the end of an era? Pediatr Surg Int 30:829–831 PubMed DOI
Alberto Peña AB (2015) Surgical treatment of colorectal problems in children. Springer Cham, Switzerland DOI
Abdalla WMA, De La Torre L (2017) The high pressure distal colostogram in anorectal malformations: technique and pitfalls. J Pediatr Surg 52:1207–1209 PubMed DOI