Injury to the posterior malleolus in Maisonneuve fractures
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
NU 22-10-00240
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
PubMed
38041703
PubMed Central
PMC11249719
DOI
10.1007/s00068-023-02394-7
PII: 10.1007/s00068-023-02394-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Fibular notch, Maisonneuve fracture, Posterior malleolus, Tillaux–Chaput tubercle,
- MeSH
- dislokovaná fraktura diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fibula zranění diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- fraktury kotníku * diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the incidence and a complex pathoanatomy of posterior malleolus fractures in a Maisonneuve fracture. METHODS: The study included 100 prospectively collected patients with a complete clinical and radiological documentation of an ankle fracture or fracture-dislocation including a fracture of the proximal quarter of the fibula. RESULTS: A posterior malleolus fracture was identified in 74 patients, and in 27% of these cases it carried more than one quarter of the fibular notch. Displacement of the posterior fragment by more than 2 mm was shown by scans in 72% of cases. Small intercalary fragments were identified in 43% of cases. Fractures of the Tillaux-Chaput tubercle were identified in 20 patients. CONCLUSION: Our study has proved a high rate of posterior malleolus fractures associated with a Maisonneuve fracture, and documented their considerable variability in terms of involvement of the fibular notch, tibiotalar contact area, direction of displacement and frequency of intercalary fragments. Of no less importance is a combination of Tillaux-Chaput fractures with a Maisonneuve fracture.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Jehlička D, Bartoníček J, Svatoš F, Dobiáš J. Luxační zlomeniny hlezna u dospĕlých. I. Část: Epidemiologické zhodnocení ročního souboru [Fracture-dislocations of the ankle joint in adults. Part I: epidemiologic evaluation of patients during a 1-year period] Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2002;69:243–247. PubMed
Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Kašper Å, Malík J, Tuček M. Pathoanatomy of Maisonneuve fracture based on radiologic and CT examination. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139:497–506. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3099-2. PubMed DOI
Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Tuček M. Maisonneuve fractures of the ankle: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev. 2022 doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.21.00160. PubMed DOI
Stufkens SA, van den Bekerom MP, Doornberg JN, van Dijk CN, Kloen P. Evidence-based treatment of maisonneuve fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50:62–67. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.08.017. PubMed DOI
He JQ, Ma XL, Xin JY, Cao HB, Li N, Sun ZH, Wang GX, Fu X, Zhao B, Hu FK. Pathoanatomy and injury mechanism of typical Maisonneuve fracture. Orthop Surg. 2020;12:1644–1651. doi: 10.1111/os.12733. PubMed DOI PMC
Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Tuček M, Naňka O. Posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015;41:587–600. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0560-6. PubMed DOI
Kašper Å, Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Kamin K, Tuček M. Double Maisonneuve fracture: an unknown fracture pattern. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48:2433–9. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01786-x. PubMed DOI
Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Kostlivý K, Vaněček V, Klika D, Trešl I. Anatomy and classification of the posterior tibial fragment in ankle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135:505–516. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2171-4. PubMed DOI
Rammelt S, Boszczyk A. Computed tomography in the diagnosis and treatment of ankle fractures: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev. 2018;6:e7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00209. PubMed DOI
Mueller E, Kleinertz H, Tessarzyk M, Rammelt S, Bartoníček J, Frosch KH, Barg A, Schlickewei C. Intercalary fragments in posterior malleolar fractures: incidence, treatment implications, and distribution within CT-based classification systems. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023;49:851–858. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02119-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Rammelt S, Bartoníček J, Kroker L. Pathoanatomy of the anterolateral tibial fragment in ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104:353–363. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00167. PubMed DOI
Amman E. Die Maisonneuve-Fraktur Resultate von 37 behandelten Fällen in der Jahren 1971–1981. Inauguraldissertation. Universität Basel; 1981.
Kirschner P, Brünner M. Die Operation Der Maisonneuve-Fraktur. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 1999;11:11–18. doi: 10.1007/s00064-006-0078-5. PubMed DOI
Sproule JA, Khalid M, O´Sullivan M, McCabe JP. Outcome after surgery for Maisonneuve fracture of the fibula. Injury. 2004;35:791–798. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00155-4. PubMed DOI
Babis GC, Papagelopoulos PJ, Tsarouchas J, Zoubos AB, Korres DS, Nikiforidis P. Operative treatment for Maisonneuve fracture of the proximal fibula. Orthopedics. 2000;23:687–690. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20000701-15. PubMed DOI
Pankovich AM. Maisonneuve fracture of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:337–342. doi: 10.2106/00004623-197658030-00007. PubMed DOI
Pelton K, Thordarson DB, Barnwell J. Open versus closed treatment of the fibulae in Maisonneuve injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:604–608. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0604. PubMed DOI
Kostlivý K, Bartoníček J, Rammelt S. Posterior malleolus fractures in Bosworth fracture-dislocations. A combination not to be missed. Injury. 2020;51:537–541. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.088. PubMed DOI
Fojtík P, Kostlivý K, Bartoníček J, Naňka O. The fibular notch: an anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42:1161–1166. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02476-w. PubMed DOI
Gardner MJ, Brodsky A, Briggs SM, Nielson JH, Lorich DG. Fixation of posterior malleolar fractures provides greater syndesmotic stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:165–171. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000203489.21206.a9. PubMed DOI
van Drijfhout CC, Verhage SM, Hoogendoorn JM. Influence of fragment size and postoperative joint congruency on longterm outcome of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:673–678. doi: 10.1177/1071100715570895. PubMed DOI
Miller MA, McDonald TC, Graves ML, Spitler CA, Russell GV, Jones LC, Replogle W, Wise JA, Hydrick J, Bergin PF. Stability of the syndesmosis after posterior malleolar fracture fixation. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39:99–104. doi: 10.1177/1071100717735839. PubMed DOI
Baumbach SF, Herterich V, Damblemont A, Hieber F, Böcker W, Polzer H. Open reduction and internal fixation of the posterior malleolus fragment frequently restores syndesmotic stability. Injury. 2019;50:564–570. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.12.025. PubMed DOI
Miller AN, Carroll EA, Parker RJ, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Posterior malleolar stabilization of syndesmotic injuries is equivalent to screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1129–1135. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1111-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Haraguchi N, Haruyama H, Toga H, Kato F. Pathoanatomy of posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1085–1092. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00856. PubMed DOI