• This record comes from PubMed

High-Intensity Conditioning Activity Causes Localized Postactivation Performance Enhancement and Nonlocalized Performance Reduction

. 2024 Jan 01 ; 38 (1) : e1-e7.

Language English Country United States Media print

Document type Journal Article

Links

PubMed 38085631
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0000000000004590
PII: 00124278-202401000-00026
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Kolinger D, Stastny P, Pisz A, Krzysztofik M, Wilk M, Tsoukos A, and Bogdanis GC. High-intensity conditioning activity causes localized postactivation performance enhancement and nonlocalized performance reduction. J Strength Cond Res 38(1): e1-e7, 2024-This study aimed to examine whether a conditioning activity (CA) performed by the legs (barbell back squat) may cause postactivation performance enhancement (PAPE) on muscle groups other than leg extensors in isokinetic (eccentric [ECC] and concentric [CON]) and dynamic movement. Twelve male basketball players (age: 21.3 ± 3.2, body mass: 89.6 ± 14.1 kg, height: 187.4 ± 4.6 cm, and 1 repetition maximum (1RM) barbell back squat: 113 ± 21 kg) with previous resistance-training experience of at least 2 years, performed 3 sets of 3-4 repetitions of back-squats with submaximal load (60, 90, and 90% 1RM) as CA. Before and after the CA, they performed pretest and post-test in the form of countermovement jumps (CMJs) (localized) or explosive push-ups (EPUs) (nonlocalized) along with isokinetic flexion and extension at the knee (localized) or at the elbow (nonlocalized). The localized and nonlocalized protocols were divided into 2 days in a randomized order. The back squat as CA significantly increased peak torque (PT) (p < 0.05) in all CON and ECC muscle actions and average power per repetition (APPR) (p < 0.05) (all muscle actions except ECC flexion) of the localized isokinetic tests with large (>0.8) and medium (0.4-0.79) effect sizes and significantly decreased (p < 0.01) the PT and APPR (p < 0.01) of the nonlocalized isokinetic test in the ECC flexion. The CMJ and EPU tests showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) between premeasures and postmeasures of take-off height. The effect of PAPE seems to be specific to the muscles most involved in the CA, and the CA inhibits PT of subsequent muscle ECC contractions in muscles not involved in the CA.

See more in PubMed

Bartolomei S, Lanzoni IM, Fantozzi S, Cortesi M. A comparison between non‐localized post‐activation performance enhancements following resistance exercise for the upper and the lower body. Appl Sci 12: 1639, 2022.

Batista MAB, Ugrinowitsch C, Roschel H, Lotufo R, Ricard MD, Tricoli VAA. Intermittent exercise as a conditioning activity to induce postactivation potentiation. J Strength Cond Res 21: 837–840, 2007.

Beato M, de Keijzer KL, Fleming A, et al. Post flywheel squat vs. flywheel deadlift potentiation of lower limb isokinetic peak torques in male athletes. Sports Biomech 22: 1514-1527, 2023.

Beato M, Stiff A, Coratella G. Effects of postactivation potentiation after an eccentric overload bout on countermovement jump and lower-limb muscle strength. J Strength Cond Res 35: 1825–1832, 2021.

Blazevich AJ, Babault N. Post-activation potentiation versus post-activation performance enhancement in humans: Historical perspective, underlying mechanisms, and current issues. Front Physiol 10: 1359, 2019.

Carter J, Greenwood M. Complex training reexamined: Review and recommendations to improve strength and power. Strength Cond J 36: 11–19, 2014.

Chatzopoulos DE, Michailidis CJ, Giannakos AK, et al. Postactivation potentiation effects after heavy resistance exercise on running speed. J Strength Cond Res 21: 1278–1281, 2007.

Cheng J, Brooke JD, Misiaszek JE, Staines WR. Crossed inhibition of the soleus H reflex during passive pedalling movement. Brain Res 779: 280–284, 1998.

Constantini NW, Dubnov G, Lebrun CM. The menstrual cycle and sport performance. Clin Sports Med 24: e51–e82, 2005.

Cuenca-Fernández F, Smith IC, Jordan MJ, et al. Nonlocalized postactivation performance enhancement (PAPE) effects in trained athletes: A pilot study. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 42: 1122–1125, 2017.

Douglas J, Pearson S, Ross A, McGuigan M. Eccentric exercise: Physiological characteristics and acute responses. Sports Med 47: 663–675, 2017.

Downey RJ, Deprez DA, Chilibeck PD. Effects of postactivation potentiation on maximal vertical jump performance after a conditioning contraction in upper-body and lower-body muscle groups. J Strength Cond Res 36: 259–261, 2022.

Ebben WP. Complex training: A brief review. J Sports Sci Med 1: 42–46, 2002.

Escamilla RF, Andrews JR. Shoulder muscle recruitment patterns and related biomechanics during upper extremity sports. Sports Med 39: 569–590, 2009.

Esformes JI, Bampouras TM. Effect of back squat depth on lower-body postactivation potentiation. J Strength Cond Res 27: 2997–3000, 2013.

Finlay MJ, Bridge CA, Greig M, Page RM. Erratum: Correction to: Upper-body post-activation performance enhancement for athletic performance: A systematic review with meta-analysis and recommendations for future research. Sports Med 52: 873, 2022.

Gandevia SC. Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev 81: 1725–1789, 2001.

Garrison JC, Hart JM, Palmieri RM, Kerrigan DC, Ingersoll CD. Lower extremity EMG in male and female college soccer players during single-leg landing. J Sport Rehabil 14: 48–57, 2005.

Gołaś A, Maszczyk A, Zajac A, Mikołajec K, Stastny P. Optimizing post activation potentiation for explosive activities in competitive sports. J Hum Kinet 52: 95–106, 2016.

Herzog W, Schappacher G, DuVall M, Leonard TR, Herzog JA. Residual force enhancement following eccentric contractions: A new mechanism involving titin. Physiology 31: 300–312, 2016.

Hodgson M, Docherty D, Robbins D. Post-activation potentiation: Underlying physiology and implications for motor performance. Sports Med 35: 585–595, 2005.

Hodgson MJ, Docherty D, Zehr EP. Postactivation potentiation of force is independent of H-reflex excitability. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 3: 219–231, 2008.

Laskin G, Talpey S, Gregory R. The effects of an upper body conditioning stimulus on lower body post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE): A pilot study. Int J Strength Cond 1: 2021.

Linder EE, Prins JH, Murata NM, DeRenne C, Morgan CF, Solomon JR. Effects of preload 4 repetition maximum on 100-m sprint times in collegiate women. J Strength Cond Res 24: 1184–1190, 2010.

Lloyd RS, Oliver JL. The youth physical development model: A new approach to long-term athletic development. Strength Cond J 34: 61–72, 2012.

McBride JM, Nimphius S, Erickson TM. The acute effects of heavy-load squats and loaded countermovement jumps on sprint performance. J Strength Cond Res 19: 893–897, 2005.

Neltner TJ, Anders JPV, Keller JL, et al. Ipsilateral and contralateral torque responses to bilateral and unilateral maximal, fatiguing, isokinetic leg extensions. Int J Kinesiol Sport Sci 8: 25–33, 2021.

Power GMJ, Colwell E, Saeterbakken AH, Drinkwater EJ, Behm DG. Lack of evidence for non-local muscle fatigue and performance enhancement in young adults. J Sports Sci Med 20: 339–348, 2021.

Rand MK, Ohtsuki T. EMG analysis of lower limb muscles in humans during quick change in running directions. Gait Posture 12: 169–183, 2000.

Seitz LB, Haff GG. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation of jump, sprint, throw, and upper-body ballistic performances: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med 46: 231–240, 2016.

Seitz LB, Trajano GS, Dal Maso F, Haff GG, Blazevich AJ. Postactivation potentiation during voluntary contractions after continued knee extensor task-specific practice. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 40: 230–237, 2015.

Seitz LB, Trajano GS, Haff GG. The back squat and the power clean: Elicitation of different degrees of potentiation. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 9: 643–649, 2014.

Sugisaki N, Kurokawa S, Okada J, Kanehisa H. Difference in the recruitment of hip and knee muscles between back squat and plyometric squat jump. PLoS One 9: 101203, 2014.

Taylor JL, Todd G, Gandevia SC. Evidence for a supraspinal contribution to human muscle fatigue. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 33: 400–405, 2006.

Tillin NA, Bishop D. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation and its effect on performance of subsequent explosive activities. Sports Med 39: 147–166, 2009.

Willardson JM. A brief review: Factors affecting the length of the rest interval between resistance exercise sets. J Strength Cond Res 20: 978–984, 2006.

Williams JJ, Herron RL, Spradley B, Saracino P. Postactivation potentiation effect of heavy sled towing on subsequent sprints. J Strength Cond Res 35: 1229–1233, 2021.

Wong V, Yamada Y, Bell ZW, et al. Is there A cross over effect in post activation potentiation? Med Sci Sports Exerc 52: 827–828, 2020.

Wong V, Yamada Y, Bell ZW, et al. Postactivation performance enhancement: Does conditioning one arm augment performance in the other? Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 40: 407–414, 2020.

Zero AM, Rice CL. State-of-the-art review: Spinal and supraspinal responses to muscle potentiation in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 121: 1271–1282, 2021.

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...