Updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of first-line treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma with extended follow-up data
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, systematický přehled, časopisecké články, přehledy
PubMed
38289361
PubMed Central
PMC10827892
DOI
10.1007/s00262-023-03621-1
PII: 10.1007/s00262-023-03621-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors, Metastasis, Network meta-analysis, Renal cell carcinoma,
- MeSH
- ipilimumab MeSH
- karcinom z renálních buněk * farmakoterapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory ledvin * farmakoterapie MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- nivolumab MeSH
- patologická kompletní odpověď MeSH
- síťová metaanalýza MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
- Názvy látek
- ipilimumab MeSH
- nivolumab MeSH
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies are the recommended first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, no head-to-head phase-3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the efficacy of different ICI-based combination therapies. Here, we compared the efficacy of various first-line ICI-based combination therapies in patients with mRCC using updated survival data from phase-3 RCTs. Three databases were searched in June 2023 for RCTs that analyzed oncologic outcomes in mRCC patients treated with ICI-based combination therapies as first-line treatment. A network meta-analysis compared outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and complete response (CR) rate. Subgroup analyses were based on the International mRCC Database Consortium risk classification. The treatment ranking analysis of the entire cohort showed that nivolumab + cabozantinib (81%) had the highest likelihood of improving OS, followed by nivolumab + ipilimumab (75%); pembrolizumab + lenvatinib had the highest likelihood of improving PFS (99%), ORR (97%), and CR (86%). These results remained valid even when the analysis was limited to patients with intermediate/poor risk, except that nivolumab + ipilimumab had the highest likelihood of achieving CR (100%). Further, OS benefits of ICI doublets were not inferior to those of ICI + tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations. Recommendation of combination therapies with ICIs and/or tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on survival benefits and patient pretreatment risk classification will help advance personalized medicine for mRCC.
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam Saudi Arabia
Department of Urology La Croix Du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France
Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology University of Rennes Rennes France
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery The University of Jordan Amman Jordan
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, Bedke J, Capitanio U, Dabestani S, et al. European association of urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2022 update. Eur Urol. 2022;82:399–410. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006. PubMed DOI
Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N, Alva A, Baine M, Beckermann K, et al. Kidney cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN. 2022;20:71–90. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0001. PubMed DOI PMC
Lombardi P, Filetti M, Falcone R, Di Bidino R, Iacovelli R, Ciccarese C, et al. New first-line immunotherapy-based combinations for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2022;106:102377. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102377. PubMed DOI
Mori K, Mostafaei H, Miura N, Karakiewicz PI, Luzzago S, Schmidinger M, et al. Systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cancer Immunol Immunother CII. 2021;70:265–273. doi: 10.1007/s00262-020-02684-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Quhal F, Mori K, Bruchbacher A, Resch I, Mostafaei H, Pradere B, et al. First-line immunotherapy-based combinations for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4:755–765. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.001. PubMed DOI
Burotto M, Powles T, Escudier B, Apolo AB, Bourlon MT, Shah AY, et al. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib vs sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): 3-year follow-up from the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:603. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.603. PubMed DOI
Haanen J, Larkin J, Choueiri TK, Albiges L, Rini BI, Atkins MB, et al. Extended follow-up from JAVELIN Renal 101: subgroup analysis of avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib by the international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium risk group in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. ESMO Open. 2023;8:101210. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101210. PubMed DOI PMC
Motzer RJ, Porta C, Eto M, Powles T, Grünwald V, Alekseev B, et al. Final prespecified overall survival (OS) analysis of CLEAR: 4-year follow-up of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (L+P) vs sunitinib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:4502. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.4502. DOI
Plimack ER, Stus V, Gafanov R, Waddell T, Nosov D, Pouliot F, et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma: 5-year analysis of KEYNOTE-426. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2023;41:LBA4501-LBA. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.17_suppl.LBA4501. DOI
Hutton B, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Internal Med. 2015;162(11):777–784. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385. PubMed DOI
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. PubMed DOI PMC
Motzer R, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Porta C, Eto M, Powles T, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1289–1300. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035716. PubMed DOI
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928. PubMed DOI PMC
Connor MJ, Shah TT, Smigielska K, Day E, Sukumar J, Fiorentino F, et al. Additional treatments to the local tumour for metastatic prostate cancer-assessment of novel treatment algorithms (IP2-ATLANTA): protocol for a multicentre, phase II randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e042953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042953. PubMed DOI PMC
van Valkenhoef G, Lu G, de Brock B, Hillege H, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Automating network meta-analysis. Res Synth. Methods. 2012;3:285–299. PubMed
Woods BS, Hawkins N, Scott DA. Network meta-analysis on the log-hazard scale, combining count and hazard ratio statistics accounting for multi-arm trials: a tutorial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-54. PubMed DOI PMC
Motzer RJ, McDermott DF, Escudier B, Burotto M, Choueiri TK, Hammers HJ, et al. Conditional survival and long-term efficacy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2022;128:2085–2097. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34180. PubMed DOI PMC
Motzer RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J, Rini B, Albiges L, Campbell MT, et al. Avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1103–1115. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816047. PubMed DOI PMC
Motzer RJ, Powles T, Burotto M, Escudier B, Bourlon MT, Shah AY, et al. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (CheckMate 9ER): long-term follow-up results from an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23:888–898. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00290-X. PubMed DOI PMC
Motzer RJ, Rini BI, McDermott DF, Arén Frontera O, Hammers HJ, Carducci MA, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended follow-up of efficacy and safety results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1370–1385. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30413-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, Arén Frontera O, Melichar B, Choueiri TK, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1277–1290. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126. PubMed DOI PMC
Powles T, Plimack ER, Soulières D, Waddell T, Stus V, Gafanov R, et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-426): extended follow-up from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1563–1573. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30436-8. PubMed DOI
Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V, Gafanov R, Hawkins R, Nosov D, et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1116–1127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816714. PubMed DOI
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008. PubMed DOI PMC
Allen E, Jabouille A, Rivera LB, Lodewijckx I, Missiaen R, Steri V, et al. Combined antiangiogenic and anti-PD-L1 therapy stimulates tumor immunity through HEV formation. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:46966. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aak9679. PubMed DOI PMC
Liu XD, Hoang A, Zhou L, Kalra S, Yetil A, Sun M, et al. Resistance to antiangiogenic therapy is associated with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:1017–1029. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0244. PubMed DOI PMC
Mori K, Abufaraj M, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Fajkovic H, Remzi M, et al. The Predictive value of programmed death ligand 1 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2021;79:783–792. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.10.006. PubMed DOI
Mori K, Pradere B, Quhal F, Katayama S, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, et al. Differences in oncological and toxicity outcomes between programmed cell death-1 and programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2021;99:102242. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102242. PubMed DOI
Deeks ED. Cabozantinib: A review in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Target Oncol. 2019;14:107–113. doi: 10.1007/s11523-019-00622-y. PubMed DOI
Bergerot P, Lamb P, Wang E, Pal SK. Cabozantinib in combination with immunotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma: rationale and clinical evidence. Mol Cancer Ther. 2019;18:2185–2193. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-1399. PubMed DOI
Lindner AK, Pichler M, Thurnher M, Pichler R. Targeting c-met to improve immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2022;81:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.10.025. PubMed DOI
Khan KA, Kerbel RS. Improving immunotherapy outcomes with anti-angiogenic treatments and vice versa. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15:310–324. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.9. PubMed DOI
Akalu YT, Rothlin CV, Ghosh S. TAM receptor tyrosine kinases as emerging targets of innate immune checkpoint blockade for cancer therapy. Immunol Rev. 2017;276:165–177. doi: 10.1111/imr.12522. PubMed DOI PMC
Ocaña-Guzman R, Vázquez-Bolaños L, Sada-Ovalle I. Receptors that inhibit macrophage activation: mechanisms and signals of regulation and tolerance. J Immunol Res. 2018;2018:8695157. doi: 10.1155/2018/8695157. PubMed DOI PMC
Graham DK, DeRyckere D, Davies KD, Earp HS. The TAM family: phosphatidylserine sensing receptor tyrosine kinases gone awry in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:769–785. doi: 10.1038/nrc3847. PubMed DOI
Bolli N, Avet-Loiseau H, Wedge DC, Van Loo P, Alexandrov LB, Martincorena I, et al. Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2014;5:2997. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3997. PubMed DOI PMC
Birchmeier C, Birchmeier W, Gherardi E, Vande Woude GF. Met, metastasis, motility and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:915–925. doi: 10.1038/nrm1261. PubMed DOI
Balan M, Mier y Teran E, Waaga-Gasser AM, Gasser M, Choueiri TK, Freeman G, et al. Novel roles of c-Met in the survival of renal cancer cells through the regulation of HO-1 and PD-L1 expression. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:8110–8120. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.612689. PubMed DOI PMC
Ireland L, Luckett T, Schmid MC, Mielgo A. Blockade of stromal gas6 alters cancer cell plasticity, activates nk cells, and inhibits pancreatic cancer metastasis. Front Immunol. 2020;11:297. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00297. PubMed DOI PMC
Zhao GJ, Zheng JY, Bian JL, Chen LW, Dong N, Yu Y, et al. Growth arrest-specific 6 enhances the suppressive function of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells mainly through Axl receptor. Mediat Inflamm. 2017;2017:6848430. doi: 10.1155/2017/6848430. PubMed DOI PMC
Voron T, Marcheteau E, Pernot S, Colussi O, Tartour E, Taieb J, et al. Control of the immune response by pro-angiogenic factors. Front Oncol. 2014;4:70. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00070. PubMed DOI PMC
Kwilas AR, Ardiani A, Donahue RN, Aftab DT, Hodge JW. Dual effects of a targeted small-molecule inhibitor (cabozantinib) on immune-mediated killing of tumor cells and immune tumor microenvironment permissiveness when combined with a cancer vaccine. J Transl Med. 2014;12:294. doi: 10.1186/s12967-014-0294-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Lu X, Horner JW, Paul E, Shang X, Troncoso P, Deng P, et al. Effective combinatorial immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature. 2017;543:728–732. doi: 10.1038/nature21676. PubMed DOI PMC
Tolaney SM, Ziehr DR, Guo H, Ng MR, Barry WT, Higgins MJ, et al. Phase II and biomarker study of cabozantinib in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients. Oncologist. 2017;22:25–32. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0229. PubMed DOI PMC
McGregor B, Mortazavi A, Cordes L, Salabao C, Vandlik S, Apolo AB. Management of adverse events associated with cabozantinib plus nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma: a review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2022;103:102333. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102333. PubMed DOI PMC
Motzer RJ, Banchereau R, Hamidi H, Powles T, McDermott D, Atkins MB, et al. Molecular subsets in renal cancer determine outcome to checkpoint and angiogenesis blockade. Cancer Cell. 2020;38:803–17.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.10.011. PubMed DOI PMC
Choueiri TK, Powles T, Albiges L, Burotto M, Szczylik C, Zurawski B, et al. Cabozantinib plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:1767–1778. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212851. PubMed DOI PMC
Mori K, Schmidinger M, Quhal F, Egawa S, Shariat SF, Grünwald V. What is next in second- and later-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma? review of the recent literature. Curr Opin Urol. 2021;31:276–284. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000867. PubMed DOI
Pal SK, Albiges L, Tomczak P, Suárez C, Voss MH, de Velasco G, et al. Atezolizumab plus cabozantinib versus cabozantinib monotherapy for patients with renal cell carcinoma after progression with previous immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment (CONTACT-03): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. London: Lancet; 2023. PubMed PMC