Problematic pornography use across countries, genders, and sexual orientations: Insights from the International Sex Survey and comparison of different assessment tools

. 2024 May ; 119 (5) : 928-950. [epub] 20240227

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid38413365

Grantová podpora
Auckland University of Technology, 2021 Faculty Research Development Fund
Chaire Professeur Junior of Artois University
Charles University institutional support programme Cooperatio-Health Sciences
Dialogue Stratégique de Gestion 2
KKP126835 Hungarian National Research, Development, and Innovation Office
International Center for Responsible Gaming
JP21H05173 Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
21H02849 Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Kindbridge Research Institute
Ministry for Culture and Innovation
National Research Foundation of Korea
2020/36/C/HS6/00005 National Science Centre of Poland
2021/40/Q/HS6/00219 National Science Centre of Poland
19BSH117 National Social Science Foundation of China
Problem Gambling Network of Ohio
073-2022 SENACYT
Strategic Dialogue and Management Scholarship (Phase 1 and 2)
Tempus Közalapítvány
Tier 1 Canada Research Chair
Universidad Cientifica del Sur
WUN Research Development Fund

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Problematic pornography use (PPU) is a common manifestation of the newly introduced Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder diagnosis in the 11th edition of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Although cultural, gender- and sexual orientation-related differences in sexual behaviors are well documented, there is a relative absence of data on PPU outside Western countries and among women as well as gender- and sexually-diverse individuals. We addressed these gaps by (a) validating the long and short versions of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS and PPCS-6, respectively) and the Brief Pornography Screen (BPS) and (b) measuring PPU risk across diverse populations. METHODS: Using data from the pre-registered International Sex Survey [n = 82 243; mean age (Mage) = 32.4 years, standard deviation = 12.5], a study across 42 countries from five continents, we evaluated the psychometric properties (i.e. factor structure, measurement invariance, and reliability) of the PPCS, PPCS-6, and BPS and examined their associations with relevant correlates (e.g. treatment-seeking). We also compared PPU risk among diverse groups (e.g. three genders). RESULTS: The PPCS, PPCS-6, and BPS demonstrated excellent psychometric properties [for example, comparative fit index = 0.985, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.981, root mean square error of approximation = 0.060 (90% confidence interval = 0.059-0.060)] in the confirmatory factor analysis, with all PPCS' inter-factor correlations positive and strong (rs = 0.72-0.96). A total of 3.2% of participants were at risk of experiencing PPU (PPU+) based on the PPCS, with significant country- and gender-based differences (e.g. men reported the highest levels of PPU). No sexual orientation-based differences were observed. Only 4-10% of individuals in the PPU+ group had ever sought treatment for PPU, while an additional 21-37% wanted to, but did not do so for specific reasons (e.g. unaffordability). CONCLUSIONS: This study validated three measures to assess the severity of problematic pornography use across languages, countries, genders, and sexual orientations in 26 languages: the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS, and PPCS-6, respectively), and the Brief Pornography Screen (BPS). The problematic pornography use risk is estimated to be 3.2-16.6% of the population of 42 countries, and varies among different groups (e.g. genders) and based on the measure used.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 11th edn; 2022. Available at: https://icd.who.int/

Reid RC, Carpenter BN, Hook JN, Garos S, Manning JC, Gilliland R, et al. Report of findings in a DSM‐5 field trial for hypersexual disorder. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2868–2877.

Kraus SW, Krueger RB, Briken P, First MB, Stein DJ, Kaplan MS, et al. Compulsive sexual behaviour disorder in the ICD‐11. World Psych. 2018;17:109–110.

Grubbs JB, Perry SL. Moral incongruence and pornography use: a critical review and integration. J Sex Res. 2019;56:29–37.

Grubbs JB, Perry SL, Wilt JA, Reid RC. Pornography problems due to moral incongruence: an integrative model with a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48:397–415.

Kraus SW, Sweeney PJ. Hitting the target: considerations for differential diagnosis when treating individuals for problematic use of pornography. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48:431–435.

Grubbs JB, Hoagland C, Lee B, Grant JT, Davison P, Reid RC, et al. Sexual addiction 25 years on: a systematic and methodological review of empirical literature and an agenda for future research. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020;8:101925.

Gola M, Lewczuk K, Potenza MN, Kingston DA, Grubbs JB, Stark R, et al. What should be included in the criteria for compulsive sexual behavior disorder? J Behav Addict. 2022;11:160–165.

Briken P, Turner D. What does ‘Sexual’ mean in compulsive sexual behavior disorder?: commentary to the debate: ‘Behavioral addictions in the ICD‐11’. J Behav Addict. 2022;11:222–225.

Jennings TL, Gleason N, Kraus SW. Assessment of compulsive sexual behavior disorder among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer clients: commentary to the debate: ‘Behavioral addictions in the ICD‐11’. J Behav Addict. 2022;11:216–221.

Bőthe B, Koós M, Demetrovics Z. Contradicting classification, nomenclature, and diagnostic criteria of compulsive sexual behavior disorder and future directions–commentary on ‘What should be included in the criteria for compulsive sexual behavior disorder?’ (Gola et al., 2020) and should compulsive sexual behavior (CSB) be considered as a behavioral addiction? A debate paper presenting the opposing view (Sassover and Weinstein, 2020). J Behav Addict. 2022;11:204–206.

Petersen JL, Hyde JS. A meta‐analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychol Bull. 2010;136:21–38.

Parker R. Sexuality, culture and society: shifting paradigms in sexuality research. Cult Health Sex. 2009;11:251–266.

Khan T, Abimbola S, Kyobutungi C, Pai M. How we classify countries and people–and why it matters. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7:e009704. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009704

American Psychological Association. Inclusive Language Guide, 2nd edn. Available at: https://www.apa.org/about/apa/equity-diversity-inclusion/language-guidelines.pdf

Klein V, Savaş Ö, Conley TD. How WEIRD and androcentric is sex research? Global inequities in study populations. J Sex Res. 2022;59:810–817.

Kowalewska E, Gola M, Kraus SW, Lew‐starowicz M. Spotlight on compulsive sexual behavior disorder: a systematic review of research on women. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;2025–2043.

Grubbs JB, Kraus SW, Perry SL. Self‐reported addiction to pornography in a nationally representative sample: the roles of use habits, religiousness, and moral incongruence. J Behav Addict. 2019;8:88–93.

Herbenick D, Fu TC, Wright P, Paul B, Gradus R, Bauer J, et al. Diverse sexual behaviors and pornography use: findings from a nationally representative probability survey of Americans aged 18 to 60 years. J Sex Med. 2020;17:623–633.

Lewczuk K, Glica A, Nowakowska I, Gola M, Grubbs JB. Evaluating pornography problems due to moral incongruence model. J Sex Med. 2020;17:300–311.

Rissel C, Richters J, de Visser RO, McKee A, Yeung A, Caruana T. A profile of pornography users in Australia: findings from the second Australian study of health and relationships. J Sex Res. 2017;54:227–240.

Træen B, Spitznogle K, Beverfjord A. Attitudes and use of pornography in the Norwegian population 2002. J Sex Res. 2004;41:193–200.

Lewczuk K, Wizła M, Glica A, Potenza MN, Lew‐Starowicz M, Kraus SW. Withdrawal and tolerance as related to compulsive sexual behavior disorder and problematic pornography use–preregistered study based on a nationally representative sample in Poland. J Behav Addict. 2022;11:979–993.

Grubbs JB, Lee BN, Hoagland KC, Kraus SW, Perry SL. Addiction or transgression? Moral incongruence and self‐reported problematic pornography use in a nationally representative sample. Clin Psychol Sci. 2020;8:936–946.

Költő A, Cosma A, Young H, Moreau N, Pavlova D, Tesler R, et al. Romantic attraction and substance use in 15‐year‐old adolescents from eight European countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:3063.

Borgogna NC, Mcdermott RC, Aita SL, Kridel MM. Anxiety and depression across gender and sexual minorities: implications for transgender, gender nonconforming, pansexual, demisexual, asexual, queer, and questioning individuals. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2019;6:54–63.

Feinstein BA, Hurtado M, Dyar C, Davila J. Disclosure, minority stress, and mental health among bisexual, pansexual, and queer (Bi+) adults: the roles of primary sexual identity and multiple sexual identity label use. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2023;10:181–189.

Kaestle CE, Ivory AH. A forgotten sexuality: content analysis of bisexuality in the medical literature over two decades. J Bisex. 2012;12:35–48.

Ahorsu DK, Adjorlolo S, Nurmala I, Ruckwongpatr K, Strong C, Lin CY. Problematic porn use and cross‐cultural differences: a brief review. Curr Addict Rep. 2023;10:572–580.

Fernandez DP, Griffiths MD. Psychometric instruments for problematic pornography use: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof. 2021;44:111–141.

Bőthe B, Tóth‐Király I, Zsila Á, Griffiths MD, Demetrovics Z, Orosz G. The development of the problematic pornography consumption scale (PPCS). J Sex Res. 2018;55:395–406.

Bőthe B, Tóth‐Király I, Demetrovics Z, Orosz G. The short version of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS‐6): a reliable and valid measure in general and treatment‐seeking populations. J Sex Res. 2021;58:342–352.

Kraus SW, Gola M, Grubbs JB, Kowalewska E, Hoff RA, Lew‐Starowicz M, et al. Validation of a brief pornography screen across multiple samples. J Behav Addict. 2020;9:259–271.

Chen L, Jiang X. The assessment of problematic internet pornography use: a comparison of three scales with mixed methods. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:488.

Griffiths MD. A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. J Subst Use. 2005;10:191–197.

Chen L, Luo X, Bőthe B, Jiang X, Demetrovics Z, Potenza MN. Properties of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS‐18) in community and subclinical samples in China and Hungary. Addict Behav. 2021;112:106591.

Bőthe B, Vaillancourt‐Morel MP, Dion J, Štulhofer A, Bergeron S. Validity and reliability of the short version of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS‐6‐A) in adolescents. Psychol Addict Behav. 2021;35:486–500.

Alidost F, Zareiyan A, Bőthe B, Farnam F. Psychometric properties of the Persian short version of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS‐6). Sex Health Compulsivity. 2022;29:96–107.

Kraus SW, Martino S, Potenza MN. Clinical characteristics of men interested in seeking treatment for use of pornography. J Behav Addict. 2016;5:169–178.

Chen L, Jiang X, Luo X, Kraus SW, Bőthe B. The role of impaired control in screening problematic pornography use: evidence from cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies in a large help‐seeking male sample. Psychol Addict Behav. 2022;36:537–546.

Grubbs JB, Floyd CG, Griffin KR, Jennings TL, Kraus SW. Moral incongruence and addiction: a registered report. Psychol Addict Behav. 2022;36:749–761.

Kowalewska E, Gola M, Lew‐Starowicz M, Kraus SW. Predictors of compulsive sexual behavior among treatment‐seeking women. Sex Med. 2022;10:100525.

Borgogna NC, Griffin KR, Grubbs JB, Kraus SW. Understanding differences in problematic pornography use: considerations for gender and sexual orientation. J Sex Med. 2022;19:1290–1302.

Lew‐Starowicz M, Draps M, Kowalewska E, Obarska K, Kraus SW, Gola M. Tolerability and efficacy of paroxetine and naltrexone for treatment of compulsive sexual behaviour disorder. World Psychiatry. 2022;21:468–469.

Bőthe B, Koós M, Nagy L, Kraus SW, Potenza MN, Demetrovics Z. International Sex Survey: study protocol of a large, cross‐cultural collaborative study in 45 countries. J Behav Addict. 2021;10:632–645.

Jeong S, Lee Y. Consequences of not conducting measurement invariance tests in cross‐cultural studies: a review of current research practices and recommendations. Adv Dev Hum Resour. 2019;21:466–483.

Milfont TL, Fischer R. Testing measurement invariance across groups: applications in cross‐cultural research. Int J Psychol Res. 2010;3:2011–2079.

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross‐cultural adaptation of self‐report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.

Qualtrics. Qualtrics research suite. 2022.

Kraus SW, Rosenberg H, Martino S, Nich C, Potenza MN. The development and initial evaluation of the pornography‐use avoidance self‐efficacy scale. J Behav Addict. 2017;6:354–363.

Kohut T, Balzarini RN, Fisher WA, Grubbs JB, Campbell L, Prause N. Surveying pornography use: a shaky science resting on poor measurement foundations. J Sex Res. 2020;57:722–742.

IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 28.0 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2021.

Muthén LK, Muthén BO. MPlus User's Guide 8th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2022.

Little RJA. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83:1198–1202.

Finney SJ, DiStefano C. Non‐normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO, editorsStructural Equation Modeling: a Second Course 2nd ed. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing; 2013. p. 439–492.

Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. Weighted least squares estimation with missing data; 2010.

Islam MS, Tasnim R, Sujan MSH, Bőthe B, Ferdous MZ, Sikder MT, et al. Validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Bangla version of the brief pornography screen in men and women. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11469-022-00903-0

Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editorsTesting Structural Equation Models 21 Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993. p. 136–162.

Schermelleh‐Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness‐of‐fit measures. Methods Psychol Res. 2003;8:23–74.

Kenny DA, Kaniskan B, McCoach DB. The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociol Methods Res. 2015;44:486–507.

Millsap P. Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis; 2011.

Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods. 2000;3:4–70.

Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. In: McGraw‐Hill series in Psychology 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: McGraw‐Hill; 1978.

McDonald RP. The theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis, canonical factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1970;23:1–21.

McNeish D. Thanks coefficient alpha, we’l take it from here. Psychol Methods. 2018;23:412–433.

Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.

Green SB, Yang Y. Commentary on coefficient alpha: a cautionary tale. Psychometrika. 2009;74:121–135.

Revelle W, Zinbarg RE. Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika. 2009;74:145–154.

Dunn TJ, Baguley T, Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. Br J Psychol. 2014;105:399–412.

Reed GM, First MB, Billieux J, Cloitre M, Briken P, Achab S, et al. Emerging experience with selected new categories in the ICD‐11: complex PTSD, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder. World Psychiatry. 2022;21:189–213.

Grubbs JB, Kraus SW. Pornography use and psychological science: a call for consideration. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2021;30:68–75.

Griffin KR, Way BM, Kraus SW. Controversies and clinical recommendations for the treatment of compulsive sexual behavior disorder. Curr Addict Rep. 2021;8:546–555.

Grubbs JB, Grant JT, Engelman J. Self‐identification as a pornography addict: examining the roles of pornography use, religiousness, and moral incongruence. Sex Addict Compulsivity. 2018;25:269–292.

Bőthe B, Tóth‐Király I, Potenza MN, Griffiths MD, Orosz G, Demetrovics Z. Revisiting the role of impulsivity and compulsivity in problematic sexual behaviors. J Sex Res. 2019;56:166–179.

Carvalho J, Rosa PJ, Štulhofer A. Exploring hypersexuality pathways from eye movements: the role of (sexual) impulsivity. J Sex Med. 2021;18:1607–1614.

Lykke LC, Cohen PN. Widening gender gap in opposition to pornography, 1975–2012. Soc Curr. 2015;2:307–323.

Chen L, Jiang X, Wang Q, Bőthe B, Potenza Marc N, Wu H. The association between the quantity and severity of pornography use: a meta‐analysis. J Sex Res. 2022;509:704–719.

Vaillancourt‐Morel MP, Bergeron S. Self‐perceived problematic pornography use: beyond individual differences and religiosity. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48:437–441.

Baumeister RF, Mendoza JP. Cultural variations in the sexual marketplace: gender equality correlates with more sexual activity. J Soc Psychol. 2011;151:350–360.

Petersen JL, Hyde JS. Gender differences in sexual attitudes and behaviors: a review of meta‐analytic results and large datasets. J Sex Res. 2011;48:149–165.

Grubbs JB, Floyd CG, Kraus SW. Pornography use and public health: examining the importance of online sexual behavior in the health sciences. Am J Public Health. 2023;113:22–26.

Nelson KM, Rothman EF. Should public health professionals consider pornography a public health crisis? Am J Public Health. 2020;110:151–153.

McKay K, Poulin C, Muñoz‐Laboy M. Claiming public health crisis to regulate sexual outlets: a critique of the state of Utah's declaration on pornography. Arch Sex Behav. 2021;50:401–405.

Antons S, Engel J, Briken P, Krüger THC, Brand M, Stark R. Treatments and interventions for compulsive sexual behavior disorder with a focus on problematic pornography use: a preregistered systematic review. J Behav Addict. 2022;11:643–666.

Borgogna NC, Garos S, Meyer CL, Trussell MR, Kraus SW. A review of behavioral interventions for compulsive sexual behavior disorder. Curr Addict Rep. 2022;9:99–108.

Castro‐Calvo J, Flayelle M, Perales JC, Brand M, Potenza MN, Billieux J. Compulsive sexual behavior disorder should not be classified by solely relying on component/symptomatic features: commentary to the debate: ‘Behavioral addictions in the ICD‐11’. J Behav Addict. 2022;11:210–215.

Starcevic V. Tolerance and withdrawal symptoms may not be helpful to enhance understanding of behavioural addictions. Addiction. 2016;111:1307–1308.

Sniewski L, Farvid P. Hidden in shame: heterosexual men's experiences of self‐perceived problematic pornography use. Psychol Men Masc. 2020;21:201–212.

Wéry A, Schimmenti A, Karila L, Billieux J. Where the mind cannot dare: a case of addictive use of online pornography and its relationship with childhood trauma. J Sex Marital Ther. 2019;45:114–127.

Ford JJ, Durtschi JA, Franklin DL. Structural therapy with a couple battling pornography addiction. Am J Fam Ther. 2012;40:336–348.

Wéry A, Billieux J. Online sexual activities: an exploratory study of problematic and non‐problematic usage patterns in a sample of men. Comput Human Behav. 2016;56:257–266.

Grubbs JB, Kraus SW, Perry SL, Lewczuk K, Gola M. Moral incongruence and compulsive sexual behavior: results from cross‐sectional interactions and parallel growth curve analyses. J Abnorm Psychol. 2020;129:266–278.

Briken P, Wiessner C, Štulhofer A, Klein V, Fuß J, Reed GM, et al. Who feels affected by ‘out of control’ sexual behavior? Prevalence and correlates of indicators for ICD‐11 Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder in the German Health and Sexuality Survey (GeSiD). J Behav Addict. 2022;11:900–911.

Muthén B, Asparouhov T. Recent methods for the study of measurement invariance with many groups: alignment and random effects. Sociol Methods Res. 2018;47:637–664.

Zhang Z, Braun TM, Peterson KE, Hu H, Téllez‐Rojo MM, Sánchez BN. Extending tests of random effects to assess for measurement invariance in factor models. Stat Biosci. 2018;10:634–650.

Kim ES, Cao C, Wang Y, Nguyen DT. Measurement invariance testing with many groups: a comparison of five approaches. Struct Equ Modeling. 2017;24:524–544.

Rutkowski L, Svetina D. Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large‐scale international surveys. Educ Psychol Meas. 2014;74:31–57.

Jiang X, Wu Y, Zhang K, Bothe B, Hong Y, Chen L. Symptoms of problematic pornography use among help‐seeking male adolescents: latent profile and network analysis. J Behav Addict. 2022;11:912–927.

Štulhofer A, Rousseau A, Shekarchi R. A two‐wave assessment of the structure and stability of self‐reported problematic pornography use among male Croatian adolescents. Int J Sex Health. 2020;32:151–164.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...