European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of actinic keratoses, epithelial UV-induced dysplasia and field cancerization on behalf of European Association of Dermato-Oncology, European Dermatology Forum, European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and Union of Medical Specialists (Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes)
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, směrnice pro lékařskou praxi
PubMed
38451047
DOI
10.1111/jdv.19897
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- aktinická keratóza * diagnóza terapie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- dermatologie normy metody MeSH
- konsensus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory kůže * prevence a kontrola diagnóza terapie etiologie MeSH
- spinocelulární karcinom prevence a kontrola diagnóza terapie etiologie MeSH
- ultrafialové záření škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
A collaboration of multidisciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology, the European Dermatology Forum, the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, and the European Union of Medical Specialists was formed to develop European recommendations on AK diagnosis and treatment, based on current literature and expert consensus. This guideline addresses the epidemiology, diagnostics, risk stratification and treatments in immunocompetent as well as immunosuppressed patients. Actinic keratoses (AK) are potential precursors of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and display typical histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of this malignancy in an early stage. They can develop into cSSC in situ and become invasive in a low percentage of cases. AK is the most frequent neoplasia in white populations, frequently occurring within a cancerous field induced by ultraviolet radiation. Since it cannot be predicted, which lesion will progress to cSCC and when treatment is usually recommended. The diagnosis of AK and field cancerization is made by clinical examination. Dermatoscopy, confocal microscopy, optical coherence tomography or line-field confocal-OCT can help in the differential diagnosis of AK and other skin neoplasms. A biopsy is indicated in clinically and/or dermatoscopically suspicious and/or treatment-refractory lesions. The choice of treatment depends on patients' and lesion characteristics. For single non-hyperkeratotic lesions, the treatment can be started upon patient's request with destructive treatments or topical treatments. For multiple lesions, field cancerization treatment is advised with topical treatments and photodynamic therapy. Preventive measures such as sun protection, self-examination and repeated field cancerization treatments of previously affected skin areas in high-risk patients are advised.
1st Department of Dermatology Aristotle University Thessaloniki Greece
Centre for Dermatooncology Department of Dermatology Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen Germany
CentroDerm Clinic Wuppertal Germany
Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg Erlangen Germany
Department of Dermatology University Hospital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium
Department of Dermatology University Hospital Kiel Germany
Department of Dermatology University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy
Dermatologia Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome Italy
Faculty of Health University Witten Herdecke Witten Germany
GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
Skin Cancer Center Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale IRCCS di Reggio Emilia Reggio Emilia Italy
Skin Cancer Center Department of Dermatology Ruhr University Bochum Bochum Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010;182:E839–E842.
Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Greenhalgh T, Heneghan C, Liberati S, et al. The 2011 Oxford CEBM Levels of Evidence (Introductory Document). Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine. 2011. https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels‐of‐evidence/ocebm‐levels‐of‐evidence
Heppt MV, Leiter U, Steeb T, Amaral T, Bauer A, Becker JC, et al. S3 Guideline for actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma–short version, part 1: diagnosis, interventions for actinic keratoses, care structures and quality‐of‐care indicators. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2020;18:275–294.
Eisen DB, Asgari MM, Bennett DD, Connolly SM, Dellavalle RP, Freeman EE, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of actinic keratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:e209–e233.
Eisen DB, Dellavalle RP, Frazer‐Green L, Schlesinger TE, Shive M, Wu PA. Focused update: guidelines of care for the management of actinic keratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87:373–374.e5.
World Health Organization. WHO Classification of tumours online. 2023.
Heaphy MR, Ackerman AB. The nature of solar keratosis: a critical review in historical perspective. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:138–150.
Röwert‐Huber J, Patel M, Forschner T, Ulrich C, Eberle J, Kerl H, et al. Actinic keratosis is an early in situ squamous cell carcinoma: a proposal for reclassification. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156:8–12.
Ackerman A, Mones J. Solar (actinic) keratosis is squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155:9–22.
Padilla RS, Sebastian S, Jiang Z, Nindl I, Larson R. Gene expression patterns of normal human skin, actinic keratosis, and squamous cell carcinoma: a spectrum of disease progression. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146:288–293.
Jetter N, Chandan N, Wang S, Tsoukas M. Field cancerization therapies for management of actinic keratosis: a narrative review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19:543–557.
Siegel J, Korgavkar K, Weinstock M. Current perspective on actinic keratosis: a review. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177:350–358.
Figueras Nart I, Cerio R, Dirschka T, Dréno B, Lear J, Pellacani G, et al. Defining the actinic keratosis field: a literature review and discussion. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:544–563.
Kennedy C, Willemze R, de Gruijl FR, Bavinck JNB, Bajdik CD. The influence of painful sunburns and lifetime sun exposure on the risk of actinic keratoses, seborrheic warts, melanocytic nevi, atypical nevi, and skin cancer. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120:1087–1093.
Karagas MR, Zens MS, Nelson HH, Mabuchi K, Perry AE, Stukel TA, et al. Measures of cumulative exposure from a standardized sun exposure history questionnaire: a comparison with histologic assessment of solar skin damage. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:719–726.
Harvey I, Frankel S, Marks R, Shalom D, Nolan‐Farrell M. Non‐melanoma skin cancer and solar keratoses II analytical results of the South Wales Skin Cancer Study. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:1308–1312.
Ming M, Han W, Maddox J, Soltani K, Shea CR, Freeman DM, et al. UVB‐induced ERK/AKT‐dependent PTEN suppression promotes survival of epidermal keratinocytes. Oncogene. 2010;29:492–502.
Kanellou P, Zaravinos A, Zioga M, Stratigos A, Baritaki S, Soufla G, et al. Genomic instability, mutations and expression analysis of the tumour suppressor genes p14ARF, p15INK4b, p16INK4a and p53 in actinic keratosis. Cancer Lett. 2008;264:145–161.
Harwood CA, Proby CM. Human papillomaviruses and non‐melanoma skin cancer. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2002;15:101–114.
Lebwohl MG, Rosen T, Stockfleth E. The role of human papillomavirus in common skin conditions: current viewpoints and therapeutic options. Cutis. 2010;86(suppl):1–11; quiz suppl 2.
Queille S, Luron L, Spatz A, Avril MF, Ribrag V, Duvillard P, et al. Analysis of skin cancer risk factors in immunosuppressed renal transplant patients shows high levels of UV‐specific tandem CC to TT mutations of the p53 gene. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28:724–731.
Nehal KS, Bichakjian CK. Update on keratinocyte carcinomas. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:363–374.
Wang J, Aldabagh B, Yu J, Arron ST. Role of human papillomavirus in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a meta‐analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:621–629.
Chockalingam R, Downing C, Tyring SK. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in organ transplant recipients. J Clin Med. 2015;4:1229–1239.
Strickley JD, Messerschmidt JL, Awad ME, Li T, Hasegawa T, Ha DT, et al. Immunity to commensal papillomaviruses protects against skin cancer. Nature. 2019;575:519–522.
Reinehr CPH, Bakos RM. Actinic keratoses: review of clinical, dermoscopic, and therapeutic aspects. An Bras Dermatol. 2019;94:637–657.
Fernandez‐Figueras M, Carrato C, Sáenz X, Puig L, Musulen E, Ferrándiz C, et al. Actinic keratosis with atypical basal cells (AK I) is the most common lesion associated with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29:991–997.
Werner R, Sammain A, Erdmann R, Hartmann V, Stockfleth E, Nast A. The natural history of actinic keratosis: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169:502–518.
Flohil SC, Van Der Leest RJ, Dowlatshahi EA, Hofman A, De Vries E, Nijsten T. Prevalence of actinic keratosis and its risk factors in the general population: the Rotterdam Study. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133:1971–1978.
Memon AA, Tomenson JA, Bothwell J, Friedmann PS. Prevalence of solar damage and actinic keratosis in a Merseyside population. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:1154–1159.
Frost C, Green A, Williams G. The prevalence and determinants of solar keratoses at a subtropical latitude (Queensland, Australia). Br J Dermatol. 1998;139:1033–1039.
Ferrándiz C, Plazas M, Sabaté M, Palomino R, EPIQA Study Group. Prevalence of actinic keratosis among dermatology outpatients in Spain. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2016;107:674–680.
Jacobs LC, Liu F, Pardo LM, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, Kayser M, et al. IRF4, MC1R and TYR genes are risk factors for actinic keratosis independent of skin color. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:3296–3303.
Fargnoli MC, Altomare G, Benati E, Borgia F, Broganelli P, Carbone A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of actinic keratosis in patients attending Italian dermatology clinics. Eur J Dermatol. 2017;27:599–608.
Dziunycz PJ, Schuller E, Hofbauer GF. Prevalence of actinic keratosis in patients attending general practitioners in Switzerland. Dermatology. 2018;234:214–219.
Roewert‐Huber J, Stockfleth E, Kerl H. Pathology and pathobiology of actinic (solar) keratosis–an update. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157:18–20.
Ramsay HM, Fryer AA, Reece S, Smith AG, Harden PN. Clinical risk factors associated with nonmelanoma skin cancer in renal transplant recipients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;36:167–176.
Jiyad Z, Marquart L, O'Rourke P, Green AC. The natural history of actinic keratoses in organ transplant recipients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:162–164.
Jiyad Z, O'Rourke P, Soyer H, Green AC. Actinic keratosis‐related signs predictive of squamous cell carcinoma in renal transplant recipients: a nested case–control study. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176:965–970.
DiGiovanna JJ, Kraemer KH. Shining a light on xeroderma pigmentosum. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:785–796.
Marçon CR, Moraes JC, de Olivas Ferreira MAM, Oliari CB. Dermatological and epidemiological profiles of patients with albinism in São Paulo, Brazil, between 2010 and 2017: a cross‐sectional study. Dermatology. 2020;236:219–227.
Zalaudek I, Piana S, Moscarella E, Longo C, Zendri E, Castagnetti F, et al. Morphologic grading and treatment of facial actinic keratosis. Clin Dermatol. 2014;32:80–87.
Dirschka T, Gupta G, Micali G, Stockfleth E, Basset‐Séguin N, Del Marmol V, et al. Real‐world approach to actinic keratosis management: practical treatment algorithm for office‐based dermatology. J Dermatolog Treat. 2017;28:431–442.
Lallas A, Tschandl P, Kyrgidis A, Stolz W, Rabinovitz H, Cameron A, et al. Dermoscopic clues to differentiate facial lentigo maligna from pigmented actinic keratosis. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174:1079–1085.
Tschandl P, Rosendahl C, Kittler H. Dermatoscopy of flat pigmented facial lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29:120–127.
Olsen EA, Abernethy ML, Kulp‐Shorten C, Callen JP, Glazer SD, Huntley A, et al. A double‐blind, vehicle‐controlled study evaluating masoprocol cream in the treatment of actinic keratoses on the head and neck. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;24:738–743.
Weinstock MA, Bingham SF, Cole GW, Eilers D, Naylor MF, Kalivas J, et al. Reliability of counting actinic keratoses before and after brief consensus discussion: the VA topical tretinoin chemoprevention (VATTC) trial. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137:1055–1058.
Ahmady S, Jansen MHE, Nelemans PJ, Kessels J, Arits A, de Rooij MJM, et al. Risk of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma after different treatments for actinic keratosis: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158:634–640.
Dreno B, Cerio R, Dirschka T, Figueras Nart I, Lear JT, Peris K, et al. A novel actinic keratosis field assessment scale for grading actinic keratosis disease severity. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017;97:1108–1113.
Dirschka T, Pellacani G, Micali G, Malvehy J, Stratigos A, Casari A, et al. A proposed scoring system for assessing the severity of actinic keratosis on the head: actinic keratosis area and severity index. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31:1295–1302.
Baker C, James A, Supranowicz M, Spelman L, Shumack S, Cole J, et al. Method of Assessing Skin Cancerization and Keratoses™ (MASCK): development and photographic validation in multiple anatomical sites of a novel assessment tool intended for clinical evaluation of patients with extensive skin field cancerization. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022;47:1144–1153.
Werner R, Stockfleth E, Connolly S, Correia O, Erdmann R, Foley P, et al. Evidence‐and consensus‐based (S3) guidelines for the treatment of actinic keratosis–International League of Dermatological Societies in cooperation with the European Dermatology Forum–short version. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29:2069–2079.
Huerta‐Brogeras M, Olmos O, Borbujo J, Hernández‐Núnez A, Castano E, Romero‐Maté A, et al. Validation of dermoscopy as a real‐time noninvasive diagnostic imaging technique for actinic keratosis. Arch Dermatol. 2012;148:1159–1164.
Zalaudek I, Giacomel J, Schmid K, Bondino S, Rosendahl C, Cavicchini S, et al. Dermatoscopy of facial actinic keratosis, intraepidermal carcinoma, and invasive squamous cell carcinoma: a progression model. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66:589–597.
Valdés‐Morales KL, Peralta‐Pedrero ML, Jurado‐Santa Cruz F, Morales‐Sánchez MA. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy of actinic keratosis: a systematic review. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2020;10:e2020121.
Pampena R, Condorelli A, Cornacchia L, Guiducci L, Raucci M, Benati E, et al. Treatment monitoring of 5‐fluorouracil 0.5%/salicylic acid 10% lesion‐directed therapy for actinic keratosis using dermoscopy and in‐vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:e13744.
Benati E, Longhitano S, Pampena R, Mirra M, Raucci M, Pellacani G, et al. Digital follow‐up by means of dermatoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy of actinic keratosis treated with imiquimod 3.75% cream. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:1471–1477.
Longo C, Borsari S, Benati E, Moscarella E, Alfano R, Argenziano G. Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy for monitoring the treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate gel: report of two cases. Dermatol Ther. 2016;6:81–87.
Ulrich M, Alarcon I, Malvehy J, Puig S. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy characterization of field‐directed 5‐fluorouracil 0.5%/salicylic acid 10% in actinic keratosis. Dermatology. 2015;230:193–198.
Malvehy J, Roldán‐Marín R, Iglesias‐García P, Díaz Lorca MA, Puig i Sardà S. Monitoring treatment of field cancerisation with 3% diclofenac sodium 2.5% hyaluronic acid by reflectance confocal microscopy: a histologic correlation. Acta Derm Venereol. 2014;95(1):45–50.
Navarrete‐Dechent C, DeRosa AP, Longo C, Liopyris K, Oliviero M, Rabinovitz H, et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy terminology glossary for nonmelanocytic skin lesions: a systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:1414–1427.e3.
Pellacani G, Ulrich M, Casari A, Prow TW, Cannillo F, Benati E, et al. Grading keratinocyte atypia in actinic keratosis: a correlation of reflectance confocal microscopy and histopathology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29:2216–2221.
Tang Z, Kang L, Zhang Y, Huang J, Tong X, Zhou L, et al. The diagnostic value of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in actinic keratosis. Skin Res Technol. 2021;27:80–85.
Cinotti E, Tognetti L, Cartocci A, Lamberti A, Gherbassi S, Orte Cano C, et al. Line‐field confocal optical coherence tomography for actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma: a descriptive study. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021;46:1530–1541.
Ruini C, Schuh S, Gust C, Kendziora B, Frommherz L, French LE, et al. Line‐field confocal optical coherence tomography for the in vivo real‐time diagnosis of different stages of keratinocyte skin cancer: a preliminary study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:2388–2397.
Ruini C, Schuh S, Gust C, Hartmann D, French LE, Sattler EC, et al. In‐vivo LC‐OCT evaluation of the downward proliferation pattern of keratinocytes in actinic keratosis in comparison with histology: first impressions from a pilot study. Cancers. 2021;13:2856.
Bagazgoitia L, Cuevas J, Juarranz A. Expression of p53 and p16 in actinic keratosis, bowenoid actinic keratosis and Bowen's disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24:228–230.
Askari SK, Schram SE, Wenner RA, Bowers S, Liu A, Bangerter AK, et al. Evaluation of prospectively collected presenting signs/symptoms of biopsy‐proven melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and seborrheic keratosis in an elderly male population. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56:739–747.
Schmitz L, Gambichler T, Kost C, Gupta G, Stucker M, Stockfleth E, et al. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas are associated with basal proliferating actinic keratoses. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180:916–921.
Schmitz L, Brehmer A, Falkenberg C, Gambichler T, Heppt MV, Steeb T, et al. Treatment‐resistant actinic keratoses are characterized by distinct clinical and histological features. Ital J Dermatol Venerol. 2021;156:213–219.
Stockfleth E, Ferrandiz C, Grob JJ, Leigh I, Pehamberger H, Kerl H, et al. Development of a treatment algorithm for actinic keratoses: a European consensus. Eur J Dermatol. 2008;18:651–659.
Wehner MR, Linos E, Parvataneni R, Stuart SE, Boscardin WJ, Chren MM. Timing of subsequent new tumors in patients who present with basal cell carcinoma or cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:382–388.
Marques E, Chen TM. Actinic keratosis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
Weinstock MA, Thwin SS, Siegel JA, Marcolivio K, Means AD, Leader NF, et al. Chemoprevention of basal and squamous cell carcinoma with a single course of fluorouracil, 5%, cream: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154:167–174.
Del Regno L, Catapano S, Di Stefani A, Cappilli S, Peris K. A review of existing therapies for actinic keratosis: current status and future directions. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022;23:339–352.
Dianzani C, Conforti C, Giuffrida R, Corneli P, di Meo N, Farinazzo E, et al. Current therapies for actinic keratosis. Int J Dermatol. 2020;59:677–684.
Stewart JR, Lang ME, Brewer JD. Efficacy of nonexcisional treatment modalities for superficially invasive and in situ squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87:131–137.
Leiter U, Heppt MV, Steeb T, Amaral T, Bauer A, Becker JC, et al. S3 Guideline for actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) ‐ short version, part 2: epidemiology, surgical and systemic treatment of cSCC, follow‐up, prevention and occupational disease. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2020;18:400–413.
de Berker D, McGregor JM, Mohd Mustapa MF, Exton LS, Hughes BR. British Association of Dermatologists' guidelines for the care of patients with actinic keratosis 2017. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176:20–43.
Poulin Y, Lynde CW, Barber K, Vender R, Claveau J, Bourcier M, et al. Non‐melanoma skin cancer in Canada chapter 3: management of actinic keratoses. J Cutan Med Surg. 2015;19:227–238.
Chetty P, Choi F, Mitchell T. Primary care review of actinic keratosis and its therapeutic options: a global perspective. Dermatol Ther. 2015;5:19–35.
Dermatological cryosurgery and cryotherapy. Anticancer Res. 2016;36:4979–4980.
Guidelines of care for cryosurgery. American Academy of Dermatology Committee on guidelines of care. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;31:648–653.
Nashan D, Meiss F, Muller M. Therapeutic strategies for actinic keratoses—a systematic review. Eur J Dermatol. 2013;23:14–32.
Mota A, De Carvalho N, Pellacani G, de Faria PCP, Melo DF, Pineiro‐Maceira JM, et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy in actinic keratosis‐comparison of efficacy between cryotherapy protocols. Skin Res Technol. 2020;26:876–882.
Gage AA. Experimental cryogenic injury of the palate: observations pertinent to cryosurgical destruction of tumors. Cryobiology. 1978;15:415–425.
Arisi M, Guasco Pisani E, Calzavara‐Pinton P, Zane C. Cryotherapy for actinic keratosis: basic principles and literature review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022;15:357–365.
Heppt MV, Steeb T, Ruzicka T, Berking C. Cryosurgery combined with topical interventions for actinic keratosis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180:740–748.
Hantash BM, Stewart DB, Cooper ZA, Rehmus WE, Koch RJ, Swetter SM. Facial resurfacing for nonmelanoma skin cancer prophylaxis. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:976–982.
Ostertag JU, Quaedvlieg PJ, van der Geer S, Nelemans P, Christianen ME, Neumann MH, et al. A clinical comparison and long‐term follow‐up of topical 5‐fluorouracil versus laser resurfacing in the treatment of widespread actinic keratoses. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38:731–739.
Tai F, Shah M, Pon K, Alavi A. Laser resurfacing monotherapy for the treatment of actinic keratosis. J Cutan Med Surg. 2021;25:634–642.
Zane C, Facchinetti E, Rossi MT, Specchia C, Ortel B, Calzavara‐Pinton P. Cryotherapy is preferable to ablative CO2 laser for the treatment of isolated actinic keratoses of the face and scalp: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170:1114–1121.
Steeb T, Schlager JG, Kohl C, Ruzicka T, Heppt MV, Berking C. Laser‐assisted photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:947–956.
Pomerantz H, Hogan D, Eilers D, Swetter SM, Chen SC, Jacob SE, et al. Long‐term efficacy of topical fluorouracil cream, 5%, for treating actinic keratosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:952–960.
Jorizzo J, Stewart D, Bucko A, Davis SA, Espy P, Hino P, et al. Randomized trial evaluating a new 0.5% fluorouracil formulation demonstrates efficacy after 1‐, 2‐, or 4‐week treatment in patients with actinic keratosis. Cutis. 2002;70:335–339.
Weiss J, Menter A, Hevia O, Jones T, Ling M, Rist T, et al. Effective treatment of actinic keratosis with 0.5% fluorouracil cream for 1, 2, or 4 weeks. Cutis. 2002;70:22–29.
Stockfleth E, Begeault N, Delarue A. Intensity of local skin reactions during 5‐fluorouracil treatment related to the number of actinic keratosis lesions: a post hoc, exploratory analysis. Dermatol Ther. 2022;12:467–479.
Stockfleth E, von Kiedrowski R, Dominicus R, Ryan J, Ellery A, Falques M, et al. Efficacy and safety of 5‐fluorouracil 05%/salicylic acid 10% in the field‐directed treatment of actinic keratosis: a phase III, randomized, double‐blind, vehicle‐controlled trial. Dermatol Ther. 2017;7:81–96.
Mohney L, Singh R, Grada A, Feldman S. Use of topical calcipotriol plus 5‐fluorouracil in the treatment of actinic keratosis: a systematic review. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21:60–65.
Azin M, Mahon AB, Isaacman S, Seaman JE, Allen IE, Szarek M, et al. Topical calcipotriol plus 5‐fluorouracil immunotherapy for actinic keratosis treatment. JID Innov. 2022;2:100104.
Samrao A, Cockerell CJ. Pharmacotherapeutic management of actinic keratosis: focus on newer topical agents. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013;14:273–277.
Jansen MHE, Kessels J, Nelemans PJ, Kouloubis N, Arits A, van Pelt HPA, et al. Randomized trial of four treatment approaches for actinic keratosis. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:935–946.
Vegter S, Tolley K. A network meta‐analysis of the relative efficacy of treatments for actinic keratosis of the face or scalp in Europe. PLoS One. 2014;9:e96829.
Swanson N, Smith CC, Kaur M, Goldenberg G. Imiquimod 2.5% and 3.75% for the treatment of actinic keratoses: two phase 3 multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12:1278–1282.
Jorizzo J, Dinehart S, Matheson R, Moore JK, Ling M, Fox TL, et al. Vehicle‐controlled, double‐blind, randomized study of imiquimod 5% cream applied 3 days per week in one or two courses of treatment for actinic keratoses on the head. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:265–268.
Szeimies RM, Bichel J, Ortonne JP, Stockfleth E, Lee J, Meng TC. A phase II dose‐ranging study of topical resiquimod to treat actinic keratosis. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:205–210.
Stockfleth E, Hofbauer GFL, Reinhold U, Popp G, Hengge UR, Szeimies RM, et al. Topical resiquimod dosing regimens in patients with multiple actinic keratoses: a multicentre, partly placebo‐controlled, double‐blind clinical trial. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180:297–305.
Gan TJ. Diclofenac: an update on its mechanism of action and safety profile. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:1715–1731.
Johnsen JI, Lindskog M, Ponthan F, Pettersen I, Elfman L, Orrego A, et al. Cyclooxygenase‐2 is expressed in neuroblastoma, and nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs induce apoptosis and inhibit tumor growth in vivo. Cancer Res. 2004;64:7210–7215.
Gebauer K, Brown P, Varigos G. Topical diclofenac in hyaluronan gel for the treatment of solar keratoses. Australas J Dermatol. 2003;44:40–43.
Rivers JK, Arlette J, Shear N, Guenther L, Carey W, Poulin Y. Topical treatment of actinic keratoses with 3.0% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146:94–100.
Wolf JE Jr, Taylor JR, Tschen E, Kang S. Topical 3.0% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel in the treatment of actinic keratoses. Int J Dermatol. 2001;40:709–713.
McEwan LE, Smith JG. Topical diclofenac/hyaluronic acid gel in the treatment of solar keratoses. Australas J Dermatol. 1997;38:187–189.
Nelson C, Rigel D, Smith S, Swanson N, Wolf J. Phase IV, open‐label assessment of the treatment of actinic keratosis with 3.0% diclofenac sodium topical gel (Solaraze). J Drugs Dermatol. 2004;3:401–407.
Kose O, Koc E, Erbil AH, Caliskan E, Kurumlu Z. Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of 3% diclofenac sodium gel and 5% imiquimod cream in the treatment of actinic keratosis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2008;19:159–163.
Zane C, Facchinetti E, Rossi MT, Specchia C, Calzavara‐Pinton PG. A randomized clinical trial of photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate vs. diclofenac 3% plus hyaluronic acid gel for the treatment of multiple actinic keratoses of the face and scalp. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170:1143–1150.
Steeb T, Wessely A, Harlass M, Heppt F, Koch EAT, Leiter U, et al. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of interventions for actinic keratosis from post‐marketing surveillance trials. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2253.
Gollnick H, Dirschka T, Ostendorf R, Kerl H, Kunstfeld R. Long‐term clinical outcomes of imiquimod 5% cream vs. diclofenac 3% gel for actinic keratosis on the face or scalp: a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:82–89.
Stockfleth E, Harwood CA, Serra‐Guillen C, Larsson T, Osterdal ML, Skov T. Phase IV head‐to‐head randomized controlled trial comparing ingenol mebutate 0.015% gel with diclofenac sodium 3% gel for the treatment of actinic keratosis on the face or scalp. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178:433–442.
Smolinski MP, Bu Y, Clements J, Gelman IH, Hegab T, Cutler DL, et al. Discovery of novel dual mechanism of action Src signaling and tubulin polymerization inhibitors (KX2‐391 and KX2‐361). J Med Chem. 2018;61:4704–4719.
Blauvelt A, Kempers S, Lain E, Schlesinger T, Tyring S, Forman S, et al. Phase 3 trials of tirbanibulin ointment for actinic keratosis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:512–520.
Cheng B, Veerabagu S, Miller CJ, Sobanko JF, Shin TM, Higgins HW 2nd, et al. A comparison of invasive squamous cell carcinoma greater than 1 year after treatment with 5‐fluorouracil, imiquimod, or photodynamic therapy with aminolevulinic acid. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87:592–596.
Heppt MV, Dykukha I, Graziadio S, Salido‐Vallejo R, Chapman‐Rounds M, Edwards M. Comparative efficacy and safety of tirbanibulin for actinic keratosis of the face and scalp in Europe: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Med. 2022;11:1654.
Mpourazanis G, Konschake W, Vogiatzis R, Papalexis P, Georgakopoulou VE, Ntritsos G, et al. The role and effectiveness of photodynamic therapy on patients with actinic keratosis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Cureus. 2022;14:e26390.
Koch EAT, Wessely A, Steeb T, Berking C, Heppt MV. Safety of topical interventions for the treatment of actinic keratosis. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021;20:801–814.
Pflugfelder A, Welter AK, Leiter U, Weide B, Held L, Eigentler TK, et al. Open label randomized study comparing 3 months vs. 6 months treatment of actinic keratoses with 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic acid gel: a trial of the German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26:48–53.
Dohil MA. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 4% 5‐fluorouracil cream in a novel patented aqueous cream containing peanut oil once daily compared with 5% 5‐fluorouracil cream twice daily: meeting the challenge in the treatment of actinic keratosis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15:1218–1224.
Stockfleth E. The importance of treating the field in actinic keratosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(Suppl 2):8–11.
Hadley G, Derry S, Moore RA. Imiquimod for actinic keratosis: systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:1251–1255.
Hanke CW, Beer KR, Stockfleth E, Wu J, Rosen T, Levy S. Imiquimod 2.5% and 3.75% for the treatment of actinic keratoses: results of two placebo‐controlled studies of daily application to the face and balding scalp for two 3‐week cycles. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62:573–581.
Ulrich C, Johannsen A, Rowert‐Huber J, Ulrich M, Sterry W, Stockfleth E. Results of a randomized, placebo‐controlled safety and efficacy study of topical diclofenac 3% gel in organ transplant patients with multiple actinic keratoses. Eur J Dermatol. 2010;20:482–488.
Perrett CM, McGregor JM, Warwick J, Karran P, Leigh IM, Proby CM, et al. Treatment of post‐transplant premalignant skin disease: a randomized intrapatient comparative study of 5‐fluorouracil cream and topical photodynamic therapy. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156:320–328.
Ulrich C, Bichel J, Euvrard S, Guidi B, Proby CM, van de Kerkhof PC, et al. Topical immunomodulation under systemic immunosuppression: results of a multicentre, randomized, placebo‐controlled safety and efficacy study of imiquimod 5% cream for the treatment of actinic keratoses in kidney, heart, and liver transplant patients. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157(Suppl 2):25–31.
Santos‐Juanes J, Esteve A, Mas‐Vidal A, Coto‐Segura P, Salgueiro E, Gomez E, et al. Acute renal failure caused by imiquimod 5% cream in a renal transplant patient: review of the literature on side effects of imiquimod. Dermatology. 2011;222:109–112.
Morton CA, Szeimies RM, Basset‐Seguin N, Calzavara‐Pinton P, Gilaberte Y, Haedersdal M, et al. European dermatology forum guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy 2019 part 1: treatment delivery and established indications ‐ actinic keratoses, Bowen's disease and basal cell carcinomas. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33:2225–2238.
Morton CA, Szeimies RM, Basset‐Seguin N, Calzavara‐Pinton PG, Gilaberte Y, Haedersdal M, et al. European Dermatology Forum guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy 2019 part 2: emerging indications ‐ field cancerization, photorejuvenation and inflammatory/infective dermatoses. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:17–29.
Heerfordt IM, Philipsen PA, Wulf HC. Bringing the gentle properties of daylight photodynamic therapy indoors: a systematic review of efficacy and safety. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022;39:102858.
Dirschka T, Radny P, Dominicus R, Mensing H, Bruning H, Jenne L, et al. Photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a multicentre, randomized, observer‐blind phase III study in comparison with a registered methyl‐5‐aminolaevulinate cream and placebo. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166:137–146.
Steeb T, Wessely A, Petzold A, Brinker TJ, Schmitz L, Leiter U, et al. Evaluation of long‐term clearance rates of interventions for actinic keratosis: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157:1066–1077.
Lacour JP, Ulrich C, Gilaberte Y, Von Felbert V, Basset‐Seguin N, Dreno B, et al. Daylight photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate cream is effective and nearly painless in treating actinic keratoses: a randomised, investigator‐blinded, controlled, phase III study throughout Europe. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29:2342–2348.
Rubel DM, Spelman L, Murrell DF, See JA, Hewitt D, Foley P, et al. Daylight photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate cream as a convenient, similarly effective, nearly painless alternative to conventional photodynamic therapy in actinic keratosis treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171:1164–1171.
Dirschka T, Ekanayake‐Bohlig S, Dominicus R, Aschoff R, Herrera‐Ceballos E, Botella‐Estrada R, et al. A randomized, intraindividual, non‐inferiority, phase III study comparing daylight photodynamic therapy with BF‐200 ALA gel and MAL cream for the treatment of actinic keratosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33:288–297.
Rasanen JE, Neittaanmaki N, Ylitalo L, Hagman J, Rissanen P, Ylianttila L, et al. 5‐aminolaevulinic acid nanoemulsion is more effective than methyl‐5‐aminolaevulinate in daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: a nonsponsored randomized double‐blind multicentre trial. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181:265–274.
Malvehy J. A new vision of actinic keratosis beyond visible clinical lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(Suppl 1):3–8.
Steeb T, Wessely A, Leiter U, French LE, Berking C, Heppt MV. The more the better? An appraisal of combination therapies for actinic keratosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:727–732.
Steeb T, Niesert AC, French LE, Berking C, Heppt MV. Microneedling‐assisted photodynamic therapy for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results from a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82:515–519.
Jorizzo J, Weiss J, Furst K, VandePol C, Levy SF. Effect of a 1‐week treatment with 0.5% topical fluorouracil on occurrence of actinic keratosis after cryosurgery: a randomized, vehicle‐controlled clinical trial. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:813–816.
Jorizzo J, Weiss J, Vamvakias G. One‐week treatment with 0.5% fluorouracil cream prior to cryosurgery in patients with actinic keratoses: a double‐blind, vehicle‐controlled, long‐term study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006;5:133–139.
Heppt MV, Steeb T, Leiter U, Berking C. Efficacy of photodynamic therapy combined with topical interventions for the treatment of actinic keratosis: a meta‐analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33:863–873.
Dahle DO, Grotmol T, Leivestad T, Hartmann A, Midtvedt K, Reisaeter AV, et al. Association between pretransplant cancer and survival in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2017;101:2599–2605.
Allen NC, Martin AJ, Snaidr VA, Eggins R, Chong AH, Fernandez‐Penas P, et al. Nicotinamide for skin‐cancer chemoprevention in transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:804–812.
Heppt MV, Steeb T, Niesert AC, Zacher M, Leiter U, Garbe C, et al. Local interventions for actinic keratosis in organ transplant recipients: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180:43–50.
Hasan ZU, Ahmed I, Matin RN, Homer V, Lear JT, Ismail F, et al. Topical treatment of actinic keratoses in organ transplant recipients: a feasibility study for SPOT (squamous cell carcinoma prevention in organ transplant recipients using topical treatments). Br J Dermatol. 2022;187:324–337.
Dragieva G, Prinz BM, Hafner J, Dummer R, Burg G, Binswanger U, et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial of topical photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate in the treatment of actinic keratoses in transplant recipients. Br J Dermatol. 2004;151:196–200.
Ulrich C, Busch JO, Meyer T, Nindl I, Schmook T, Sterry W, et al. Successful treatment of multiple actinic keratoses in organ transplant patients with topical 5% imiquimod: a report of six cases. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155:451–454.
Togsverd‐Bo K, Halldin C, Sandberg C, Gonzalez H, Wennberg AM, Sorensen SS, et al. Photodynamic therapy is more effective than imiquimod for actinic keratosis in organ transplant recipients: a randomized intraindividual controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178:903–909.
Massey PR, Schmults CD, Li SJ, Arron ST, Asgari MM, Bouwes Bavinck JN, et al. Consensus‐based recommendations on the prevention of squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients: a Delphi consensus statement. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157:1219–1226.
Gupta G, Dirschka T. Squamous cell carcinoma and its precursors. Rook's Textbook of Dermatology, Chapter 142. 10th ed., 2024, pp.1–53.
Griffiths CEM, Barker J, Bleiker TO, Hussain W, Simpson RC, editors. Chapter 142: Squamous cell carcinoma and its precursors. In: Rooks textbook of dermatology. 10th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2024.
Walker JL, Siegel JA, Sachar M, Pomerantz H, Chen SC, Swetter SM, et al. 5‐fluorouracil for actinic keratosis treatment and chemoprevention: a randomized controlled trial. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:1367–1370.
Chen AC, Martin AJ, Choy B, Fernandez‐Penas P, Dalziell RA, McKenzie CA, et al. A phase 3 randomized trial of nicotinamide for skin‐cancer chemoprevention. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1618–1626.