Previous research has demonstrated that Maasai and Europeans tend to align in their ratings of the physical strength and aggressiveness of Maasai male faces, calibrated to hand grip strength (HGS). However, perceptions of attractiveness of these faces differed among populations. In this study, three morphs of young Maasai men created by means of geometric morphometrics, and depicting the average sample and two extrema (± 4 SD of HGS), were assessed by men and women from Tanzania, Czech Republic, Russia, Pakistan, China, and Mexico (total sample = 1540). The aim of this study was to test cross-cultural differences in the perception of young Maasai men's composites calibrated to HGS, focusing on four traits: physical strength, attractiveness, aggressiveness, and helpfulness. Individuals from all six cultures were able to distinguish between low, medium, and high HGS portraits. Across all study populations, portrait of Maasai men with lower HGS was perceived as less attractive, more aggressive, and less helpful. This suggests that people from diverse populations share similar perceptions of physical strength based on facial shape, as well as attribute similar social qualities like aggressiveness and helpfulness to these facial images. Participants from all samples rated the composite image of weak Maasai men as the least attractive.

Fudan University Shanghai China

Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology Russian Academy of Sciences Leninsky Prospect 32a 119334 Moscow Russia

Instituto de Antropología Universidad Veracruzana Xalapa Mexico

National Research University Higher School of Economics Moscow Russia

Ostrava University Ostrava Czech Republic

St John's University of Tanzania Dodoma Tanzania

University of Haripur Haripur Pakistan

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Niewoehner WA. Neanderthal hands in their proper perspective. In: Harvati K, Harrison T, editors. Neanderthals Revisited: New Approaches and Perspectives. Springer; 2008. pp. 157–190.

Bardo A, Moncel MH, Dunmore CJ, Kivell TL, Pouydebat E, Cornette R. The implications of thumb movements for Neanderthal and modern human manipulation. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75694-2. PubMed DOI PMC

Samuel D, Wilson K, Martin HJ, Allen R, Sayer AA, Stokes M. Age-associated changes in hand grip and quadriceps muscle strength ratios in healthy adults. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2012;24:245–250. doi: 10.1007/BF03325252. PubMed DOI

Martín-Ponce E, Hernández-Betancor I, González-Reimers E, Hernández-Luis R, Martínez-Riera A, Santolaria F. Prognostic value of physical function tests: hand grip strength and six-minute walking test in elderly hospitalized patients. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:7530. doi: 10.1038/srep07530. PubMed DOI PMC

Guerra RS, Fonseca I, Pichel F, Restivo MT, Amaral TF. Handgrip strength and associated factors in hospitalized patients. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2015;39:322–330. doi: 10.1177/0148607113514113. PubMed DOI

Gallup AC, Fink B. Handgrip strength as a Darwinian fitness indicator in men. Front. Psychol. 2018;9:439. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00439. PubMed DOI PMC

Sell A, Cosmides L, Tooby J, Sznycer D, von Rueden C, Gurven M. Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009;276:575–584. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1177. PubMed DOI PMC

Sell A, Hone LS, Pound N. The importance of physical strength to human males. Hum. Nat. 2012;23:30–44. doi: 10.1007/s12110-012-9131-2. PubMed DOI

Apicella CL. Upper-body strength predicts hunting reputation and reproductive success in Hadza hunter–gatherers. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2014;35(6):508–518. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.07.001. DOI

Sell A, Lukazsweski AW, Townsley M. Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men’s bodily attractiveness. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2017;284(1869):20171819. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1819. PubMed DOI PMC

Nicolay CW, Walker AL. Grip strength and endurance: Influences of anthropometric variation, hand dominance, and gender. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2005;35:605–618. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.01.007. DOI

Wang YC, Bohannon RW, Li X, Sindhu B, Kapellusch J. Hand-grip strength: Normative reference values and equations for individuals 18 to 85 years of age residing in the United States. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2018;48:685–693. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7851. PubMed DOI

Bardo A, Kivell TL, Town K, Donati G, Ballieux H, Stamate C, et al. Get a grip: Variation in human hand grip strength and implications for human evolution. Symmetry. 2021;13(7):1142. doi: 10.3390/sym13071142. DOI

Leyk D, Gorges W, Ridder D, Wunderlich M, Rüther T, Sievert A, et al. Hand-grip strength of young men, women and highly trained female athletes. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007;99:415–421. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0351-1. PubMed DOI

Dodds RM, Syddall HE, Cooper R, Kuh D, Cooper C, Sayer AA. Global variation in grip strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis of normative data. Age Ageing. 2016;45(2):209–216. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv192. PubMed DOI PMC

Carson RG. Get a grip: Individual variations in grip strength are a marker of brain health. Neurobiol. Aging. 2018;71:189–222. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.07.023. PubMed DOI

Young RW. Evolution of the human hand: The role of throwing and clubbing. J. Anat. 2003;202:165–174. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2003.00144.x. PubMed DOI PMC

Puts DA. Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2010;31(3):157–175. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005. DOI

Marcinkowska UM. The good genes hypothesis. In: Shackelford TK, editor. Encyclopedia of Sexual Psychology and Behavior. Springer International Publishing; 2023. pp. 1–3.

Saribay SA, Tureček P, Paluch R, Kleisner K. Differential effects of resource scarcity and pathogen prevalence on heterosexual women’s facial masculinity preferences. Evol. Hum. Sci. 2021;3:e48. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.42. PubMed DOI PMC

DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Crawford JR, Welling LLM, Little AC. The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2010;277(1692):2405–2410. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2184. PubMed DOI PMC

Butovskaya ML, Mezentseva A, Mabulla A, Shackelford TK, Schaefer K, Fink B, et al. Facial cues to physical strength increase attractiveness but decrease aggressiveness assessments in male Maasai of Northern Tanzania. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2022;43(2):115–121. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.11.006. DOI

Windhager S, Ottendorfer T, Mabulla A, Butovskaya M, Fink B, Schaefer K. Perception of strength, attractiveness and aggressiveness of Maasai male faces calibrated to handgrip strength: Evidence from a European sample. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2023 doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23869. PubMed DOI PMC

Schaefer K, Seiser VM, Prucha S, Kerschbaumer V, Fink B, Windhager S. Male facial cues to physical strength in Europe: Medium-strength preference and higher aggressiveness attribution to the weakest. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2024 doi: 10.1002/ajhb.24040. PubMed DOI

Fink B, Neave N, Seydel H. Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2007;19(1):82–87. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20583. PubMed DOI

Butovskaya ML, Windhager S, Karelin D, Mezentseva A, Schaefer K, Fink B. Associations of physical strength with facial shape in an African pastoralist society, the Maasai of Northern Tanzania. PloS One. 2018;13(5):e0197738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197738. PubMed DOI PMC

Mezentseva AA, Rostovtseva VV, Butovskaya ML. Facial cues to physical strength are not always associated with facial masculinity: Comparative study of Europeans and Southern Siberians. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2023;36(1):e23974. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23974. PubMed DOI

Windhager S, Bookstein FL, Mueller H, Zunner E, Kirchengast S, Schaefer K. Calibrating facial morphs for use as stimuli in biological studies of social perception. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:6698. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24911-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Windhager S, Schaefer K, Fink B. Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2011;23(6):805–814. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21219. PubMed DOI

Isen J, McGue M, Iacono W. Genetic influences on the development of grip strength in adolescence. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2014;154:189–200. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22492. PubMed DOI PMC

Crewther BT, Thomas AG, Stewart-Williams S, Kilduff LP, Cook CJ. Is salivary cortisol moderating the relationship between salivary testosterone and hand-grip strength in healthy men? Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2017;17(2):188–194. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1220628. PubMed DOI

Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 2010;33:61–135. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. PubMed DOI

Hill AK, Hunt J, Welling LL, Cárdenas RA, Rotella MA, Wheatley JR, et al. Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men’s traits. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2013;34(5):334–341. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.05.004. DOI

Durkee PK, Polo P, Munoz-Reyes JA, Rodríguez-Ruiz C, Losada-Pérez M, Fernández-Martínez AB, et al. Men’s bodily attractiveness: Muscles as fitness indicators. Evol. Psychol. 2019;17(2):1474704919852918. doi: 10.1177/1474704919852918. PubMed DOI PMC

Aung T, Rosenfield KA, Puts D. Male voice pitch mediates the relationship between objective and perceived formidability. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2021;42(2):121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.08.007. DOI

Richardson T, Waddington M, Gilman RT. Young, formidable men show greater sensitivity to facial cues of dominance. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2021;42(1):43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.004. DOI

Mefodeva V, Sidari MJ, Chau H, Fitzsimmons B, Antoine G, Clarkson TR, et al. Multivariate intra-sexual selection on men’s perceptions of male facial morphology. Adapt. Hum. Behav. Physiol. 2020;6:143–169. doi: 10.1007/s40750-020-00128-2. DOI

Kordsmeyer TL, Hunt J, Puts DA, Ostner J, Penke L. The relative importance of intra-and intersexual selection on human male sexually dimorphic traits. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2018;39(4):424–436. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.008. DOI

Huk T, Winkel W. Testing the sexy son hypothesis—A research framework for empirical approaches. Behav. Ecol. 2008;19(2):456–461. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arm150. DOI

Voegeli R, Schoop R, Prestat-Marquis E, Rawlings AV, Shackelford TK, Fink B. Cross-cultural perception of female facial appearance: A multi-ethnic and multi-centre study. PloS One. 2021;16(1):e0245998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245998. PubMed DOI PMC

Lidborg LH, Cross CP, Boothroyd LG. A meta-analysis of the association between male dimorphism and fitness outcomes in humans. Elife. 2022;11:e65031. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65031. PubMed DOI PMC

Henrich J, Muthukrishna M. The origins and psychology of human cooperation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2021;72:207–240. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-081920-042106. PubMed DOI

Misiak M, Butovskaya M, Oleszkiewicz A, Sorokowski P. Digit ratio and hand grip strength are associated with male competition outcomes: A study among traditional populations of the Yali and Hadza. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2020;32:e23321. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23321. PubMed DOI

Butovskaya M, Marczak M, Misiak M, Karelin D, Białek M, Sorokowski P. Approach to resource management and physical strength predict differences in helping: Evidence from two small-scale societies. Front. Psychol. 2020;11:373. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00373. PubMed DOI PMC

International Monetary Fund. Country Composition of WEO Groups. (2023) https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2023/April/groups-and-aggregates

Kim CR, Jeon YJ, Kim MC, Jeong T, Koo WR. Reference values for hand grip strength in the South Korean population. PloS One. 2018;13(4):e0195485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195485. PubMed DOI PMC

Amaral CA, Amaral TLM, Monteiro GTR, Vasconcellos MTL, Portela MC. Hand grip strength: Reference values for adults and elderly people of Rio Branco, Acre Brazil. PloS One. 2019;14(1):e0211452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211452. PubMed DOI PMC

Moncada-Jiménez J, Dicker EE, Chacón-Araya Y, Peralta-Brenes M, Briceño-Torres JM, Villarreal-Ángeles M, et al. Exploring handgrip strength as a cross-cultural correlate of body composition and upper body strength in older adults from Costa Rica and Kansas. J. Cross Cult. Gerontol. 2023;38:223–244. doi: 10.1007/s10823-023-09481-7. PubMed DOI PMC

McGrath RP, Kraemer WJ, Snih SA, Peterson MD. Handgrip strength and health in aging adults. Sports Med. 2018;48:1993–2000. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0952-y. PubMed DOI

Zengin A, Breasail Ó, M., Parsons, C. M., Jarjou, L. M., Janha, R. E., Jobe, M.,, et al. Sex-specific associations between cardiovascular risk factors and physical function: the Gambian Bone and Muscle Ageing Study. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023;14(1):84–92. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13069. PubMed DOI PMC

Wang YC, Bohannon RW, Li X, Sindhu B, Kapellusch J. Hand-grip strength: Normative reference values and equations for individuals 18 to 85 years of age residing in the United States. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2018;48(9):685–693. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7851. PubMed DOI

Ellemers N. Gender stereotypes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2018;69:275–298. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719. PubMed DOI

Rudman LA, Glick P. The social Psychology Of Gender: How Power And Intimacy Shape Gender Relations. Guilford Publications; 2021.

Makina D, Pasura D. Routledge Handbook of Contemporary African Migration. Routledge; 2023.

Yu R, Ong S, Cheung O, Leung J, Woo J. Reference values of grip strength, prevalence of low grip strength, and factors affecting grip strength values in Chinese adults. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2017;18(6):551.e9–551.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.03.006. PubMed DOI

Ingrová P, Králík M, Bártová V. Relationships between the hand grip strength and body composition in Czech and Slovak students. Slov. Antropol. 2017;20(1):30–43.

Bakholdina VY, Movsesian AA, Negasheva MA. Association of the digit ratio (2D: 4D) with sexually dimorphic morphological traits. Eur. J. Anat. 2018;22(4):317–322.

Han C, Wang H, Hahn AC, Fisher CI, Kandrik M, Fasolt V, et al. Cultural differences in preferences for facial coloration. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2018;39:154–159. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.11.005. DOI

Lu Y, Xiao K, Yang J, Pointer M, Li C, Wuerger S. Different colour predictions of facial preference by Caucasian and Chinese observers. Sci. Rep. 2022;12(1):12194. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15951-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Lu Y, Yang J, Xiao K, Pointer M, Li C, Wuerger S. Skin coloration is a culturally-specific cue for attractiveness, healthiness, and youthfulness in observers of Chinese and western European descent. PloS One. 2021;16(10):e0259276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259276. PubMed DOI PMC

Marcinkowska UM, Rantala MJ, Lee AJ, Kozlov MV, Aavik T, Cai H, et al. Women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity are strongest under favorable ecological conditions. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:3387. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39350-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Fiala V, Tureček P, Akoko RM, Pokorný Š, Kleisner K. Africans and Europeans differ in their facial perception of dominance and sex-typicality: A multidimensional Bayesian approach. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:6821. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10646-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Health and Health Systems Ranking of Countries Worldwide In 2023, By Health Index Score. Statistahttps://www.statista.com/statistics/1290168/health-index-of-countries-worldwide-by-health-index-score/ (2023).

Kleisner K, Tureček P, Roberts SC, Havlíček J, Valentova JV, Akoko RM, et al. How and why patterns of sexual dimorphism in human faces vary across the world. Sci. Rep. 2021;11(1):5978. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85402-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Lefevre CE, Etchells PJ, Howell EC, Clark AP, Penton-Voak IS. Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not. Biol. Lett. 2014;10(10):20140729. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0729. PubMed DOI PMC

Carré JM, McCormick CM, Mondloch CJ. Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychol. Sci. 2009;20(10):1194–1198. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02423.x. PubMed DOI

Ikuenobe P. Human rights, personhood, dignity, and African communalism. J. Hum. Rights. 2018;17(5):589–604. doi: 10.1080/14754835.2018.1533455. DOI

Bates, C. Communalism and identity among South Asians in diaspora. Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics. Working Paper https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/4007/ (2000).

Vasquez, A. Cultural Regions. https://quizlet.com/166647296/world-geography-chapter-9-cultural-regions-flash-cards/.

Religion in Tanzania. Wikipedia.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Tanzania. Accessed 9 Feb 2024.

Religion in the Czech Republic. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_Czech_Republic. Accessed 9 Feb 2024.

Religion in Russia. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Russia. Accessed 9 Feb 2024.

Religion in Pakistan. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Pakistan#:~:text=96.47%25%20are%20Muslims%2C%20followed%20by,maps%20of%20religious%20minority%20groups. Accessed 9 Feb 2024.

Religion in China. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_China. Accessed 9 Feb 2024.

Religion in Mexico. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Mexico. Accessed 9 Feb 2024.

Nei M, Livshits G. Genetic relationships of Europeans, Asians and Africans and the origin of modern Homo sapiens. Hum. Hered. 1989;39(5):276–281. doi: 10.1159/000153872. PubMed DOI

Turakulov R, Easteal S. Number of SNPS loci needed to detect population structure. Hum. Hered. 2003;55(1):37–45. doi: 10.1159/000071808. PubMed DOI

Rosenberg NA, Mahajan S, Ramachandran S, Zhao C, Pritchard JK, Feldman MW. Clines, clusters, and the effect of study design on the inference of human population structure. PLoS Genet. 2005;1(6):e70. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010070. PubMed DOI PMC

Li JZ, Absher DM, Tang H, Southwick AM, Casto AM, Ramachandran S, et al. Worldwide human relationships inferred from genome-wide patterns of variation. Science. 2008;319(5866):1100–1104. doi: 10.1126/science.1153717. PubMed DOI

Tang H, Quertermous T, Rodriguez B, Kardia SLR, Zhu X, Brown A, et al. Genetic structure, self-identified race/ethnicity, and confounding in case-control association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005;76(2):268–275. doi: 10.1086/427888. PubMed DOI PMC

Sohail M, Palma-Martínez MJ, Chong AY, Quinto-Cortés CD, Barberena-Jonas C, Medina-Muñoz SG, et al. Mexican biobank advances population and medical genomics of diverse ancestries. Nature. 2023;622:775–783. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06560-0. PubMed DOI PMC

García-Ortiz H, Barajas-Olmos F, Contreras-Cubas C, Cid-Soto MA, Córdova EJ, Centeno-Cruz F, et al. The genomic landscape of Mexican Indigenous populations brings insights into the peopling of the Americas. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5942. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26188-w. PubMed DOI PMC

Moreno-Mayar JV, Vinner L, de Barros Damgaard P, De La Fuente C, Chan, et al. Early human dispersals within the Americas. Science. 2018;362:2621. doi: 10.1126/science.aav2621. PubMed DOI

Bookstein FL. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press; 1997.

Mitteroecker P, Schaefer K. Thirty years of geometric morphometrics: Achievements, challenges, and the ongoing quest for biological meaningfulness. Am. J. Biol. Anthropol. 2022;178:181–210. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24531. PubMed DOI PMC

Rohlf FJ. The tps series of software. Hystrix. 2015;26:1.

Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets H. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Academic Press; 2012.

Adams, D., Collyer, M., Kaliontzopoulou, A., Baken, E. Geomorph: Software for Geometric Morphometric Analyses. R Package Version 4.0.6. https://cran.r-project.org/package=geomorph. (2023).

Claude J. Morphometrics with R. Springer; 2008.

Violence exposure is associated with preference for masculine faces: evidence from Senegal