The present research focused on how environmental harshness may affect heterosexual women's preferences of potential male mates' facial characteristics, namely masculinity-femininity. The evidence on this issue is mixed and mostly from Western samples. We aimed to provide causal evidence using a sample of Turkish women and Turkish male faces. A video-based manipulation was developed to heighten environmental harshness perceptions. In the main experiment, participants were primed with resource scarcity, pathogen prevalence or neither (control). They then saw masculinised vs. feminised versions of the same faces and indicated the face that they would prefer for a long-term relationship and separately rated the faces on various dimensions. In general, masculinised faces were perceived as slightly more attractive, slightly healthier and much more formidable. A multilevel Bayesian model showed that pathogen prevalence lowered the preference for masculinised faces while resource scarcity weakly elevated it. The overall drop in attractiveness ratings in cases of high perceived pathogen prevalence, one of the strongest effects we observed, suggests that during epidemics, the formation of new relationships is not a favourable strategy. Implications for evolutionary theories of mate preference are discussed.

Center for Theoretical Study Charles University and Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic

Department of Clinical Psychology Utrecht University The Netherlands

Department of Philosophy and History of Sciences Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Psychology Kadir Has University Istanbul Turkey

See more in PubMed

Alexopoulos, C., Timmermans, E., Sharabi, L. L., Roaché, D. J., Croft, A., Hall, E. D., … Uhlich, M. (2021). Settling down without settling: Perceived changes in partner preferences in response to COVID-19. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 10.1177/02654075211011527. DOI

Bártová, K., Štěrbová, Z., Varella, M. A. C., & Valentova, J. V. (2020). Femininity in men and masculinity in women is positively related to sociosexuality. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109575. 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109575 DOI

Blake, K. R., Dixson, B. J. W., O'Dean, S. M., & Denson, T. F. (2016). Standardized protocols for characterizing women's fertility: A data-driven approach. Hormones and Behavior, 81, 74–83. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.03.004 PubMed DOI

Boothroyd, L. G., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., DeBruine, L. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). Facial correlates of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(3), 211–218. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.009 DOI

Boothroyd, L. G., Scott, I., Gray, A. W., Coombes, C. I., & Pound, N. (2013). Male facial masculinity as a cue to health outcomes. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(5), 147470491301100. 10.1177/147470491301100508 PubMed DOI

Brooks, R., Scott, I. M., Maklakov, A. A., Kasumovic, M. M., Clark, A. P., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2011). National income inequality predicts women's preferences for masculinized faces better than health does. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1707), 810–812. 10.1098/rspb.2010.0964 PubMed DOI PMC

Clarkson, T. R., Sidari, M. J., Sains, R., Alexander, M., Harrison, M., Mefodeva, V., … Dixson, B. J. W. (2020). A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology. Royal Society Open Science, 7(1), 191209. 10.1098/rsos.191209 PubMed DOI PMC

Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 61–72. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.61 PubMed DOI

Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (2001). Risk-taking, intrasexual competition, and homicide. In French J. A., Kamil A. C., & Leger D. W. (Eds.), The Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 47): Evolutionary psychology and motivation (pp. 1–36). University of Nebraska Press. PubMed

DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L. M., & Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1692), 2405–2410. 10.1098/rspb.2009.2184 PubMed DOI PMC

DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L. G., Perrett, D. I., Penton-Voak, I. S., … Tiddeman, B. P. (2006). Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273(1592), 1355–1360. 10.1098/rspb.2005.3445 PubMed DOI PMC

DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Crawford, J. R., & Welling, L. L. M. (2011). Further evidence for regional variation in women's masculinity preferences. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1707), 813–814. 10.1098/rspb.2010.2200 DOI

DeBruine, L. M., & Tiddeman, B. P. (2017). Webmorph. http://webmorph.org

Dixson, B. J. W., Blake, K. R., Denson, T. F., Gooda-Vossos, A., O'Dean, S. M., Sulikowski, D., … Brooks, R. C. (2018a). The role of mating context and fecundability in women's preferences for men's facial masculinity and beardedness. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 93, 90–102. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.04.007 PubMed DOI

Dixson, B. J. W., Lee, A. J., Blake, K. R., Jasienska, G., & Marcinkowska, U. M. (2018b). Women's preferences for men's beards show no relation to their ovarian cycle phase and sex hormone levels. Hormones and Behavior, 97, 137–144. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.11.006 PubMed DOI

Dixson, B. J. W., Little, A. C., Dixson, H. G., & Brooks, R. C. (2017). Do prevailing environmental factors influence human preferences for facial morphology? Behavioral Ecology, 28(5), 1217–1227. 10.1093/beheco/arx067 DOI

Fink, B., Neave, N., & Seydel, H. (2007). Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. American Journal of Human Biology, 19(1), 82–87. 10.1002/ajhb.20583 PubMed DOI

Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–587. 10.1017/S0140525X0000337X PubMed DOI

Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A. J., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Christensen, P. N. (2004). Women's preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15(3), 203–207. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503010.x PubMed DOI

Gildersleeve, K., DeBruine, L., Haselton, M. G., Frederick, D. A., Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2013). Shifts in women's mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle: A critique of Harris (2011) and Harris (2012). Sex Roles, 69(9), 516–524. 10.1007/s11199-013-0273-4 DOI

Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108(3), 233–242. 10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233 PubMed DOI

Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. Random House.

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X PubMed DOI

Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(4), 251–267. 10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00066-6 DOI

Jones, A. L., & Jaeger, B. (2019). Biological bases of beauty revisited: The effect of symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism on female facial attractiveness. Symmetry, 11(2), 279. 10.3390/sym11020279 DOI

Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., Han, C., … DeBruine, L. M. (2018). No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women's hormonal status. Psychological Science, 29(6), 996–1005. 10.1177/0956797618760197 PubMed DOI PMC

Kruger, D. J. (2006). Male facial masculinity influences attributions of personality and reproductive strategy. Personal Relationships, 13(4), 451–463. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00129.x DOI

Little, A. C., Cohen, D. L., Jones, B. C., & Belsky, J. (2007). Human preferences for facial masculinity change with relationship type and environmental harshness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61(6), 967–973. 10.1007/s00265-006-0325-7 DOI

Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2011). Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and symmetry in opposite-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1714), 2032–2039. 10.1098/rspb.2010.1925 PubMed DOI PMC

Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2013). Environment contingent preferences: Exposure to visual cues of direct male–male competition and wealth increase women's preferences for masculinity in male faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 193–200. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.008 DOI

Little, A. C., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2002). The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. British Journal of Psychology, 93(4), 451–464. 10.1348/000712602761381349 PubMed DOI

Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1496), 1095–1100. 10.1098/rspb.2002.1984 PubMed DOI PMC

Lu, H. J., Zhu, X. Q., & Chang, L. (2015). Good genes, good providers, and good fathers: Economic development involved in how women select a mate. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9(4), 215–228. 10.1037/ebs0000048 DOI

Luevano, V. X., & Zebrowitz, L. A. (2007). Do impressions of health, dominance, and warmth explain why masculine faces are preferred more in a short-term mate? Evolutionary Psychology, 5(1), 15-27. 10.1177/147470490700500102 DOI

Marcinkowska, U. M., Galbarczyk, A., & Jasienska, G. (2018). La donna è mobile? Lack of cyclical shifts in facial symmetry, and facial and body masculinity preferences – A hormone based study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 88, 47–53. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.11.007 PubMed DOI

Marcinkowska, U. M., Rantala, M. J., Lee, A. J., Kozlov, M. V., Aavik, T., Cai, H., … Dixson, B. J. W. (2019). Women's preferences for men's facial masculinity are strongest under favorable ecological conditions. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 3387. 10.1038/s41598-019-39350-8 PubMed DOI PMC

McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.

McIntosh, T. L., Lee, A. J., Sidari, M. J., Stower, R. E., Sherlock, J. M., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2017). Microbes and masculinity: Does exposure to pathogenic cues alter women's preferences for male facial masculinity and beardedness? PLOS ONE, 12(6), e0178206. 10.1371/journal.pone.0178206 PubMed DOI PMC

Moore, F. R., Coetzee, V., Contreras-Garduño, J., Debruine, L. M., Kleisner, K., Krams, I., … Suzuki, T. N. (2013). Cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for cues to sex- and stress-hormones in the male face. Biology Letters, 9(3), 20130050. 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0050 PubMed DOI PMC

O'Connor, J. J. M., Fraccaro, P. J., & Feinberg, D. R. (2012). The influence of male voice pitch on women's perceptions of relationship investment. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 10(1), 1–13. 10.1556/JEP.10.2012.1.1 PubMed DOI

Pazhoohi, F., Pazhouhi, S., & Kingstone, A. (2021). Concern about contracting COVID-19 predicts men's preference for female facial femininity, but not women's preference for male facial masculinity. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 7(1), 17–27. 10.1007/s40750-020-00158-w PubMed DOI PMC

Penton-Voak, I. S., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., Tiddeman, B. P., & Perrett, D. I. (2003). Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117(3), 264–271. 10.1037/0735-7036.117.3.264 PubMed DOI

Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(1), 39–48. 10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00033-1 DOI

Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399(6738), 741–742. 10.1038/21557 PubMed DOI

Pereira, K. J., David, V. F., Varella, M. A. C., & Valentova, J. V. (2020). Environmental threat influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in male and female faces but not voices or dances. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(4), 303–311. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.05.003 DOI

Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., … Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394(6696), 884–887. 10.1038/29772 PubMed DOI

Pettijohn, T. F., Sacco, D. F., & Yerkes, M. J. (2009). Hungry people prefer more mature mates: A field test of the environmental security hypothesis. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 3(3), 216–232. 10.1037/h0099321 DOI

Pisanski, K., & Feinberg, D. R. (2013). Cross-cultural variation in mate preferences for averageness, symmetry, body size, and masculinity. Cross-Cultural Research, 47(2), 162–197. 10.1177/1069397112471806 DOI

Polo, P., Muñoz-Reyes, J. A., Pita, M., Shackelford, T. K., & Fink, B. (2019). Testosterone-dependent facial and body traits predict men's sociosexual attitudes and behaviors. American Journal of Human Biology, 31(3), e23235. 10.1002/ajhb.23235 PubMed DOI

Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 157–175. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005 DOI

Rantala, M. J., Moore, F. R., Skrinda, I., Krama, T., Kivleniece, I., Kecko, S., & Krams, I. (2012). Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in humans. Nature Communications, 3:694. 10.1038/ncomms1696 PubMed DOI PMC

Rhodes, G., Chan, J., Zebrowitz, L. A., & Simmons, L. W. (2003). Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270(suppl_1), S93–S95. 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0023 PubMed DOI PMC

Rhodes, G., Yoshikawa, S., Palermo, R., Simmons, L. W., Peters, M., Lee, K., … Crawford, J. R. (2007). Perceived health contributes to the attractiveness of facial symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism. Perception, 36(8), 1244–1252. 10.1068/p5712 PubMed DOI

Ryder, H., Maltby, J., Rai, L., Jones, P., & Flowe, H. D. (2016). Women's fear of crime and preference for formidable mates: How specific are the underlying psychological mechanisms? Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(4), 293–302. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.01.005 DOI

Saribay, S. A., Biten, A. F., Meral, E. O., Aldan, P., Třebický, V., & Kleisner, K. (2018). The Bogazici face database: Standardized photographs of Turkish faces with supporting materials. PLOS ONE, 13(2), e0192018. 10.1371/journal.pone.0192018 PubMed DOI PMC

Scheib, J. E. (2001). Context-specific mate choice criteria: Women's trade-offs in the contexts of long-term and extra-pair mateships. Personal Relationships, 8(4), 371–389. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00046.x DOI

Scott, I. M., Clark, A. P., Josephson, S. C., Boyette, A. H., Cuthill, I. C., Fried, R. L., … Penton-Voak, I. S. (2014). Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(40), 14388–14393. 10.1073/pnas.1409643111 PubMed DOI PMC

Snyder, J. K., Fessler, D. M. T., Tiokhin, L., Frederick, D. A., Lee, S. W., & Navarrete, C. D. (2011). Trade-offs in a dangerous world: Women's fear of crime predicts preferences for aggressive and formidable mates. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(2), 127–137. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.08.007 DOI

Stan Development Team. (2018). RStan: The R interface to Stan. R package version 2.17. 3.

Stower, R. E., Lee, A. J., McIntosh, T. L., Sidari, M. J., Sherlock, J. M., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2019). Mating strategies and the masculinity paradox: How relationship context, relationship status, and sociosexuality shape women's preferences for facial masculinity and beardedness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 809–820. 10.1007/s10508-019-1437-2 PubMed DOI

Swaddle, J. P., & Reierson, G. W. (2002). Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1507), 2285–2289. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2165 PubMed DOI PMC

Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(3), 175–201. 10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00005-7 DOI

Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(2), 131–144. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.001 DOI

Waynforth, D., Delwadia, S., & Camm, M. (2005). The influence of women's mating strategies on preference for masculine facial architecture. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(5), 409–416. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.03.003 DOI

Zuckerman, M., Miyake, K., & Elkin, C. S. (1995). Effects of attractiveness and maturity of face and voice on interpersonal impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 29(2), 253–272. 10.1006/jrpe.1995.1015 DOI

FACEDIG automated tool for placing landmarks on facial portraits for geometric morphometrics users

Violence exposure is associated with preference for masculine faces: evidence from Senegal

Cross-cultural perception of strength, attractiveness, aggressiveness and helpfulness of Maasai male faces calibrated to handgrip strength