One proposal for the persistence of homosexuality in the human population is the sexually antagonistic gene hypothesis, which suggests that the lower fertility of homosexual individuals, especially men, may be compensated by higher fertility of their relatives of the opposite sex. To test this hypothesis, we have collected data from 7,312 heterosexual men, 459 gay men, 3,352 heterosexual women, and 79 lesbian women mainly from Czechia. In an online survey, participants answered questions regarding their own as well as their parents' and grandparents' fertility. For men, we obtained no significant results except for higher fertility of gay men's paternal grandmothers, but the magnitude of this effect was very small. For the female sample, we recorded lower fertility of lesbian women's mothers and fathers. In line with our expectations, both gay men and lesbian women had lower fertility rates than their heterosexual counterparts. Our results are consistent with recent studies which likewise do not support the sexually antagonistic gene hypothesis.

Department of Biology Education Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czechia

Department of Philosophy and History of Science Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czechia

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Viničná 7 128 00 Prague Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ablaza C, Kabátek J, Perales F. Are sibship characteristics predictive of same sex marriage? An examination of fraternal birth order and female fecundity effects in population-level administrative data from the Netherlands. Journal of Sex Research. 2022;59(6):671–683. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.1974330. PubMed DOI

Apostolou M. Interfamily conflict, reproductive success, and the evolution of male homosexuality. Review of General Psychology. 2013;17(3):288–296. doi: 10.1037/a0031521. DOI

Apostolou M. The direct reproductive cost of same-sex attraction: Evidence from two nationally representative U.S. samples. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2022;51(4):1857–1864. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02199-y. PubMed DOI

Barthes J, Godelle B, Raymond M. Human social stratification and hypergyny: Toward an understanding of male homosexual preference. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2013;34(3):155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.01.001. DOI

Barthes J, Crochet P-A, Raymond M. Male homosexual preference: Where, when, why? PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0134817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134817. PubMed DOI PMC

Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B. 1995;57(1):289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x. DOI

Blanchard R. Fraternal birth order, family size, and male homosexuality: Meta-analysis of studies spanning 25 years. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2018;47(1):1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1007-4. PubMed DOI

Blanchard R, Klassen P. H-Y antigen and homosexuality in men. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1997;185(3):373–378. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0315. PubMed DOI

Blanchard R, Skorska MN. New data on birth order in homosexual men and women and a reply to Vilsmeier et al. (2021a, 2021b) Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2022;51(7):3319–3349. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02362-z. PubMed DOI

Blanchard R, Krupp J, VanderLaan DP, Vasey PL, Zucker KJ. A method yielding comparable estimates of the fraternal birth order and female fecundity effects in male homosexuality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2020;287(1923):20192907. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2907. PubMed DOI PMC

Bobrow D, Bailey JM. Is male homosexuality maintained via kin selection? Evolution and Human Behavior. 2001;22(5):361–368. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00074-5. DOI

Bogaert AF, Skorska MN, Wang C, Gabrie J, MacNeil AJ, Hoffarth MR, VanderLean DP, Zucker KJ, Blanchard R. Male homosexuality and maternal immune responsivity to the Y-linked protein NLGN4Y. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2018;115(2):302–306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705895114. PubMed DOI PMC

Camperio Ciani A, Battaglia U, Cesare L, Camperio Ciani G, Capiluppi C. Possible balancing selection in human female homosexuality. Human Nature. 2018;29(1):14–32. doi: 10.1007/s12110-017-9309-8. PubMed DOI

Camperio Ciani A, Battaglia U, Zanzotto G. Human homosexuality: A paradigmatic arena for sexually antagonistic selection? Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2015;7(4):a017657. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017657. PubMed DOI PMC

Camperio Ciani A, Corna F, Capiluppi C. Evidence for maternally inherited factors favouring male homosexuality and promoting female fecundity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 2004;271(1554):2217–2221. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2872. PubMed DOI PMC

Camperio Ciani A, Iemmola F, Blecher SR. Genetic factors increase fecundity in female maternal relatives of bisexual men as in homosexuals. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2009;6(2):449–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00944.x. PubMed DOI

Camperio Ciani A, Pellizzari E. Fecundity of paternal and maternal non-parental female relatives of homosexual and heterosexual men. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e51088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051088. PubMed DOI PMC

Coome LA, Skorska MN, VanderLaan DP. Direct reproduction and sexual orientation and gender diversity in Thailand. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2020;49(7):2449–2460. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01830-8. PubMed DOI

Crapo RH. Factors in the cross-cultural patterning of male homosexuality: A reappraisal of the literature. Cross-Cultural Research. 1995;29(2):178–202. doi: 10.1177/106939719502900204. DOI

Flegr J. Adaptations, by-products, and spandrels. In: Shackelford TK, editor. The Cambridge handbook on evolutionary perspectives on sexual psychology. Cambridge University Press; 2022. pp. 87–113.

Fleischman DS, Fessler DMT, Cholakians AE. Testing the affiliation hypothesis of homoerotic motivation in humans: The effects of progesterone and priming. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2015;44(5):1395–1404. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0436-6. PubMed DOI

Fořt, J., Valentova, J. V., Hudáčová, K., & Kunc, B. (2024). Kin fertility in men and women of different sexual orientations. Manuscript in preparation.

Fry JD. The genomic location of sexually antagonistic variation: Some cautionary comments. Evolution. 2010;64(5):1510–1516. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00898.x. PubMed DOI PMC

Ganna, A., Verweij, K. J. H., Nivard, M. G., Maier, R., Wedow, R., Busch, A. S., Abdellaoui, A., Guo, S., Sathirapongsasuti, J. F., 23andMe Research Team, Lichtenstein, P., Lundström, S., Långström, N., Auton, A., Harris, K. M., Beecham, G. W., Martin, E. R., Sanders, A. R., Perry, J. R. B., … Zietsch, B. P. (2019). Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior. Science, 365(6456), eaat7693. 10.1126/science.aat7693 PubMed PMC

Gibson JR, Chippindale AK, Rice WR. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 2002;269(1490):499–505. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1863. PubMed DOI PMC

Gómez JM, Gónzalez-Megías A, Verdú M. The evolution of same-sex sexual behaviour in mammals. Nature Communications. 2023;14(1):5719. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41290-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Gómez Jiménez FR, Semenyna SW, Vasey PL. Offspring production among the relatives of Istmo Zapotec men and Muxes. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2020;49(2):581–594. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01611-y. PubMed DOI

Gómez Jiménez FR, Vasey PL. Kin-directed altruism and the evolution of male androphilia among Istmo Zapotec Muxes. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2022;43:224–233. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.02.002. DOI

Hamer D, Hu S, Magnuson V, Hu N, Pattatucci A. A linkage between DNA markers on the X-chromosome and male sexual orientation. Science. 1993;261(5119):321–327. doi: 10.1126/science.8332896. PubMed DOI

Iemmola F, Camperio Ciani A. New evidence of genetic factors influencing sexual orientation in men: Female fecundity increase in the maternal line. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2009;38(3):393–399. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9381-6. PubMed DOI

Kaňková, Š., Flegr, J., & Calda, P. (2015). The influence of latent toxoplasmosis on women’s reproductive function: Four cross-sectional studies. Folia Parasitologica, 62(1). 10.14411/fp.2015.041 PubMed

Khovanova T. On the mathematics of the fraternal birth order effect and the genetics of homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2020;49(2):551–555. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01573-1. PubMed DOI

King M, Green J, Osborn DPJ, Arkell J, Hetherton J, Pereira E. Family size in white gay and heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2005;34(1):117–122. doi: 10.1007/s10508-005-1006-8. PubMed DOI

Kirkpatrick RC. The evolution of human homosexual behavior. Current Anthropology. 2000;41(3):385–413. doi: 10.1086/300145. PubMed DOI

Luoto S, Krams I, Rantala MJ. A life history approach to the female sexual orientation spectrum: Evolution, development, causal mechanisms, and health. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2019;48(5):1273–1308. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1261-0. PubMed DOI

McDonald, J. H. (2014). Handbook of biological statistics (3rd ed.). Sparky House Publishing.

Miller EM. Homosexuality, birth order, and evolution: Toward an equilibrium reproductive economics of homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2000;29(1):1–34. doi: 10.1023/A:1001836320541. PubMed DOI

Monk JD, Giglio E, Kamath A, Lambert MR, McDonough CE. An alternative hypothesis for the evolution of same-sex sexual behaviour in animals. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2019;3(12):1622–1631. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1019-7. PubMed DOI

Moscovice LR, Surbeck M, Fruth B, Hohmann G, Jaeggi AV, Deschner T. The cooperative sex: Sexual interactions among female bonobos are linked to increases in oxytocin, proximity and coalitions. Hormones and Behavior. 2019;116:104581. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104581. PubMed DOI

Muscarella F. The evolution of homoerotic behavior in humans. Journal of Homosexuality. 2000;40(1):51–77. doi: 10.1300/J082v40n01_03. PubMed DOI

Nakagawa S. A farewell to Bonferroni: The problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behavioral Ecology. 2004;15(6):1044–1045. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arh107. DOI

Peri-Rotem N. Religion and fertility in Western Europe: Trends across cohorts in Britain, France and the Netherlands. European Journal of Population. 2016;32(2):231–265. doi: 10.1007/s10680-015-9371-z. PubMed DOI PMC

Posit Team. (2023). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R (Version 2023.3.0.386) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://www.posit.co/

Rahman Q, Collins A, Morrison M, Orrells JC, Cadinouche K, Greenfield S, Begum S. Maternal inheritance and familial fecundity factors in male homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2008;37(6):962–969. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9191-2. PubMed DOI

Raymond M, Crochet P-A. Carving non-proximal explanations for same-sex sexual orientation [Commentary] Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2023;52:3007–3012. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02497-z. PubMed DOI

Raymond, M., Turek, D., Durand, V., Nila, S., Suryobroto, B., Vadez, J., Barthes, J., Apostolou, M., & Crochet, P.-A. (2023). Increased birth rank of homosexual males: Disentangling the older brother effect and sexual antagonism hypothesis. Peer Community Journal, 3, e22. 10.24072/pcjournal.247

Roselli CE. Programmed for preference: The biology of same-sex attraction in rams. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2020;114:12–15. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.032. PubMed DOI PMC

Sanders AR, Martin ER, Beecham GW, Guo S, Dawood K, Rieger G, Badner JA, Gershon ES, Krishnappa RS, Kolundzija AB, Duan J, Gejman PV, Bailey JM. Genome-wide scan demonstrates significant linkage for male sexual orientation. Psychological Medicine. 2015;45(7):1379–1388. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714002451. PubMed DOI

Schwartz G, Kim RM, Kolundzija AB, Rieger G, Sanders AR. Biodemographic and physical correlates of sexual orientation in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2010;39(1):93–109. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9499-1. PubMed DOI

Semenyna SW, Petterson LJ, VanderLaan DP, Vasey PL. A comparison of the reproductive output among the relatives of Samoan androphilic fa’afafine and gynephilic men. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2017;46(1):87–93. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0765-8. PubMed DOI

Semenyna SW, Gómez Jiménez FR, VanderLaan DP, Vasey PL. Male androphilia, fraternal birth order, and female fecundity in Samoa: A 10-y retrospective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023;120(50):e2313284120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2313284120. PubMed DOI PMC

Swift-Gallant A, Coome LA, Aitken M, Monks DA, VanderLaan DP. Evidence for distinct biodevelopmental influences on male sexual orientation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(26):12787–12792. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1809920116. PubMed DOI PMC

The Jamovi Project. (2022). Jamovi (Version 2.3.21) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org

Trivers R. Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist. 1974;14(1):249–264. doi: 10.1093/icb/14.1.249. DOI

VanderLaan DP, Skorska MN, Peragine DE, Coome LA. Carving the biodevelopment of same-sex sexual orientation at its joints. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02360-1. PubMed DOI

Vasey PL. Homosexual behavior in primates—A review of evidence and theory. International Journal of Primatology. 1995;16(2):173–204. doi: 10.1007/BF02735477. DOI

Vasey PL, Pocock DS, VanderLaan DP. Kin selection and male androphilia in Samoan fa’afafine. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2007;28(3):159–167. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.08.004. DOI

Wilson EO. Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1975.

Wilson EO. On human nature. Harvard University Press; 1978.

Zietsch BP, Morley KI, Shekar SN, Verweij KJH, Keller MC, Macgregor S, Wright MJ, Bailey JM, Martin NG. Genetic factors predisposing to homosexuality may increase mating success in heterosexuals. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2008;29(6):424–433. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.07.002. DOI

Zietsch BP, Sidari MJ, Abdellaoui A, Maier R, Långström N, Guo S, Beecham GW, Martin ER, Sanders AR, Verweij KJH. Genomic evidence consistent with antagonistic pleiotropy may help explain the evolutionary maintenance of same-sex sexual behaviour in humans. Nature Human Behaviour. 2021;5(9):1251–1258. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01168-8. PubMed DOI

Zuckerman P. Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns. In: Martin M, editor. The Cambridge companion to atheism. 1. Cambridge University Press; 2006. pp. 47–66.