Diagnostic accuracy of carotid plaque instability by noninvasive imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print
Document type Journal Article, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis
Grant support
NV19-04-00270, NV19-08-00362, NU22-04-00389, SGS11/LF/2022
University of Ostrava
University of Lausanne
Faculty of Biology and Medicine
PubMed
38953552
DOI
10.1093/ehjci/jeae144
PII: 7702685
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- carotid atherosclerosis, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, plaque instability, ultrasound,
- MeSH
- Plaque, Atherosclerotic * diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Risk Assessment MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods MeSH
- Carotid Artery Diseases diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods MeSH
- Carotid Stenosis diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
AIMS: There is increasing evidence that plaque instability in the extracranial carotid artery may lead to an increased stroke risk independently of the degree of stenosis. We aimed to determine diagnostic accuracy of vulnerable and stable plaque using noninvasive imaging modalities when compared to histology in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Medline Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in the detection of 1) vulnerable/stable plaque, and 2) vulnerable/stable plaque characteristics, compared to histology. The quality of included studies was assessed by QUADAS-2 and univariate and bivariate random-effect meta-analyses were performed. We included 36 vulnerable and 5 stable plaque studies in the meta-analysis, and out of 211 plaque characteristics from remaining studies, we classified 169 as vulnerable and 42 as stable characteristics (28 CT, 120 MRI, 104 US characteristics). We found that MRI had high accuracy [90% (95% CI: 82-95%)] in the detection of vulnerable plaque, similar to CT [86% (95% CI: 76-92%); P > 0.05], whereas US showed less accuracy [80% (95% CI: 75-84%); P = 0.013]. CT showed high diagnostic accuracy in visualizing characteristics of vulnerable or stable plaques (89% and 90%) similar to MRI (86% and 89%; P > 0.05); however, US had lower accuracy (77%, P < 0.001 and 82%, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: CT and MRI have a similar, high performance in detecting vulnerable carotid plaques, whereas US showed significantly less diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, MRI visualized all vulnerable plaque characteristics allowing for a better stroke risk assessment. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID CRD42022329690.
References provided by Crossref.org
Carotid plaque characteristics by computed Tomography: A diagnostic accuracy systematic review