Apixaban vs Aspirin According to CHA2DS2-VASc Score in Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From ARTESiA
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Comparative Study, Multicenter Study
PubMed
39019530
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.002
PII: S0735-1097(24)07160-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score, apixaban, aspirin, major bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism, subclinical atrial fibrillation,
- MeSH
- Aspirin * therapeutic use MeSH
- Stroke * prevention & control etiology epidemiology MeSH
- Atrial Fibrillation * drug therapy complications MeSH
- Risk Assessment methods MeSH
- Factor Xa Inhibitors * therapeutic use MeSH
- Hemorrhage chemically induced epidemiology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pyrazoles * therapeutic use MeSH
- Pyridones * therapeutic use adverse effects administration & dosage MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- apixaban MeSH Browser
- Aspirin * MeSH
- Factor Xa Inhibitors * MeSH
- Pyrazoles * MeSH
- Pyridones * MeSH
BACKGROUND: ARTESiA (Apixaban for the Reduction of Thrombo-Embolism in Patients With Device-Detected Sub-Clinical Atrial Fibrillation) demonstrated that apixaban, compared with aspirin, significantly reduced stroke and systemic embolism (SE) but increased major bleeding in patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation. OBJECTIVES: To help inform decision making, the authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of apixaban according to baseline CHA2DS2-VASc score. METHODS: We performed a subgroup analysis according to baseline CHA2DS2-VASc score and assessed both the relative and absolute differences in stroke/SE and major bleeding. RESULTS: Baseline CHA2DS2-VASc scores were <4 in 1,578 (39.4%) patients, 4 in 1,349 (33.6%), and >4 in 1,085 (27.0%). For patients with CHA2DS2-VASc >4, the rate of stroke was 0.98%/year with apixaban and 2.25%/year with aspirin; compared with aspirin, apixaban prevented 1.28 (95% CI: 0.43-2.12) strokes/SE per 100 patient-years and caused 0.68 (95% CI: -0.23 to 1.57) major bleeds. For CHA2DS2-VASc <4, the stroke/SE rate was 0.85%/year with apixaban and 0.97%/year with aspirin. Apixaban prevented 0.12 (95% CI: -0.38 to 0.62) strokes/SE per 100 patient-years and caused 0.33 (95% CI: -0.27 to 0.92) major bleeds. For patients with CHA2DS2-VASc =4, apixaban prevented 0.32 (95% CI: -0.16 to 0.79) strokes/SE per 100 patient-years and caused 0.28 (95% CI: -0.30 to 0.86) major bleeds. CONCLUSIONS: One in 4 patients in ARTESiA with subclinical atrial fibrillation had a CHA2DS2-VASc score >4 and a stroke/SE risk of 2.2% per year. For these patients, the benefits of treatment with apixaban in preventing stroke/SE are greater than the risks. The opposite is true for patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score <4. A substantial intermediate group (CHA2DS2-VASc =4) exists in which patient preferences will inform treatment decisions. (Apixaban for the Reduction of Thrombo-Embolism in Patients With Device-Detected Sub-Clinical Atrial Fibrillation; NCT01938248).
Amphia Ziekenhuis Breda the Netherlands
Cardiology and Vascular Disease Division Rennes University Health Centre Rennes France
Cardiology Department Hospital Universitario La Luz Madrid Spain
Cliniques du Sud Luxembourg Department of Cardiology Arlon Belgium
Department of Cardiology Montreal Heart Institute Université de Montréal Montreal Quebec Canada
Department of Cardiology University Hospital Basel University of Basel Basel Switzerland
Department of Cardiology Western University London Ontario Canada
Department of Medicine Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
J W Goethe University Frankfurt Germany
Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
McMaster University Hamilton Health Sciences Hamilton Ontario Canada
Population Health Research Institute McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
School of Medicine and Dentistry University of Rochester Rochester New York USA
References provided by Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01938248