External validation of the DIAFORA system to predict lower-extremity amputations in a prospective Danish cohort

. 2025 Jan ; 42 (1) : e15443. [epub] 20240928

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, validační studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39340796

AIM: A diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU) is a major risk factor for lower-extremity amputation (LEA). To help clinicians predict the risk of LEA in people with DFU, the Diabetic Foot Risk Assessment (DIAFORA) system was developed but has never been externally validated. METHODS: In this study, 317 people presenting with a new DFU were included. At baseline, participants were grouped into three groups based on their DIAFORA score: low-risk (<15), medium-risk (15-25), and high-risk (>25). Participants were followed until healing, LEA, death, or at least 3 months. Discriminative accuracy was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios (LRs) and the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: All 317 participants completed at least 3 months of follow-up for a median duration of 146 days, during which 12.6% underwent minor amputation and 2.5% major amputation. People in the low- and medium-risk categories had major amputation rates of 0.9% and 2.1%, respectively, and negative LR of major LEA of 0.10 and 0.38, respectively, while the people in the high-risk category had an amputation rate of 25.0% and a positive LR of 12.9. The DIAFORA risk groups had a sensitivity of 75.0% and a specificity of 65.7%, with a corresponding AUC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.68-0.87) for the prediction of major LEA. CONCLUSION: The DIAFORA score is a useful tool for risk stratification of people presenting with a newly occurred DFU, with the external validation presenting results similar to those presented in the original study. The DIAFORA score may guide clinicians towards more individualized DFU treatment regimens.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nabuurs‐Franssen MH, Huijberts MSP, Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman AC, Willems J, Schaper NC. Health‐related quality of life of diabetic foot ulcer patients and their caregivers. Diabetologia. 2005;48:1906‐1910. doi:10.1007/s00125-005-1856-6 PubMed DOI

Røikjer J, Werkman NCC, Ejskjaer N, et al. Incidence, hospitalization and mortality and their changes over time in people with a first ever diabetic foot ulcer. Diabet Med. 2021;39:e14725. doi:10.1111/dme.14725 PubMed DOI

Crawford F, Inkster M, Kleijnen J, Fahey T. Predicting foot ulcers in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. QJM. 2006;100:65‐86. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcl140 PubMed DOI

Monteiro‐Soares M, Martins‐Mendes D, Vaz‐Carneiro A, Dinis‐Ribeiro M. Lower‐limb amputation following foot ulcers in patients with diabetes: classification systems, external validation and comparative analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2015;31:515‐529. doi:10.1002/dmrr.2634 PubMed DOI

Monteiro‐Soares M, Vaz‐Carneiro A, Sampaio S, Dinis‐Ribeiro M. Validation and comparison of currently available stratification systems for patients with diabetes by risk of foot ulcer development. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;167:401‐407. doi:10.1530/EJE-12-0279 PubMed DOI

Monteiro‐Soares M, Dinis‐Ribeiro M. A new diabetic foot risk assessment tool: DIAFORA. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32:429‐435. PubMed

van Netten JJ, Bus SA, Apelqvist J, et al. Definitions and criteria for diabetes‐related foot disease (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024:40. Published online in may 2023. PubMed

Hansen CS, Eldrup E, Yderstræde K, Vind BF, Andersen ST, Røikjer J, Hommel E, Duun E, Jørgensen LB, Ejskjær N. Diabetisk neuropati. https://endocrinology.dk/nbv/diabetes‐melitus/type‐1‐diabetes‐mellitus/ 2022.

Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, et al. High prevalence of ischaemia, infection and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline results from the Eurodiale study. Diabetologia. 2007;50:18‐25. doi:10.1007/s00125-006-0491-1 PubMed DOI

Pineda C, Espinosa R, Pena A. Radiographic imaging in osteomyelitis: the role of plain radiography, computed tomography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and scintigraphy. Semin Plast Surg. 2009;23:80‐89. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1214160 PubMed DOI PMC

Akhtar S, Schaper N, Apelqvist J, Jude E. A review of the Eurodiale studies: what lessons for diabetic foot care? Curr Diab Rep. 2011;11:302‐309. doi:10.1007/s11892-011-0195-x PubMed DOI

Geiss LS, Li Y, Hora I, Albright A, Rolka D, Gregg EW. Resurgence of diabetes‐related nontraumatic lower‐extremity amputation in the young and middle‐aged adult U.S. Population Diabetes Care. 2019;42:50‐54. doi:10.2337/dc18-1380 PubMed DOI

Røikjer J, Jensen MH, Vestergaard P, Sørensen AM, Laursen HVB, Ejskjær N. Twenty years with diabetes and amputations: a retrospective population‐based cohort study. Diabet Med. 2020;37:2098‐2108. doi:10.1111/dme.14251 PubMed DOI

Røikjer J, Kvist AV, Nikontovic A, et al. Declining incidence of major lower‐extremity amputations in the northern Danish region between 2016 and 2021: the impact of diabetes and preventive vascular procedures. Ann Vasc Surg. 2024;2024:407‐413. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.043 PubMed DOI

Røikjer J, Wegeberg A‐M, Nikontovic A, Brock C, Vestergaard P. Prevalence of painful and painless diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the northern Danish region: a population‐based study. Prim Care Diabetes. 2024:S1751‐9918(24)00164‐5. doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2024.08.006 PubMed DOI

Beulens JWJ, Yauw JS, Elders PJM, et al. Prognostic models for predicting the risk of foot ulcer or amputation in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and external validation study. Diabetologia. 2021;64:1550‐1562. doi:10.1007/s00125-021-05448-w PubMed DOI PMC

Monteiro‐Soares M, Boyko EJ, Ribeiro J, Ribeiro I, Dinis‐Ribeiro M. Risk stratification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review. Diabetologia. 2011;54:1190‐1199. doi:10.1007/s00125-010-2030-3 PubMed DOI

Monteiro‐Soares M, Hamilton EJ, Russell DA, et al. Classification of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2023;40:e3645. doi:10.1002/dmrr.3645 PubMed DOI

Abbas ZG, Lutale JK, Game FL, Jeffcoate WJ. Comparison of four systems of classification of diabetic foot ulcers in Tanzania. Diabet Med. 2008;25:134‐137. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02308.x PubMed DOI

Jeon BJ, Choi HJ, Kang JS, Tak MS, Park ES. Comparison of five systems of classification of diabetic foot ulcers and predictive factors for amputation. Int Wound J. 2017;14:537‐545. doi:10.1111/iwj.12642 PubMed DOI PMC

Monteiro‐Soares M, Martins‐Mendes D, Vaz‐Carneiro A, Sampaio S, Dinis‐Ribeiro M. Classification systems for lower extremity amputation prediction in subjects with active diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014;30:610‐622. doi:10.1002/dmrr.2535 PubMed DOI

Monteiro‐Soares M, Russell D, Boyko EJ, et al. Guidelines on the classification of diabetic foot ulcers (IWGDF 2019). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36 (Suppl 1):e3273. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...