• This record comes from PubMed

Effects of reperfusion grade and reperfusion strategy on the clinical outcome: Insights from ESCAPE-NA1 trial

. 2024 Dec ; 30 (6) : 804-811. [epub] 20241014

Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the association of reperfusion quality and different patterns of achieved reperfusion with clinical and radiological outcomes in the ESCAPE NA1 trial. METHODS: Data are from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial. Good clinical outcome [90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2], excellent outcome (90-day mRS0-1), isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage, symptomatic hemorrhage (sICH) on follow-up imaging, and death were compared across different levels of reperfusion defined by expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) Scale. Comparisons were also made between patients with (a) first-pass eTICI 2c3 reperfusion vs multiple-pass eTICI 2c3; (b) final eTICI 2b reperfusion vs eTICI 2b converted-to-eTICI 2c3; (c) sudden reperfusion vs gradual reperfusion if >1 pass was required. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test associations of reperfusion grade and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1037 included patients, final eTICI 0-1 was achieved in 46 (4.4%), eTICI 2a in 76 (7.3%), eTICI 2b in 424 (40.9%), eTICI 2c in 284 (27.4%), and eTICI 3 in 207 (20%) patients. The odds for good and excellent clinical outcome gradually increased with improved reperfusion grades (adjOR ranging from 5.7-29.3 and 4.3-17.6) and decreased for sICH and death. No differences in outcomes between first-pass versus multiple-pass eTICI 2c3, eTICI 2b converted-to-eTICI 2c3 versus unchanged eTICI 2b and between sudden versus gradual eTICI 2c3 reperfusion were observed. CONCLUSION: Better reperfusion degrees significantly improved clinical outcomes and reduced mortality, independent of the number of passes and whether eTICI 2c3 was achieved suddenly or gradually.

See more in PubMed

Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016; 387: 1723–31. PubMed

Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, et al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 708–18. PubMed PMC

Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 11–21. PubMed

Tao C, Nogueira RG, Zhu Y, et al. Trial of endovascular treatment of acute basilar-artery occlusion. N Engl J Med 2022; 387: 1361–72. PubMed

Jovin TG, Li C, Wu L, et al. Trial of thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke due to basilar-artery occlusion. N Engl J Med 2022; 387: 1373–84. PubMed

Olthuis SGH, Pirson FAV, Pinckaers FME, et al. Endovascular treatment versus no endovascular treatment after 6-24h in patients with ischaemic stroke and collateral flow on CT angiography (MR CLEAN-LATE) in the Netherlands: a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023; 401: 1371–80. PubMed

Yoshimura S, Sakai N, Yamagami H, et al. Endovascular therapy for acute stroke with a large ischemic region. N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 1303–13. PubMed

Vanicek J, Cimflova P, Bulik M, et al. Single-centre experience with patients selection for mechanical thrombectomy based on automated computed tomography perfusion analysis–a comparison with computed TomographyCT perfusion thrombectomy trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2019; 28: 1085–92. PubMed

Rha JH, Saver JL. The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2007; 38: 967–73. PubMed

Zaidat OO, Suarez JI, Sunshine JL, et al. Thrombolytic therapy of acute ischemic stroke: correlation of angiographic recanalization with clinical outcome. Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 880–4. PubMed PMC

Sarraj A, Hassan AE, Abraham MG, et al. Trial of endovascular thrombectomy for large ischemic strokes. N Engl J Med 2023; 388: 1259–71. PubMed

Huo X, Ma G, Tong X, et al. Trial of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct. N Engl J Med 2023; 388: 1272–83. PubMed

Zaidat OO, Castonguay AC, Linfante I, et al. First pass effect: a new measure for stroke thrombectomy devices. Stroke 2018; 49: 660–6. PubMed

Ospel JM, Volny O, Jayaraman M, et al. Optimizing fast first pass complete reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke – the BADDASS approach (BAlloon guiDe with large bore Distal Access catheter with dual aspiration with Stent-retriever as Standard approach). Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16: 955–63. PubMed

Requena M, García-Tornel Á, Rodríguez I, et al. Complete sudden recanalization: there is hope beyond the first pass effect. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol 2023; 3: e000652.

Hill MD, Goyal M, Menon BK, et al. Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 395: 878–87. PubMed

Larrue V, Von Kummer R, Müller Aet al. et al. Risk factors for severe hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: a secondary analysis of the European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study (ECASS II). Stroke 2001; 32: 438–41. PubMed

Dargazanli C, Consoli A, Barral M, et al. Impact of modified TICI 3 versus modified TICI 2b reperfusion score to predict good outcome following endovascular therapy. Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38: 90–96. PubMed PMC

Kaesmacher J, Maegerlein C, Zibold F, et al. Improving mTICI2b reperfusion to mTICI2c/3 reperfusions: a retrospective observational study assessing technical feasibility, safety and clinical efficacy. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 274–82. PubMed

Kaesmacher J, Ospel JM, Meinel TR, et al. Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b reperfusions: to treat or to stop? Stroke 2020; 51: 3461–71. PubMed

Jang KM, Choi HH, Nam TKet al. et al. Clinical outcomes of first-pass effect after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 211: 107030. PubMed

Tonetti DA, Desai SM, Casillo S, et al. Successful reperfusion, rather than number of passes, predicts clinical outcome after mechanical thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 12: 548–51. PubMed

Sezer M, Escaned J, Broyd CJ, et al. Gradual versus abrupt reperfusion during primary percutaneous coronary interventions in ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (GUARD). J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11: 24172. PubMed PMC

Flottmann F, van Horn N, Maros ME, et al. Early TICI 2b or late TICI 3—is perfect the enemy of good? Clin Neuroradiol 2022; 32: 353–60. PubMed PMC

Winkelmeier L, Faizy TD, Brekenfeld C, et al. Comparison of thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b and TICI 3 reperfusion in endovascular therapy for large ischemic anterior circulation strokes. J Neurointerv Surg 2023: jnis-2023-020724. PubMed PMC

Cimflova P, Singh N, Kappelhof M, et al. Effect of incomplete reperfusion patterns on clinical outcome: insights from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial. J Neurointerv Surg 2023: jnis-2023-020553. PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...