Effects of reperfusion grade and reperfusion strategy on the clinical outcome: Insights from ESCAPE-NA1 trial

. 2024 Dec ; 30 (6) : 804-811. [epub] 20241014

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39397754

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the association of reperfusion quality and different patterns of achieved reperfusion with clinical and radiological outcomes in the ESCAPE NA1 trial. METHODS: Data are from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial. Good clinical outcome [90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2], excellent outcome (90-day mRS0-1), isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage, symptomatic hemorrhage (sICH) on follow-up imaging, and death were compared across different levels of reperfusion defined by expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) Scale. Comparisons were also made between patients with (a) first-pass eTICI 2c3 reperfusion vs multiple-pass eTICI 2c3; (b) final eTICI 2b reperfusion vs eTICI 2b converted-to-eTICI 2c3; (c) sudden reperfusion vs gradual reperfusion if >1 pass was required. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test associations of reperfusion grade and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1037 included patients, final eTICI 0-1 was achieved in 46 (4.4%), eTICI 2a in 76 (7.3%), eTICI 2b in 424 (40.9%), eTICI 2c in 284 (27.4%), and eTICI 3 in 207 (20%) patients. The odds for good and excellent clinical outcome gradually increased with improved reperfusion grades (adjOR ranging from 5.7-29.3 and 4.3-17.6) and decreased for sICH and death. No differences in outcomes between first-pass versus multiple-pass eTICI 2c3, eTICI 2b converted-to-eTICI 2c3 versus unchanged eTICI 2b and between sudden versus gradual eTICI 2c3 reperfusion were observed. CONCLUSION: Better reperfusion degrees significantly improved clinical outcomes and reduced mortality, independent of the number of passes and whether eTICI 2c3 was achieved suddenly or gradually.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016; 387: 1723–31. PubMed

Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, et al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 708–18. PubMed PMC

Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 11–21. PubMed

Tao C, Nogueira RG, Zhu Y, et al. Trial of endovascular treatment of acute basilar-artery occlusion. N Engl J Med 2022; 387: 1361–72. PubMed

Jovin TG, Li C, Wu L, et al. Trial of thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke due to basilar-artery occlusion. N Engl J Med 2022; 387: 1373–84. PubMed

Olthuis SGH, Pirson FAV, Pinckaers FME, et al. Endovascular treatment versus no endovascular treatment after 6-24h in patients with ischaemic stroke and collateral flow on CT angiography (MR CLEAN-LATE) in the Netherlands: a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023; 401: 1371–80. PubMed

Yoshimura S, Sakai N, Yamagami H, et al. Endovascular therapy for acute stroke with a large ischemic region. N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 1303–13. PubMed

Vanicek J, Cimflova P, Bulik M, et al. Single-centre experience with patients selection for mechanical thrombectomy based on automated computed tomography perfusion analysis–a comparison with computed TomographyCT perfusion thrombectomy trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2019; 28: 1085–92. PubMed

Rha JH, Saver JL. The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2007; 38: 967–73. PubMed

Zaidat OO, Suarez JI, Sunshine JL, et al. Thrombolytic therapy of acute ischemic stroke: correlation of angiographic recanalization with clinical outcome. Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 880–4. PubMed PMC

Sarraj A, Hassan AE, Abraham MG, et al. Trial of endovascular thrombectomy for large ischemic strokes. N Engl J Med 2023; 388: 1259–71. PubMed

Huo X, Ma G, Tong X, et al. Trial of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct. N Engl J Med 2023; 388: 1272–83. PubMed

Zaidat OO, Castonguay AC, Linfante I, et al. First pass effect: a new measure for stroke thrombectomy devices. Stroke 2018; 49: 660–6. PubMed

Ospel JM, Volny O, Jayaraman M, et al. Optimizing fast first pass complete reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke – the BADDASS approach (BAlloon guiDe with large bore Distal Access catheter with dual aspiration with Stent-retriever as Standard approach). Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16: 955–63. PubMed

Requena M, García-Tornel Á, Rodríguez I, et al. Complete sudden recanalization: there is hope beyond the first pass effect. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol 2023; 3: e000652.

Hill MD, Goyal M, Menon BK, et al. Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 395: 878–87. PubMed

Larrue V, Von Kummer R, Müller Aet al. et al. Risk factors for severe hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: a secondary analysis of the European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study (ECASS II). Stroke 2001; 32: 438–41. PubMed

Dargazanli C, Consoli A, Barral M, et al. Impact of modified TICI 3 versus modified TICI 2b reperfusion score to predict good outcome following endovascular therapy. Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38: 90–96. PubMed PMC

Kaesmacher J, Maegerlein C, Zibold F, et al. Improving mTICI2b reperfusion to mTICI2c/3 reperfusions: a retrospective observational study assessing technical feasibility, safety and clinical efficacy. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 274–82. PubMed

Kaesmacher J, Ospel JM, Meinel TR, et al. Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b reperfusions: to treat or to stop? Stroke 2020; 51: 3461–71. PubMed

Jang KM, Choi HH, Nam TKet al. et al. Clinical outcomes of first-pass effect after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 211: 107030. PubMed

Tonetti DA, Desai SM, Casillo S, et al. Successful reperfusion, rather than number of passes, predicts clinical outcome after mechanical thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 12: 548–51. PubMed

Sezer M, Escaned J, Broyd CJ, et al. Gradual versus abrupt reperfusion during primary percutaneous coronary interventions in ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (GUARD). J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11: 24172. PubMed PMC

Flottmann F, van Horn N, Maros ME, et al. Early TICI 2b or late TICI 3—is perfect the enemy of good? Clin Neuroradiol 2022; 32: 353–60. PubMed PMC

Winkelmeier L, Faizy TD, Brekenfeld C, et al. Comparison of thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b and TICI 3 reperfusion in endovascular therapy for large ischemic anterior circulation strokes. J Neurointerv Surg 2023: jnis-2023-020724. PubMed PMC

Cimflova P, Singh N, Kappelhof M, et al. Effect of incomplete reperfusion patterns on clinical outcome: insights from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial. J Neurointerv Surg 2023: jnis-2023-020553. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...