• This record comes from PubMed

Preoperative prediction of diffuse glioma type and grade in adults: a gadolinium-free MRI-based decision tree

. 2025 Mar ; 35 (3) : 1242-1254. [epub] 20241019

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Links

PubMed 39425768
PubMed Central PMC11836213
DOI 10.1007/s00330-024-11140-5
PII: 10.1007/s00330-024-11140-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources

OBJECTIVES: To develop a gadolinium-free MRI-based diagnosis prediction decision tree (DPDT) for adult-type diffuse gliomas and to assess the added value of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) enhanced images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included preoperative grade 2-4 adult-type diffuse gliomas (World Health Organization 2021) scanned between 2010 and 2021. The DPDT, incorporating eleven GBCA-free MRI features, was developed using 18% of the dataset based on consensus readings. Diagnosis predictions involved grade (grade 2 vs. grade 3/4) and molecular status (isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and 1p/19q). GBCA-free diagnosis was predicted using DPDT, while GBCA-enhanced diagnosis included post-contrast images. The accuracy of these predictions was assessed by three raters with varying experience levels in neuroradiology using the test dataset. Agreement analyses were applied to evaluate the prediction performance/reproducibility. RESULTS: The test dataset included 303 patients (age (SD): 56.7 (14.2) years, female/male: 114/189, low-grade/high-grade: 54/249, IDH-mutant/wildtype: 82/221, 1p/19q-codeleted/intact: 34/269). Per-rater GBCA-free predictions achieved ≥ 0.85 (95%-CI: 0.80-0.88) accuracy for grade and ≥ 0.75 (95%-CI: 0.70-0.80) for molecular status, while GBCA-enhanced predictions reached ≥ 0.87 (95%-CI: 0.82-0.90) and ≥ 0.77 (95%-CI: 0.71-0.81), respectively. No accuracy difference was observed between GBCA-free and GBCA-enhanced predictions. Group inter-rater agreement was moderate for GBCA-free (0.56 (95%-CI: 0.46-0.66)) and substantial for GBCA-enhanced grade prediction (0.68 (95%-CI: 0.58-0.78), p = 0.008), while substantial for both GBCA-free (0.75 (95%-CI: 0.69-0.80) and GBCA-enhanced (0.77 (95%-CI: 0.71-0.82), p = 0.51) molecular status predictions. CONCLUSION: The proposed GBCA-free diagnosis prediction decision tree performed well, with GBCA-enhanced images adding little to the preoperative diagnostic accuracy of adult-type diffuse gliomas. KEY POINTS: Question Given health and environmental concerns, is there a gadolinium-free imaging protocol to preoperatively evaluate gliomas comparable to the gadolinium-enhanced standard practice? Findings The proposed gadolinium-free diagnosis prediction decision tree for adult-type diffuse gliomas performed well, and gadolinium-enhanced MRI demonstrated only limited improvement in diagnostic accuracy. Clinical relevance Even inexperienced raters effectively classified adult-type diffuse gliomas using the gadolinium-free diagnosis prediction decision tree, which, until further validation, can be used alongside gadolinium-enhanced images to respect standard practice, despite this study showing that gadolinium-enhanced images hardly improved diagnostic accuracy.

See more in PubMed

Ellingson BM, Bendszus M, Boxerman J et al (2015) Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials. Neuro Oncol 17:1188–1198 PubMed PMC

Haddad AF, Young JS, Morshed RA, Berger MS (2022) FLAIRectomy: resecting beyond the contrast margin for glioblastoma. Brain Sci 12:544 PubMed PMC

Castet F, Alanya E, Vidal N et al (2019) Contrast-enhancement in supratentorial low-grade gliomas: a classic prognostic factor in the molecular age. J Neurooncol 143:515–523 PubMed

Eichberg DG, Di L, Morell AA et al (2020) Incidence of high grade gliomas presenting as radiographically non-enhancing lesions: experience in 111 surgically treated non-enhancing gliomas with tissue diagnosis. J Neurooncol 147:671–679 PubMed

Wen PY, van den Bent M, Youssef G et al (2023) RANO 2.0: update to the response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria for high- and low-grade gliomas in adults. J Clin Oncol 41:5187–5199 PubMed PMC

Leyba K, Wagner B (2019) Gadolinium-based contrast agents: why nephrologists need to be concerned. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 28:154–162 PubMed PMC

van der Molen AJ, Quattrocchi CC, Mallio CA et al (2024) Ten years of gadolinium retention and deposition: ESMRMB-GREC looks backward and forward. Eur Radiol 34:600–611 PubMed PMC

Chaban YV, Vosshenrich J, McKee H et al (2024) Environmental sustainability and MRI: challenges, opportunities, and a call for action. J Magn Reson Imaging 59:1149–1167 PubMed PMC

Crowson MG, Rocke DJ, Hoang JK et al (2017) Cost-effectiveness analysis of a non-contrast screening MRI protocol for vestibular schwannoma in patients with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss. Neuroradiology 59:727–736 PubMed

Ogbole GI, Adeyomoye AO, Badu-Peprah A et al (2018) Survey of magnetic resonance imaging availability in West Africa. Pan Afr Med J 30:240 PubMed PMC

Proença F, Guerreiro C, Sá G, Reimão S (2021) Neuroimaging safety during pregnancy and lactation: a review. Neuroradiology 63:837–845 PubMed

Blumfield E, Moore MM, Drake MK et al (2017) Survey of gadolinium-based contrast agent utilization among the members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology: a Quality and Safety Committee report. Pediatr Radiol 47:665–673 PubMed

Xie H, Lei Y, Wang T et al (2022) Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement synthesis using cascade networks with local supervision. Med Phys 49:3278–3287 PubMed PMC

Pasumarthi S, Tamir JI, Christensen S et al (2021) A generic deep learning model for reduced gadolinium dose in contrast-enhanced brain MRI. Magn Reson Med 86:1687–1700 PubMed

Qu Y, Kong D, Wen H et al (2022) Perfusion measurement in brain gliomas using velocity-selective arterial spin labeling: comparison with pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Eur Radiol 32:2976–2987 PubMed

Togao O, Hiwatashi A, Yamashita K et al (2017) Grading diffuse gliomas without intense contrast enhancement by amide proton transfer MR imaging: comparisons with diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging. Eur Radiol 27:578–588 PubMed

Lasocki A, Anjari M, Örs Kokurcan S, Thust SC (2021) Conventional MRI features of adult diffuse glioma molecular subtypes: a systematic review. Neuroradiology 63:353–362 PubMed

Lasocki A, Buckland ME, Drummond KJ et al (2022) Conventional MRI features can predict the molecular subtype of adult grade 2-3 intracranial diffuse gliomas. Neuroradiology 64:2295–2305 PubMed PMC

Nam YK, Park JE, Park SY et al (2021) Reproducible imaging-based prediction of molecular subtype and risk stratification of gliomas across different experience levels using a structured reporting system. Eur Radiol 31:7374–7385 PubMed

Setyawan NH, Choridah L, Nugroho HA et al (2024) Beyond invasive biopsies: using VASARI MRI features to predict grade and molecular parameters in gliomas. Cancer Imaging 24:3 PubMed PMC

Çelik S, Öven BB, Demir MK et al (2021) Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status in patients with grade II-III astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 207:106745 PubMed

Corell A, Ferreyra Vega S, Hoefling N et al (2020) The clinical significance of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign in grade II and III gliomas: a population-based study. BMC Cancer 20:450 PubMed PMC

Han Z, Chen Q, Zhang L et al (2022) Radiogenomic association between the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign and IDH mutation status in adult patients with lower-grade gliomas: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 32:5339–5352 PubMed

Smits M (2016) Imaging of oligodendroglioma. Br J Radiol 89:20150857 PubMed PMC

Johnson DR, Diehn FE, Giannini C et al (2017) Genetically defined oligodendroglioma is characterized by indistinct tumor borders at MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:678–684 PubMed PMC

(2024) VASARI research project—the cancer imaging archive (TCIA) public access—cancer imaging archive wiki Available via https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/display/Public/VASARI+Research+Project. Last change by Quasar Jarosz. Accessed 19 Aug 2024

Kim S, Lee W (2017) Does McNemar’s test compare the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic tests? Stat Methods Med Res 26:142–154 PubMed

Sim J, Wright CC (2005) The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85:257–268 PubMed

Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174 PubMed

Vanbelle S (2017) Comparing dependent kappa coefficients obtained on multilevel data. Biom J 59:1016–1034 PubMed PMC

Du N, Zhou X, Mao R et al (2022) Preoperative and noninvasive prediction of gliomas histopathological grades and IDH molecular types using multiple MRI characteristics. Front Oncol 12:873839 PubMed PMC

Kang KM, Song J, Choi Y et al (2024) MRI scoring systems for predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and chromosome 1p/19q codeletion in adult-type diffuse glioma lacking contrast enhancement. Radiology 311:e233120 PubMed

Ma H, Zeng S, Xie D et al (2024) Looking through the imaging perspective: the importance of imaging necrosis in glioma diagnosis and prognostic prediction—single centre experience. Radiol Oncol 58:23–32 PubMed PMC

Berzero G, Di Stefano AL, Ronchi S et al (2021) IDH-wildtype lower-grade diffuse gliomas: the importance of histological grade and molecular assessment for prognostic stratification. Neuro Oncol 23:955–966 PubMed PMC

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...