BACKGROUND: The application of a biochar in agronomical soil offers a dual benefit of improving soil quality and sustainable waste recycling. However, utilizing new organic waste sources requires exploring the biochar's production conditions and application parameters. Woodchips (W) and bone-meat residues (BM) after mechanical deboning from a poultry slaughterhouse were subjected to pyrolysis at 300 °C and 500 °C and applied to cambisol and luvisol soils at ratios of 2% and 5% (w/w). RESULTS: Initially, the impact of these biochar amendments on soil prokaryotes was studied over the course of one year. The influence of biochar variants was further studied on prokaryotes and fungi living in the soil, rhizosphere, and roots of Triticum aestivum L., as well as on soil enzymatic activity. Feedstock type, pyrolysis temperature, application dose, and soil type all played significant roles in shaping both soil and endophytic microbial communities. BM treated at a lower pyrolysis temperature of 300 °C increased the relative abundance of Pseudomonadota while causing a substantial decrease in soil microbial diversity. Conversely, BM prepared at 500 °C favored the growth of microbes known for their involvement in various nutrient cycles. The W biochar, especially when pyrolysed at 500 °C, notably affected microbial communities, particularly in acidic cambisol compared to luvisol. In cambisol, biochar treatments had a significant impact on prokaryotic root endophytes of T. aestivum L. Additionally, variations in prokaryotic community structure of the rhizosphere depended on the increasing distance from the root system (2, 4, and 6 mm). The BM biochar enhanced the activity of acid phosphatase, whereas the W biochar increased the activity of enzymes involved in the carbon cycle (β-glucosidase, β-xylosidase, and β-N-acetylglucosaminidase). CONCLUSIONS: These results collectively suggest, that under appropriate production conditions, biochar can exert a positive influence on soil microorganisms, with their response closely tied to the biochar feedstock composition. Such insights are crucial for optimizing biochar application in agricultural practices to enhance soil health.

Department of Agro Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamycka 129 Prague Suchdol 165 21 Czech Republic

Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology University of Chemistry and Technology Prague Technicka 3 Prague 6 166 28 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Adam G, Duncan H. Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2001;33(7–8):943–51. DOI

Adamczyk M, Perez-Mon C, Gunz S, Frey B. Strong shifts in microbial community structure are associated with increased litter input rather than temperature in High Arctic soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;151:108054. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108054. DOI

Adetunji AT, Lewu FB, Mulidzi R, Ncube B. The biological activities of DOI

Ali A, Guo D, Zhang Y, et al. Using bamboo biochar with compost for the stabilization and phytotoxicity reduction of heavy metals in mine-contaminated soils of China. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2690. 10.1038/s41598-017-03045-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Ali A, Guo D, Arockiam J, et al. Application of wood biochar in polluted soils stabilized the toxic metals and enhanced wheat ( PubMed DOI

Anderson MJ. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 2001;26:32–46.

Anderson MJ, Walsh DCI. PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: What null hypothesis are you testing? Ecol Monogr. 2013;83:557–74. DOI

Azeem M, Ali A, Arockiam J, et al. Bone-derived biochar improved soil quality and reduced Cd and Zn phytoavailability in a multi-metal contaminated mining soil. Environ Pollut. 2021;277:116800. 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116800. PubMed DOI

Baetz U, Martinoia E. Root exudates: the hidden part of plant defense. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19:90–8. 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.11.006. PubMed DOI

Barra PJ, Inostroza NG, Acuña JJ, et al. Formulation of bacterial consortia from avocado DOI

Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 1995;57:289–300. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x. DOI

Bessadok K, Navarro-Torre S, Pajuelo E, et al. The ACC-Deaminase Producing Bacterium PubMed DOI PMC

Bosetto A, Justo PI, Zanardi B, et al. Research Progress Concerning Fungal and Bacterial PubMed DOI

Bruns MA, Byrne LB. Scale Model of a Soil Aggregate and Associated Organisms: A Teaching Tool for Soil Ecology. JNRLSE. 2004;33:85–91. 10.2134/jnrlse.2004.0085. DOI

Buss W, Bogush A, Ignatyev K, Mašek O. Unlocking the Fertilizer Potential of Waste-Derived Biochar. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2020;8:12295–303. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04336. DOI

Callahan BJ. (2018) Silva taxonomic training data formatted for DADA2 (Silva version 132) [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.1172783. DOI

Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016a;13:581–3. 10.1038/nmeth.3869. PubMed DOI PMC

Callahan BJ, Sankaran K, Fukuyama JA, et al. Bioconductor workflow for microbiome data analysis: from raw reads to community analyses. F1000Res. 2016b;5:1492. 10.12688/f1000research.8986.1. PubMed DOI PMC

Chen S, Qi G, Ma G, Zhao X. Biochar amendment controlled bacterial wilt through changing soil chemical properties and microbial community. Microbiol Res. 2020;231:126373. 10.1016/j.micres.2019.126373. PubMed DOI

Coombs JT, Franco CMM. Isolation and Identification of Actinobacteria from Surface-Sterilized Wheat Roots. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:5603–8. 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5603-5608.2003. PubMed DOI PMC

Cruz-Paredes C, Bang-Andreasen T, Christensen S, et al. Bacteria Respond Stronger Than Fungi Across a Steep Wood Ash-Driven pH Gradient. Front Glob Change. 2021;4:781844. 10.3389/ffgc.2021.781844. DOI

DeForest JL. The influence of time, storage temperature, and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and l-DOPA. Soil Biol Biochem. 2009;41:1180–6. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.029. DOI

Ding Y, Liu Y, Liu S et al. (2016) Biochar to improve soil fertility. A review. ASD 36:. 10.1007/s13593-016-0372-z

Divan Baldani VL, Baldani JI, Döbereiner J. Inoculation of rice plants with the endophytic diazotrophs DOI

Ekenler M, Tabatabai MA. DOI

Elzobair KA, Stromberger ME, Ippolito JA. Stabilizing effect of biochar on soil extracellular enzymes after a denaturing stress. Chemosphere. 2016;142:114–9. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.018. PubMed DOI

Estrada GA, Baldani VLD, de Oliveira DM, et al. Selection of phosphate-solubilizing diazotrophic DOI

Fang K, Bao Z-S-N, Chen L, et al. Growth-promoting characteristics of potential nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the root of an invasive plant PubMed DOI PMC

Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology. 2007;88:1354–64. 10.1890/05-1839. PubMed DOI

Fitz WJ, Wenzel WW, Wieshammer G, Istenic B. Microtome sectioning causes artifacts in rhizobox experiments. Plant Soil. 2003;256:455–62. DOI

Foster EJ, Hansen N, Wallenstein M, Cotrufo MF. Biochar and manure amendments impact soil nutrients and microbial enzymatic activities in a semi-arid irrigated maize cropping system. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2016;233:404–14. 10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.029. DOI

Frank A, Saldierna Guzmán J, Shay J. Transmission of Bacterial Endophytes. Microorganisms. 2017;5:70. 10.3390/microorganisms5040070. PubMed DOI PMC

Fraraccio S, Strejcek M, Dolinova I, et al. Secondary compound hypothesis revisited: Selected plant secondary metabolites promote bacterial degradation of cis-1,2-dichloroethylene (cDCE). Sci Rep. 2017;7. 10.1038/s41598-017-07760-1. PubMed PMC

Gaiero JR, McCall CA, Thompson KA, et al. Inside the root microbiome: Bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion. Am J Bot. 2013;100:1738–50. 10.3732/ajb.1200572. PubMed DOI

Geisseler D, Horwath WR. Relationship between carbon and nitrogen availability and extracellular enzyme activities in soil. Pedobiologia. 2009;53:87–98. 10.1016/j.pedobi.2009.06.002. DOI

Ghani WAWAK, Mohd A, da Silva G, et al. Biochar production from waste rubber-wood-sawdust and its potential use in C sequestration: Chemical and physical characterization. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;44:18–24. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.017. DOI

Glæsner N, Hansen HCB, Hu Y, et al. Low crystalline apatite in bone char produced at low temperature ameliorates phosphorus-deficient soils. Chemosphere. 2019;223:723–30. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.048. PubMed DOI

Glaser B, Lehr V-I. Biochar effects on phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: A meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9338. 10.1038/s41598-019-45693-z. PubMed DOI PMC

Haack FS, Poehlein A, Kröger C et al. (2016) Molecular Keys to the PubMed PMC

Haegeman B, Hamelin J, Moriarty J, et al. Robust estimation of microbial diversity in theory and in practice. ISME J. 2013;7:1092–101. 10.1038/ismej.2013.10. PubMed DOI PMC

Ibarra-Galeana JA, Castro-Martínez C, Fierro-Coronado RA, et al. Characterization of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria exhibiting the potential for growth promotion and phosphorus nutrition improvement in maize ( DOI

Ishii S, Ashida N, Ohno H, et al. PubMed DOI

Ives AR, Carpenter SR. Stability and Diversity of Ecosystems. Science. 2007;317:58–62. 10.1126/science.1133258. PubMed DOI

Ji M, Wang X, Usman M, et al. Effects of different feedstocks-based biochar on soil remediation: A review. Environ Pollut. 2022;294:118655. 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118655. PubMed DOI

Jia Y, Siebers N, Panten K, Kruse J. Fate and availability of phosphorus from bone char with and without sulfur modification in soil size fractions after five-year field fertilizations. Soil Tillage Res. 2023;231:105720. 10.1016/j.still.2023.105720. DOI

Jiang S, Huang J, Lu H, et al. Optimisation for assay of fluorescein diacetate hydrolytic activity as a sensitive tool to evaluate impacts of pollutants and nutrients on microbial activity in coastal sediments. Mar Pollut Bull. 2016;110:424–31. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.031. PubMed DOI

Jin Y, Liang X, He M, et al. Manure biochar influence upon soil properties, phosphorus distribution and phosphatase activities: A microcosm incubation study. Chemosphere. 2016;142:128–35. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.07.015. PubMed DOI

Kandel S, Joubert P, Doty S. Bacterial Endophyte Colonization and Distribution within Plants. Microorganisms. 2017;5:77. 10.3390/microorganisms5040077. PubMed DOI PMC

Karimi B, Maron PA, Chemidlin-Prevost Boure N, et al. Microbial diversity and ecological networks as indicators of environmental quality. Environ Chem Lett. 2017;15:265–81. 10.1007/s10311-017-0614-6. DOI

Kennedy AC, Smith KL. Soil microbial diversity and the sustainability of agricultural soils. Plant Soil. 1995;170:75–86. 10.1007/BF02183056.

Khan AA, Jilani G, Akhtar MS, et al. Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria: occurrence, mechanisms and their role in crop production. J Agric Biol Sci. 2009;1:48–58.

Kracmarova M, Karpiskova J, Uhlik O, et al. Microbial Communities in Soils and Endosphere of PubMed DOI PMC

Kracmarova M, Kratochvilova H, Uhlik O, et al. Response of Soil Microbes and Soil Enzymatic Activity to 20 Years of Fertilization. Agronomy. 2020b;10:1542. 10.3390/agronomy10101542. DOI

Kuźniar A, Włodarczyk K, Grządziel J, et al. Culture-independent analysis of an endophytic core microbiome in two species of wheat: PubMed DOI

Latini A, Bacci G, Teodoro M, et al. The Impact of Soil-Applied Biochars From Different Vegetal Feedstocks on Durum Wheat Plant Performance and Rhizospheric Bacterial Microbiota in Low Metal-Contaminated Soil. Front Microbiol. 2019;10. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02694. PubMed PMC

Lehmann J, Joseph S. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Oxfordshire: Routledge; 2012.

Li T, Zhou Q. The key role of PubMed DOI

Li X, Wang T, Chang SX, et al. Biochar increases soil microbial biomass but has variable effects on microbial diversity: A meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2020;749:141593. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141593. PubMed DOI

Liu P, Conrad R. PubMed DOI

Liu J, Liu M, Wu M, et al. Soil pH rather than nutrients drive changes in microbial community following long-term fertilization in acidic Ultisols of southern China. J Soils Sediments. 2018;18:1853–64. 10.1007/s11368-018-1934-2. DOI

Lopes ÉMG, Reis MM, Frazão LA, et al. Biochar increases enzyme activity and total microbial quality of soil grown with sugarcane. Environ Technol Innov. 2021;21:101270. 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101270. DOI

Lopez-Echartea E, Strejcek M, Mukherjee S, et al. Bacterial succession in oil-contaminated soil under phytoremediation with poplars. Chemosphere. 2020;243:125242. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125242. PubMed DOI

Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Luo Y, Dungait JAJ, Zhao X, et al. Pyrolysis temperature during biochar production alters its subsequent utilization by microorganisms in an acid arable soil. Land Degrad Dev. 2018;29:2183–8. 10.1002/ldr.2846. DOI

McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61217. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. PubMed DOI PMC

Miliute I, Buzaite O, Baniulis D, Stanys V. Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops and their role in stress tolerance: a review. Zemdirbyste. 2015;102:465–78. 10.13080/z-a.2015.102.060. DOI

Nilsson RH, Ryberg M, Abarenkov K, et al. The ITS region as a target for characterization of fungal communities using emerging sequencing technologies. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;296:97–101. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01618.x. PubMed DOI

Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R et al. (2019) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-6.

Oni BA, Oziegbe O, Olawole OO. Significance of biochar application to the environment and economy. Ann Agric Sci. 2019;64:222–36. 10.1016/j.aoas.2019.12.006. DOI

Pan S-Y, Dong C-D, Su J-F, et al. The Role of Biochar in Regulating the Carbon, Phosphorus, and Nitrogen Cycles Exemplified by Soil Systems. Sustainability. 2021;13:5612. 10.3390/su13105612. DOI

Pande A, Pandey P, Mehra S, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their efficiency on the growth of maize. JGEB. 2017;15:379–91. 10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.06.005. PubMed DOI PMC

Pedrinho A, Mendes LW, de Araujo Pereira AP, et al. Soil microbial diversity plays an important role in resisting and restoring degraded ecosystems. Plant Soil. 2024;500:325–49. 10.1007/s11104-024-06489-x. DOI

Penn CJ, Camberato JJ. A Critical Review on Soil Chemical Processes that Control How Soil pH Affects Phosphorus Availability to Plants. Agriculture. 2019;9:120. 10.3390/agriculture9060120. DOI

Perazzolli M, Vicelli B, Antonielli L, et al. Simulated global warming affects endophytic bacterial and fungal communities of Antarctic pearlwort leaves and some bacterial isolates support plant growth at low temperatures. Sci Rep. 2022;12:18839. 10.1038/s41598-022-23582-2. PubMed DOI PMC

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing in. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.

Rodriguez H, Gonzalez T, Goire I, Bashan Y. Gluconic acid production and phosphate solubilization by the plant growth-promoting bacterium PubMed DOI

Schmalenberger A, Fox A. Bacterial Mobilization of Nutrients From Biochar-Amended Soils. Advances in Applied Microbiology. Elsevier; 2016. pp. 109–59. PubMed

Sharma SK, Ramesh A, Sharma MP, et al. Microbial Community Structure and Diversity as Indicators for Evaluating Soil Quality. In: Lichtfouse E, editor. Biodiversity, Biofuels, Agroforestry and Conservation Agriculture. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2010. pp. 317–58.

Sharma S, Kumar V, Tripathi RB. Isolation of Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganism (PSMs) From Soil. JMB. 2011;2:90–5.

Sharma M, Khurana H, Singh DN, Negi RK. The genus PubMed DOI

Shaw LJ, Nicol GW, Smith Z, et al. PubMed DOI

Stiborova H, Kronusova O, Kastanek P, et al. Waste products from the poultry industry: a source of high-value dietary supplements. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2020;95:985–92. 10.1002/jctb.6131. DOI

Stott DE, Andrews SS, Liebig MA, et al. Evaluation of DOI

Száková J, Stiborová H, Mercl F, et al. Woodchips biochar

Tang L, Shen Z, Duan X, et al. Evaluating the potential of charred bone as P hotspot assisted by phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Sci Total Environ. 2019;696:133965. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133965. PubMed DOI

Taylor DL, Walters WA, Lennon NJ, et al. Accurate Estimation of Fungal Diversity and Abundance through Improved Lineage-Specific Primers Optimized for Illumina Amplicon Sequencing. AEM. 2016;82:7217–26. 10.1128/AEM.02576-16. PubMed DOI PMC

Thiruvengadam S, Ramki R, Rohini S, et al. Isolation, Screening and Evaluation of Multifunctional Strains of High Efficient Phosphate Solubilizing Microbes from Rhizosphere Soil. Rese Jour Pharm Technol. 2020;13:1825. 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00328.5. DOI

Tomczyk A, Sokołowska Z, Boguta P. Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2020;19:191–215. 10.1007/s11157-020-09523-3. DOI

Van den Brink PJ, Braak CJF. Ecological and statistical evaluation of effects of pesticides in freshwater model ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1999;18:138–48.

van den Brink PJ, den Besten PJ, bij, de Vaate A, ter Braak CJF. (2009) Principal response curves technique for the analysis of multivariate biomonitoring time series. Environ Monit Assess 152:271–281. 10.1007/s10661-008-0314-6 PubMed

Vassilev N, Martos E, Mendes G, et al. Biochar of animal origin: a sustainable solution to the global problem of high-grade rock phosphate scarcity? Animal biochar solubilisation. J Sci Food Agric. 2013;93:1799–804. 10.1002/jsfa.6130. PubMed DOI

Vaughn SF, Kenar JA, Thompson AR, Peterson SC. Comparison of biochars derived from wood pellets and pelletized wheat straw as replacements for peat in potting substrates. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;51:437–43. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.10.010. DOI

Wall DH, Nielsen UN, Six J. Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature. 2015;528:69–76. 10.1038/nature15744. PubMed DOI

Wang J. Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: A review. J Clean Prod. 2019;227:1002–22. DOI

Wang X, Zhou W, Liang G, et al. Characteristics of maize biochar with different pyrolysis temperatures and its effects on organic carbon, nitrogen and enzymatic activities after addition to fluvo-aquic soil. Sci Total Environ. 2015;538:137–44. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.026. PubMed DOI

Warnock DD, Lehmann J, Kuyper TW, Rillig MC. Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil – concepts and mechanisms. Plant Soil. 2007;300:9–20. 10.1007/s11104-007-9391-5. DOI

Wenzel WW, Wieshammer G, Fitz WJ, Puschenreiter M. Novel rhizobox design to assess rhizosphere characteristics at high spatial resolution. Plant Soil. 2001;237:37–45. DOI

White JF, Kingsley KL, Zhang Q, et al. Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management. Pest Manag Sci. 2019;75:2558–65. 10.1002/ps.5527. PubMed DOI PMC

Wickham H. ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition). J Stat Soft. 2017;77. 10.18637/jss.v077.b02.

Wittmann C, Kähkönen MA, Ilvesniemi H, et al. Areal activities and stratification of hydrolytic enzymes involved in the biochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, sulphur and phosphorus in podsolized boreal forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2004;36:425–33. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.10.019. DOI

Woolet J, Whitman T. Pyrogenic organic matter effects on soil bacterial community composition. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;141:107678. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107678. DOI

Xun W, Liu Y, Li W, et al. Specialized metabolic functions of keystone taxa sustain soil microbiome stability. Microbiome. 2021;9:35. 10.1186/s40168-020-00985-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Yao F, Yang S, Wang Z, et al. Microbial Taxa Distribution Is Associated with Ecological Trophic Cascades along an Elevation Gradient. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2071. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02071. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhang J, Kim Y-J, Hoang V-A, et al. PubMed DOI

Zhang L, Jing Y, Xiang Y, et al. Responses of soil microbial community structure changes and activities to biochar addition: A meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2018;643:926–35. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.231. PubMed DOI

Zhang M, Riaz M, Zhang L, et al. Biochar Induces Changes to Basic Soil Properties and Bacterial Communities of Different Soils to Varying Degrees at 25 mm Rainfall: More Effective on Acidic Soils. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1321. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01321. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhao L, Cao X, Mašek O, Zimmerman A. Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures. J Hazard Mater. 2013;256–257:1–9. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.04.015. PubMed DOI

Zhao S-X, Ta N, Wang X-D. Effect of Temperature on the Structural and Physicochemical Properties of Biochar with Apple Tree Branches as Feedstock Material. Energies. 2017;10:1293. 10.3390/en10091293. DOI

Zheng H, Liu D, Liao X, et al. Field-aged biochar enhances soil organic carbon by increasing recalcitrant organic carbon fractions and making microbial communities more conducive to carbon sequestration. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2022;340:108177. 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108177. DOI

Zhou X, Guo Z, Chen C, Jia Z. Soil microbial community structure and diversity are largely influenced by soil pH and nutrient quality in 78-year-old tree plantations. Biogeosciences. 2017;14:2101–11. 10.5194/bg-14-2101-2017. DOI

Zhou C, Heal K, Tigabu M, et al. Biochar addition to forest plantation soil enhances phosphorus availability and soil bacterial community diversity. Ecol Manag. 2020;455:117635. 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117635. DOI

Zwetsloot MJ, Lehmann J, Bauerle T, et al. Phosphorus availability from bone char in a P-fixing soil influenced by root-mycorrhizae-biochar interactions. Plant Soil. 2016;408:95–105. 10.1007/s11104-016-2905-2. DOI