One-Year Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of PreserFlo MicroShunt with Mitomycin C Applied by Sub-Tenon Injection Versus Sponge

. 2025 Jan ; 14 (1) : 153-167. [epub] 20241122

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39576486
Odkazy

PubMed 39576486
PubMed Central PMC11724825
DOI 10.1007/s40123-024-01074-y
PII: 10.1007/s40123-024-01074-y
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

INTRODUCTION: This study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of PreserFlo MicroShunt (PMS) implantation with mitomycin C (MMC) applied by sub-tenon injection versus conventional application by MMC-soaked sponges. METHODS: This retrospective, 1-year cohort study included 100 eyes of 100 patients with glaucoma who underwent PMS implantation with MMC (0.4 mg/ml) delivered either by sub-tenon injection (50 eyes) or via soaked sponges (50 eyes). The primary outcome measure at 1 year was intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, with complete success defined as an IOP reduction of ≥ 20% and achieving a target IOP of ≤ 21 or 18 mmHg without the use of medication. Secondary outcomes, including corneal endothelial cell density (CECD) loss, the number of medications, and complications, were assessed and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Sustained reductions in mean IOP were observed in both groups over the 1-year follow-up, with no significant differences between the groups. The complete success rate, with a target IOP of ≤ 21 mmHg after 1 year, was 19.3% in the sponge group and 26.4% in the injection group. The qualified success rate was 59.0% and 87.4% in the sponge and injection groups, respectively. A longer survival rate was observed in the injection group than in the sponge group when IOP was below 21 mmHg. The mean CECD significantly decreased (P < 0.01) from baseline to each postoperative follow-up time point in both groups. At 1 year postoperatively, the percentage of total CECD loss was 8.1% in the sponge group and 8.0% in the injection group. However, no significant differences in mean CECD values, the number of medications, or adverse events were found between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: PMS implantation with sub-tenon injection of MMC was comparable in terms of efficacy and safety to traditional MMC delivery via soaked sponges. However, the injection group demonstrated a significantly higher success rate than the sponge group.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by glaucoma: a meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020. Eye. 2024;38:2036. PubMed PMC

Chen W, Xu Y, Liu Z, Zhao J. Global, regional and national burden of Glaucoma: an update analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Int Ophthalmol. 2024;44:234. PubMed

Jayaram H, Kolko M, Friedman DS, Gazzard G. Glaucoma: now and beyond. Lancet. 2023;402:1788–801. PubMed

Chan L, Moster MR, Bicket AK, et al. New devices in glaucoma. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023;12:2381–95. PubMed PMC

Saeed E, Gołaszewska K, Dmuchowska DA, Zalewska R, Konopińska J. The PreserFlo MicroShunt in the context of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: a narrative review. Int J Env Res Public Health. 2023;20:2904. PubMed PMC

Jabłońska J, Lewczuk K, Konopińska J, Mariak Z, Rękas M. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery: a review and classification of implant-dependent procedures and techniques. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 2022;100:e327–38. PubMed PMC

Pinchuk L, Riss I, Batlle JF, et al. The development of a micro-shunt made from poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) to treat glaucoma. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017;105:211–21. PubMed PMC

Gambini G, Carlà MM, Giannuzzi F, et al. PreserFlo® MicroShunt: an overview of this minimally invasive device for open-angle glaucoma. Vision (Basel). 2022;6:12. PubMed PMC

Pawiroredjo SSM, Bramer WM, Pawiroredjo ND, et al. Efficacy of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt and a meta-analysis of the literature. J Clin Med. 2022;11:7149. PubMed PMC

Pietris J, Casson R. One year outcomes of Preserflo Microshunt for primary open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glaucoma. 2024;10:1097. PubMed

Khan A, Khan AU. Comparing the safety and efficacy of Preserflo Microshunt implantation and trabeculectomy for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 2024;102:e443–51. PubMed

Khawaja AP, Abegão Pinto L, Stalmans I, et al. Additional guidance on the use of the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt in the treatment of glaucoma: insights from a second Delphi Consensus Panel. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024;13:1569–88. PubMed PMC

Beckers HJM, Aptel F, Webers CAB, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the PRESERFLO® MicroShunt in primary open-angle glaucoma: results from a 2-year multicenter study. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022;5:195–209. PubMed

Majtanova N, Keri P, Kriskova P, et al. Surgical outcomes of trabeculectomy augmented with sub-tenon injected mitomycin C. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2023;124:907–14. PubMed

Pantalon A, Feraru C, Tarcoveanu F, Chiselita D. Success of primary trabeculectomy in advanced open angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:2219–29. PubMed PMC

Bhayani R, Martínez de la Casa JM, Figus M, Klabe K, Rabiolo A, Mercieca K. Short-term safety and efficacy of Preserflo™ Microshunt in glaucoma patients: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Eye. 2023;37:644–9. PubMed PMC

Schlenker MB, Durr GM, Michaelov E, Ahmed IIK. Intermediate outcomes of a novel standalone ab externo SIBS microshunt with mitomycin C. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;215:141–5. PubMed

Tanner A, Haddad F, Fajardo-Sanchez J, et al. One-year surgical outcomes of the PreserFlo MicroShunt in glaucoma: a multicentre analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2023;107:1104–11. PubMed PMC

Steiner S, Resch H, Kiss B, Vass C. PRESERFLO™ Microshunt: 1-year results of a 25-Gauge vs 27-Gauge needle tract. J Clin Med. 2024;13:1979. PubMed PMC

Tojo N, Hayashi A. The outcomes of Trabectome surgery in patients with low, middle, and high preoperative intraocular pressure. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:4099–108. PubMed PMC

Batlle JF, Fantes F, Riss I, et al. Three-year follow-up of a novel aqueous humor MicroShunt. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:e58–65. PubMed

Vinod K, Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, et al. Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery: a survey of the American Glaucoma Society. J Glaucoma. 2017;26:687–93. PubMed PMC

Bell K, Bezerra BD, Mofokeng M, et al. Learning from the past: Mitomycin C use in trabeculectomy and its application in bleb-forming minimally invasive glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021;66:109–23. PubMed

Ahmed IIK, Sadruddin O, Panarelli JF. Subconjunctival filtration in evolution: current evidence on MicroShunt implantation for treating patients with glaucoma. Eye Vis (Lond). 2023;10:10. PubMed PMC

Saeed E, Zalewska R, Konopińska J. Early complications and results of Preserflo MicroShunt in the management of uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma: a case series. Int J Env Res Public Health. 2022;19:8679. PubMed PMC

Verma-Fuehring R, Dakroub M, Bamousa A, Kann G, Hillenkamp J, Kampik D. The use of intraluminal PRESERFLO stenting in avoiding early postoperative hypotony. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024. 10.1007/s00417-00024-06567-x. PubMed PMC

Janson BJ, Alward WL, Kwon YH, et al. Glaucoma-associated corneal endothelial cell damage: a review. Survey in Ophthalmology. 2018;63:500–6. PubMed

Ibarz-Barberá M, Morales-Fernández L, Corroto-Cuadrado A, et al. Corneal endothelial cell loss after PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt implantation in the anterior chamber: anterior segment OCT tube location as a risk factor. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022;11:293–310. PubMed PMC

Ahmed T, Honjo M, Sakata R, Fujishiro T, Shirato S, Aihara M. Long-term results of the safety and effectiveness of a novel microshunt in Japanese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2022;66:33–40. PubMed

Steindor FA, Trigaux C, Holtmann C, Spaniol K, Geerling G, Borrelli M. PRESERFLO MicroShunt®: efficacy and endothelial cell density. J Glaucoma. 2023. 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002325. PubMed

Gassel CJ, Wenzel DA, Nasyrov E, Strasser T, Voykov B. Intermediate-term impact on corneal endothelial cells and efficacy of Preserflo MicroShunt implantation in patients with open-angle glaucoma - a prospective study over two years. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024. 10.1007/s00417-00024-06508-00418. PubMed PMC

Chamard C, Hammoud S, Bluwol E, Lachkar Y. Endothelial cell loss 5 years after Preserflo MicroShunt implantation: about two cases. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2021;25: 101238. PubMed PMC

Jamke M, Herber R, Haase MA, Jasper CS, Pillunat LE, Pillunat KR. PRESERFLO ™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023;261:2901–15. PubMed PMC

Baker ND, Barnebey HS, Moster MR, et al. Ab-Externo MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma: one-year results from a 2-year randomized, multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:1710–21. PubMed

Brooks SE, Laird ML, Marcus DM, Johnson MH, Ramage JI, Green K. Kinetics of fluid delivery from methylcellulose sponges. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:16–21. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...