Target trial emulation to evaluate the effect of immune-related adverse events on outcomes in metastatic urothelial cancer
Language English Country Germany Media electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study
PubMed
39708183
PubMed Central
PMC11663210
DOI
10.1007/s00262-024-03871-7
PII: 10.1007/s00262-024-03871-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Adverse events, Immortal time bias, Immune checkpoint inhibitors, Immunotherapy, Metastatic, Target trial emulation, Urothelial cancer,
- MeSH
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors * adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell drug therapy mortality immunology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Metastasis MeSH
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms drug therapy mortality immunology pathology MeSH
- Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions etiology MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Urologic Neoplasms drug therapy mortality immunology pathology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors * MeSH
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an important therapeutic pillar in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). The occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) appears to be associated with improved outcomes in observational studies. However, these associations are likely affected by immortal time bias and do not represent causal effects. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of irAEs on outcomes while correcting for immortal time bias, using target trial emulation (TTE). METHODS: TTE was contrasted to adjusted naïve and time-updated Cox models. We performed a multi-institutional retrospective study involving mUC patients under ICI. The primary objective was to assess the impact of irAEs on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included the influence of irAEs on objective response rates (ORRs) to ICI and the influence of systemic corticosteroids on outcomes. RESULTS: Among 335 patients (median age: 69 yrs), 69.6% received ICI in the second line or further lines. During a median follow-up of 21.1 months, 122 (36.4%) patients developed irAEs of any grade (grade ≥ 3: 14.9%). Hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS ranged from 0.37 for naïve adjusted Cox model to 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-1.30) with time-updated covariates, and from 0.41 to 1.10 (95% CI, 0.69-1.75) for OS. TTE accounting for immortal time bias yielded a HR of 1.02 (95% CI, 0.72-1.44) for PFS, and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.62-1.30) for OS. In contrast to the naïve Cox model (HR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.26-4.05), the presence of irAEs was no longer a predictive factor for improved ORR in time-updated Cox models (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.68-2.36) and TTE (HR = 1.43, 95% CI 0.89-2.29). In patients with irAEs, systemic corticosteroids did not negatively impact survival. CONCLUSION: Using TTE, we were able to show that the occurrence of irAEs is no longer associated with better survival or improved response rates to ICI in mUC patients, in contrast to the naïve analysis. These findings demonstrate that TTE is a suitable formal framework to avoid immortal time bias in studies with time-dependent non-interventional exposures.
Department of Surgery S H Ho Urology Centre The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
Department of Surgical Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia
Department of Urology and Neurourology Marien Hospital Herne Ruhr University Bochum Herne Germany
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal IRYCIS Universidad de Alcala Madrid Spain
Department of Urology La Croix du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France
Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology St Josef Medical Center University of Regensburg Regensburg Germany
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Division of Oncology Department of Internal Medicine Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
See more in PubMed
Meeks JJ, Black PC, Galsky M, Grivas P, Hahn NM, Hussain SA, Milowsky MI, Steinberg GD, Svatek RS, Rosenberg JE (2023) Checkpoint inhibitors in urothelial carcinoma-future directions and biomarker selection. Eur Urol S0302–2838(23):02816–02826. 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.011 PubMed
Compérat E, Amin MB, Cathomas R, Choudhury A, De Santis M, Kamat A, Stenzl A, Thoeny HC, Witjes JA (2022) Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments. Lancet 400(10364):1712–1721. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01188-6 PubMed
Cathomas R, Lorch A, Bruins HM, Compérat EM, Cowan NC, Efstathiou JA, Fietkau R, Gakis G, Hernández V, Espinós EL, Neuzillet Y, Ribal MJ, Rouanne M, Thalmann GN, van der Heijden AG, Veskimäe E, Alfred Witjes J, Milowsky MI (2022) The 2021 updated european association of urology guidelines on metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol 81(1):95–103. 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.09.026 PubMed
Powles T, Bellmunt J, Comperat E, De Santis M, Huddart R, Loriot Y, Necchi A, Valderrama BP, Ravaud A, Shariat SF, Szabados B, van der Heijden MS, Gillessen S (2022) Bladder cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 33(3):244–258. 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.012 PubMed
Powles T, Valderrama BP, Gupta S, Bedke J, Kikuchi E, Hoffman-Censits J, Iyer G, Vulsteke C, Park SH, Shin SJ, Castellano D, Fornarini G, Li JR, Gümüş M, Mar N, Loriot Y, Fléchon A, Duran I, Drakaki A, Narayanan S, Yu X, Gorla S, Homet Moreno B, van der Heijden MS (2024) Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in untreated advanced urothelial cancer. N Engl J Med 390(10):875–888 PubMed
Morad G, Helmink BA, Sharma P, Wargo JA (2021) Hallmarks of response, resistance, and toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade. Cell 184(21):5309–5337. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.020 PubMed PMC
Wu Z, Chen Q, Qu L, Li M, Wang L, Mir MC, Carbonara U, Pandolfo SD, Black PC, Paul AK, Di Lorenzo G, Porpiglia F, Mari A, Necchi A, Rouprêt M, Psutka SP, Autorino R (2022) Adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy for urologic cancer patients in clinical trials: a collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 81(4):414–425. 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.01.028 PubMed
Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD (2018) Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med 378(2):158–168. 10.1056/NEJMra1703481 PubMed
Rogado J, Sánchez-Torres JM, Romero-Laorden N, Ballesteros AI, Pacheco-Barcia V, Ramos-Leví A, Arranz R, Lorenzo A, Gullón P, Donnay O, Adrados M, Costas P, Aspa J, Alfranca A, Mondéjar R, Colomer R (2019) Immune-related adverse events predict the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibodies in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 109:21–27. 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.10.014 PubMed
Robesti D, Nocera L, Belladelli F, Schultz JG, Fallara G, Marandino L, Raggi D, Montorsi F, Msaouel P, Necchi A, Martini A (2023) The immune-related adverse events paradox in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer after atezolizumab immunotherapy: analysis of individual patient data from IMvigor210 and IMvigor211 trials. BJU Int. 10.1111/bju.16121 PubMed
Kearney M, Zhang L, Hubscher E, Musat M, Harricharan S, Wilke T (2023) Undertreatment in patients with advanced urothelial cancer: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Future Oncol. 10.2217/fon-2023-0298 PubMed PMC
Sanda GE, Shabto JM, Goyal S, Liu Y, Martini DJ, Nazha B, Brown JT, Yantorni LB, Anne Russler G, Caulfield S, Joshi SS, Narayan VM, Kissick H, Ogan K, Master VA, Carthon BC, Kucuk O, Bilen MA (2023) Immune-related adverse events and clinical outcomes in advanced urothelial cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Oncologist 28(12):1072–1078. 10.1093/oncolo/oyad154 PubMed PMC
Kawai T, Taguchi S, Nakagawa T, Kamei J, Nakamura Y, Obinata D, Yamaguchi K, Kaneko T, Kakutani S, Tokunaga M, Uemura Y, Sato Y, Enomoto Y, Nishimatsu H, Fujimura T, Fukuhara H, Takahashi S, Kume H (2022) Impact of immune-related adverse events on the therapeutic efficacy of pembrolizumab in urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study using time-dependent analysis. J Immunother Cancer 10(2):e003965. 10.1136/jitc-2021-003965 PubMed PMC
Hernán MA, Robins JM (2016) Using big data to emulate a target trial when a randomized trial is not available. Am J Epidemiol 183(8):758–764. 10.1093/aje/kwv254 PubMed PMC
Kuehne F, Arvandi M, Hess LM, Faries DE, Matteucci Gothe R, Gothe H, Beyrer J, Zeimet AG, Stojkov I, Mühlberger N, Oberaigner W, Marth C, Siebert U (2022) Causal analyses with target trial emulation for real-world evidence removed large self-inflicted biases: systematic bias assessment of ovarian cancer treatment effectiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 152:269–280 PubMed
Bentzen HB, Hostmaelingen N (2019) Balancing protection and free movement of personal data: the new European union general data protection regulation. Ann Intern Med 170:335–337 PubMed
Haanen J, Obeid M, Spain L, Carbonnel F, Wang Y, Robert C, Lyon AR, Wick W, Kostine M, Peters S, Jordan K, Larkin J (2022) Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 33(12):1217–1238. 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.001 PubMed
Strohmaier S, Wallisch C, Kammer M, Geroldinger A, Heinze G, Oberbauer R, Haller MC (2022) Survival benefit of first single-organ deceased donor kidney transplantation compared with long-term dialysis across ages in transplant-eligible patients with kidney failure. JAMA Netw Open 5(10):e2234971. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34971 PubMed PMC
R Core Team. R (2021) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD (2018) Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med 378(2):158–168. 10.1056/NEJMra1703481 PubMed
Otsuka H, Kita Y, Ito K, Sano T, Inokuchi J, Tomida R, Takahashi A, Matsumoto K, Kurahashi R, Ozaki Y, Uegaki M, Maruyama S, Mukai S, Tsutsumi M, Kawahara T, Segawa T, Kitamura H, Morita S, Kobayashi T (2022) Immune-related adverse events in urothelial cancer patients: adjustment for immortal time bias. Cancer Sci 113(11):3912–3921. 10.1111/cas.15539 PubMed PMC
Morales-Barrera R, Villacampa G, Vidal N, Figols M, Giner J, Bonfill T, Suárez C, Díaz N, Mateo J, González M, Domenech M, Puente J, Carles J (2023) Prevalence of immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy in advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma following immune-checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Clin Transl Oncol 25(12):3556–3564. 10.1007/s12094-023-03213-6 PubMed
Suissa S (2008) Immortal time bias in pharmacoepidemioogy. Am J Epidemiol 167:492–499 PubMed
Maher VE, Fernandes LL, Weinstock C, Tang S, Agarwal S, Brave M, Ning YM, Singh H, Suzman D, Xu J, Goldberg KB, Sridhara R, Ibrahim A, Theoret M, Beaver JA, Pazdur R (2019) Analysis of the association between adverse events and outcome in patients receiving a programmed death protein 1 or programmed death ligand 1 antibody. J Clin Oncol 37(30):2730–2737 PubMed
Matthews AA, Danaei G, Islam N, Kurth T (2022) Target trial emulation: applying principles of randomised trials to observational studies. BMJ 30(378):e071108. 10.1136/bmj-2022-071108 PubMed
Hernán MA, Sauer BC, Hernández-Díaz S, Platt R, Shrier I (2016) Specifying a target trial prevents immortal time bias and other self-inflicted injuries in observational analyses. J Clin Epidemiol 79:70–75. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.014 PubMed PMC
Conforti F, Pala L, Bagnardi V, De Pas T, Martinetti M, Viale G, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A (2018) Cancer immunotherapy efficacy and patients’ sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 19(6):737–746 PubMed
Klein SL, Flanagan KL (2016) Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 16(10):626–638. 10.1038/nri.2016.90 PubMed