Comprehensive cost-of-illness analysis of pressure ulcer treatment: A real-world study at a Czech university hospital
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
NU20-09-00094
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
PubMed
39800361
PubMed Central
PMC11725365
DOI
10.1111/iwj.70137
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- cost analysis, healthcare costs, patients, pressure ulcers, treatment costs,
- MeSH
- dekubity * ekonomika terapie MeSH
- délka pobytu ekonomika MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hospitalizace * ekonomika MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- náklady na zdravotní péči * statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- nemocnice univerzitní ekonomika MeSH
- osobní újma zaviněná nemocí * MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
Pressure ulcers (PUs) impose a significant economic burden on healthcare systems, affecting patient quality of life and leading to substantial treatment costs. This study presents a cost-of-illness analysis of PU treatment in hospitalized patients in the Czech Republic, based on real-world clinical data. The analysis was conducted using a comprehensive methodology at a Czech university hospital, involving 304 hospitalizations. The study included all hospitalized patients with PUs. Data were collected employing a bottom-up, person-based approach, which refers to the collection and analysis of cost data at the individual patient level. This method captures detailed resource utilization for each patient. The methodology accounted for both systemic and local costs, including materials, medications, caregiver time, and procedures. The study involved 304 hospitalizations, with a mean length of stay of 13 days. The total cost of PU treatment, excluding pharmacotherapy, had a median of €678, while including pharmacotherapy, the median cost rose to €929. Younger patients incurred higher treatment costs. Significant cost variations were observed among different departments. We developed and applied a novel cost model to quantify the expenses associated with PUs, which accurately highlighted the financial burden in the hospital care setting. We present a rigorous methodology for PU cost-of-illness analysis, providing a valuable tool for future research and clinical practice. This comprehensive approach supports the development of targeted interventions to reduce the incidence and severity of PUs, ultimately improving patient care and reducing healthcare costs.
Department of Dermatology University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Faculty of Business Administration Prague University of Economics and Business Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
EPUAP, NPIAP, PPPIA . In: Haesler E, ed. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2019:404.
Búřilová P, Pokorná A, Benešová K, et al. A ten‐year follow‐up of the prevalence of pressure injuries in The Czech Republic: analysis of the national registry. Int Wound J. 2022;19:1870‐1877. PubMed PMC
Pokorná A, Dolanová D, Benešová K, et al. How the COVID‐19 pandemic influences the prevalence of pressure injuries in The Czech Republic: a nationwide analysis of a health registry in 2020. J Tissue Viability. 2022;31(3):424‐430. PubMed PMC
Krupová L, Pokorná A. Quality of life in patients with non‐healing wounds, with particular focus on assesment tools – a literature review. Cent Eur J Nurs Midwifery. 2020;11(2):94‐103.
Solmos S, LaFond C, Pohlman AS, Sala J, Mayampurath A. Characteristics of critically ill adults with sacrococcygeal unavoidable hospital‐acquired pressure injuries: a retrospective, matched, case‐control study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2021;48(1):11‐19. PubMed
Brem H, Maggi J, Nierman D, et al. High cost of stage IV pressure ulcers. Am J Surg. 2010;200(4):473‐477. PubMed PMC
Krupová L, Krupa M, Benešová K, et al. Sledování prevalence dekubitů—srovnání národních dat s daty konkrétního poskytovatele zdravotních služeb—Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava. Čes Slov Neurol Neurochir. 2022;85/118(Suppl 1):21‐27.
Smith S, Snyder A, McMahon LF, Petersen L, Meddings J. Success in hospital‐acquired pressure ulcer prevention: a tale in two data sets. Health Aff. 2018;37(11):1787‐1796. PubMed PMC
Demarré L, Van Lancker A, Van Hecke A, et al. The cost of prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(11):1754‐1774. PubMed
Pokorná A, Krupová L, Benešová K, et al. Challenges in prospective observational studies evaluating pressure ulcer costs: how to price the items correctly. J Wound Care. 2023;32(9):579‐586. PubMed
Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. BMJ. 2022;11:e067975. PubMed PMC
Kottner J, Cuddigan J, Carville K, et al. Pressure ulcer/injury classification today: an international perspective. J Tissue Viability. 2020;29(3):197‐203. PubMed
Klugarová J, Pokorná A, Hussain S, et al. Economic evaluations of interventions for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: an umbrella review protocol. JBI Evid Synth. 2022;20(2):633‐639. PubMed
Padula WV, Mishra MK, Makic MBF, Sullivan PW. Improving the quality of pressure ulcer care with prevention: a cost‐effectiveness analysis. Med Care. 2011;49(4):385‐392. PubMed
Dealey C, Posnett J, Walker A. The cost of pressure ulcers in the United Kingdom. J Wound Care. 2012;21(6):261‐266. PubMed
Ocampo W, Cheung A, Baylis B, et al. Economic evaluations of strategies to prevent hospital‐acquired pressure injuries. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2017;30(7):319‐333. PubMed PMC
Palfreyman SJ, Stone PW. A systematic review of economic evaluations assessing interventions aimed at preventing or treating pressure ulcers. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(3):769‐788. PubMed
Mohamed TH. Risk factors of pressure ulcers in hospitalized elderly Egyptian people. Egypt J Geriatr Gerontol. 2021;8(2):1‐7.
Tsai YJ, Lin CH, Yen YH, et al. Risk factors for pressure ulcer recurrence following surgical reconstruction: a cross‐sectional retrospective analysis. Front Surg. 2023;3(10):970681. PubMed PMC
Cooper KL. Evidence‐based prevention of pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Nurse. 2013;33(6):57‐66. PubMed
Hansen Edwards C, Håkon Bjørngaard J, Minet Kinge J, et al. The healthcare costs of increased body mass index–evidence from The Trøndelag Health Study. Health Econ Rev. 2024;14(1):36. PubMed PMC
Lichterfeld‐Kottner A, Lahmann N, Kottner J. Sex‐specific differences in prevention and treatment of institutional‐acquired pressure ulcers in hospitals and nursing homes. J Tissue Viability. 2020;29(3):204‐210. PubMed