An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of First-Line Triplet vs. Doublet Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

. 2025 Jan 09 ; 17 (2) : . [epub] 20250109

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39857987

Purpose: The addition of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), with or without docetaxel (Doc), is currently recommended for metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Recently, the ARANOTE trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of Darolutamide + ADT in this setting. We aimed to update a network meta-analysis (NMA) of these combination therapies. Methods: We conducted a systematic search for RCTs on systemic therapies for mHSPC using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Web of Science Core Collection in September 2024. An NMA utilizing random-effects models was performed to compare progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse event (AE) incidence (PROSPERO: CRD42024591458). Results: A total of 12 RCTs (n = 11,954) were included in our NMAs. Triplet therapies were associated with significant improvements in PFS compared to ARPI-based doublet therapies (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.93; p = 0.01), but the difference did not reach the conventional levels of statistical significance for OS (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.67-1.01; p = 0.059). In a subset analysis, compared to ARPI-based doublet therapies, triplet therapies showed a significant improvement in PFS in patients with high-volume disease (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.47-0.88; p < 0.01), whereas no significant improvement was observed in those with low-volume disease (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.45-1.67; p = 0.7). No significant difference in grade ≥ 3 AEs was observed between triplet therapies and ARPI-based doublet therapies. The main limitations include patient heterogeneity and limited follow-up in some studies. Conclusions: Triplet therapies can improve the oncologic outcomes of patients with mHSPC compared to ARPI-based doublet therapies, without significantly increasing severe AEs. These findings warrant further confirmation in a head-to-head trial powered for overall survival.

2nd Department of Urology Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education 01 813 Warsaw Poland

Collegium Medicum Faculty of Medicine WSB University 41 300 Dąbrowa Górnicza Poland

Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University 20072 Pieve Emanuele Italy

Department of Medical Oral and Biotechnological Sciences G d'Annunzio University of Chieti 66013 Chieti Italy

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University 15006 Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona Università Politecnica Delle Marche 60126 Ancona Italy

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna 1090 Vienna Austria

Department of Urology IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital 20090 Milan Italy

Department of Urology Medical College Jagiellonian University 30 688 Krakow Poland

Department of Urology Semmelweis University 1082 Budapest Hungary

Department of Urology Shimane University Faculty of Medicine Izumo 693 8504 Shimane Japan

Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo 105 8461 Japan

Department of Urology The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX 75390 USA

Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf 20251 Hamburg Germany

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY 10065 USA

Division of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London London WC1E 6BT UK

Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery The University of Jordan Amman 11942 Jordan

Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology 1010 Vienna Austria

Research Center for Evidence Medicine Urology Department Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz 51656 65811 Iran

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Lowrance W., Dreicer R., Jarrard D.F., Scarpato K.R., Kim S.K., Kirkby E., Buckley D.I., Griffin J.C., Cookson M.S. Updates to Advanced Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline (2023) J. Urol. 2023;209:1082–1090. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003452. PubMed DOI

Schaeffer E.M., Srinivas S., Adra N., An Y., Barocas D., Bitting R., Bryce A., Chapin B., Cheng H.H., D’Amico A.V., et al. Prostate Cancer, Version 4.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2023;21:1067–1096. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0050. PubMed DOI

Tilki D., van den Bergh R.C.N., Briers E., Van den Broeck T., Brunckhorst O., Darraugh J., Eberli D., De Meerleer G., De Santis M., Farolfi A., et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II-2024 Update: Treatment of Relapsing and Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur. Urol. 2024;86:164–182. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.010. PubMed DOI

Matsukawa A., Rajwa P., Kawada T., Bekku K., Laukhtina E., Klemm J., Pradere B., Mori K., Karakiewicz P.I., Kimura T., et al. Impact of disease volume on survival efficacy of triplet therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024;29:716–725. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02485-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Yanagisawa T., Rajwa P., Thibault C., Gandaglia G., Mori K., Kawada T., Fukuokaya W., Shim S.R., Mostafaei H., Motlagh R.S., et al. Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors in Addition to Docetaxel with Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. 2022;82:584–598. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.002. PubMed DOI

Saad F., Vjaters E., Shore N., Olmos D., Xing N., Pereira de Santana Gomes A.J., Cesar de Andrade Mota A., Salman P., Jievaltas M., Ulys A., et al. Darolutamide in Combination with Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer from the Phase III ARANOTE Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024;42:Jco2401798. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-01798. PubMed DOI PMC

Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gøtzsche P.C., Ioannidis J.P., Clarke M., Devereaux P.J., Kleijnen J., Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. PubMed DOI PMC

Shea B.J., Reeves B.C., Wells G., Thuku M., Hamel C., Moran J., Moher D., Tugwell P., Welch V., Kristjansson E., et al. AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008. PubMed DOI PMC

Munn Z., Moola S., Lisy K., Riitano D., Tufanaru C. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 2015;13:147–153. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000054. PubMed DOI

Sterne J.A., Hernán M.A., Reeves B.C., Savović J., Berkman N.D., Viswanathan M., Henry D., Altman D.G., Ansari M.T., Boutron I., et al. ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919. PubMed DOI PMC

van Valkenhoef G., Lu G., de Brock B., Hillege H., Ades A.E., Welton N.J. Automating network meta-analysis. Res. Synth. Methods. 2012;3:285–299. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1054. PubMed DOI

Shim S.R., Kim S.J., Lee J., Rücker G. Network meta-analysis: Application and practice using R software. Epidemiol. Health. 2019;41:e2019013. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2019013. PubMed DOI PMC

Woods B.S., Hawkins N., Scott D.A. Network meta-analysis on the log-hazard scale, combining count and hazard ratio statistics accounting for multi-arm trials: A tutorial. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2010;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-54. PubMed DOI PMC

Rücker G., Schwarzer G. Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2015;15:58. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0060-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Sweeney C.J., Chen Y.H., Carducci M., Liu G., Jarrard D.F., Eisenberger M., Wong Y.N., Hahn N., Kohli M., Cooney M.M., et al. Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;373:737–746. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503747. PubMed DOI PMC

Hussain M., Tombal B., Saad F., Fizazi K., Sternberg C.N., Crawford E.D., Shore N., Kopyltsov E., Kalebasty A.R., Boegemann M., et al. Darolutamide Plus Androgen-Deprivation Therapy and Docetaxel in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer by Disease Volume and Risk Subgroups in the Phase III ARASENS Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023;41:3595–3607. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00041. PubMed DOI

Armstrong A.J., Azad A.A., Iguchi T., Szmulewitz R.Z., Petrylak D.P., Holzbeierlein J., Villers A., Alcaraz A., Alekseev B., Shore N.D., et al. Improved Survival with Enzalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022;40:1616–1622. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00193. PubMed DOI PMC

Kyriakopoulos C.E., Chen Y.-H., Carducci M.A., Liu G., Jarrard D.F., Hahn N.M., Shevrin D.H., Dreicer R., Hussain M., Eisenberger M., et al. Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase III E3805 CHAARTED Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018;36:1080–1087. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.3657. PubMed DOI PMC

Sweeney C.J., Martin A.J., Stockler M.R., Begbie S., Cheung L., Chi K.N., Chowdhury S., Frydenberg M., Horvath L.G., Joshua A.M., et al. Testosterone suppression plus enzalutamide versus testosterone suppression plus standard antiandrogen therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (ENZAMET): An international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:323–334. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00063-3. PubMed DOI

Gravis G., Boher J.-M., Joly F., Soulie M., Albiges L., Priou F., Latorzeff I., Delva R., Krakowski I., Laguerre B., et al. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Plus Docetaxel Versus ADT Alone in Metastatic Non castrate Prostate Cancer: Impact of Metastatic Burden and Long-term Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase 3 GETUG-AFU15 Trial. Eur. Urol. 2016;70:256–262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.005. PubMed DOI

Fizazi K., NamPhuong T., Fein L., Matsubara N., Rodriguez-Antolin A., Alekseev B.Y., Ozguroglu M., Ye D., Feyerabend S., Protheroe A., et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): Final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:686–700. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30082-8. PubMed DOI

Fizazi K., Foulon S., Carles J., Roubaud G., McDermott R., Fléchon A., Tombal B., Supiot S., Berthold D., Ronchin P., et al. Abiraterone plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PEACE-1): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Lancet. 2022;399:1695–1707. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00367-1. PubMed DOI

Clarke N.W., Ali A., Ingleby F.C., Hoyle A., Amos C.L., Attard G., Brawley C.D., Calvert J., Chowdhury S., Cook A., et al. Addition of docetaxel to hormonal therapy in low- and high-burden metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer: Long-term survival results from the STAMPEDE trial. Ann. Oncol. 2019;30:1992–2003. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz396. PubMed DOI PMC

Sydes M.R., Spears M.R., Mason M.D., Clarke N.W., Dearnaley D.P., de Bono J.S., Attard G., Chowdhury S., Cross W., Gillessen S., et al. Adding abiraterone or docetaxel to long-term hormone therapy for prostate cancer: Directly randomised data from the STAMPEDE multi-arm, multi-stage platform protocol. Ann. Oncol. 2018;29:1235–1248. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy072. PubMed DOI PMC

James N.D., de Bono J.S., Spears M.R., Clarke N.W., Mason M.D., Dearnaley D.P., Ritchie A.W.S., Amos C.L., Gilson C., Jones R.J., et al. Abiraterone for Prostate Cancer Not Previously Treated with Hormone Therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:338–351. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1702900. PubMed DOI PMC

Chi K.N., Chowdhury S., Bjartell A., Byung Ha C., Gomes A.J.P.d.S., Given R., Juarez A., Merseburger A.S., Ozguroglu M., Uemura H., et al. Apalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Final Survival Analysis of the Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III TITAN Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021;39:2294–2303. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03488. PubMed DOI

Attard G., Murphy L., Clarke N.W., Sachdeva A., Jones C., Hoyle A., Cross W., Jones R.J., Parker C.C., Gillessen S., et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for patients with metastatic prostate cancer starting androgen deprivation therapy: Final results from two randomised phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:443–456. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00148-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Hoyle A.P., Ali A., James N.D., Cook A., Parker C.C., de Bono J.S., Attard G., Chowdhury S., Cross W.R., Dearnaley D.P., et al. Abiraterone in “High-” and “Low-risk” Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer. Eur. Urol. 2019;76:719–728. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.006. PubMed DOI

Halabi S., Roy A., Rydzewska L., Guo S., Godolphin P., Hussain M., Tangen C., Thompson I., Xie W., Carducci M.A., et al. Radiographic Progression-Free Survival and Clinical Progression-Free Survival as Potential Surrogates for Overall Survival in Men with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024;42:1044–1054. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01535. PubMed DOI PMC

Miszczyk M., Rajwa P., Fazekas T., Briganti A., Karakiewicz P.I., Rouprêt M., Shariat S.F. The State of Intermediate Clinical Endpoints as Surrogates for Overall Survival in Prostate Cancer in 2024. Eur. Urol. Oncol. 2024;7:1195–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.004. PubMed DOI

Nelson P.S. Molecular states underlying androgen receptor activation: A framework for therapeutics targeting androgen signaling in prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012;30:644–646. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.1300. PubMed DOI

Matsukawa A., Yanagisawa T., Parizi M.K., Laukhtina E., Klemm J., Fazekas T., Mori K., Kimura S., Briganti A., Ploussard G., et al. Cardiovascular events among men with prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00886-0. PubMed DOI

Matsukawa A., Yanagisawa T., Rajwa P., Fazekas T., Miszczyk M., Tsuboi I., Parizi M.K., Laukhtina E., Klemm J., Chiujdea S., et al. Central Nervous System Toxicity in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Network Meta-analysis. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer. 2024;23:102251. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102251. PubMed DOI

Fizazi K., Shore N.D., Smith M., Ramos R., Jones R., Niegisch G., Vjaters E., Wang Y., Srinivasan S., Sarapohja T., et al. Efficacy and safety outcomes of darolutamide in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with comorbidities and concomitant medications from the randomised phase 3 ARAMIS trial. Eur. J. Cancer. 2023;192:113258. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113258. PubMed DOI

Urabe F., Imai Y., Goto Y., Tashiro K., Hashimoto M., Yoshihara K., Yamamoto S., Hara S., Miyajima K., Fukuokaya W., et al. Real-world evidence of triplet therapy efficacy in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A Japanese multicenter study. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024;54:1208–1213. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyae098. PubMed DOI

Azad A.A., Bressel M., Tan H., Voskoboynik M., Suder A., Weickhardt A.J., Guminski A., Francis R.J., Saghebi J., Dhiantravan N., et al. Sequential [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (UpFrontPSMA): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25:1267–1276. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00440-6. PubMed DOI

Markowski M.C., Sternberg C.N., Wang H., Wang T., Linville L., Marshall C.H., Sullivan R., King S., Lotan T.L., Antonarakis E.S. TRIUMPH: Phase II trial of rucaparib monotherapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer harboring germline homologous recombination repair gene mutations. Oncologist. 2024;29:794–800. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae120. PubMed DOI PMC

Riaz I.B., Naqvi S.A.A., He H., Asghar N., Siddiqi R., Liu H., Singh P., Childs D.S., Ravi P., Hussain S.A., et al. First-line Systemic Treatment Options for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9:635–645. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7762. PubMed DOI PMC

Lim B., Lee W., Kyung Y.S., You D., Jeong I.G., Hong J.H., Ahn H., Kim C.S. Biopsy-detected Gleason grade 5 tumor is an additional prognostic factor in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2022;148:727–734. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03642-2. PubMed DOI

Warner E.W., Van der Eecken K., Murtha A.J., Kwan E.M., Herberts C., Sipola J., Ng S.W.S., Chen X.E., Fonseca N.M., Ritch E., et al. Multiregion sampling of de novo metastatic prostate cancer reveals complex polyclonality and augments clinical genotyping. Nat. Cancer. 2024;5:114–130. doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00692-y. PubMed DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...