An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of First-Line Triplet vs. Doublet Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
PubMed
39857987
PubMed Central
PMC11763793
DOI
10.3390/cancers17020205
PII: cancers17020205
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- ARPI, adverse event, docetaxel, mHSPC, network meta-analysis, overall survival, progression-free survival, systematic review, triplet therapy,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Purpose: The addition of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), with or without docetaxel (Doc), is currently recommended for metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Recently, the ARANOTE trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of Darolutamide + ADT in this setting. We aimed to update a network meta-analysis (NMA) of these combination therapies. Methods: We conducted a systematic search for RCTs on systemic therapies for mHSPC using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Web of Science Core Collection in September 2024. An NMA utilizing random-effects models was performed to compare progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse event (AE) incidence (PROSPERO: CRD42024591458). Results: A total of 12 RCTs (n = 11,954) were included in our NMAs. Triplet therapies were associated with significant improvements in PFS compared to ARPI-based doublet therapies (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.93; p = 0.01), but the difference did not reach the conventional levels of statistical significance for OS (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.67-1.01; p = 0.059). In a subset analysis, compared to ARPI-based doublet therapies, triplet therapies showed a significant improvement in PFS in patients with high-volume disease (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.47-0.88; p < 0.01), whereas no significant improvement was observed in those with low-volume disease (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.45-1.67; p = 0.7). No significant difference in grade ≥ 3 AEs was observed between triplet therapies and ARPI-based doublet therapies. The main limitations include patient heterogeneity and limited follow-up in some studies. Conclusions: Triplet therapies can improve the oncologic outcomes of patients with mHSPC compared to ARPI-based doublet therapies, without significantly increasing severe AEs. These findings warrant further confirmation in a head-to-head trial powered for overall survival.
2nd Department of Urology Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education 01 813 Warsaw Poland
Collegium Medicum Faculty of Medicine WSB University 41 300 Dąbrowa Górnicza Poland
Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University 20072 Pieve Emanuele Italy
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University 15006 Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna 1090 Vienna Austria
Department of Urology IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital 20090 Milan Italy
Department of Urology Medical College Jagiellonian University 30 688 Krakow Poland
Department of Urology Semmelweis University 1082 Budapest Hungary
Department of Urology Shimane University Faculty of Medicine Izumo 693 8504 Shimane Japan
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo 105 8461 Japan
Department of Urology The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX 75390 USA
Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf 20251 Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY 10065 USA
Division of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London London WC1E 6BT UK
Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery The University of Jordan Amman 11942 Jordan
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology 1010 Vienna Austria
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Lowrance W., Dreicer R., Jarrard D.F., Scarpato K.R., Kim S.K., Kirkby E., Buckley D.I., Griffin J.C., Cookson M.S. Updates to Advanced Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline (2023) J. Urol. 2023;209:1082–1090. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003452. PubMed DOI
Schaeffer E.M., Srinivas S., Adra N., An Y., Barocas D., Bitting R., Bryce A., Chapin B., Cheng H.H., D’Amico A.V., et al. Prostate Cancer, Version 4.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2023;21:1067–1096. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0050. PubMed DOI
Tilki D., van den Bergh R.C.N., Briers E., Van den Broeck T., Brunckhorst O., Darraugh J., Eberli D., De Meerleer G., De Santis M., Farolfi A., et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II-2024 Update: Treatment of Relapsing and Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur. Urol. 2024;86:164–182. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.010. PubMed DOI
Matsukawa A., Rajwa P., Kawada T., Bekku K., Laukhtina E., Klemm J., Pradere B., Mori K., Karakiewicz P.I., Kimura T., et al. Impact of disease volume on survival efficacy of triplet therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024;29:716–725. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02485-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Yanagisawa T., Rajwa P., Thibault C., Gandaglia G., Mori K., Kawada T., Fukuokaya W., Shim S.R., Mostafaei H., Motlagh R.S., et al. Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors in Addition to Docetaxel with Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. 2022;82:584–598. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.002. PubMed DOI
Saad F., Vjaters E., Shore N., Olmos D., Xing N., Pereira de Santana Gomes A.J., Cesar de Andrade Mota A., Salman P., Jievaltas M., Ulys A., et al. Darolutamide in Combination with Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer from the Phase III ARANOTE Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024;42:Jco2401798. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-01798. PubMed DOI PMC
Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gøtzsche P.C., Ioannidis J.P., Clarke M., Devereaux P.J., Kleijnen J., Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. PubMed DOI PMC
Shea B.J., Reeves B.C., Wells G., Thuku M., Hamel C., Moran J., Moher D., Tugwell P., Welch V., Kristjansson E., et al. AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008. PubMed DOI PMC
Munn Z., Moola S., Lisy K., Riitano D., Tufanaru C. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 2015;13:147–153. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000054. PubMed DOI
Sterne J.A., Hernán M.A., Reeves B.C., Savović J., Berkman N.D., Viswanathan M., Henry D., Altman D.G., Ansari M.T., Boutron I., et al. ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919. PubMed DOI PMC
van Valkenhoef G., Lu G., de Brock B., Hillege H., Ades A.E., Welton N.J. Automating network meta-analysis. Res. Synth. Methods. 2012;3:285–299. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1054. PubMed DOI
Shim S.R., Kim S.J., Lee J., Rücker G. Network meta-analysis: Application and practice using R software. Epidemiol. Health. 2019;41:e2019013. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2019013. PubMed DOI PMC
Woods B.S., Hawkins N., Scott D.A. Network meta-analysis on the log-hazard scale, combining count and hazard ratio statistics accounting for multi-arm trials: A tutorial. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2010;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-54. PubMed DOI PMC
Rücker G., Schwarzer G. Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2015;15:58. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0060-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Sweeney C.J., Chen Y.H., Carducci M., Liu G., Jarrard D.F., Eisenberger M., Wong Y.N., Hahn N., Kohli M., Cooney M.M., et al. Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;373:737–746. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503747. PubMed DOI PMC
Hussain M., Tombal B., Saad F., Fizazi K., Sternberg C.N., Crawford E.D., Shore N., Kopyltsov E., Kalebasty A.R., Boegemann M., et al. Darolutamide Plus Androgen-Deprivation Therapy and Docetaxel in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer by Disease Volume and Risk Subgroups in the Phase III ARASENS Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023;41:3595–3607. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00041. PubMed DOI
Armstrong A.J., Azad A.A., Iguchi T., Szmulewitz R.Z., Petrylak D.P., Holzbeierlein J., Villers A., Alcaraz A., Alekseev B., Shore N.D., et al. Improved Survival with Enzalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022;40:1616–1622. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00193. PubMed DOI PMC
Kyriakopoulos C.E., Chen Y.-H., Carducci M.A., Liu G., Jarrard D.F., Hahn N.M., Shevrin D.H., Dreicer R., Hussain M., Eisenberger M., et al. Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase III E3805 CHAARTED Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018;36:1080–1087. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.3657. PubMed DOI PMC
Sweeney C.J., Martin A.J., Stockler M.R., Begbie S., Cheung L., Chi K.N., Chowdhury S., Frydenberg M., Horvath L.G., Joshua A.M., et al. Testosterone suppression plus enzalutamide versus testosterone suppression plus standard antiandrogen therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (ENZAMET): An international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:323–334. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00063-3. PubMed DOI
Gravis G., Boher J.-M., Joly F., Soulie M., Albiges L., Priou F., Latorzeff I., Delva R., Krakowski I., Laguerre B., et al. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Plus Docetaxel Versus ADT Alone in Metastatic Non castrate Prostate Cancer: Impact of Metastatic Burden and Long-term Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase 3 GETUG-AFU15 Trial. Eur. Urol. 2016;70:256–262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.005. PubMed DOI
Fizazi K., NamPhuong T., Fein L., Matsubara N., Rodriguez-Antolin A., Alekseev B.Y., Ozguroglu M., Ye D., Feyerabend S., Protheroe A., et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): Final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:686–700. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30082-8. PubMed DOI
Fizazi K., Foulon S., Carles J., Roubaud G., McDermott R., Fléchon A., Tombal B., Supiot S., Berthold D., Ronchin P., et al. Abiraterone plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PEACE-1): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Lancet. 2022;399:1695–1707. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00367-1. PubMed DOI
Clarke N.W., Ali A., Ingleby F.C., Hoyle A., Amos C.L., Attard G., Brawley C.D., Calvert J., Chowdhury S., Cook A., et al. Addition of docetaxel to hormonal therapy in low- and high-burden metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer: Long-term survival results from the STAMPEDE trial. Ann. Oncol. 2019;30:1992–2003. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz396. PubMed DOI PMC
Sydes M.R., Spears M.R., Mason M.D., Clarke N.W., Dearnaley D.P., de Bono J.S., Attard G., Chowdhury S., Cross W., Gillessen S., et al. Adding abiraterone or docetaxel to long-term hormone therapy for prostate cancer: Directly randomised data from the STAMPEDE multi-arm, multi-stage platform protocol. Ann. Oncol. 2018;29:1235–1248. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy072. PubMed DOI PMC
James N.D., de Bono J.S., Spears M.R., Clarke N.W., Mason M.D., Dearnaley D.P., Ritchie A.W.S., Amos C.L., Gilson C., Jones R.J., et al. Abiraterone for Prostate Cancer Not Previously Treated with Hormone Therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:338–351. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1702900. PubMed DOI PMC
Chi K.N., Chowdhury S., Bjartell A., Byung Ha C., Gomes A.J.P.d.S., Given R., Juarez A., Merseburger A.S., Ozguroglu M., Uemura H., et al. Apalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Final Survival Analysis of the Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III TITAN Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021;39:2294–2303. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03488. PubMed DOI
Attard G., Murphy L., Clarke N.W., Sachdeva A., Jones C., Hoyle A., Cross W., Jones R.J., Parker C.C., Gillessen S., et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for patients with metastatic prostate cancer starting androgen deprivation therapy: Final results from two randomised phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:443–456. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00148-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Hoyle A.P., Ali A., James N.D., Cook A., Parker C.C., de Bono J.S., Attard G., Chowdhury S., Cross W.R., Dearnaley D.P., et al. Abiraterone in “High-” and “Low-risk” Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer. Eur. Urol. 2019;76:719–728. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.006. PubMed DOI
Halabi S., Roy A., Rydzewska L., Guo S., Godolphin P., Hussain M., Tangen C., Thompson I., Xie W., Carducci M.A., et al. Radiographic Progression-Free Survival and Clinical Progression-Free Survival as Potential Surrogates for Overall Survival in Men with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024;42:1044–1054. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01535. PubMed DOI PMC
Miszczyk M., Rajwa P., Fazekas T., Briganti A., Karakiewicz P.I., Rouprêt M., Shariat S.F. The State of Intermediate Clinical Endpoints as Surrogates for Overall Survival in Prostate Cancer in 2024. Eur. Urol. Oncol. 2024;7:1195–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.004. PubMed DOI
Nelson P.S. Molecular states underlying androgen receptor activation: A framework for therapeutics targeting androgen signaling in prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012;30:644–646. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.1300. PubMed DOI
Matsukawa A., Yanagisawa T., Parizi M.K., Laukhtina E., Klemm J., Fazekas T., Mori K., Kimura S., Briganti A., Ploussard G., et al. Cardiovascular events among men with prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00886-0. PubMed DOI
Matsukawa A., Yanagisawa T., Rajwa P., Fazekas T., Miszczyk M., Tsuboi I., Parizi M.K., Laukhtina E., Klemm J., Chiujdea S., et al. Central Nervous System Toxicity in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Network Meta-analysis. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer. 2024;23:102251. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102251. PubMed DOI
Fizazi K., Shore N.D., Smith M., Ramos R., Jones R., Niegisch G., Vjaters E., Wang Y., Srinivasan S., Sarapohja T., et al. Efficacy and safety outcomes of darolutamide in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with comorbidities and concomitant medications from the randomised phase 3 ARAMIS trial. Eur. J. Cancer. 2023;192:113258. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113258. PubMed DOI
Urabe F., Imai Y., Goto Y., Tashiro K., Hashimoto M., Yoshihara K., Yamamoto S., Hara S., Miyajima K., Fukuokaya W., et al. Real-world evidence of triplet therapy efficacy in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A Japanese multicenter study. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024;54:1208–1213. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyae098. PubMed DOI
Azad A.A., Bressel M., Tan H., Voskoboynik M., Suder A., Weickhardt A.J., Guminski A., Francis R.J., Saghebi J., Dhiantravan N., et al. Sequential [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (UpFrontPSMA): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25:1267–1276. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00440-6. PubMed DOI
Markowski M.C., Sternberg C.N., Wang H., Wang T., Linville L., Marshall C.H., Sullivan R., King S., Lotan T.L., Antonarakis E.S. TRIUMPH: Phase II trial of rucaparib monotherapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer harboring germline homologous recombination repair gene mutations. Oncologist. 2024;29:794–800. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae120. PubMed DOI PMC
Riaz I.B., Naqvi S.A.A., He H., Asghar N., Siddiqi R., Liu H., Singh P., Childs D.S., Ravi P., Hussain S.A., et al. First-line Systemic Treatment Options for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9:635–645. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7762. PubMed DOI PMC
Lim B., Lee W., Kyung Y.S., You D., Jeong I.G., Hong J.H., Ahn H., Kim C.S. Biopsy-detected Gleason grade 5 tumor is an additional prognostic factor in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2022;148:727–734. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03642-2. PubMed DOI
Warner E.W., Van der Eecken K., Murtha A.J., Kwan E.M., Herberts C., Sipola J., Ng S.W.S., Chen X.E., Fonseca N.M., Ritch E., et al. Multiregion sampling of de novo metastatic prostate cancer reveals complex polyclonality and augments clinical genotyping. Nat. Cancer. 2024;5:114–130. doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00692-y. PubMed DOI