Wildlife-vehicle collision liability in Europe: A review of existing approaches and their implications
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Review
PubMed
40127598
DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124986
PII: S0301-4797(25)00962-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Large mammals, Roadkill, Underreporting, Ungulates, WVC data, Wildlife management,
- MeSH
- Animals, Wild * MeSH
- Accidents, Traffic * legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
We present an overview of wildlife-vehicle collision (WVC) liability covering 36 European countries. We reviewed approaches to WVC liability which are currently in effect across Europe and their potential consequences for WVC reporting. To obtain relevant information, we conducted a survey, including a web-based questionnaire. We retrieved answers to questions related to human fatalities from WVC, the existence of WVC databases, roadkill data systems and recommendation for drivers in the event of WVC. In 19 countries, no one is liable when a motorized vehicle collides with a wild animal. In the remaining countries, road managers or road owners may be liable as well as drivers or hunters, either consistently or under certain conditions. Liability can, in some countries, be changed after a legal assessment. Human fatalities due to WVCs have been reported in 27 countries, with approximately 90 deaths annually across European roads. The number of injured people and estimates of socio-economic losses were not possible to obtain at a European level as many countries lack reliable databases. We discuss how existing WVC liability across countries provoke some actors to transfer liability to another actor or avoid reporting these incidents altogether. WVC underreporting in certain national databases is one of the consequences of the existing WVC liability rules in the given countries. This fact reduces the potential to identify hotspots and define appropriate mitigation measures. In conclusion, we propose several procedures for modifying WVC liability that could enhance wildlife protection and road safety.
Administration de La Nature et des Forêts Service de La Nature Luxembourg
CDV Transport Research Centre Brno Czechia
Centre of Estonian Rural Research and Knowledge Tartu Estonia
Cerema DTer Sud Ouest Saint Médard en Jalles France
Department of Hunting State Forest Service Latvia
Ecological Counseling Center Cahul Cahul Republic of Moldova
Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy University of Life Sciences in Lublin Poland
Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences Open University of Cyprus Cyprus
Federation of Hunters of Kosovo Kosovo
Fish and Wildlife Service Umbria Region Italy
Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria
Langbein Wildlife Associates UK
Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Water Management Republic of Srpska Bosnia and Herzegovina
Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning Administration for Environment North Macedonia
Ministry of Interior of the Slovak Republic Slovakia
MINUARTIA Wildlife Consultancy Spain; Faculty of Biology University of Barcelona Spain
Natural and Agricultural Environmental Studies Department Service Public de Wallonie Belgium
Natural History Museum of Montenegro Podgorica Montenegro
Nature Research Centre Lithuania
Natuurpunt Studie Mechelen Belgium
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Trondheim Norway
Protection and Preservation of Natural Environment in Albania Tirana Albania
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SLU Grimso Wildlife Research Station Riddarhyttan Sweden
University of Belgrade Faculty of Forestry Belgrade Serbia
Wageningen University and Research Wageningen the Netherlands
References provided by Crossref.org