Longitudinal outcomes following international multicentre experience with robotic aortic valve replacement†
Language English Country Germany Media print
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study
Grant support
# 2UM1 HL088925 12
National Insitute of Health National Heart Lung Blood Institute
PubMed
40131409
DOI
10.1093/ejcts/ezaf103
PII: 8093267
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Robotic valve surgery, Robotic-assisted aortic valve replacement,
- MeSH
- Aortic Valve * surgery MeSH
- Aortic Valve Stenosis * surgery MeSH
- Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation * methods adverse effects mortality MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Longitudinal Studies MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Robotic Surgical Procedures * methods adverse effects mortality statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Heart Valve Prosthesis MeSH
- Thoracotomy methods MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
OBJECTIVES: In an effort to maintain the technical aspects of traditional prosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) while reducing invasiveness and facilitate options for concomitant operations, transaxillary lateral mini-thoracotomy endoscopic robotic-assisted aortic valve replacement (RAVR) has been introduced. The present data highlight the contemporary international collaborative experience. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing standardized RAVR across 10 international sites (1/2020-7/2024) were evaluated using a central database with 1 year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were analysed with a median predicted risk of 1.6% with aortic stenosis in 85.7%, nearly half with bicuspid valves. Biological prostheses were implanted in 220 (73.3%) with a median valve size 23 mm, 10% receiving aortic root enlargement, with 17% of all patients undergoing concomitant procedures. Median cross-clamp 120 min with no conversions to sternotomy. Median length of stay was 5 days, 4.3% with prolonged ventilation, 1.7% renal failure, 1.0% stroke and 8.3% required re-thoracotomy for evacuation of haemothorax. There were two 30-day operative mortalities (0.7%). The new permanent pacemaker rate for the full cohort was 2.6%. Of 163 patients with complete 1-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up, mean aortic valve gradient was 10 mmHg and all but 2 patients (1.2%) had trace to no prosthetic or paravalvular insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: RAVR is safe and effective, providing the reproducible benefits of surgical AVR while affording a less invasive approach that permits the opportunity for concomitant procedures. For low and intermediate risk patients with aortic valve disease, RAVR is a potential reproducible alternative for patients and heart teams.
Department of Cardiac Surgery University Hospital Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
Department of Cardiac Surgery University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery The Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA USA
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery West Virginia University Morgantown WV USA
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Herzzentrum Hirslanden Zurich Switzerland
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein Sao Paulo Brazil
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
Department of Surgery National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei Taiwan
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic Florida Weston FL USA
Division of Adult Cardiac Surgery Presbyterian Hospital Columbia University New York NY USA
Division of Cardiac Surgery Baylor Scott and White Health Plano TX USA
Division of Cardiac Surgery King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center Riyadh Saudi Arabia
Division of Cardiac Surgery Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA
Division of Cardiac Surgery McGovern Medical School UTHealth Houston TX USA
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery SSM Health St Mary's Hospital Madison WI USA
References provided by Crossref.org