Gender differences in the presentation and management of patients with severe aortic stenosis at specialist versus primary/secondary care centres: A sub-analysis of the IMPULSE enhanced registry
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, srovnávací studie
PubMed
40169038
DOI
10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133223
PII: S0167-5273(25)00266-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Aortic stenosis, Aortic valve replacement, Europe, Gender, Intervention,
- MeSH
- aortální stenóza * epidemiologie diagnóza terapie chirurgie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- management nemoci * MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- pohlavní dimorfismus * MeSH
- primární zdravotní péče * trendy MeSH
- registrace * MeSH
- sekundární péče * trendy MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- sexuální faktory MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Francie epidemiologie MeSH
- Německo epidemiologie MeSH
- Spojené království epidemiologie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Management and treatment of severe aortic stenosis (AS) may differ considerably in European countries. To investigate these differences in France, Germany, and the UK, the IMPULSE enhanced registry was established. Previous data revealed differences in how patients were managed in specialist (hub) versus primary/secondary care (satellite) centres. METHODS: The IMPULSE enhanced registry sub-analysis aimed to determine if there were gender-specific differences for patients with severe AS at centres with and without access to intervention. RESULTS: Among the 790 patients, 594 and 196 were recruited at hub and satellite centres, respectively; 44 % of patients were female. In both settings, women were older than men (hubs: 78.7 vs. 76.2, p = 0.007; satellites: 79.8 vs. 75.1, p = 0.002). Symptoms at the presentation were comparable. Males had more often undergone previous cardiac surgery. Females had a smaller left ventricular (LV) outflow tract, smaller LV cavities, and, more often, a preserved ejection fraction (>50 %). There was no gender-based difference in time to intervention. At one year, the cumulative incidence of aortic valve replacement in females was higher than in males in hubs (p = 0.012) but not in satellites (p = 0.600); surgical AVR was more common in males in hubs only (p = 0.008), while transcatheter aortic valve implantation was more common in females in both settings (hubs: p < 0.001; satellites: p = 0.022). One-year survival was comparable in both genders, regardless of setting. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of gender-specific differences in patients with severe AS, according to the diagnostic setting, could improve patient stratification and earlier diagnosis.
Department of Cardiology Angiology and Pneumology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
Department of Cardiology Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital Thomas Dr Liverpool L14 3PE UK
Department of Cardiology University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
Division of Cardiology University of Ottawa Heart Institute Ottawa Canada
Edwards Lifesciences 18600 Prague Czech Republic
Heart Institute Department of Cardiology Hospital University Germans Trias i Pujol Barcelona Spain
Institute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine Cloppenburg Germany
Normandie University UNIROUEN U1096 CHU Rouen Department of Cardiology F 76000 Rouen France
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org