Pelvic floor muscle training during the childbirth period: a best practice implementation project
Language English Country United States Media electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
40171864
DOI
10.1097/xeb.0000000000000495
PII: 02205615-202501001-00003
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Midwifery * standards MeSH
- Guideline Adherence * MeSH
- Urinary Incontinence * prevention & control MeSH
- Evidence-Based Practice MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pelvic Floor * physiology MeSH
- Parturition * MeSH
- Practice Guidelines as Topic MeSH
- State Medicine MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Exercise Therapy * methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- United Kingdom MeSH
INTRODUCTION: In the UK, the Royal College of Midwives and the Chartered Society for Physiotherapy advocate that women undertake early and effective pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) during the childbirth period to reduce the incidence of urinary incontinence (UI). OBJECTIVES: This project sought to assess and improve midwives' compliance with best practice recommendations for PFMT in a UK NHS maternity service, with the goal of improving PFMT for women. METHODS: This project used the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework and JBI's best practice recommendations for PFMT. Following a baseline audit of midwives' practice, the results were considered. The JBI Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) approach was used to identify barriers and facilitators to improve compliance with recommendations. A follow-up audit was undertaken after the development of a revised continuing professional development (CPD) program for midwives on PFMT. RESULTS: The results showed improved compliance with all four audit criteria. Criterion 1 (midwives' engagement with PFMT) increased from 76% to 92%; Criterion 2 (PFMT during the antenatal period) rose from 50% to 92%; Criterion 3 (postnatal risk assessment for UI) rose from 45% to 67%; and Criterion 4 (PFMT for high-risk women during the postnatal period) increased from 49% to 92%. CONCLUSION: Whilst this study presented some challenges in implementing evidence-based initiatives in a UK NHS maternity service, it also demonstrated that an audit approach can overcome these, thereby improving compliance with best practices. In this case, changes to a CPD PFMT program increased midwives' compliance with evidence-based practice criteria. In the future, when implementing change in the NHS system, consideration should be given to organizational and leadership factors. Further audits will need to be carried out to monitor practice and effect change. SPANISH ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A322.
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Cardiff Wales UK
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Royal College Midwives/Chartered Society for Physiotherapy. Joint statement on pelvic floor muscle exercises improving health outcomes for women following pregnancy and birth [internet]. RCM/CSP; 2020. Available from: https://www.csp.org.uk/system/files/documents/2020-05/001616_rcm_position_statement_update_v3.pdf
Hermansen IL, O’Connell BO, Gaskin CJ. Women's explanations for urinary incontinence, their management strategies, and their quality of life during the postpartum period. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2010; 37 (2):187–192.
Woodley SJ, Lawrenson P, Boyle R, Cody JD, Mørkved S, Kernohan A, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women [internet]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 5:CD007471.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Pelvic floor dysfunction: prevention and non-surgical management. NICE guideline [NG210] [internet]. NICE; 2021. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng210
Porritt K. Evidence summary. Pelvic floor muscle training (antenatal and post-natal): prevention and treatment of urinary incontinence. The JBI EBP Database. 2019; JBI22778.
Porritt K, McArthur A, Lockwood C, Munn Z. JBI's approach to evidence implementation: a 7-phase process model to support and guide getting evidence into practice. JBI Evid Implement 2023; 21 (1):3–13.
Ayoubian A, Nasiripour AA, Tabibi SJ, Bahadori M. Evaluation of facilitators and barriers to implementing evidence-based practice in the health services: a systematic review. Galen Med J 2020; 9:e1645.
Nursing and Midwifery Council. Continuing professional development [internet]. NMC; 2021. Available from: https://www.nmc.org.uk/revalidation/requirements/cpd/
Health Education England. Introduction to the pelvic floor during pregnancy [internet]. HEE; 2024. Available from: https://portal.e-lfh.org.uk/
NHS Wales. Continuous professional development (CPD) strategy for the NHS Wales healthcare workforce: consultation. NHS Wales. Available from: https://heiw.nhs.wales/news/consultation-on-the-continuing-professional-development-cpd-strategy-for-nhs-wales/
Health Education England. NHS digital academy [internet]. HEE; 2024. Available from: https://digital-transformation.hee.nhs.uk/digital-academy
Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci 2012; 7:50.
Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med 2011; 104 (12):510–520.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Principles for putting evidence-based guidance into practice [internet]. NICE; 2024. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/About/what-we-do/Into-practice/Principles-for-putting-evidence-based-guidance-into-practice.pdf