Preoperative tumour size assessment in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: Final results of the SENTIX study
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
PubMed
40220456
DOI
10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.04.005
PII: S0090-8258(25)00163-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Cervical cancer, Clinical staging, FIGO, Guidelines, MRI, Preoperative staging, TNM, Tumour size, Ultrasound,
- MeSH
- biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny metody MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie MeSH
- nádory děložního čípku * patologie chirurgie diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- předoperační péče metody MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- tumor burden MeSH
- ultrasonografie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Preoperative tumour size is a key prognostic marker in tailoring surgical treatment in early-stage cervical cancer. This post-hoc analysis assessed the accuracy of preoperative tumour size evaluation via imaging, utilizing data from the prospective, international, multicentre SENTIX study that evaluated safety of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy without pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS: Between 05/2016-09/2020, forty-seven sites across 18 countries enrolled cervical cancer patients (FIGO2018 stages 1A1/lymphovascular-space-invasion-positive to 1B2). Preoperative staging included pelvic MRI or ultrasound as mandatory imaging modalities. All patients underwent primary surgical treatment. Pathological assessment of surgical specimens served as reference standard for evaluating the accuracy of preoperative assessments. RESULTS: Among the 680 included patients, although the mean tumour size discrepancy between preoperative/pathological assessments was only 1.24 ± 8.891 mm, postoperative pT stage was upgraded in 187 (27.5 %) and downgraded in 74 (10.9 %) patients. Discrepancy of ≥10 mm was observed among 155 (22.8 %) patients across all stages, with underestimation in 105 (15.4 %), overestimation in 50 (7.4 %), and a positive correlation (P < 0.0001) between the pathological tumour size and the discrepancy in size assessment. If a maximum 2 cm tumour size threshold were applied to guide the decision between simple and radical hysterectomy, underestimation would result in inadequate surgical management for 9.0 % of patients, whereas overestimation would lead to unnecessarily radical procedures in 5.1 % of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights, that even with the use of modern imaging in preoperative staging, inaccuracies in tumour size assessment remain a common cause of up-/down-staging after surgery resulting in potential inappropriate planning of surgery, and thus in procedure that is either excessively or insufficiently radical. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02494063.
Asklepios Klinik Altona Department of Radiology Germany
Cliniques universitaires Saint Luc Institut Roi Albert 2 Avenue Hippocrate Brussel Belgium
Department of Gynaecogy and Obstetrics Bory Hospital Bratislava Slovakia
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics University Hospital of Liège CHU Liège Liège Belgium
Department of Gynecology Obstetrics Medical University of Gdansk Poland
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne Lucerne Switzerland
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine University of Debrecen Hungary
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
Department of Radiology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University 121 08 Prague Czech Republic
Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología Valencia Spain
Gynecologic Oncology Unit La Paz University Hospital Madrid Spain
Holy Cross Cancer Center Kielce Poland
Hospital Clinico San Carlos IdISSC School of Medicine University Complutense Madrid Spain
MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid Spain
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02494063