OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effects of computer-assisted Ci™ navigation on clinical, radiological, and functional results versus conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and July 2011, a total of 85 patients (36 males, 49 females; mean age: 66.2±5.2 years; range, 59 to 84 years) who underwent P.F.C. Sigma™ knee system implantation using computer-assisted Ci™ navigation system (BrainLAB®, DePuy International, Leeds, UK) and completed a minimum follow-up of eight years were included in the study. In the control group, a total of 100 patients (40 males, 60 females; mean age: 68.3±3.9 years; range, 60 to 79 years) who completed a minimum follow-up of eight years were randomly selected from a dataset of implanted P.F.C. Sigma™ knee systems in the same period using Specialist® 2 instrumentation without navigation. An implant survival analysis was used to compare implant survivorship between the groups throughout 12 years. The Knee Society Score (KSS) and range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Based on long-format X-ray images, the implant position in the frontal and sagittal planes was evaluated. RESULTS: The ratio for navigation to control group survival is approximately 1.01 at 12 years. The clinical outcomes showed no significant difference between the groups (knee scores, p=0.707 and functional scores, p=0.485). In the measured angles analysis, we observed a consistent pattern in both groups. In the control group, there was a trend toward implanting the tibial component with slight varus alignment (p=0.038) and a higher posterior slope (p<0.001). On average, the operation was prolonged by 13 min in the navigated group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study results demonstrate that while kinematic navigation in TKA improves the precision of implant alignment, it does not provide significant benefits in terms of long-term implant survival or functional outcomes compared to conventional TKA methods. The use of the computer-assisted Ci™ navigation system is associated with prolonged operation duration, although no technical complications related to the navigation device's software can be observed. Therefore, although navigation offers theoretical advantages in component positioning, its use may be more justifiable in cases with challenging alignment requirements rather than as a routine practice.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery St Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;192:13–22. PubMed

Özer H, Abdulaliyev F, Cavdar Yilmaz NP, Ahmadov A, Gungor Y, Tosun SN, et al. Gerdy’s tubercle as a novel anatomical landmark for the proximal tibial cut in total knee arthroplasty. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2024;35:305–314. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2024.1531. PubMed DOI PMC

Massin P. How does total knee replacement technique influence polyethylene wear. S21-7Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103 doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.06.024. PubMed DOI

Maquet P. The biomechanics of the knee and surgical possibilities of healing osteoarthritic knee joints. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;146:102–110. PubMed

Townley CO. The anatomic total knee resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;192:82–96. PubMed

Luan Y, Wang H, Zhang M, Li J, Zhang N, Liu B, et al. Comparison of navigation systems for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg. 2023;10:1112147–1112147. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1112147. PubMed DOI PMC

Lei K, Liu L, Chen X, Feng Q, Yang L, Guo L. Navigation and robotics improved alignment compared with PSI and conventional instrument, while clinical outcomes were similar in TKA: A network meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30:721–733. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06436-8. PubMed DOI

Çabuk H, Turan K, Muratoğlu OG, Ergün T, Öztürk Ç, Ertürer RE. Comparison of the radiological parameters between dynamic-referencing tactile guidance robotic system and Microplasty® instrumentation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022;33:580–587. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.742. PubMed DOI PMC

Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: Comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.05.009. PubMed DOI

Stöckl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:180–186. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000136835.40566.d9. PubMed DOI

Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;433:152–159. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150564.31880.c4. PubMed DOI

Clayton AW, Cherian JJ, Banerjee S, Kapadia BH, Jauregui JJ, Harwin SF, et al. Does the use of navigation in total knee arthroplasty affect outcomes. J Knee Surg. 2014;27:171–175. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1374814. PubMed DOI

Weng YJ, Hsu RW, Hsu WH. Comparison of computerassisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:668–673. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.006. PubMed DOI

Fehring TK, Mason JB, Moskal J, Pollock DC, Mann J, Williams VJ. When computer-assisted knee replacement is the best alternative. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:132–136. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000229363.50361.25. PubMed DOI

Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:153–156. PubMed

Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:709–714. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B5.1894655. PubMed DOI

Çimen O, Mert M, Navat A, Köksal A, Öner A, Dırvar F, et al. Does sagittal alignment of the femoral component have an impact on radiological loosening and functional results in revision knee arthroplasty. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023;34:651–660. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1002. PubMed DOI PMC

Shah SM. After 25years of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty, where do we stand today. Arthroplasty. 2021;3:41–41. doi: 10.1186/s42836-021-00100-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Bae DK, Song SJ. Computer assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011;3:259–267. doi: 10.4055/cios.2011.3.4.259. PubMed DOI PMC

Bové JC, Clavé A. Navigated total knee arthroplasty: Retrospective study of 600 continuous cases. OTSR. 2021;107:102857–102857. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102857. PubMed DOI

Kim YH, Kim JS, Choi Y, Kwon OR. Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:14–19. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01700. PubMed DOI

Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:471–476. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18878. PubMed DOI

Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:236–243. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00386. PubMed DOI

Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computerassisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jigbased technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:372–377. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14643. PubMed DOI

Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:682–687. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b5.14927. PubMed DOI

Lee HJ, Park YB, Song MK, Kwak YH, Kim SH. Comparison of the outcomes of navigation-assisted revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty versus navigation-assisted primary TKA. Int Orthop. 2019;43:315–322. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4028-2. PubMed DOI

Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9–12. PubMed

Bach CM, Steingruber IE, Peer S, Nogler M, Wimmer C, Ogon M. Radiographic assessment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;385:144–150. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200104000-00022. PubMed DOI

Gromov K, Korchi M, Thomsen MG, Husted H, Troelsen A. What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:480–487. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.940573. PubMed DOI PMC

Matassi F, Pettinari F, Frasconà F, Innocenti M, Civinini R. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A review. J Orthop Traumatol. 2023;24:24–24. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00702-w. PubMed DOI PMC

DePuy Synthes. DePuy Synthes. SIGMA primary knee system balanced surgical technique. Warsaw, IN: DePuy Synthes; 2024.

Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS. The clinical outcome of computernavigated compared with conventional knee arthroplasty in the same patients: A prospective, randomized, doubleblind, long-term study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2017;99:989–996. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00791. PubMed DOI

Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY. Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and loadbearing distribution at the knee. Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY. Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and loadbearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;(255):215-27. PubMed

Cheng T, Zhang G, Zhang X. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Res. 2011;171:590–600. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.006. PubMed DOI

Jung SH, Cho MR, Song SK. Appropriateness of the use of navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2020;12:324–329. doi: 10.4055/cios19159. PubMed DOI PMC

Selvanayagam R, Kumar V, Malhotra R, Srivastava DN, Digge VK. A prospective randomized study comparing navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2019;27:2309499019848079–2309499019848079. doi: 10.1177/2309499019848079. PubMed DOI

Cip J, Obwegeser F, Benesch T, Bach C, Ruckenstuhl P, Martin A. Twelve-year follow-up of navigated computerassisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized comparative trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:1404–1411. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.012. PubMed DOI

Ruangsomboon P, Ruangsomboon O, Pornrattanamaneewong C, Narkbunnam R, Chareancholvanich K. Clinical and radiological outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Orthop. 2023;94:60–79. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.9411. PubMed DOI PMC

Synder M, Altimimi MA, Borowski A, Sibiński M, Drobniewski M. Evaluation of outcomes of total knee replacement with and without a navigation system. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2016;18:251–261. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1212869. PubMed DOI

Zampogna B, Campi S, Torre G, Villari E, Moncada F, Perrino A, et al. Outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional TKA: A bicentric controlled retrospective clinical study. J Clin Med. 2021;10:3352–3352. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153352. PubMed DOI PMC

Huang TW, Lee CY, Lin SJ, Peng KT, Huang KC, Lee MS, et al. Comparison of computer-navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty in patients with Ranawat type-II valgus deformity: Medium-term clinical and radiological results. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:390–390. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-390. PubMed DOI PMC

Mitsiou D, Pakos EE, Papadopoulos DV, Georgiadis G, Gelalis ID, Tsantes AG, et al. Is TKA with computerassisted navigation associated with less blood loss. A comparative study between computer-navigated and conventional method. J Orthop. 2020;20:50–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.014. PubMed DOI PMC

Pan Y, Jiang B, Li Y, Yu Y, Chen Y. Alignment analysis of Brainlab knee 3 navigation-guided total knee arthroplasty using the adjusted mechanical method. Front Surg. 2022;9:1040025–1040025. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1040025. PubMed DOI PMC

Li JT, Gao X, Li X. Comparison of iASSIST navigation system with conventional techniques in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes. Orthop Surg. 2019;11:985–993. doi: 10.1111/os.12550. PubMed DOI PMC

Patrick NJ, Man LLC, Wai-Wang C, Tim-Yun OM, Wing CK, Hing CK, et al. No difference in long-term functional outcomes or survivorship after total knee arthroplasty with or without computer navigation: A 17-year survivorship analysis. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021;33:30–30. doi: 10.1186/s43019-021-00114-2. PubMed DOI PMC

Chávez-Valladares S, Trigueros-Larrea JM, Pais-Ortega S, González-Bedia MA, Caballero-García A, Córdova A, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty at 5-year follow-up: Is there any benefit. J Pers Med. 2023;13:1365–1365. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091365. PubMed DOI PMC

Lakhotia D, Agrawal U, Singh SP. A prospective randomized study on whether computer navigation is better than conventional total knee replacement in terms of short-term functional and clinical outcomes. e53226Cureus. 2024;16 doi: 10.7759/cureus.53226. PubMed DOI PMC