A System Model and Requirements for Transformation to Human-Centric Digital Health
Language English Country Canada Media electronic
Document type Journal Article, Review
PubMed
40294402
PubMed Central
PMC12070013
DOI
10.2196/68661
PII: v27i1e68661
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, autonomy, digital economy, digital health, dignity, human rights, modeling, neoliberalism, privacy, system analysis,
- MeSH
- Digital Technology MeSH
- Digital Health * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Human Rights MeSH
- Patient-Centered Care * MeSH
- Privacy MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
Digital transformation is widely understood as a process where technology is used to modify an organization's products and services and to create new ones. It is rapidly advancing in all sectors of society. Researchers have shown that it is a multidimensional process determined by human decisions based on ideologies, ideas, beliefs, goals, and the ways in which technology is used. In health care and health, the end result of digital transformation is digital health. In this study, a detailed literature review covering 560 research articles published in major journals was performed, followed by an analysis of ideas, beliefs, and goals guiding digital transformation and their possible consequences for privacy, human rights, dignity, and autonomy in health care and health. Results of literature analyses demonstrated that from the point of view of privacy, dignity, and human rights, the current laws, regulations, and system architectures have major weaknesses. One possible model of digital health is based on the dominant ideas and goals of the business world related to the digital economy and neoliberalism, including privatization of health care services, monetization and commodification of health data, and personal responsibility for health. These ideas represent meaningful risks to human rights, privacy, dignity, and autonomy. In this paper, we present an alternative solution for digital health called human-centric digital health (HCDH). Using system thinking and system modeling methods, we developed a system model for HCDH. It uses 5 views (ideas, health data, principles, regulation, and organizational and technical innovations) to align with human rights and values and support dignity, privacy, and autonomy. To make HCDH future proof, extensions to human rights, the adoption of the principle of restricted informational ownership of health data, and the development of new duties, responsibilities, and laws are needed. Finally, we developed a system-oriented, architecture-centric, ontology-based, and policy-driven approach to represent and manage HCDH ecosystems.
1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Deggendorf Institute of Technology eHealth Competence Center Bavaria Deggendorf Germany
Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences Tampere University Tampere Finland
See more in PubMed
Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2019;28(2):118–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.0. DOI
Rights in the digital age challenges and ways forward. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. [2024-04-29]. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/deb707a8-en.pdf?expires=1731223570&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=DFFC7DF0D9ADAFB4AEBF1D473E3AD422 .
Stoumpos AI, Kitsios F, Talias MA. Digital transformation in healthcare: technology acceptance and its applications. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043407. ijerph20043407 PubMed DOI PMC
Lupton D. The digitally engaged patient: self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Soc Theory Health. 2013 Jun 19;11(3):256–70. doi: 10.1057/sth.2013.10. DOI
Mergel I, Edelmann N, Haug N. Defining digital transformation: results from expert interviews. Gov Inf Q. 2019 Oct;36(4):101385. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002. DOI
Kraus S, Schiavone F, Pluzhnikova A, Invernizzi AC. Digital transformation in healthcare: analyzing the current state-of-research. J Bus Res. 2021 Feb;123:557–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.030. DOI
McGregor S. Neoliberalism and health care. Int J Consum Stud. 2008 Jul 07;25(2):82–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2001.00183.x. DOI
Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. World Health Organization. [2024-04-29]. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/gs4dhdaa2a9f352b0445bafbc79ca799dce4d.pdf .
Paul M, Maglaras L, Ferrag MA, Almomani I. Digitization of healthcare sector: a study on privacy and security concerns. ICT Express. 2023 Aug;9(4):571–88. doi: 10.1016/j.icte.2023.02.007. DOI
Blobel B, Oemig F, Ruotsalainen P, Lopez DM. Transformation of health and social care systems-an interdisciplinary approach toward a foundational architecture. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022 Mar 7;9:802487. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.802487. PubMed DOI PMC
Abernethy A, Adams L, Barrett M, Bechtel C, Brennan P, Butte A, Faulkner J, Fontaine E, Friedhoff S, Halamka J, Howell M, Johnson K, Long P, McGraw D, Miller R, Lee P, Perlin J, Rucker D, Sandy L, Savage L, Stump L, Tang P, Topol E, Tuckson R, Valdes K. The promise of digital health: then, now, and the future. NAM Perspect. 2022;2022:e34. doi: 10.31478/202206e. 10.31478/202206e PubMed DOI PMC
Ruotsalainen P, Blobel B. Transformed health ecosystems-challenges for security, privacy, and trust. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022 Mar 25;9:827253. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.827253. PubMed DOI PMC
Wang T, Giunti G, Melles M, Goossens R. Digital patient experience: umbrella systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 04;24(8):e37952. doi: 10.2196/37952. v24i8e37952 PubMed DOI PMC
Hendl T, Shukla A. Can digital health democratize health care? Bioethics. 2024 Jan 09;38(6):491–502. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13266. PubMed DOI
Zuboff S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London, UK: Profile Books; 2019.
I invented the world wide web. The New York Times. [2024-04-29]. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/24/opinion/world-wide-web.html .
Karppinen K. Human rights and digital. In: Tumber H, Waisbord S, editors. The Routledge Companion to Media and Human Rights. New York, NY: Routledge; 2017.
Fatehi F, Samadbeik M, Kazemi A. What is digital health? Review of definitions. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Nov 23;275:67–71. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200696.SHTI200696 PubMed DOI
Meskó B, Drobni Z, Bényei É, Gergely B, Győrffy Z. Digital health is a cultural transformation of traditional healthcare. Mhealth. 2017 Sep;3:38. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2017.08.07. mh-03-2017.08.07 PubMed DOI PMC
Yeung AW, Torkamani A, Butte AJ, Glicksberg BS, Schuller B, Rodriguez B, Ting DS, Bates D, Schaden E, Peng H, Willschke H, van der Laak J, Car J, Rahimi K, Celi LA, Banach M, Kletecka-Pulker M, Kimberger O, Eils R, Islam SM, Wong ST, Wong TY, Gao W, Brunak S, Atanasov AG. The promise of digital healthcare technologies. Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 26;11:1196596. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1196596. PubMed DOI PMC
WHO remains firmly committed to the principles set out in the preamble to the Constitution. World Health Organization. [2024-04-29]. https://www.who.int/about/governance/constitution .
News. World Health Organization. [2024-04-29]. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/
Coveney P, Highfield R. Virtual You. Hoboken, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2023.
Capitalism. Cambridge Dictionary. [2024-04-29]. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/capitalism .
Sadiku MM, Chukwu UC, Ajayi-Majebi A, Musa SM. Digital capitalism: a primer. Int J Trend Sci Res. 2022;6(4):590–7.
Bi J. From information extraction to remaining data—the production mystery of digital capitalism. Comput Sci Math Forum. 2023;8(1):15. doi: 10.3390/cmsf2023008015. DOI
Verhulst SG. Operationalizing digital self-determination. Data Policy. 2023 Apr 24;5:1. doi: 10.1017/dap.2023.11. DOI
Neubauer R. Neoliberalism in the information age, or vice versa? Global citizenship, technology, and hegemonic ideology. tripleC. 2011 Sep 06;9(2):195–230. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v9i2.238. DOI
Commodification. University of Georgia. [2024-04-29]. https://neolib.uga.edu/commodification .
Lipton JD. Our Data, Ourselves: A Personal Guide to Digital Privacy. Oxford, UK: University California Press; 2022.
Stanley ML, Henne P, Niemi L, Sinnott-Armstrong W, De Brigard F. Making moral principles suit yourself. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Oct;28(5):1735–41. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01935-8. 10.3758/s13423-021-01935-8 PubMed DOI
Marks SP. Human rights: a brief introduction. Harvard University. [2024-04-29]. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/134/2017/07/Human-Rights-A-brief-intro-2017.pdf .
Dignity. EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. [2024-04-29]. https://fra.europa.eu/en/eu-charter/title/title-i-dignity .
Andorno R. Human dignity and human rights. In: ten Have HA, Gordijn B, editors. Handbook of Global Bioethics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2014. pp. 45–57.
Universal declaration of human rights. United Nations. [2024-04-29]. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights .
The right to privacy in the digital age: meeting report. Geneva Academy. [2024-04-29]. https://www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/ReportThe%20Right%20to%20Privacy%20in%20the%20Digital%20Age.pdf .
A/HRC/51/17: the right to privacy in the digital age. United Nations. [2024-04-29]. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/thematic-reports/ahrc5117-right-privacy-digital-age .
Nickel J, Etinson A. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (fall 2024 edition) The Stanford Encyclopedia. [2024-04-29]. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/rights-human/> .
Wong WH. We, the Data: Human Rights in the Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2023.
Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union. European Union. [2024-04-29]. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf .
Agich JG. Key concepts: autonomy. In: van Staden W, editor. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology. New York, NY: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009.
Autonomy. Cambridge Dictionary. [2024-04-29]. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/autonomy .
Christman J. Autonomy in moral and political philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [2024-04-29]. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/autonomy-moral/
Becker M. Privacy in the digital age: comparing and contrasting individual versus social approaches towards privacy. Ethics Inf Technol. 2019 Jul 17;21(4):307–17. doi: 10.1007/s10676-019-09508-z. DOI
Citron DK. The Fight for Privacy - Protecting Dignity, Identity, and Love in the Digital Age. New York, NY: W.W Norton Company; 2022.
Nissenbaum H. Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review. [2024-04-29]. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol79/iss1/10/
Ajana B. Digital health and the biopolitics of the quantified self. Digit Health. 2017 Feb 01;3:2055207616689509. doi: 10.1177/2055207616689509. 10.1177_2055207616689509 PubMed DOI PMC
Wang C, Zhang N, Wang C. Managing privacy in the digital economy. Fundam Res. 2021 Sep;1(5):543–51. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2021.08.009. DOI
Das S, Lee HP, Forlizzi J. Privacy in the age of AI. Commun ACM. 2023 Oct 20;66(11):29–31. doi: 10.1145/3625254. DOI
Cohen JE. Configuring the Networked Self: Law, Code, and the Play of Everyday Practice. London, UK: Yale University Press; 2012.
Khatiwada P, Yang B, Lin JC, Blobel B. Patient-generated health data (PGHD): understanding, requirements, challenges, and existing techniques for data security and privacy. J Pers Med. 2024 Mar 03;14(3):282. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030282. jpm14030282 PubMed DOI PMC
Brantly AF, Brantly ND. Patient-centric cybersecurity. J Cyberpol. 2020 Dec 09;5(3):372–91. doi: 10.1080/23738871.2020.1856902. DOI
Vayena E, Haeusermann T, Adjekum A, Blasimme A. Digital health: meeting the ethical and policy challenges. Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14571. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14571. smw-14571 PubMed DOI
Yaka AM. A deep dive into dynamic data flows, wearable devices, and the concept of health data. Int Data Priv Law. 2023;13(2):124–40. doi: 10.1093/idpl/ipad007. DOI
Schneble CO, Elger BS, Shaw DM. All our data will be health data one day: the need for universal data protection and comprehensive consent. J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 28;22(5):e16879. doi: 10.2196/16879. v22i5e16879 PubMed DOI PMC
Kahn SD, Terry SF. Who owns (or controls) health data? Sci Data. 2024 Feb 01;11(1):156. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-02982-1. 10.1038/s41597-024-02982-1 PubMed DOI PMC
Home page. General Data Protection Regulation. [2024-04-29]. https://gdpr-info.eu/
EU GDPR recital. SecureDataService. [2024-04-29]. https://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/r35.htm .
Berkerley human research protection program. UC Berkeley. [2025-12-04]. https://cphs.berkeley.edu/hipaa/hipaa18.html .
Ruotsalainen P, Blobel B. Future pHealth ecosystem-holistic view on privacy and trust. J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 26;13(7):e34. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071048. jpm13071048 PubMed DOI PMC
Purtova N, van Maanen G. Data as an economic good, data as a commons, and data governance. Law Innov Technol. 2024 Nov 02;16(1):1–42. doi: 10.1080/17579961.2023.2265270.2265270 PubMed DOI PMC
Martin EG, Begany GM. Opening government health data to the public: benefits, challenges, and lessons learned from early innovators. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 01;24(2):345–51. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw076. ocw076 PubMed DOI PMC
DIRECTIVE 96/9 EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. European Parliament. [2024-04-29]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31996L0009 .
Banterle F. Data ownership in the data economy: a European dilemma. In: Synodinou TE, Jougleux P, Markou C, Prastitou T, editors. EU Internet Law in the Digital Era: Regulation and Enforcement. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020. pp. 199–225.
Balkin JM. Information fiduciaries and the first amendment. UC Davis Law Review. [2024-04-29]. https://lawreview.sf.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk15026/files/media/documents/49-4_Balkin.pdf .
Ligett K, Nissim K. We need to focus on how our data is used, not just how it is shared. Commun ACM. 2023 Aug 23;66(9):32–4. doi: 10.1145/3572912. DOI
van Roessel I, Reumann M, Brand A. Potentials and challenges of the health data cooperative model. Public Health Genomics. 2017 Jun 22;20(6):321–31. doi: 10.1159/000489994. 000489994 PubMed DOI PMC
Bühler MM, Nübel K, Jelinek T, Riechert D, Bauer T, Schmid T, Schneider M. Data cooperatives as a catalyst for collaboration, data sharing and the digital transformation of the construction sector. Buildings. 2023 Feb 05;13(2):442. doi: 10.3390/buildings13020442. DOI
Thompson M, Venters W. Platform, or technology project? A spectrum of six strategic ‘plays’ from UK government IT initiatives and their implications for policy. Gov Inf Q. 2021 Oct;38(4):101628. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101628. DOI
Hashiguchi TC, Oderkirk J, Slawomirski L. Fulfilling the promise of artificial intelligence in the health sector: let's get real. Value Health. 2022 Mar;25(3):368–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1369. S1098-3015(21)03225-3 PubMed DOI
Ruotsalainen P, Blobel B. Health information systems in the digital health ecosystem-problems and solutions for ethics, trust and privacy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 26;17(9):3006. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093006. ijerph17093006 PubMed DOI PMC
Suleyman M, Bhaskar M. The Coming Wave: Technology, Power, and the Twenty-First Century's Greatest Dilemma. Lanham, MD: Penguin Random House; 2023.
Oudin A, Maatoug R, Bourla A, Ferreri F, Bonnot O, Millet B, Schoeller F, Mouchabac S, Adrien V. Digital phenotyping: data-driven psychiatry to redefine mental health. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 04;25:e44502. doi: 10.2196/44502. v25i1e44502 PubMed DOI PMC
Babrak L, Menetski J, Rebhan M, Nisato G, Zinggeler M, Brasier N, Baerenfaller K, Brenzikofer T, Baltzer L, Vogler C, Gschwind L, Schneider C, Streiff F, Groenen P, Miho E. Traditional and digital biomarkers: two worlds apart? Digit Biomark. 2019 Aug 16;3(2):92–102. doi: 10.1159/000502000. dib-0003-0092 PubMed DOI PMC
Maturo A. Medicalization: current concept and future directions in a bionic society. Mens Sana Monogr. 2012;10(1):122. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.91587. PubMed DOI PMC
Clarke AE, Mamo L, Fishman JR, Shim JK, Fosket JR. Biomedicalization: technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. Am Sociol Rev. 2003 Apr;68(2):161. doi: 10.2307/1519765. DOI
Coin A, Mulder M, Dubljević V. Ethical aspects of BCI technology: what is the state of the art? Philosophies. 2020 Oct 24;5(4):31. doi: 10.3390/philosophies5040031. DOI
Saha S, Mamun KA, Ahmed K, Mostafa R, Naik GR, Darvishi S, Khandoker AH, Baumert M. Progress in brain computer interface: challenges and opportunities. Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Feb 25;15:578875. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.578875. PubMed DOI PMC
Klein E, Goering S, Gagne J, Shea CV, Franklin R, Zorowitz S, Dougherty DD, Widge AS. Brain-computer interface-based control of closed-loop brain stimulation: attitudes and ethical considerations. Brain-Computer Interfaces. 2016 Jul 18;3(3):140–8. doi: 10.1080/2326263x.2016.1207497. DOI
Teller M. Legal aspects related to digital twin. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Oct 04;379(2207):20210023. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0023. PubMed DOI
Fischer RP, Volpert A, Antonino P, Ahrens TD. Digital patient twins for personalized therapeutics and pharmaceutical manufacturing. Front Digit Health. 2023;5:1302338. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1302338. PubMed DOI PMC
Cusumano MA. Generative AI as a new innovation platform. Commun ACM. 2023 Sep 22;66(10):18–21. doi: 10.1145/3615859. DOI
Shein E. Governments setting limits on AI. Commun ACM. 2024 Mar 25;67(4):12–4. doi: 10.1145/3640506. DOI
Jacobson N. A taxonomy of dignity: a grounded theory study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009 Feb 24;9(1):33. doi: 10.1186/1472-698x-9-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Sun N, Esom K, Dhaliwal M, Amon JJ. Human rights and digital health technologies. Health Hum Rights. 2020 Dec;22(2):21–32. hhr-22-02-021 PubMed PMC
Ruotsalainen P, Blobel B, Pohjolainen S. Privacy and trust in eHealth: a fuzzy linguistic solution for calculating the merit of service. J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 19;12(5):657. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050657. jpm12050657 PubMed DOI PMC
Cohen JE. Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2019.
Prohibited AI practices. The EU Artificial Intelligence Act. [2024-04-29]. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/5/
The ethics of manipulation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive. [2024-04-29]. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/ethics-manipulation/
Ruotsalainen P, Blobel B. Privacy and trust in pHealth - past, present and future. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Nov 03;299:104–17. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220968.SHTI220968 PubMed DOI
Kieffer G, Hepburn KJ. Is neoliberalism killing us? A cross sectional study of the impact of neoliberal beliefs on health and social wellbeing in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2022 Oct 22;53(3):363–73. doi: 10.1177/00207314221134040. PubMed DOI PMC
Brantly A. Utopia lost – human rights in a digital world. Appl Cybersecur Internet Gov. 2022 Dec 3;1(1):1–19. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0016.1238. DOI
Levine EV. Cargo cult AI. Commun ACM. 2023 Aug 23;66(9):46–51. doi: 10.1145/3606946. DOI
Varošanec I. On the path to the future: mapping the notion of transparency in the EU regulatory framework for AI. Int Rev Law Comput Technol. 2022 Apr 08;36(2):95–117. doi: 10.1080/13600869.2022.2060471. DOI
Ensuring the protection of human rights. United Nations. [2024-04-29]. https://www.un.org/techenvoy/sites/www.un.org.techenvoy/files/general/Digital_Human_Rights_Summary_PDF.pdf .
Farahany NA. The Battle for Your Brain: Defending the Right to Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology. New York, NY: St Martins; 2023.
Zarsky TZ. Privacy and manipulation in the digital age. Theo Inq L. 2019;20(1):22. doi: 10.1515/til-2019-0006. DOI
Mouton Dorey C, Baumann H, Biller-Andorno N. Patient data and patient rights: Swiss healthcare stakeholders' ethical awareness regarding large patient data sets - a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Mar 07;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0261-x. 10.1186/s12910-018-0261-x PubMed DOI PMC
Traina G, Feiring E. Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents. J Med Ethics. 2022 Jan 02;48(1):39–45. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105612. medethics-2019-105612 PubMed DOI PMC
A new UN office for digital and emerging technologies. United Nations. [2024-04-29]. https://www.un.org/techenvoy/
Lamdan S. DATA Cartels. Cambridge, MA: Stanford University Press; 2023.
Wachter S, Mittelstadt B. A right to reasonable inferences: re-thinking data protection law in the age of big data and AI. Colum Bus L Rev. 2019;2:1. doi: 10.31228/osf.io/mu2kf. DOI
Jain SH, Powers BW, Hawkins JB, Brownstein JS. The digital phenotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2015 May;33(5):462–3. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3223.nbt.3223 PubMed DOI
The United Nations secretary-general’s roadmap for digital cooperation ensuring the protection of human rights. United Nations. [2024-04-29]. https://www.un.org/techenvoy/content/roadmap-digital-cooperation .
Bualamwini J. Unmasking AI. New York, NY: Penguin Random House; 1999.
Nguyen AM, Rivera AM, Gualtieri L. A new health care paradigm: the power of digital health and e-patients. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 Sep;1(3):203–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.04.005. PubMed DOI PMC
Blobel B. Intelligent security and privacy solutions for enabling personalized telepathology. Diagn Pathol. 2011 Mar 30;6(Suppl 1):S4–228. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-6-S1-S4. 1746-1596-6-S1-S4 PubMed DOI PMC
Brochhausen M, Bost S, Singh N, Brochhausen C, Blobel B. Understanding the gap between information models and realism-based ontologies using the generic component model. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Oct 27;285:159–64. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210590.SHTI210590 PubMed DOI
Grön K. Common good in the era of data-intensive healthcare. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2021 Oct 12;8(1):230. doi: 10.1057/s41599-021-00911-w. DOI
Verde L, Marulli F, Marrone S. Exploring the impact of data poisoning attacks on machine learning model reliability. Procedia Comput Sci. 2021;192:2624–32. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.032. DOI