BACKGROUND: Niche partitioning allows species to diversify resource utilisation and space allocation and reduce interspecific competition. Variations in abiotic and biotic conditions in different ecosystems may further influence resource availability and habitat utilisation, potentially reducing competition. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of environmental variation on spatial and trophic niche overlap between two freshwater apex predators, the northern pike (Esox lucius) and the European catfish (Silurus glanis), in three different water bodies. METHODS: We used fine-scale acoustic telemetry to assess the spatial niche overlap of pike and catfish, analyzing their spatial and habitat use in relation to the thermocline and their presence in benthic versus open-water habitats. Stable isotope analysis (SIA) was used to quantify trophic niche overlap and dietary differences between the species. We compared the habitat use, spatial niche width and overlap, and trophic differentiation among waterbodies to determine how environmental conditions influence predator interactions. RESULTS: During summer, pike and catfish primarily occupied benthic habitats above the thermocline across all waterbodies and diel periods. However, catfish more frequently used open water above the thermocline, while pike were more often present in both open water and benthic habitats below it. While this general pattern of habitat use was consistent, its extent varied among lakes, suggesting that local environmental conditions shape species-specific habitat selection. Despite these variations, the species exhibited substantial spatial overlap, though its magnitude fluctuated across waterbodies and diel periods. Catfish occupied a broader spatial niche in two waterbodies, while pike had a broader niche in one. Across all lakes, catfish consistently maintained a broader trophic niche than pike. However, pike exhibited higher trophic overlap with catfish than vice versa, with nearly complete overlap in one lake and substantial but incomplete overlap in others. This suggests that pike relies more heavily on shared prey resources, while catfish exploits a broader range of food sources beyond those used by pike.These patterns were primarily driven by the position of the thermocline, prey availability, structural complexity and the greater foraging plasticity of catfish, highlighting the environmental dependence of niche partitioning in these predators. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that spatial and trophic niche overlaps between pike and catfish are highly context-dependent, shaped by abiotic conditions, prey availability, and species-specific foraging strategies. This study highlights the importance of integrating spatial and trophic analyses to understand predator interactions in aquatic ecosystems.

Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences Institute of Hydrobiology České Budějovice Czech Republic

Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice České Budějovice Czech Republic

Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Tromsø Norway

Université Paris Saclay CNRS AgroParisTech Ecologie Systématique Evolution Gif sur Yvette France

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Petalas C, Lazarus T, Lavoie RA, Elliott KH, Guigueno MF. Foraging niche partitioning in sympatric seabird populations. Sci Rep. 2021;11:2493. PubMed PMC

Conradt L, Clutton-Brock TH, Thomson D. Habitat segregation in ungulates: are males forced into suboptimal foraging habitats through indirect competition by females? Oecologia. 1999;119:367–77. PubMed

Pianka ER, Huey RB. Comparative ecology, resource utilization and niche segregation among gekkonid lizards in the Southern Kalahari. Copeia. 1978;691–701.

Svanbäck R, Bolnick DI. Intraspecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2007;274:839–44. PubMed PMC

Urban MC, Tewksbury JJ, Sheldon KS. On a collision course: competition and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2012;279:2072–80. PubMed PMC

Werner EE, Hall DJ, Laughlin DR, Wagner DJ, Wilsmann LA, Funk FC. Habitat partitioning in a freshwater fish community. J Fish Board Can. 1977;34:360–70.

Griffin JN, De La Haye KL, Hawkins SJ, Thompson RC, Jenkins SR. Predator diversity and ecosystem functioning: density modifies the effect of resource partitioning. Ecology. 2008;89:298–305. PubMed

Finke DL, Snyder WE. Niche partitioning increases resource exploitation by diverse communities. Science. 2008;321:1488–90. PubMed

Ross ST. Resource partitioning in fish assemblages: a review of field studies. Copeia. 1986;352–88.

Jessopp M, Arneill GE, Nykänen M, Bennison A, Rogan E. Central place foraging drives niche partitioning in seabirds. Oikos. 2020;129:1704–13.

Watabe R, Tsunoda H, Saito MU. Evaluating the Temporal and spatio-temporal niche partitioning between carnivores by different analytical method in Northeastern Japan. Sci Rep. 2022;12:11987. PubMed PMC

Kronfeld-Schor N, Dayan T. Partitioning of time as an ecological resource. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2003;34:153–81.

Macarthur R, Levins R. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am Nat. 1967;101:377–85.

Schoener TW. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science. 1974;185:27–39. PubMed

Reebs SG. Plasticity of diel and circadian activity rhythyms in fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2002;12:349–71.

Werner EE, Hall DJ. Foraging efficiency and habitat switching in competiting sunfishes. Ecology. 1979;60:256–64.

Van Valen L. Morphological variation and width of ecological niche. Am Nat. 1965;99:377–90.

Bolnick DI, Yang LH, Fordyce JA, Davis JM, Svanbäck R. Measuring individual-level resource specialization. Ecology. 2002;83:2936–41.

Amundsen PA, Bøhn T, Popova OA, Staldvik FJ, Reshetnikov YS, Kashulin NA, et al. Ontogenetic niche shifts and resource partitioning in a Subarctic piscivore fish guild. Hydrobiologia. 2003;497:109–19.

Griffen BD, Byers JE. Partitioning mechanisms of predator interference in different habitats. Oecologia. 2006;146:608–14. PubMed

Trochine C, Risholt C, Schou MO, Lauridsen TL, Jacobsen L, Skov C et al. Diet and food selection by fish larvae in turbid and clear water shallow temperate lakes. Sci Total Environ. 2022;804. PubMed

Pekcan-Hekim Z, Hellén N, Härkönen L, Nilsson PA, Nurminen L, Horppila J. Bridge under troubled water: turbulence and niche partitioning in fish foraging. Ecol Evol. 2016;6. PubMed PMC

Dias RM, Tófoli RM, da Silva JCB, Gomes LC, Agostinho AA. Effects of habitat complexity on trophic interactions of three congeneric fish species. Aquat Ecol. 2022;56:877–89.

Lennox RJ, Westrelin S, Souza AT, Šmejkal M, Říha M, Prchalová M, et al. A role for lakes in revealing the nature of animal movement using high dimensional telemetry systems. Mov Ecol. 2021;9:1–28. PubMed PMC

Bloomfield EJ, Guzzo MM, Middel TA, Ridgway MS, McMeans BC. Seasonality can affect ecological interactions between fishes of different thermal guilds. Front Ecol Evol. 2022;10:986459.

Copp GH, Robert Britton J, Cucherousset J, García-Berthou E, Kirk R, Peeler E, et al. Voracious invader or benign feline? A review of the environmental biology of European catfish Silurus glanis in its native and introduced ranges. Fish Fish. 2009;10:252–82.

Skov C, Nilsson P. Biology and ecology of Pike. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 2018.

Vejřík L, Vejříková I, Blabolil P, Eloranta AP, Kočvara L, Peterka J, et al. European catfish (Silurus glanis) as a freshwater apex predator drives ecosystem via its diet adaptability. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15970. PubMed PMC

Říha M, Rabaneda-Bueno R, Jarić I, Souza AT, Vejřík L, Draštík V, et al. Seasonal habitat use of three predatory fishes in a freshwater ecosystem. Hydrobiologia. 2022;849:3351–71.

Adámek Z, Mikl L, Šlapanský L, Jurajda P, Halačka K. The diet of predatory fish in drinking water reservoirs – how can they contribute to biomanipulation efforts? Folia Zool. 2019;68:215–24.

Byström P, Karlsson J, Nilsson P, Van Kooten T, Ask J, Olofsson F. Substitution of top predators: effects of pike invasion in a subarctic lake. Freshw Biol. 2007;52:1271–80.

Cucherousset J, Horky P, Slavík O, Ovidio M, Arlinghaus R, Boulêtreau S, et al. Ecology, behaviour and management of the European catfish. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2018;28:177–90.

Kobler A, Klefoth T, Mehner T, Arlinghaus R. Coexistence of behavioural types in an aquatic top predator: A response to resource limitation? Oecologia. 2009;161:837–47. PubMed

Říha M, Gjelland K, Děd V, Eloranta AP, Rabaneda-Bueno R, Baktoft H, et al. Contrasting structural complexity differentiate hunting strategy in an ambush apex predator. Sci Rep. 2021;11:17472. PubMed PMC

Brodersen J, Howeth JG, Post DM. Emergence of a novel prey life history promotes contemporary sympatric diversification in a top predator. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8115. PubMed

Carol J, Zamora L, García-Berthou E. Preliminary telemetry data on the movement patterns and habitat use of European catfish (Silurus glanis) in a reservoir of the river Ebro, Spain. Ecol Freshw Fish. 2007;16:450–6.

Brevé NWP, Verspui R, de Laak GAJ, Bendall B, Breukelaar AW, Spierts ILY. Explicit site fidelity of European catfish (Silurus Glanis, L., 1758) to man-made habitat in the river meuse, Netherlands. J Appl Ichthyol. 2014;30:472–8.

Vejřík L, Vejříková I, Kočvara L, Sajdlová Z, Hoang The SC, Šmejkal M, et al. Thirty-year-old paradigm about unpalatable perch egg strands disclaimed by the freshwater top-predator, the European catfish (Silurus glanis). PLoS ONE. 2017;12:1–9. PubMed PMC

Vagnon C, Bazin S, Cattanéo F, Goulon C, Guillard J, Frossard V. The opportunistic trophic behaviour of the European catfish (Silurus glanis) in a recently colonised large peri-alpine lake. Ecol Freshw Fish. 2022;31:650–61.

Encina L, Rodríguez-Ruiz A, Orduna C, Cid JR, de Ilaria M, Granado-Lorencio C. Impact of invasive European catfish (Silurus glanis) on the fish community of Torrejón reservoir (Central Spain) during a 11-year monitoring study. Biol Invasions. 2024;26:745–56.

De Santis V, Brignone S, Čech M, Eckert EM, Fontaneto D, Magalhães F, et al. LIFE PREDATOR: prevent, detect, combat the spread of Silurus glanis in South European lakes to protect biodiversity. NeoBiota. 2024;93:225–44.

Pierce RB. The ecology of Northern pike. Pierce RB, editor. North. Pike Ecol. Conserv. Manag. Hist. University of Minnesota Press; 2012. p. 0.

Říha M, Rabaneda-Bueno R, Lukáš Vejřík|, Jarić, Prchalová M, Šmejkal M et al. Hungry catfish—effect of prey availability on movement dynamics of a top predator. Freshw Biol. 2025;70:e70017.

Vejřík L, Vejříková I, Blabolil P, Sajdlová Z, Kočvara L, Kolařík T, et al. Trophic position of the species and site trophic state affect diet niche and individual specialization: from apex predator to herbivore. Biology (Basel). 2023;12:1113. PubMed PMC

Jarić I, Říha M, Souza AT, Rabaneda-Bueno R, Děd V, Gjelland K, et al. Influence of internal seiche dynamics on vertical movement of fish. Freshw Biol. 2022;67:1543–58.

Ward AJW, Webster MM, Hart PJB. Intraspecific food competition in fishes. Fish Fish. 2006. pp. 231–61.

Winslow L, Read J, Woolway R, Brentrup J, Leach T, Zwart J et al. Package rLakeAnalyzer Lake Phys Tools. 2022.

Wolf N, Carleton SA, Del Martínez C. Ten years of experimental animal isotopic ecology. Funct Ecol. 2009. pp. 17–26.

Boecklen WJ, Yarnes CT, Cook BA, James AC. On the use of stable isotopes in trophic ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2011;42:411–40.

Pinnegar JK, Polunin NVC. Differential fractionation of δ13C and δ15N among fish tissues: implications for the study of trophic interactions. Funct Ecol. 1999;13:225–31.

Anderson C, Cabana G. Estimating the trophic position of aquatic consumers in river food webs using stable nitrogen isotopes. J North Am Benthol Soc. 2007;26.

Olsson K, Stenroth P, Nyström P, Granéli W. Invasions and niche width: does niche width of an introduced crayfish differ from a native crayfish? Freshw Biol. 2009;54:1731–40.

Francis RICC. Back-calculation of fish length: a critical review. J Fish Biol. 1990;36:883–902.

Říha M, Ricard D, Vašek M, Prchalová M, Mrkvička T, Jůza T, et al. Patterns in diel habitat use of fish covering the littoral and pelagic zones in a reservoir. Hydrobiologia. 2015;747:111–31.

Moraes K, Souza AT, Vašek M, Bartoň D, Blabolil P, Čech M, et al. Openness of fish habitat matters: lake pelagic fish community starts very close to the shore. Water. 2021;13:3291.

Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, Skaug HJ, Mächler M, Bolker BM. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 2017;9:378–400.

Lüdecke D. sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science. R Package Version 2018, 2. 2024.

Lenth Remmeans. Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.10.3. 2024.

Eckrich CA, Albeke SE, Flaherty EA, Bowyer RT, Ben-David M, rKIN. Kernel-based method for estimating isotopic niche size and overlap. J Anim Ecol. 2020;89:757–71. PubMed

Swanson HK, Lysy M, POwer M, Stasko AD, Johnson JD, Reist JD. A new probabilistic method for quantifying n-dimensional ecological niches and niche overlap. Ecology. 2015;96:318–24. PubMed

R Development Core Team R. R: a Language and environment for statistical computing. Team RDC, editor. R found. Stat. Comput. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024.

Souchon Y, Tissot L. Synthesis of thermal tolerances of the common freshwater fish species in large Western Europe rivers. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst. 2012;405:03.

Pierce RB, Carlson AJ, Carlson BM, Hudson D, Staples DF. Depths and thermal habitat used by large versus small Northern pike in three Minnesota lakes. Trans Am Fish Soc. 2013;142:1629–39.

Hilge V. The influence of temperature on the growth of the European catfish (Silurus Glanis L). J Appl Ichthyol. 1985;1:27–31.

Nordahl O, Koch-Schmidt P, Tibblin P, Forsman A, Larsson P. Vertical movements of coastal pike (Esox lucius)—On the role of sun basking. Ecol Freshw Fish. 2020;29:18–30.

Skov C, Lucas MC, Jacobsen L. Spatial ecology. In: Skov C, Nilsson PA, editors. Biol Ecol pike. 2018. pp. 91–128.

Říha M, Prchalová M. Models of Animal Distributions in Inland Waters. Encycl Inl Waters, Second Ed. Elsevier; 2022. p. 292–301.

Craig JF. A short review of Pike ecology. Hydrobiologia. 2008;601:5–16.

Beaumont WRC, Hodder KH, Masters JEG, Scott LJ, Welton JS. Activity patterns in pike (Esox lucius), as determined by motion-sensing telemetry. Aquat Telemetry: Adv Appl. Rome: FAO/COISPA, 2005:231–243.

Michels NO, Hrabik TR, Mensinger AF. Effects of predator species, composition and light environment on prey escape behaviours of invasive and native benthic fishes. Ecol Freshw Fish. 2024;33:e12777.

Jepsen N, Beck S, Skov C, Koed A. Behavior of pike (Esox Lucius L.) 50 cm in a turbid reservoir and in a clearwater lake. Ecol Freshw Fish. 2001;10:26–34.

Vejřík L, Vejříková I, Blabolil P, Bartoň D, Sajdlová Z, Kočvara L et al. Long-lines for research monitoring and efficient population regulation of an invasive apex predator, European catfish (Silurus glanis). Heliyon. 2024;10. PubMed PMC

Cucherousset J, Olden JD. Ecological impacts of non-native freshwater fishes. Fisheries. 2011;36:215–30.

Eklöv P, Svanbäck R. Predation risk influences adaptive morphological variation in fish populations. Am Nat. 2006;167:440–52. PubMed

Huss M, Byström P, Persson L. Resource heterogeneity, diet shifts and intra-cohort competition: effects on size divergence in YOY fish. Oecologia. 2008;158:249–57. PubMed

Werner EE, Gilliam JF. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1984;15:393–425.

Vašek M, Prchalová M, Peterka J, Ketelaars HAM, Wagenvoort AJ, Čech M, et al. The utility of predatory fish in biomanipulation of deep reservoirs. Ecol Eng. 2013;52:104–11.

Milardi M, Green AJ, Mancini M, Trotti P, Kiljunen M, Torniainen J, et al. Invasive catfish in Northern Italy and their impacts on waterbirds. NeoBiota. 2022;72:109–28.