Excellent interobserver agreement and steep learning curve for target volume delineation for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation using a commercial software
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
945119
European Union's Horizon-2020 research and innovation programme
PubMed
40519057
PubMed Central
PMC12247503
DOI
10.1093/europace/euaf122
PII: 8163513
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Ablation, Interobserver variability in imaging and EAM merging, STAR, Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation, Ventricular tachycardia,
- MeSH
- Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac MeSH
- Tachycardia, Ventricular * physiopathology surgery diagnostic imaging radiotherapy diagnosis MeSH
- Learning Curve * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Observer Variation MeSH
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted * methods MeSH
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Workflow MeSH
- Radiosurgery * methods MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Software * MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
AIMS: Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) has emerged as bail-out treatment for ventricular tachycardia (VT). Accurate, reproducible, and easy-to-use data transfer from electroanatomical mapping (EAM) systems to radiotherapy planning CT is desirable. We aim to evaluate interobserver variability, ease of use, and learning curve for EAM based target volume (CardTV-EPinv) creation and transfer using available software packages. METHODS AND RESULTS: In patients considered for STAR, CardTV-EPinv were created using ADAS and Slicer3D for workflow comparison. Four CardTV-EPinv (clinically targeted volume and three mock targets) were created by an experienced operator and a 2nd-year medical student, based on endocardial EAM tags indicating VT substrate location. CardTV-EPinv sizes, Hausdorff distances (HDs), and workflow duration were measured to assess interobserver variability and learning curve. Agreement between CardTV-EPinv was high using ADAS and Slicer3D workflows (HD 3.64 mm [2.7-4.5]). ADAS workflow was faster and more robust (ADAS 26 min [24-29] vs. Slicer3D 65 min [61-70], P < 0.001; system crashes: ADAS 0 vs. Slicer3D 7). In 20 patients (80% non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, LVEF 35 ± 14%), 80 CardTV-EPinv were created using ADAS. CardTV-EPinv size was similar for both observers (11.8 mL [10.1-13.7] vs. 10.7 mL [9.6-11.8], P = 0.17), with high interobserver agreement (HD 1.68 mm [1.45-1.96]; 95th percentile HD < 4.8 mm [3.5-5.7]). Linear regression showed a steep learning curve for the student (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: CardTV-EPinv creation showed excellent interobserver agreement and was faster and more robust using ADAS than 3D slicer. The steep learning curve appears clinically relevant given the limited use of STAR even in high-volume VT ablation centres.
Department of Cardiology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Department of Cardiology Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland
Department of Radiation Oncology Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland
Department of Radiation Oncology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
Willem Einthoven Center of Arrhythmia Research and Management Leiden The Netherlands Aarhus Denmark
See more in PubMed
Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, Winkel BG, Behr ER, Blom NA et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J 2022;43:3997–4126. PubMed
Sultan A, Futyma P, Metzner A, Anic A, Richter S, Roten L et al. Management of ventricular tachycardias: insights on centre settings, procedural workflow, endpoints, and implementation of guidelines-results from an EHRA survey. Europace 2024;26:euae030. PubMed PMC
Natale A, Zeppenfeld K, Della Bella P, Liu X, Sabbag A, Santangeli P et al. Twenty-five years of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a look back and a look forward. Europace 2023;25:euad225. PubMed PMC
de Riva M, Piers SR, Kapel GF, Watanabe M, Venlet J, Trines SA et al. Reassessing noninducibility as ablation endpoint of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia: the impact of left ventricular function. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2015;8:853–62. PubMed
de Riva M, Naruse Y, Ebert M, Androulakis AFA, Tao Q, Watanabe M et al. Targeting the hidden substrate unmasked by right ventricular extrastimulation improves ventricular tachycardia ablation outcome after myocardial infarction. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2018;4:316–27. PubMed
Avila P, Berruezo A, Jimenez-Candil J, Tercedor L, Calvo D, Arribas F et al. Bayesian analysis of the substrate ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug therapy for symptomatic ventricular tachycardia trial. Europace 2023;25:euad181. PubMed PMC
van der Ree MH, Dieleman EMT, Visser J, Planken RN, Boekholdt SM, de Bruin-Bon RHA et al. Non-invasive stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia: results of the prospective STARNL-1 trial. Europace 2023;25:1015–24. PubMed PMC
Gupta A, Sattar Z, Chaaban N, Ranka S, Carlson C, Sami F et al. Stereotactic cardiac radiotherapy for refractory ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease patients: a systematic review. Europace 2024;27:euae305. PubMed PMC
Kovacs B, Lehmann HI, Manninger M, Saguner AM, Futyma P, Duncker D et al. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation and its implications for modern cardiac electrophysiology: results of an EHRA survey. Europace 2024;26:euae110. PubMed PMC
Zeppenfeld K. Ventricular tachycardia ablation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2018;4:1123–40. PubMed
Subramanian M, Atreya AR, Yalagudri SD, Shekar PV, Saggu DK, Narasimhan C. Catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Card Electrophysiol Clin 2022;14:693–9. PubMed
Briceno DF, Romero J, Villablanca PA, Londono A, Diaz JC, Maraj I et al. Long-term outcomes of different ablation strategies for ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace 2018;20:104–15. PubMed
Futyma P, Sultan A, Zarebski L, Imnadze G, Maslova V, Bordignon S et al. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation of refractory ventricular arrhythmias: results from a multicentre network. Europace 2024;26:euae248. PubMed PMC
cvek J, Neuwirth R, Knybel L, Molenda L, Otahal L, Pindor J et al. Cardiac radiosurgery for malignant ventricular tachycardia. Cureus 2014;6:1–7.
Merino JL. Aiming for the STARs: radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia-bright future or cosmic gamble? Europace 2024;27:euae306. PubMed PMC
Zeppenfeld K, Rademaker R, Al-Ahmad A, Carbucicchio C, De Chillou C, Ebert M et al. Patient selection, ventricular tachycardia substrate delineation and data transfer for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation. A clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). Europace 2024;27:euae214. PubMed PMC
Hohmann S, Henkenberens C, Zormpas C, Christiansen H, Bauersachs J, Duncker D et al. A novel open-source software-based high-precision workflow for target definition in cardiac radioablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2020;31:2689–95. PubMed
Abdel-Kafi S, de Ridder M, de Riva M, van der Geest RJ, Rasch C, Zeppenfeld K. Integration of electroanatomical mapping with imaging to guide radiotherapy of VT substrates with high accuracy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2020;6:874–6. PubMed
Blanck O, Buergy D, Vens M, Eidinger L, Zaman A, Krug D et al. Radiosurgery for ventricular tachycardia: preclinical and clinical evidence and study design for a German multi-center multi-platform feasibility trial (RAVENTA). Clin Res Cardiol 2020;109:1319–32. PubMed PMC
van der Ree MH, Visser J, Planken RN, Dieleman EMT, Boekholdt SM, Balgobind BV et al. Standardizing the cardiac radioablation targeting workflow: enabling semi-automated angulation and segmentation of the heart according to the American Heart Association segmented model. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022;7:100928. PubMed PMC
Abdel-Kafi S, Sramko M, Omara S, de Riva M, Cvek J, Peichl P et al. Accuracy of electroanatomical mapping-guided cardiac radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia: pitfalls and solutions. Europace 2021;23:1989–97. PubMed
Hohmann S, Xie J, Eckl M, Grehn M, Karfoul N, Janorschke C et al. Semi-automated reproducible target transfer for cardiac radioablation—a multi-center cross-validation study within the RAVENTA trial. Radiother Oncol 2024;200:110499. PubMed
Mayinger M, Boda-Heggemann J, Mehrhof F, Krug D, Hohmann S, Xie J et al. Quality assurance process within the RAdiosurgery for VENtricular TAchycardia (RAVENTA) trial for the fusion of electroanatomical mapping and radiotherapy planning imaging data in cardiac radioablation. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023;25:100406. PubMed PMC
Herrera Siklody C, Schiappacasse L, Jumeau R, Reichlin T, Saguner AM, Andratschke N et al. Recurrences of ventricular tachycardia after stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation arise outside the treated volume: analysis of the Swiss cohort. Europace 2023;25:euad268. PubMed PMC
Brett CL, Cook JA, Aboud AA, Karim R, Shinohara ET, Stevenson WG. Novel workflow for conversion of catheter-based electroanatomic mapping to DICOM imaging for noninvasive radioablation of ventricular tachycardia. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021;11:84–8. PubMed
Kaya YS, Stoks J, Hazelaar C, van Elmpt W, Gommers S, Volders PGA et al. 3D-targeted, electrocardiographic imaging-aided stereotactic radioablation for ventricular tachycardia storm: a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep 2024;8:ytae541. PubMed PMC
Hecko J, Knybel L, Rybar M, Penhaker M, Jiravsky O, Neuwirth R et al. Optimized target delineation procedure for the radiosurgery treatment of ventricular tachycardia: observer-independent accuracy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2024;29:280–9. PubMed PMC
Grehn M, Mandija S, Miszczyk M, Krug D, Tomasik B, Stickney KE et al. STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR): the Standardized Treatment and Outcome Platform for Stereotactic Therapy Of Re-entrant tachycardia by a Multidisciplinary consortium (STOPSTORM.eu) and review of current patterns of STAR practice in Europe. Europace 2023;25:1284–95. PubMed PMC
Haskova J, Wichterle D, Kautzner J, Sramko M, Peichl P, Knybel PL et al. Efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardias: the Czech experience. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2024;10:654–66. PubMed
Kluge A, Ehrbar S, Grehn M, Fleckenstein J, Baus WW, Siebert FA et al. Treatment planning for cardiac radioablation: multicenter multiplatform benchmarking for the RAdiosurgery for VENtricular TAchycardia (RAVENTA). Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022;114:360–72. PubMed
Boda-Heggemann J, Blanck O, Mehrhof F, Ernst F, Buergy D, Fleckenstein J et al. Interdisciplinary clinical target volume generation for cardiac radioablation: multicenter benchmarking for the RAdiosurgery for VENtricular TAchycardia (RAVENTA) trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021;110:745–56. PubMed
Bentley D. CE marking—what does it really mean? J Tissue Viability 1999;9:11–5. PubMed
Gregoire V, Mackie TR. State of the art on dose prescription, reporting and recording in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (ICRU report no. 83). Cancer Radiother 2011;15:555–9. PubMed