Virtual reality (VR) is widely used in training, simulations, and industrial applications, yet effective locomotion remains challenging due to its impact on spatial orientation and cybersickness. This study investigates the effects of three locomotion methods-hand-tracking (HTR) with teleportation, traditional VR controllers (CTR), and the mechanical interface Cybershoes (CBS)-on navigation performance, perceived usability, and cybersickness during navigation tasks in virtual mazes of three increasing difficulty levels. The experiment involved 15 participants (M = 22.6 years, SD = 1.64), performing a total of 9 trials each (3 methods × 3 mazes), resulting in 135 exposures overall. The HTR method had the longest average maze completion time (127 ± 54 s for the simplest maze), significantly longer compared to both CTR (52 ± 25 s, p < 0.01) and CBS (52 ± 22 s, p < 0.01). CBS showed comparable navigation performance to CTR, slightly outperforming CTR only in the most difficult mazes (108 ± 51 s vs. 115 ± 42 s, p < 0.05). Regarding usability, CTR received the highest ratings (SUS: 74.67 ± 18.52), followed by CBS (67.83 ± 24.07) and HTR (65.83 ± 22.22). However, CBS induced the highest cybersickness (2.9 ± 1.2), significantly higher than HTR (1.8 ± 0.9; p = 0.006), while CTR scored intermediate (2.3 ± 1.1). Results confirm that teleportation (HTR) minimizes cybersickness but negatively impacts spatial orientation. CBS support more efficient navigation in complex tasks but considerably increases cybersickness. Joystick locomotion (CTR) provides the best balance among navigation efficiency, usability, and user comfort. These findings contribute to optimizing locomotion strategies in VR applications.

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Faculty of Mechanical Engineering University of West Bohemia Univerzitní 22 Pilsen 30100 Czech Republic

XR Institute s r o Koterovská 2827 152 Pilsen 32600 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Lochmannová, A. Exploring the role of virtual reality in preparing emergency responders for mass casualty incidents. PubMed PMC

Fajnerová, I. et al. Virtual reality environment for exposure therapy in obsessive–compulsive disorder: a validation study.

Krajčovič, M., Matys, M., Gabajová, G. & Komačka, D. Utilization of immersive virtual reality as an interactive method of assignment presentation.

Che, X. et al. Three-dimensional (3D) stimuli are always better than two-dimensional (2D) multi-tasking? A high cognitive load in 3D-MATB-II. PubMed

Che, X. et al. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional multiple object tracking learning performance in adolescent female soccer players: the role of flow experience reflected by heart rate variability. PubMed

Kazemi, R., Kumar, N. & Lee, S. C. Comparative analysis of teleportation and joystick locomotion in virtual reality navigation with different postures: A comprehensive examination of mental workload.

Kazemi, R. & Lee, S. C. Human factors/ergonomics (HFE) evaluation in the virtual reality environment: A systematic review.

Kim, Y. M., Rhiu, I. & Yun, M. H. A systematic review of a virtual reality system from the perspective of user experience.

Dvořák, M. Virtual reality sickness and its impact on the effectiveness of virtual reality training.

Chang, E., Kim,Hyun, Taek, Yoo, B. & and Virtual reality sickness: A review of causes and measurements.

Allred, A. R., Gopinath, A. R. & Clark, T. K. Validating sensory conflict theory and mitigating motion sickness in humans with galvanic vestibular stimulation. PubMed PMC

Zhang, Z. & Billah, S. M. Wheel-Based Attachable Footwear for VR: Challenges and Opportunities in Seated Walking-in-Place Locomotion. in

Martin, D., Malpica, S., Gutierrez, D., Masia, B. & Serrano, A. Multimodality in VR: A survey.

Wolbers, T. & Hegarty, M. What determines our navigational abilities? PubMed

Pastel, S. et al. Spatial orientation in virtual environment compared to real-world. PubMed

Cao, L., Lin, J. & Li, N. A virtual reality based study of indoor fire evacuation after active or passive spatial exploration.

Kim, S., Zidianakis, E. & Input Output, and interaction devices. in Interaction Techniques and Technologies in Human-Computer Interaction (CRC, (2024).

Buckingham, G. Hand tracking for immersive virtual reality: Opportunities and challenges.

Kubr, J., Lochmannová, A. & Hořejší, P. Immersive virtual reality training in industrial settings: Effects on memory retention and learning outcomes.

Kim, Y. M., Lee, Y., Rhiu, I. & Yun, M. H. Evaluation of locomotion methods in virtual reality navigation environments: an involuntary position shift and task performance.

Jerald, J.

Kim, M., Jeon, C. & Kim, J. A. Study on immersion and presence of a portable hand haptic system for immersive virtual reality. PubMed PMC

Liebers, J., Brockel, S., Gruenefeld, U. & Schneegass, S. Identifying users by their hand tracking data in augmented and virtual reality.

Rahimi, K., Banigan, C. & Ragan, E. D. Scene transitions and teleportation in virtual reality and the implications for spatial awareness and sickness. PubMed

Weissker, T., Franzgrote, M. & Kuhlen, T. Multi-scale teleportation in immersive virtual reality. PubMed

Prithul, A., Adhanom, I. B. & Folmer, E. Teleportation in virtual reality; A mini-review.

Bozgeyikli, E., Raij, A., Katkoori, S. & Dubey, R. Locomotion in Virtual Reality for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder. in

Kumar, N., Lim, C. H., Sardar, S. K., Park, S. H. & Lee, S. C. Effects of posture and locomotion methods on postural stability, cybersickness, and presence in a virtual environment.

Clifton, J. & Palmisano, S. Effects of steering locomotion and teleporting on cybersickness and presence in HMD-based virtual reality.

Langbehn, E., Lubos, P. & Steinicke, F. Evaluation of Locomotion Techniques for Room-Scale VR: Joystick, Teleportation, and Redirected Walking. in

Buttussi, F. & Chittaro, L. Locomotion in place in virtual reality: A comparative evaluation of joystick, teleport, and leaning. PubMed

Lu, Z. & Mao, R. Research on the interaction method that can alleviate cybersickness in virtual reality games. In

Teixeira, J. & Palmisano, S. Effects of dynamic field-of-view restriction on cybersickness and presence in HMD-based virtual reality.

Kim, A., Lee, J. E. & Lee, K. M. Exploring the relative effects of body position and locomotion method on presence and cybersickness when navigating a virtual environment.

Widdowson, C., Becerra, I., Merrill, C., Wang, R. F. & LaValle, S. Assessing postural instability and cybersickness through linear and angular displacement. PubMed

Mondellini, M., Arlati, S., Greci, L., Ferrigno, G. & Sacco, M. Sense of presence and cybersickness while cycling in virtual environments: their contribution to subjective experience. In

Kemeny, A., Chardonnet, J. R. & Colombet, F. Reducing cybersickness. In

Darken, R. P. & Sibert, J. L. Navigating large virtual spaces.

Koltai, B. G., Husted, J. E., Vangsted, R., Mikkelsen, T. N. & Kraus, M. in

Shaker, N., Togelius, J. & Nelson, M. J.

Birch, E. et al. Randot preschool stereoacuity test: normative data and validity. PubMed PMC

Golding, J. F. Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire.

Keshavarz, B. & Hecht, H. Validating an efficient method to quantify motion sickness. PubMed

Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S. & Lilienthal, M. G. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness.

Saredakis, D. et al. Factors associated with virtual reality sickness in Head-Mounted displays: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. PubMed PMC

Al Zayer, M., MacNeilage, P. & Folmer, E. Virtual locomotion: A survey. PubMed

Bowman, D. A. & McMahan, R. P. Virtual reality: How much immersion is enough?.

Boletsis, C. & Cedergren, J. E. VR Locomotion in the New Era of Virtual Reality: An Empirical Comparison of Prevalent Techniques.

Kim, A., Lee, J. E. & Lee, K. M. Exploring the relative effects of body position and locomotion method on presence and cybersickness when navigating a virtual environment.

Fahmi, F. et al. Comparison study of user experience between virtual reality controllers, leap motion controllers, and senso glove for anatomy learning systems in a virtual reality environment.

Bozgeyikli, E., Raij, A., Katkoori, S. & Dubey, R. Locomotion in virtual reality for room scale tracked areas.

Choi, I. & Ricci, C. Foot-mounted gesture detection and its application in virtual environments. in

Smart, L. J., Stoffregen, T. A. & Bardy, B. G. Visually induced motion sickness predicted by postural instability. PubMed

Ng, A. K. T., Chan, L. K. Y. & Lau, H. Y. K. A study of cybersickness and sensory conflict theory using a motion-coupled virtual reality system.

Hart, S. G. & Staveland, L. E. Development of NASA-TLX (Task load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. in Advances in Psychology (eds Hancock, P. A. & Meshkati, N.) vol. 52 139–183 (North-Holland, (1988).